« first day (1332 days earlier)      last day (3608 days later) » 

12:00 AM
@moose ready? it's been published since 1998 and a 2nd edition of mathml3 was published earlier this year. firefox has had good support since before it was firefox, IE/Mathplayer used to have very good support but they withdrew the API it used so it doesn''t work any more, the webkit implementation gets better gradually but that's just safari now as chrome forked off webkit, meanwhile mathjax implements it in javascript so fills in for all browsers
 
@DavidCarlisle Ah, I think I have to read en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MathML to get some knowledge about it. I just need math for some articles I write. This was the reason why I asked a MathJax developer once if mathjax would be less heavy (processing time and download time) if MathML would be supported by all browsers. The answer was "yes". So I assumend that browsers do not support MathML properly.
 
@moose use firefox:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Haha :-) I want to provide a good user experience for as many users as I can get and that means I have to support IE + FF + Chrome (and I like chrome ;-P)
@DavidCarlisle I really enjoyed to talk with you, but I have to go home now (It will get dark soon and I don't feel comfortable to walk alone in the dark, although I was told that Pittsburgh is realatively secure for the US)
Bye!
 
@moose sure I do same but I set things up to use firefox native or mathjax for everything else compare this URL in firefox where the math renders instantly and chrome where it has to get mathjax to do it, the result is nice but javascript is a lot slower than C++ nag.co.uk/numeric/FL/nagdoc_fl24/html/C09/c09intro.html
@moose bye:-)
 
@AlanMunn Uh-oh. :)
@egreg That's not fair. :(
@DavidCarlisle but I suspect it's dead. :)
 
12:11 AM
@PauloCereda it's not dead; it's just resting
 
@DavidCarlisle :)
@David: I wonder where's @Joseph right now. He wouldn't miss a MP reference. :)
 
@DavidCarlisle Are you talking about arara?
 
@AlanMunn Brent suggested Oxford Blue here but the conversation wandered a bit:-) chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/16236011#16236011
 
12:28 AM
@DavidCarlisle I hope it hasn't met the choir invisible.
 
 
5 hours later…
5:48 AM
What can be done about the following two questions?
41
Q: How to write a book in LaTeX

Patrick Da SilvaI have taken a look at other questions, and I don't see any answer to my question. If this is a duplicate for some question I haven't seen, feel free to comment. I am an experienced TeX user, I've been writing with TeX for about 3-4 years now. I am pretty good with TikZ too. The problem is, all ...

12
Q: How to write a book in LaTeX?

Peteris KruminsI wish to turn several of my blog article series into a PDF e-book but I have never used LaTeX before for creating books. For example, I want to take my Awk One-Liners Explained article series, improve it and turn it into a book. I'll probably start with this guide that I found - http://www.mat...

They're super-duper similar.
 
6:05 AM
@Werner Dupe one to the other then do a merge?
 
@JosephWright A merge concatenates the answers?
 
@Werner Yes
 
@JosephWright I would be okay with that; could you have a read over the two questions to verify that they are similar/duplicates?
I only had a quick browse.
 
@Werner Isn't one specifically about converting a blog to an e-book?
I.e. similar answers but different questions
 
@JosephWright True, but it doesn't seem to be the target of the question / just mentioned "in passing". Almost a XY-style problem.
I could vote-to-close and see what the community says.
 
6:10 AM
Hi,
Does any of you know how to correct the total number of slides in a beamer presentation when the bibliography expands on several slides?
erf. adding one compilation solved it...
 
How should I get a readable C source of TeX? I can weave tex.web and read through that, but I'd like to see TeX with the major .ch files applied. (I also tried tangling the source, but it was a utter mess and I don't know of any Pascal formatters (e.g. Artistic Style).)
I tried looking around in the web2c directory, but I'm not sure how I should build it and there's no binary in my distro (Arch Linux w/ texlive-*).
 
