« first day (1656 days earlier)      last day (3267 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

12:15 AM
@JohanLarsson You wouldn't be able to replicate your own DNA? Harsh, dude. But on the bright side, you wouldn't be using up all your teleomeres.
@Robusto You say that like you're an accountant. Remind me not to have you speak at the funeral of Provencal.
 
12:57 AM
@tchrist Would you care to translate this?
I am too lazy, but it must be something embarrassing.
 
Because?
 
Because it was in this television series where the sender is embarrassed because of it.
 
Sigue [e]n pie = Follow on foot.
 
His friend sent it on his phone.
Hmm what would that signify...
 
D[e]SPUÉS ?T VOY A HACER ALGO Q[ue] LO V[A]S A FLIPAR = After I’m going to to do (you?) something that will flip you out.
 
1:01 AM
Hmmm.
Mysterious.
Thank you.
 
I don't know what "LO D" might abbreviate at the end of the first "Follow on foot" line.
The "?T" is odd also.
I’m assuming it’s te, but not sure.
 
Isn't that question mark the end of a sentence?
No idea about LO D.
 
Doesn’t look like it: no space afterwards.
 
Well, it is a text message...
 
"Lo de después" is kind of like "the after-thing/part/whatever".
 
1:03 AM
Hmmm.
 
But SIGUE is either 2s imperative or 3s indicative.
Can’t tell.
Could be asking if somebody else is following on foot.
Or telling the personal as a command.
 
Hmm.
 
The subject would be understood in either case.
 
The thing that follows immediately after?: I'm going to do something to you that will flip you out.
No idea.
 
Like: "Is he/she/it following on foot afterwards?" But the lack of space between the "?" and the "T" (which I still think is a dative "te") is confusing.
But why "lo de después" instead of just "después" must have some further context.
It’s nominalizing an adverb.
I'm assuming Q always means que. And that here VS means vas.
 
1:08 AM
@Cerberus Three genders instead of two. Much inflection, more cases, etc.
 
You mean three genders for nouns.
 
@tchrist I don't know, the missing space would not surprise me in an SMS. But either way it's still vague. Oh, well.
 
@tchrist Yes.
The spelling and vocabulary in German are relatively easy, however.
 
Remember Spanish does have three genders for pronouns and to some extent, articles.
 
I agree with your other assumptions, based on what little I know.
@Robusto Mm only the cases, but they're not that super important.
I don't find them difficult.
Vocabulary is my only problem in German.
As in French.
 
1:11 AM
German doesn’t have enough cases.
 
Indeed not.
Latin at least tries.
But Proto-Indo-European is where it's at.
 
And it needs real declensions. I find German’s lack of rigor here to be more confusing than Latin because of this.
 
And all the strong verbs that acquire umlauts or not. Lotta shit to remember.
 
@Robusto How is that harder than remembering strong verbs in English or Spanish?
 
Turns out it was read out loud later, subtitled.
 
1:13 AM
Hah.
 
@tchrist I dunno. Maybe because they're not as obvious? Maybe I have a thing about those in German.
 
Ok, lo de después just became the subject.
 
The subject?
 
Is that afterwards business still happening?
 
1:14 AM
I see.
 
Albeit on foot. :)
 
So that is the idiom.
 
Perhaps.
 
Follow on foot = happen.
 
I don’t know a non-literal “seguir en pie" but I could imagine it.
Seguir is just a common verb.
 
1:16 AM
 
I hate text messages.
 
Hey, that looks like "pourquoi".
 
I think it’s a typo.
 
For what?
 
Sure it’s happening. Did you doubt it?
 
1:18 AM
Not "why"?
 
"acaso lo dudabas"
 
Oh, acaso, what does that mean?
 
In case.
Perhaps.
Just in case.
Stuff like that.
 
"l dudbas" must be "lo dudabas".
 
1:19 AM
Yeah.
 
I hate people like that.
 
I always use full sentences.
 
As do I.
And completely spelt-out words.
 
Except when I abbreviate something with dots.
 
I don’t abbreviate.
 
1:20 AM
I something abbreviate something when I have to abbreviate the same word all the time and it would save a lot of time and space to a. it.
Especially when I have to type it on a small touch screen.
 
> What time does your flight get into MKE?
 
That sucks.
 
