« first day (1308 days earlier)      last day (3624 days later) » 

1:00 AM
@Robusto no I mean what's the English equivalent.
To benewt?
 
I before said "made do with".
 
You read Chaucer, not me.
 
@RegDwigнt Of benutzen? I thought it was use.
 
He means cognate.
 
@Robusto You misunderstand. We are only writing words that did not come from Rome.
 
1:00 AM
@Robusto we're talking stuff not stolen from cheese-eating surrender monkeys. Get with the program.
 
Nor from Athens, either.
 
@tchrist Fail! Rome came Roma.
 
Which is a good point. I very nearly rendered the Greek επίσκοπος in italics! O the irony!
Hell, I'm going to do it anyway: επίσκοπος!
 
Blasphemy!
 
Beowulf has no “use”.
 
1:01 AM
Get hold of your tongues.
 
Oops I'm writing Greek in Latin letters.
 
Yeah, Rob read that Beowulf shit, too.
So spill the beans already.
> Replaced Old English brucan (see brook (v.))
Etymonline to the rescue. Cheap and easy.
 
I struck off his head with my sword.
 
So need it is, but in a twisted way.
 
Instead of using a spade to decollate him.
 
1:03 AM
@tchrist What about gewealdan?
 
I actually meant the actual word need.
But it's brook, as in brauchen.
 
It brooks no trouble.
 
Oh wait. It's not brauchen.
It's bruch.
 
@RegDwigнt No. It's brook as in brücken.
 
Which I thought was related to break.
 
1:04 AM
I ought to know.
 
Wait, no, I am reading the entry for the noun.
For the verb it does say brauchen.
 
> brook /brʊk/, v.

Forms: 1 brúcan, 2 bruce(n, 2–3 bruke(n, brukien, 3–6 brouke, 4 brouk, 4–5 browke; also 3–5 broken, 3–6 broke, (4–5 brok), 5–7 brooke, 5– brook; 5–6 Sc. bruk(e(ü), 6 brwk, 6–8 bruik, 7 bruike.

Etymology: OE. brúcan (pa. t. bréac, brucon, pple. ʒebrocen), a Com. Teut. verb, but found in the other langs. with weak conjugation: OFris. brûka, OS. brûcan (MDutch brûken, Dutch bruiken), LG. brûken, OHG. brûhhan (MHG. brûchen, Ger. brauchen), Goth. brukjan :– OTeut. stem *bruk- ‘to make use of, have the enjoyment of, enjoy’ :– Aryan *bhrug-, whence also L. fru-i ( :– frugv-i),
 
Yeah.
@Robusto perhaps that's a different brook. I am not familiar with any brook. New word to me.
 
@RegDwigнt Okay, so Nutz has no modern cognates outside German/Dutch, apparently.
 
Ironic.
 
1:06 AM
Old English did have one.
 
@RegDwigнt Shakespeare: "I better brook the lose of brittle life than those proud titles thou hast won of me." Or something like that. Henry IV, Part 1.
 
> 1. trans. To enjoy the use of, make use of, profit by; to use, enjoy, possess, hold. Obs. except Sc. in some legal phrases, and arch. in literature.
† b. Formerly in asseverations: so (or as) brouke I my chyn, eyes, heid, etc.: so may I (or as I wish to) have the use of my eyes, etc.
† c. to brook a name (well): to bear it appropriately, do credit to it, act consistently with it. Obs.
† 2. To make use of (food); in later usage, to digest, retain, or bear on the stomach.
 
Yes, all other peoples are slackers.
In Dutch, benutten is "to make use of, to put to use", gebruiken is "to use".
 
@RegDwigнt Only one survived.
 
@Cerberus In German, nutte means prostitute.
 
1:08 AM
> 3. To put up with, bear with, endure, tolerate [a fig. sense of ‘to stomach’ in 2]. Now only in negative or preclusive constructions.

1530 Palsgr. 471/2 ― He can nat brooke me of all men.
1583 Stubbes Anat. Abus. ii. 30 ― They cannot at any hand brooke or digest them that would counsel them to that.
1624 Capt. Smith Virginia iv. 115, ― I would deter such from comming here, that cannot well brooke labour.
1667 Milton P.L. vi. 274 ― Heav’n··Brooks not the works of violence and War.
1752 Young Brothers ii. i, ― Such insults are not brook’d by royal minds.
 