6:26 AM
@bb010g You don't: TeX's written in Pascal
@bb010g web2c is meant to make it compilable, not to produce code to read
 
@JosephWright Doesn't web2c generate C from it, though? I can run that through Artistic Style or something similar (unless web2c mangles names).
 
@bb010g Of course it has to produce something, but not really 'for human consumption'. Like I say, TeX's written in Pascal (WEB): we are meant to read that (with comments, etc.)
 
@JosephWright I'd still have the TeXified Pascal open, but I'm more comfortable with C and am working doing a port and thus want to see statements where they got put in the source vs. spread throughout a document. I know it may not flow as well, but one can work around it.
I'm mainly confused on how to set up web2c for compiling TeX.
 
7:16 AM
@bb010g Did you look at e.g. tug.org/texlive/build.html?
 
morning
I have a problem with lyx, when I create sublist just I hit on the key TAB and if I want to leave the deeper sublist and became in the parent item but it create me a new item and I check it in the forum they told is to press on the TAB again to continue the current item , but for me it's not the caase
if I hit again on the key TAB it return in the deeper item
so how I can do it please
look at the second response tex.stackexchange.com/questions/34073/…
 
8:16 AM
@fahdijbeli I've never understood any wysiwyg processor for that sort of reason. That's why most of us here prefer to enter the markup directly in an editor rather than use a system like lyx to generate it, where you have a lot less control.
 
@DavidCarlisle yes you have reason , the problem is not me I don't want to use a markup but I haven't enough time to post my book intership in my university , if I go to do it with natively code it take me long time that's the problem
 
@fahdijbeli sure good luck (sorry I can't actually help: never used lyx:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle thanks :)
@DavidCarlisle
\begin{itemize}
    \item JPA : blabla
\end{itemize}
here i want the JPA : in font bold
how I can do it
just JPA :
and the paragraph followed by it ,is normaly text
 
@fahdijbeli easiest in latex is probably to use enumitem package and \begin{itemize}[font=\bfseries] in lyx I have no idea how to get that:-)
 
ok freind thanks
 
8:40 AM
@fahdijbeli oh sorry I misread I thought JPA was part of teh label (ot presumably ought to be so: \item[JPA] bla.... If you have it as it is then you could just do ` \item \textbf{JPA} : blabla`
 
9:00 AM
ah ok I will try it @DavidCarlisle
 
@egreg Already zapped
 
@JosephWright :) We're having more than the usual amount, don't we?
 
@egreg Yes
 
 
3 hours later…
12:10 PM
Does MikTeX have kpsewhich?
 
@AlanMunn I think so. Can't check, though. ;-)
 
@egreg Because I realize that many of our answers that involve making local modified copies of files in the standard distribution become dated when we give a full path relative to the TeX Live distribution year that we answered the question in. For experienced users, this isn't a problem; they know to change the year appropriately, but for total newbies, it's not so obvious. Giving a solution using kpsewhich would be much more reliable for them.
 
12:27 PM
@AlanMunn True.
 
@egreg But to answer my original question, it seems that MikTeX does have it: tex.stackexchange.com/q/97157/2693
@DavidCarlisle What's the difference between England and a teabag? The teabag stays longer in the cup. :)
 
@AlanMunn which reminds me, I ought to look how the cricket's going
@AlanMunn yeh! British weather looks like it might save us. Pray for more rain...
 
@DavidCarlisle Rain all morning here in Chicago, but I suppose that won't help.
 
@AlanMunn we're on 83-5 which is heading to an all time record low score, so anything even slightly improbable is welcome:-) (half the team out for 83 runs and we need to make 350....) Or it rains all day and is declared a draw:-)
 
12:43 PM
@DavidCarlisle Oh wow. I didn't realize things were so bad. So it's been a fine week for England in sports indeed.
 
Another green tick stolen. :-D
 
@egreg most undeserved
@egreg is the font itself no good or just the fd file? I note you suggest re-instating cmex ?
 