Although I suppose that’s ok as an airport code.
I’d kick somebody who wrote ORD to mean Chicago in general.
 
You should only abbreviate when your convenience greatly surpasses your reader's inconvenience.
6
In absolute values, of course.
 
Sometimes proper names that are understood with antecedents can take single-letters, although I don’t do that myself.
 
1:22 AM
Such as when?
But that is why I don't like US and UK.
 
> Say Larry and Gloria at church, so we’re going over to L&G’s afterwards; wanna come with?
 
Ugh.
 
"their place" works fine.
 
Oh, I only got that one the second time I read it.
 
1:23 AM
My mind just isn't wired for abbreviations.
 
Something like that.
 
Por favor, parce mihi!
 
It takes me a very long time to understand them.
 
So can we please get rid of US and UK?
And EU?
And NL?
 
I never used "UK" until going there.
It was just the States or England.
 
1:24 AM
At least NL is not that common (yet).
 
And the pissed off Scots.
 
Then say Britain.
Even the staunchest independentists cannot deny being on the island.
 
Unless we’re doing geography, Britain always sounds borderline pretentious compared with England.
 
Kind of, so just use England.
 
Me you do not need to convince.
 
1:26 AM
We have it easy here.
 
Where is “here”? AMS?
 
Nobody cares if you say Holland, and Nederland is short and untainted by modern fads or whatever.
 
God that’s ugly.
 
It says that on luggage labels only.
 
> Ir en busca de alguien o algo; dirigirse, caminar hacia él o ello.
There is a neuter or two. :)
Luggage is encoded, yes.
Only Spanish retained a triple set of descendants from ille/illa/illum. The rest lost the third one.
 
1:34 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Repeating characters in answer: Is there a word that means "to hate beauty"? by sibibidf on english.stackexchange.com
 
2:02 AM
I separately saved two very small lives today. Have you ever held a hummingbird in your hand? So tiny, so delicate. Like butterflies. Male and female.
 
2:32 AM
Does a finch count??
How about a bluejay perched on your finger?
That one was cool because I was swapping emails with Richard Bach at the time (Johnathon Livingston Seagull)
My cat was really pissed off.
 
The hummingbird is the most fearless of all birds. Hence Huitzilopochtli.
 
Jeez...I fell asleep on my keyboard.
damn!
I thought I was waking up to el bizarro fireworks.
I dunno...I've known many hummingbirds.
That bluejay had a set of brass ones.
He looked at me, he looked at the cat....
Me with the finger outstretched.
OK, but please don't feed me to the cat.
Sleep!
G'night!
 
3:23 AM
I just caught that. :)
 
 
3 hours later…
6:41 AM
@Rob ordered 22 books now, English Authors in English.
 
Hello?
 
 
2 hours later…
8:53 AM
@Cerberus What unit?
 
9:27 AM
Do something outrageous:
+1 it is very common. Sometimes people will have a book or some papers, or be reading on a phone. Sometimes they're just eating. If you take a photo of your meal, staff might think you're a food blogger and give you free desert :-). But seriously, in a mega-city like London, no-one looks at you, ever unless you do something outrageous like commit murder or stand on the wrong side of an escalator. You could walk down the street dressed as a chicken and people wouldn't look twice. I'm not exaggerating. — user568458 yesterday
 
10:04 AM
@JohanLarsson Is this some kind of anthology collection, or did you order them individually?
 
Individual items, was reading a thread in a literature forum and ordered a bunch of classics that I have not read.
 
0
Q: Can i get down any stopge in case any work, and in the same day can we cacth same roat train in the same day

SunilIm sunil I want to go To BHC on 12th june But I book the Tiket Till hwh, But i want to get down in BBS bcz Of Some Work im haveing, can i bord any train till BHC In the Same Ticket & in the same day.??? Plz Ans

I'm surprised we haven't got this guy on EL&U yet.
 
:) ty sir
 
@Robusto Comments were helpful and constructive, at least.
 
If pun mode the English stuff could turn out unread litter
 
10:10 AM
What is "same roat train"?
 
litteratur in Swedish btw
 
@JohanLarsson Well, you'd have to put in a hyphen: litter-ature, or people would not pick up on your intention.
 
Hyphen or some other way of setting up the joke.
 
It would be very lame either way.
 
10:12 AM
Hence not worth the trouble.
 