Hi Everyone, I have a question. I want to know if the following statement is incorrect. 'Could you please confirm, have you called the AT&T benefits center?
 
@RegDwigнt Cute.
@Kabir101 Sounds good to me.
 
@tchrist Yes, I remember that one now.
 
@Robusto I am confused whether that should serve as an example of brücke. I'm no longer getting with the program myself.
 
@Kabir101 No, that sounds wrong.
 
1:09 AM
Well. Inelegant for sure. But wrong...
 
> Could you please confirm that you have called the AT&T benefits center?
 
@RegDwigнt To bridge (or brook) something is to get across it or get past it.
 
@RegDwigнt Comma,splice,or,something.
 
Comma splices are fine.
 
@tchrist It's just informal.
 
1:10 AM
Also, there are no commas in speech.
 
My ancestors were bridge-builders, so I know all about this stuff. It's in my genes.
 
But it does not sound good.
 
If it were written, I'd rewrite the hell out of it.
 
It sounds like somebody from India.
 
@tchrist yup. As I said, inelegant. You may choose to be more frank.
 
1:10 AM
@tchrist: thanks but can you explain 'why' it is wrong?
 
@Robusto I'm just not sure anymore how to parse that quote, then.
@Kabir101 "because it makes you sound like somebody from India" is actually a reason.
 
@Kabir101 It's a comma-splice.
Oh. It's already been said so.
 
Not that there's anything wrong with Indian English, of course. But we have to assume you're asking about Standard English.
 
Ha. Standard English.
 
See, I don't even think it's a comma splice.
 
1:13 AM
> Could you please confirm that you called the service center?
 
For a comma splice, you need to have two separate sentences, no?
The first part is not a sentence.
 
It’s two questions.
Could you please confirm?
Have you called the center?
 
@tchrist: two questions in one clash. is that what you want to say?
 
Yeah but the first one misses all the crucial information.
It's like asking "have you seen the?"
 
Could you please confirm THAT you blahed.
 
1:14 AM
Yup.
 
@RegDwigнt Hmm, maybe you're right. I do think the verb and the noun have commingled over the centuries, though.
 
@RegDwigнt No, like asking "Have you seen?"
 
Well, I wanted to go with whether.
@KitFox I knew you would say that.
 
I would use whether there.
 
But the point stands.
 
1:15 AM
@RegDwigнt Didn’t I already use whether?
looks up
 
@RegDwigнt Right. Which is why it sounds...the way it does.
 
"Have you seen?" is incomplete as well, and if you connect it into a single sentence with what it is I am supposed to be seeing, it is not a comma splice.
@tchrist I think you used that twice.
 
Apparently.
 
Fine. It's still sounds like a NNS acting imperious and pretending not to.
 
No argument there. That is pretty much an axiom.
 
1:16 AM
I think that makes sense.
 
> Did you really call the service center, or are you just another joker calling in to tease me about my kine?
 
lol
Nope
 
Just drop the "can you confirm" nonsense. Cut to the chase.
 
Really.
It sounds like somebody is kowtowing.
I mean that in a literal sense.
 
You want to ask them if they called, then ask them if they called. Add a please if you must, with sugar on top if you dare.
 
1:17 AM
What are they knocking their head on?
 
False politeness false remains.
Wait, did I just put a verb at the end? Heavens!
 
English is a Germanic language. QED.
 
I think ' have you called the AT&T benefits center' is good enough but adding 'could you please confirm' makes it more polite.
 
Of course German would never put the verb at the end in that one single particular sentence. Oh the irony.
 
@RegDwigнt Right. "Can you please confirm?" sounds like "I expect you didn't, but I will politely ask you in a way that suggests you obviously have been expected to do so and yet I assume you have failed in this trivial task."
 
1:19 AM
> But it has long been said: oft evil will shall evil mar.
 
@Kabir101 It makes it less polite.
 
The garden-pathing of will–shall there is delightful.
 
@Kabir101 it wastes twice as much of their time. Some people do not appreciate that. Life time is a limited thing. Nobody is giving them those seconds back. You want to be polite, be curt.
 
@KitFox: I think you need to read more books.
 
@RegDwigнt +1238712938712893129381323
goes for popcorn
 
1:21 AM
@Kabir101 I think you need to listen more and speak less.
 