@DavidCarlisle Latin Modern supplies only lmex10, while cmex is available in more optical sizes.
 
@egreg they should just rename the fonts for consistency to l.... and fix the fd (fixing the fd not to use a fixed size would be good in any case)
 
1:50 PM
more rain needed: Eng 145-6
 
2:03 PM
@DavidCarlisle A runner did almost as much as five before him did?
 
@DavidCarlisle Do you have any thoughts about the \vbox question I pose in my edit to tex.stackexchange.com/questions/186350 ?
 
@cslstr mainly that I hadn't seen it (and nor will most other people:-) it's better to ask a new question than edit a second question into an existing one. Question edits should just be clarifications, adding exam oles etc, not new questions. anyway I'll look now:-)
@cslstr vbox isn't latex syntax if course but why there? I'd have to look at fancyhdr code (not now) but I would have thought it was expecting \headrule to only take up \headrulewidth vertical space, but in any case the vertical extent needs to fit in \headheight but you've not set that?
@egreg more:-) 5 are out for a total of 48, Moeen's still batting on 51:-)
What we need is a cricket playing duck....
Oh look one just arrived.
 
2:27 PM
@DavidCarlisle A duck will almost certainly bat better. :P
 
@DavidCarlisle Your point is valid (of course); I'll make it a new question.
@DavidCarlisle I understand \vbox is tex, not latex; it seemed more appropriate in this instance... I will have to look at what \headheight is set to in this case.
 
@cslstr well you just post the code without saying what it's trying to do, it appears to be trying to put some space around the rule in which case using vspace is probably more natural.
 
2:43 PM
@cslstr I made an answer, not sure if it's what you want:-)
@JosephWright been following the color xetex special discussions on tl list?
 
@DavidCarlisle Yes: I have a feeling it's the .def file (again)
 
@JosephWright I haven't looked at the code but the suggested patches involving q and Q suggest usual problem of the graphics state restore happening at a different place from the save... But the there were suggestions there were problems in the driver itself so I stopped following:-)
oops 7 wickets gone :(
 
@DavidCarlisle The issue can be that the config files are used without people really noticing: I see that Ulrike is OK with MiKTeX but that may just be a config file difference not a binary one
 
@DavidCarlisle :)
 
@DavidCarlisle The \nointerlineskip was the key that I was missing. Without it, just a regular \rule{}{} does exactly what I thought it would...
 
2:56 PM
@JosephWright I'm trying to add a 1 rep user to a chat, but I get user doesn't exist, even though they have a registered account: stackexchange.com/users/4652705/latexnewbie Any suggestions?
@JosephWright When I paste their TeX.sx user URL, I don't get the error, but they don't show up in the list of people with access either.
 
@AlanMunn TeX-sx page for the user?
 
@JosephWright Yes. That gives no error, but nothing happens. If I use their Network profile URL, (the one I pasted to you) I get user not found.
 
@AlanMunn Odd
@HeikoOberdiek Zapped
 
3:26 PM
@cslstr but you gave the tick to herbert:-) latex \rule is a box so aligned on baseline spacing normally whereas a primitive \hrule is not.
 
@DavidCarlisle I did, thought you might not notice :) My solution ended up being closer to his formulation... But I suppose yours might truly have been "most helpful", which is technically the definition to go by... #EthicalDilemma
 
@DavidCarlisle Ah! Schrödinger's parrot, after Monty Python opened the box...
 
@cslstr don't worry I'm used to it, @egreg regularly encourages people to divert ticks away from me
3 hours ago, by egreg
Another green tick stolen. :-D
 
4:19 PM
please someone have an idea tex.stackexchange.com/questions/186398/…
for my problem
I want to stop the enumeration of later chapter
if I make Chapter 9 Hello ,
I want an output Hello
without the word Chapter 9
because the later chapter gereral conclusion should be without word chapter
 
4:41 PM
@fahdijbeli Did you check the answer linked to in the comments? That should solve your problem.
 