Are you ordering The Elementary Particles?
 
I haven't yet. It's on my list. I have a number of books to read, and am in the middle of one right now.
 
And do you think I should nag with a higher frequency?
 
My reading slows down in the summertime.
No, nagging doesn't help. It just makes me dig my heels in.
 
The opposite for me, the beach is where I read the most.
And hammocks
^ not what I mean with hammock, ^only looks good but crappy to use ime.
^ nice summer reading device
highly recommended, the ultimate thing for lazy days.
 
10:57 AM
@Rob have you tried one?
 
11:28 AM
@JohanLarsson A hammock? Yeah. They suck for your back.
The other thing, whatever it is, I haven't tried. I don't like to read outdoors unless there aren't any bugs.
 
The other thing is a hammock in Swedish. Hammock and hängmatta.
Hängmatta is only useful in ads for resorts. Completely useless in practice.
 
@JohanLarsson Did you mean the other thing is a hammock in Swedish or a hängmatta? I'm talking about that padded bench with an awning (or canopy).
 
The orange is hängmatta (hang-rug)
 
What is the bottom picture? That's what I meant by "that other thing."
 
hammock
 
11:39 AM
So they're both hammocks?
 
In your language perhaps
 
So the bottom one is a hammock in Swedish, and not the top.
 
correct
 
Different languages are confusing.
 
what is the origin of hammock, does it sound french or german?
 
11:43 AM
> type of hanging bed, 1650s, alteration of hamack, hamaca (1550s), from Spanish hamaca, from Arawakan (Haiti) word apparently meaning "fish nets" (compare Yukuna hamaca, Taino amaca). The forms of the word in Dutch (hangmat) and German (Hangmatte) were altered by folk-etymology as if it meant "hang-mat."
Etymonline: hammock
 
so mat is a word
 
I think that alteration obtains in Swedish as well.
Yes, a mat is a kind of rug, usually.
 
If you find a true hammock<?> try it!
What is the correct punctutaion here <?>?
 
> If you find a true hammock, try it!
 
ok, felt like it could be semicolon or dash or something fancy
 
11:55 AM
It could be, but I don't recommend it.
Anything but a comma there would draw attention to itself as affectation.
 
tchrist's rule applies then.
 
I didn't know that he made the rule.
So what is your point, then? That a writer should only prefer phrases that are more frequently encountered? What a boring language we would have if that were true. — Robusto 7 secs ago
 
It is something like: Failing trying to look fancy looks much dumber than too simple|plain.
I starred, lemme find the original
didn't find it
Dec 10 '14 at 22:55, by tchrist
It sounds a whole lot dumber saying whom when who is called for then saying who when whom is called for.
finally
 
12:21 PM
Well, that's not really the same thing, is it?
 
to me it is tchrist's rule
 
But the scope of his "rule" is limited to use of whom.
 
depending on how you read it
I read it as just an example
 
OK.
 
@JohanLarsson It's not a rule, it's his reflection on how things sound to him (but I agree with his perception)
 
12:24 PM
I't applies to the original language discussion also. Buying books in original language to be fancy, the sit there wearing beret and suffer instead of a nice lazy time with a good book.
@tchrist it is a rule right?
 
If you're trying to read Anna Karenina in translation, it's already not a nice lazy time.
 
I disagree that it is a "rule" in the sense of a stricture that can be somehow enforced, but I think he's right about his perception. Nothing looks dumber (to people who can tell the difference) than someone who pretends to more expertise than he has.
I'm thinking especially of people who use a word like appraised when they mean apprised: "He appraised [sic] me of the situation."
I'm looking at you, Dennis Miller.
 
What if he had been appraised, with respect to the situation?
 
Then he should have said that.
Feeling lazy today. I should get on my bike before I fuck off completely.
One more degree should do it.
 
He should have said a lot of things. He was in a place to know. Thescandals that could have been averted/
 
12:37 PM
don't wear sandals / try to avoid scandals
 
also, glass... avoid walking on glass.
 
@Robusto you should go now before it gets much hotter. how long do you ride for?
 
Today probably an hour.
This is kind of fun.
 
Hullo!
 
12:43 PM
hey
 
How are you?
 
@Robusto it showed the video then right in the middle it said: "This video contains content from SME, who has blocked it on copyright grounds."
wow that was quick
@HarryCBurn Fine. Considering.
Considering that absolutely nothing terrible is going on.
 