@KitFox: ok, I will do that.
@RegDwigнt: what if when it comes in writing?
 
@Kabir101 in all honesty, that is excellent advice, and you will do no wrong by following it yourself. You will be surprised to see how few books have anything to do with politeness. Books are not written to be polite to the reader.
 
The act of asking is itself a request for confirmation.
 
@Kabir101 I don't understand the question. It is still wasting twice as much of their time whether spoken or written.
 
@Kabir101 Don’t use all those weasel-words. It annoys your interlocutor. Get to the point. Did you or didn’t you? Yes or no?
 
1:24 AM
As I said, if you want extra politeness, a please goes a long way.
 
It is one of those most annoying things about dealing with the trans-Caucasus cultures, all the weasel-wording.
Don’t beat around the bush.
Don’t insert meaningless formulaic drivel. It sounds craven.
 
Especially on such a mundane occasion.
 
@RegDwigнt: what if you start chatting with someone from any benefits center and they write you this. I just want to figure it out what is the best way of being polite while making sense too. 'Grammatically' .
 
Asian attempts to be polite fail to connect with European ones.
 
@Kabir101 grammar has nothing at all to do with politeness. They are two completely different things. "I hate you" is exactly as grammatical as "I love you".
13 mins ago, by tchrist
> Could you please confirm that you called the service center?
Here's a grammatical sentence that's also polite.
But I really should be sleeping.
 
1:29 AM
If the honored gentleman might do this unworthy person the courtesy of informing this one of the honored gentleman’s most preferred number at which he might be reached should this unworthy person have any further questions to bother the esteemed gentlemen with, we should be ever so please to record that information here under your account information.
 
I guess it's noon in India, but here it's the darkest night.
 
In other words, what’s your damned phone number?
I deal with this constantly.
It makes me want to hang up on the idiots.
 
Yes.
Very annoying.
 
@tchrist I am somewhat certain there's an acrostichon for cunt in there.
 
@RegDwigнt All country matters are to be transmitted steganographically, not epidemiologically.
 
1:31 AM
But to be completely certain, I'd have to read it in its entirety and who's doing that.
 
Is 'alphanumerically' an understandable description of sort order? Would you know what ordering I meant?
 
I never know where people place the underbar.
Or whether numbers come before letters, for that matter.
 
@KitFox You have asked the wrong question of the right person.
 
OK, if underbars were of no concern.
 
Be prepared for a great many code points.
 
1:32 AM
An alphabetic sort is not what you think it is.
No, I shall restrict myself to RADIX-50.
 
sighs, types it anyway assuming someone will correct her if it's actually important
 
Or maybe ASCII on a good day.
 
@KitFox that is the spirit.
 
This is not sorted properly, merely commonly:
    Little Red Mushrooms
    Little Red Riding Hood
    Little Red Tent
    Little Red, More Blue
    Little, Red Rider
 
I think the operational word in your report is sorting, and everything else will plain get ignored.
 
1:34 AM
It should be this way:
    Little Red, More Blue
    Little Red Mushrooms
    Little, Red Rider
    Little Red Riding Hood
    Little Red Tent
Otherwise you are doing a bloody codepoint sort, and that simply sucks.
 
It is a requirements document, not code.
 
Hah. Then everyone will make of it what they will anyway.
 
I have another: 'I would request that you call' or 'I would request you to call', which one is the most appropriate?
 
People say "alphanumerically" when they mean "sort by numeric order of the underlying codepoints, even when that makes no sense whatsoFMHever".
 
I don't have any control over whether he uses a codepoint sort or does each one by hand on camelback.
 
1:35 AM
You just can't be precise enough in a requirements document. Unpossible.
 
Specify that it should be a "library" sort then.
 
@Kabir101 What's the rest of the sentence?
 
You are only supposed to sort the letters, not the nonletters.
 
It should be numbers first, then letters.
 
Fine.
 
1:36 AM
They probably won't even take "sorting" seriously, and argue a great deal how a random order is a kind or sorting.
 
Or letters first, then numbers.
 
Lets say, the AT&T benefits center the rest.
 
But in any case, the fact that some strains begin with numbers needs to be acknowledged.
 
The point is, don’t consider anything that isn’t a number or a letter.
 
@tchrist It won't matter. It will only ever be letters or numbers.
 
