« first day (363 days earlier)      last day (4569 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 21:00

7:00 PM
languages is hopefully going to fail
i'm not even sure what it's for
@Kitḫ i have no idea what the context is here, so i'm just going to interpret "box" saliciously
 
@JSBᾶngs Please do.
@JSBᾶngs It's for translating stuff.
You know what's funny? I know them in context, but I always mix up salacious and salubrious in practice.
 
hehe. "lubrious"
 
Jez
@Kitḫ Why isn't it called "translation"?
 
Why are you asking me?
 
Salubrious is related to salute; salacious is related to French sale.
 
7:20 PM
@Kitḫ you need to practice being salacious?
 
@z7sgѪ Yes.
 
ah i thought you were a natural
 
Perfection requires practice, no matter how much talent you have.
 
user19161
7:33 PM
@z7sgѪ practise, since you are Br.
 
user19161
@JSBᾶngs I thought sceptics was going to fail too, but I think it succeeded because it has too many sex questions.
 
user19161
@Cerberus Yes I am surprised the classicist makes a typo.
 
that deserves a star
 
user19161
@JSBᾶngs What deserves a star is this: A tan is good cos it is not a sin.
 
How can there be "too many sex questions". By definition, all .se sites have too few sex questions.
 
user19161
7:37 PM
The sex site will make it through I think. It got renamed sort of.
 
@JasperLoy renamed to skeptics.se?
 
user19161
119
Human Sexual Response and Non-Platonic Relations

Proposed Q&A site for a site for medical professionals, sex educators, counselors, and others to discuss both the physical and emotional aspects of sexual and/or romantic interactions.

Currently in commitment.

 
yeah, "sexual response" seems like a really awkward title there
why not just "Sexuality"?
 
user19161
Or sexuality and sensuality.
 
*Sinsuality
 
7:41 PM
"Humpy bumpy good times"
 
"Currently in commitment." ROFL
 
@Kitḫ LOL
 
Next they're going to start beta-testing sex.
You'd think there'd be lots of volunteers
 
user19161
Two nights ago this woman asked me "Massage?" while I was crossing the road.
 
user19161
Do I look that desperate?
 
7:44 PM
It has nothing to do with desperation.
Well, not your desperation anyway.
 
Maybe she's the desperate one.
gah, jinx
 
user19161
I don't look rich either.
 
did you ask her how much?
maybe she doesn't charge a lot
 
Couldn't be more than $5 or so anyway.
 
user19161
I think it should be 50 dollars at least.
 
7:45 PM
so was this a massage or a "massage"?
 
Not for streetwalkers.
 
I've learned from observation of actual people that just about any price point is valid depending on the location and service-provider
 
50 bucks for an alleyway upright is way too much.
 
user19161
@JSBᾶngs Well, if it was asked while crossing the road it must be a "massage".
 
user19161
@Kitḫ I think the convention is to go to a nearby cheap hotel.
 
user19161
7:47 PM
Those have hourly rates.
 
Still. Seems pricey to me.
 
user19161
I am proud to say I have not gone for a single "massage" in my life, though many of my friends have.
 
I wouldn't place a value judgment on that.
Or rather, I find nothing shameful nor prideful about engaging the services of a professional.
 
user19161
There were many times my friends tried to persuade me to join them, but through the years I managed to decline.
 
if nothing else, it's extremely problematic that a large portion of those "professionals" are de facto slaves
aside from my general moral objections
 
7:50 PM
shrugs You could make the same claim about many low-paying professions.
 
@Kitḫ there's a huge difference of degree here
 
user19161
@JSBᾶngs For me, sex must come with love, that's the guideline.
 
@JSBᾶngs Really? How so?
 
user19161
@Kitḫ Because of the prevalence of sex slaves.
 
@Kitḫ the sex trade is much, much more implicated in abuse, imprisonment, etc. than most other industries
 
7:53 PM
I am skeptical. Is it really worse than child slavery? Sweatshops? Migrant work? Drug trade?
 
[child slavery, drug trade, sex trade] > sweatshops > migrant work
roughly speaking
 
user19161
At least here I don't think we have sex slaves or child slaves, at least not that I know of and not like the neighbouring countries.
 
we have sex slaves here in america, so i suspect that you have them, too, @Jasper
 
user19161
@JSBᾶngs OK, but we sell no chewing gum here, remember?
 
@JasperLoy well, good point. maybe you're better off than us.
 
user19161
7:56 PM
Luckily I don't do chewing gum.
 
And anyhow, I object to slavery and abuse. I don't object to selling sex. That's all I am saying.
 
user19161
@Kitḫ I don't object to it either. I just won't go for it myself.
 
user19161
@Jez I love green peppers, red peppers and onions if they are cooked.
 
@Kitḫ I agree with you. But I think it's also true that a huge proportion of sex workers do not enter that industry by choice, but rather because they are forced to do so by circumstances.
 
I understand that, but I feel like I'm saying "Hey, I don't object to Wal-Mart's shoddy goods" and I am being countered with "A lot of inexpensive clothing is made by child labor!"
 
user19161
8:03 PM
Oh dear, I do have a lot of cheap clothing!
 
It's confounding.
Consternating.
 
@Kitḫ well, that's true though, and actually that's also a problem.
It's just less visible because it happens in another country
 
Uh-huh. But that's not the topic I was discussing.
See?
 
user19161
Like what goes into your food when you eat outside. The cooking happens in another room.
 
Well, you did start talking about value judgments, so people brought up "moral" problems related to it.
 
user19161
8:06 PM
Which reminds me of the movie "Waiting" where they put all kinds of bad stuff into the food. The movie had the f-word every minute.
 
@Kit @MrShinyandNew i actually don't agree about prostitution being morally acceptable in general, but let's put that aside. my point was that telling someone "go ahead and visit that prostitute" is very likely equivalent to saying "go ahead and exploit that abused, drug-addicted woman", and the latter at least should give you pause
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I was talking about value judgments related to engaging professional sex services. Abuse and slavery are only tangential to that.
@JSBᾶngs But I object to that statement.
 
@Kitḫ which one?
 
@Kitḫ Well, in the case of sex workers I think that there are too many "slaves" involved for it to be only a tangential concern.
 
> my point was that telling someone "go ahead and visit that prostitute" is very likely equivalent to saying "go ahead and exploit that abused, drug-addicted woman"
 
user19161
8:08 PM
@Kitḫ Not logically equivalent but practically so perhaps.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 bingo
 
Essentially, my only concern with prostitution is exactly this problem; too many sex workers are forced to do it and don't want to do it.
 
Well, you have all well and truly missed the point.
If you want to discuss sex slavery and all that, go ahead.
 
@Kitḫ no, i think we got the point, but our counterpoint is that the two points cannot be disentangled so easily.
 
user19161
@Kitḫ I think we get the point. We are just talking about a tangential point, so actually I think there is agreement here.
 
user19161
8:10 PM
@JSBᾶngs Jinx.
 
is that a jinx, @Jasper?
gah. meta-jinx
 
user19161
@JSBᾶngs Oh, now I understand meta-jinx.
 
8:21 PM
I think we annoyed @Kit.
 
Jez
8:44 PM
This is great. "every aborted child is in heaven"
"we'd be doing them a favour by aborting them then"
 
8:58 PM
there are other copies of that video floating around, and in one, some nitwit says right after her "i'm not an idiot" line, "well, you believe in money, right? that doesn't exist!" (head-slap)
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 21:00

« first day (363 days earlier)      last day (4569 days later) »