@AlanMunn Is the dupe chain here right (useful)? LyX really needs a separate answer I'd imagine
 
@JosephWright Yes, LyX does complicate things a bit. The comment to the LyX version should actually be converted into an answer and the question not marked as a duplicate probably. Since it's @Werner 's comment we could ask him to convert if you reopen the question.
 
@AlanMunn yes it solve my problem thanks :)
 
@AlanMunn Both steps done
 
@fahdijbeli Glad it worked for you.
 
4:45 PM
@AlanMunn how I can vote for its response
there isn't a button ?
 
228-9 :(
 
@fahdijbeli Well the linked question doesn't yet have an answer (although it will have one soon.) You could check back in a day or so to see if there's an answer then and then vote for that person's answer. Your question will likely be closed as a duplicate of that one when that one has an answer.
 
ah ok thanks
friend
 
It seems the Italians are trying to pass the match by lying down on the turf ;-)
 
5:04 PM
Prandelli looks like Loki.
 
@StephanLehmke lol
it's a way to win the "match" lol
see you
 
@fahdijbeli They only need a draw so making sure nothing at all happens is an option ;-)
 
Penalty?
@Stephan: in WC'98, they portrayed the Brazilian team as a group of soldiers, and the coach said that his intention was to "draw" the war. :)
@David: Chile vs. Brazil. What now? :)
Red card!
 
5:37 PM
@PauloCereda Eng 237-9 (7 overs left)
 
@DavidCarlisle eek
 
@JosephWright century!
 
@DavidCarlisle Wow
 
So Italy has 9 minutes left in the WC now...
The Uruguayans are eating them alive
 
@StephanLehmke The big question is Is anyone watching the England goal here in the UK? :-)
 
5:46 PM
@JosephWright Which goal?
 
@StephanLehmke Oops, s/goal/game/g
 
@JosephWright stick to cricket, the terminology is easier
 
@JosephWright All busy watching Cricket. Probably the Russians are investing in the wrong sport in England ;-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Yes
 
Wow. At least the Germans now are in good company if they have to go too. Leave the Cup to the Americans.
 
5:59 PM
@StephanLehmke Eng 248-9 (1.5 overs left)
 
@DavidCarlisle So are they winning?
 
@StephanLehmke surviving has been the issue, we're still 100 runs behind but of we can survive 9 more balls it's a draw:-)
@JosephWright arrrrrrg
 
@DavidCarlisle :-(
 
@JosephWright couldn't have gone closer to the wire
 
@JosephWright Has there been a problem with the surviving thing?
 
6:12 PM
@StephanLehmke after playing for 5 days we just had to survive 2 more balls but....
 
6:24 PM
Earth Cup Tournament: youtube.com/watch?v=8ijop2gU_S4
 
6:40 PM
I was out for a job, did I miss something? /ducks
 
7:01 PM
Let's say that Uruguay has bitten us. ;-)
 
@egreg LOL
 
@PauloCereda That Suárez guy is crazy: he has done that at least twice, before today.
 
@egreg Indeed!
 
He should be banned from the World Cup. This one and the next.
@PauloCereda I watched the match at my department, the room was full of people. Our students are very good organizers for this kind of events.
 
@egreg Cool. :) Buffon was brilliant.
And Marchisio... oh boy.
 
7:09 PM
@PauloCereda Marchisio didn't play well; but nobody gets a red card for that. Let's hope that Mexico loses its referee in the World Cup, for the sake of the game.
Let's face it: Italy deserved to be thrown out. Not in this way.
 
@egreg Give me Marchisio, I can give you Fred. What a deal! :)
 
@PauloCereda No, thanks. We already have Balotelli.
 
@egreg Ouch.
 