@Robusto not available here
 
@Mitch Part of a playlist. Next part was what got shitcanned.
24 hours ago, by Robusto
user image
And I'm off again, at exactly the same temp.
 
@Robusto Oh.
 
1:03 PM
@Mitch Great!
 
2:00 PM
@JohanLarsson Hmm you could measure convenience in time saved, or energy saved...
 
nice :)
J then
 
Yes, why not!
 
Kerb's rule then.
 
Slow pace today. Only did the 16.6 miles, and time was 1:02:56. Three minutes slower than yesterday. No gas today, just tired.
That's what I get for sprinting yesterday. Slow and steady, as the saying goes . . .
 
Umm that is still pretty fast!
 
2:07 PM
I'm an over-abbreviator.
 
@JohanLarsson So be it!
RU?
 
@Cerberus But I did it in under an hour yesterday!
Brave new world, and all that.
 
@Cerberus Yes, I lack empathy.
 
@JohanLarsson UR an ovr-abbrvtr?
 
Well, that is only 4% faster than today, isn't it? A mere change in wind speed or direction could do that.
@JohanLarsson St yrslf.
 
2:09 PM
gajs...
 
@Cerberus Yeah. But yesterday was windier.
 
This is a day for fucking off. Me missus has a b'day anyway.
 
Another reason to learn Swedish
what does fuck off mean in context?
 
@JohanLarsson Ain't gonna happen. I only learn languages that have worldwide currency. ^_^
@JohanLarsson It means indulge in idle pursuits.
 
2:11 PM
What is it called when the explanation is more difficult to understand than the explainee?
 
@JohanLarsson Whoosh.
 
yeah, +1
 
It means I'm not going to do anything useful today. Pursuit of idle pleasures.
Well, I guess I have to take that comment on languages and currency. I did study Old English, after all . . .
 
Maybe doublewhoosh?
 
If whooshes were horses . . .
 
2:13 PM
I had an incident with the horse this weekend.
We were chilling and I let it eat some grass. Then it stepped inside the reins and got stuck for a moment.
Minor panic before the rein snapped. Could have gotten ugly.
 
BTW, if you tell someone to fuck off, it's pretty hostile. I don't recommend it. But if you sa you're going to fuck off it can either mean you are going to leave the place you're currently in (usually quickly and with finality), or that you are going to indulge yourself in unproductive pursuits.
 
ok, never heard it used the third way before, maybe not so widespread
 
@JohanLarsson That's the trouble with horses. They get spooked so damned easily. A coat on a fence can spook them if they didn't expect it.
 
@Robusto Yes, that was a very strange remark.
 
@JohanLarsson Not in Sweden, anyway. Here in the U.S. it is used a lot.
@Cerberus Intended as a joke originally. Then I took myself seriously for a few seconds . . .
 
2:16 PM
Never, ever do that!
 
And I see I left out a word. Should have been "Well, I guess I have to take back that comment on languages and currency."
 
It's what Hitler did, you know.
 
@Robusto Yeah, and if grimskaftet happens to get stuck in your arm you will have to go and pick up the arm.
 
Huh, I didn't notice. I read back.
 
@Cerberus Hitler drank coffee too! We should never drink coffee!
 
2:17 PM
So both my writing and reading faculties ignore missing words.
Indeed, I don't drink coffee.
 
@Cerberus There's a certain symmetry to that.
 
Thank you.
 
And . . . and Hitler was a vegan! Which is, in large part, why I enjoy meat whenever I have the craving for it.
 
Heh.
He was also a painter, though...
 
and alive
 
2:18 PM
And...short. <cough>
 
I wonder how easy it was to be a vegan in Germany. I mean, I wonder if he ate pastry (how could he avoid it?) and whether that counted as "vegetarian" . . .
Apfelstrudel with whipped cream is hardly vegan fare.
And I realize I am conflating vegan and vegetarian and I don't care.
 
he made the rules
 
And ruled the maids.
 
Man, you are almost unbearable on endorphines :)
 
Speaking of Hitler, we watched American Sniper last night. I have to say it reminded me of nothing so much as that film Hitler was watching in Inglourious Basterds about the Nazi sniper. Both seemed to be propaganda pieces.
@JohanLarsson Indeed, endorphins are my drug of choice.
 