Train arriving, see you later
 
7:42 PM
@PauloCereda I see your German is getting better! :)
 
@PauloCereda Yet another ducbit: facebook.com/IFeakingLoveScience/photos/…
user image
7
 
@cgnieder :)
@tohecz LOL
 
@PauloCereda :)
 
8:04 PM
@AlanMunn @JosephWright Done.
 
8:57 PM
@DavidCarlisle: Quick confirmation, please...
...longtable can only break at a row-boundary...
...not mid-row.
So if you have a row that contains a big block of text, and this block of text is bigger (taller) than the text block, then you're S-O-L in terms of breaking it "properly". Correct?
@DavidCarlisle: Sorry, this is verified in the documentation (p 3; the paragraph text in the table).
 
@Werner yes, correct. That would be way too complicated to have an output routine for such a trick
 
@tohecz ...damn output routine not being complicated enough!
 
@Werner the one for LT? Have you seen it? :D
 
@tohecz I'll leave that for my bed-time reading... ;)
No, I haven't.
 
@Werner Paragraph columns are typeset in a box. You'd need to examine all cells in the current row and decide where to split all of them; and it doesn't make sense anyway, does it?
 
9:11 PM
@egreg I know... splitting tables across the page boundary doesn't.
It's for a project I'm working on, where people used tables that need to split across multiple page boundaries.
Ick.
 
@egreg well, you could use a similar algorithm than the one for footnotes maybe, but it would be sooo bad
 
@Werner Those big three column tables that should be simply text subdivided with \section and \subsection?
 
9:23 PM
@egreg Big, two-column tables... you mention "those". Which ones are you referring to?
 
@Werner That kind; big lists for projects where in the first column there's a title and the second column is the description: \subsection.
 
@egreg Yes, those kind... Ick.
 
@PauloCereda This afternoon a student came in my office; the radio was playing a piece by Albinoni and he tried with Vivaldi, which was a good shot. So we came to discuss a bit about music and I discovered he likes Čajkovskij and, particularly, the sledghehammer piano concerto. I was uncertain whether giving him the certificate for the LaTeX course. ;-)
@Werner With the compulsory rules running all page long. :(
 
@egreg Double-ick.
...and shading as well.
 
@Werner yes:-)
 
9:34 PM
@egreg :)
 
@Werner a work of literature and refinement.
@tohecz i have a feeling that for the special case that there is just one p column where you want to allow breaking I may have an answer on site somewhere, but really 99 times out of a hundred those things should be set as a list.
 
@DavidCarlisle well, I know it :)
 
@DavidCarlisle I'm interested...
 
@Werner well I'm sure I coded it once, but it might have been in my document (unlikely I never use tables:-) or on here or c.t.t sometime in the last 20 years or so,,,,
 
9:49 PM
I'm told that a TeX source of Doug Zongker's chicken paper is available to download, but my Google-fu is not availing me.
Does anyone here know where to find it?
 
@Werner no idea if thi sworks but google (by way of old answers here) suggests uucode.com/blog/2010/12/06/…
 
Wow! Greece has just gone through to the next round with a penalty kick at the last minute of injury time!
 
10:04 PM
@DavidCarlisle That's a pretty definitive target...
@DavidCarlisle ...who wrote that? Oh, I clicked some of the links: Oleg Parashchenko
 
@TRiG Write a paper and use the chickenize package (requires LuaLaTeX).
@TRiG You could use some automatic paper generator: pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen
Here's my attempt
Here is the start of the Bibliography, er, Chicken
 
@egreg You mean it's actually built in? Cool.
 
@TRiG No, I generated the paper and added \usepackage{chickenize}\chickenize
 
@egreg Which just replaces stuff with chickens?
 
10:20 PM
@TRiG Not all words, as you see; a bit more various than that paper. ;-)
 
> Along these same lines, chicken chicken the chicken we verify chicken chicken chicken Chicken chicken unification chicken the lookaside chicken chicken XML.
 

« first day (1332 days earlier)      last day (3608 days later) »