2:22 PM
unsurprising
 
@Robusto Both words are ugly anyway. They do not deserve our precision if they are imprecise themselves.
 
Agreed.
 
@Robusto What does it propagandize?
 
@Cerberus Which one?
 
American Sniper?
But you may explain the other film's propaganda too.
For I have seen neither.
 
2:24 PM
It is a propaganda piece for the American right. Almost an apologia for our disastrous incursion into Iraq.
 
Ah, I see.
 
The other is a bald-faced paean to National Socialism.
 
Ah OK.
So how does the former condone the invasion?
The intentions were probably partly noble...
 
I could state it as a joke, I suppose: One is a bald-faced paean to fascism, and the other is from a film by Quentin Tarantino.
 
So Q. T. often tried to justify the American right or...?
 
2:28 PM
@Cerberus It explains it away as action taken by the "sheep dogs" (those inclined to go to war in Iraq) to protect the "sheep" (regular Americans) from the "wolves" (the forces in Iraq). Yes, it uses those terms. And no, it doesn't seem to notice that nobody in Iraq, least of all Saddam Hussein, was responsible for 9/11.
@Cerberus No. He was lampooning the Nazis and their propaganda.
 
@Robusto Wow, and this is about the invasion itself, not about maintaining order and protecting American troops during the ensuing civil war?
@Robusto Ahh OK.
 
@Cerberus It covers the first four years of the conflict.
 
But does the rhetoric you mentioned pertain to why and how Washington sent its armies to conquer Iraq, or to the situation afterwards, or both? I mean, I can imagine you want to protect your troops once they're there, even if they came for the wrong reason; but I cannot imagine condoning the invasion itself as a way of protecting Americans.
 
@Robusto endorphines | endorphins ?
 
Endorphins ("endogenous morphine") are endogenous opioid inhibitory neuropeptides. They are produced by the central nervous system and pituitary gland. The term implies a pharmacological activity (analogous to the activity of the corticosteroid category of biochemicals) as opposed to a specific chemical formulation. It consists of two parts: endo- and -orphin; these are short forms of the words endogenous and morphine, intended to mean "a morphine-like substance originating from within the body". The class of endorphin compounds includes α-endorphin, β-endorphin, γ-endorphin, α-neo-endorphin, and...
 
2:38 PM
ty
 
LMGTFY
 
crl
 
good call
why is the e dropped?
I think it makes sesne
 
Because English.
 
2:47 PM
Single word request:
In swedish: momentana krafter.
In English: ?? forces.
Momentana means right now.
momentary feels wrong
current perhaps
 
crl
^ agreed
 
yeah 'current forces' is right.
@Robusto One nice thing with reading outdoors is that naps does not happen as frequently as when reading in bed.
but then I have no idea about what your bug situation is like
 
3:14 PM
Mitch's rule: There is a joke for everything, some great some lame. :)
 
A guy walks into a bar. He says 'Ow'.
They say that puns are the most detestable form of humor.
Poop is on that list somewhere near the top.
So I was at a college graduation yesterday.
The commencement address was by some poet. Said all the good stuff (touching the stars, don't forget all the people who help you bal bla bla).
But there was this woman sitting next to me... Who was really into the speech. She would audibly say 'amen' to some lame thing the speaker said. Or actually laugh out loud
... At some barely a joke.
Anyway it was a reasonable speech, we all warmly clapped at the end. And we sat down to get on to the next event in the program. And this woman turns to me and make gesture with her fingers over my forearm: "here's some star dust, pass it on".
All I could think was "goddamit, what is she thinking? That shit'll never come out."
 
3:33 PM
You should have spit on her, then said "we are all star stuff. Have a bit more."
 
I know!
Why are people so weird?!!!
 
@Mitch poop > pun
weird > pc
I met a weird lady last week.
My parents live in a place for old people. One night when we were watching TV with dad a woman opened the door. She had a doll that was some kind of duck and she spoke more to the doll than to us during the visit. She referred to the duck as 'the girl'
 
4:24 PM
@Mitch Come out as in out of your body?
 
4:46 PM
@Mitch Ewww. Hard to believe such people exist outside movies.
 
4:59 PM
So, do you have a rule @terdon?
 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (1656 days earlier)      last day (3267 days later) »