1:37 AM
Then specify that case does not matter.
Is this a phonebook sort?
 
I doubt the periods, dashes, braces, &c will be gotten to. And case of course matters.
 
Why does case matter?
 
Another nominee!
 
Don't they have, like, a couple special terms by this point? Like big-endian/low-endian. Just for letters-first/numbers-first.
 
It does not matter in an alphabetic sort.
 
1:38 AM
@Kabir101 I would recommend calling the benefits center.
 
@KitFox Would you? :)
 
@tchrist It matters in the strain name. A ridiculous nomenclature thing.
 
@KitFox: you been a great help.
 
@KitFox I see.
 
OMG Yoichi-san is running.
 
1:39 AM
What!?
 
Are you on drugs?
This is a made-you-look thing, right?
 
I am literally wishing for drugs right now.
 
omgomgomgomg
I feel faint.
I think I might actually swoon.
 
I long fainted, came back, fainted some more.
 
writes down a script for Reg, and sends it straight from Colorado’s finest
 
1:40 AM
Oh yeah.
 
Er, that’s the other kind of script.
 
Will do.
I could smoke a beer right now.
But I will really have to go to bed instead.
 
℞: Take two, they’re small.
 
I feel flustered.
 
I am stupefied.
 
1:41 AM
flails hands like crazy person
 
@RegDwigнt ZOMG
 
Stunned into stultiloquence.
And staggerment.
 
@JasperLoy That is a very appropriate reaction.
zOMG, indeed.
 
This is . . . Biblical.
I can think of no stronger word.
 
Arnold.
 
1:45 AM
Yoichi Oishi and phenry and The Evan Carroll™.
Our new moderators.
 
Wait The Evan is back?
 
Not yet.
 
So are you guys, like, for-Yoichi or not-for-Yoichi or what.
 
Oh.
@Alraxite the votes are secret for a reason.
 
A collection of stunners, all for different reasons.
 
1:46 AM
Ab omni malo, libera nos Domine.
Ab omni peccato, libera nos Domine.
 
Om Mani Padme Hum.
 
Ab ira tua, libera nos Domine.
A subitanea, et improvisa morte, libera nos Domine.
 
I mean, I could say "Alraxite should run for mod", but then you'll immediately lose the support of all the people who desperately hate me.
 
I'm just really surprised.
 
1:47 AM
Ab insidiis diaboli, libera nos Domine.
Ab ira, et odio, et omni mala voluntate, libera nos Domine.
 
Tchrist, those are not stronger words, them's just Latin.
 
Eine kleine Nachtmusik.
 
Smoke et mirrores.
 
A fulgure, et tempestate, libera nos Domine.
 
@RegDwigнt Oh, thank you. Maybe I should consider.
 
1:48 AM
Latin vocalization is required for invocation.
 
@KitFox and honored, apparently.
 
For certain things.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Well, what else am I supposed to say?
 
I can't offer him tea.
 
@tchrist could.
 
1:49 AM
He's so polite.
 
I think this is just a conspiracy by Sarah Palin to get @Rob to vote.
 
Or to run for mod.
 
Nihil proficiate inimicus in nobis.
 
@KitFox what sort of lagniappe would you offer him?
 
@KitFox now you're just crazy. No conspiracy is that strong.
 
1:50 AM
Domine exaudi orationem meam.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Um. Butter cookies.
 
@KitFox Without tea?
 
To get Rob to run for mod, Sarah Palin would have to run herself with no other candidates at all.
Though even so he'd probably run away instead.
 
with no other clothes at all.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 I don't know!
 
Nobody else runs Sarah like Sarah runs Sarah.
 
1:52 AM
There's no business like no business.
 
I should try to get 90 points in the next 6 days to have 300 to run as well, lol.
 
Wait what, how the hell are you below 300 again?
 
Jasper, that is so offensive I should flag thee for it!
Or maybe it was better the other way.
 
The movie 300 is good.
 
I should change my name and gravatar, then run for mod.
 
1:53 AM
For beefcake, nada más.
 
@RegDwigнt He's not been on EL&U much since the last two times he's been back.
@RegDwigнt Did you see Wai put himself up for candidate?
 
@KitFox see, I missed a time, then.
 
He's been here, but mostly reps on Maths.
 
@KitFox okay, this is gonna be a made-me-look thing.
 
Well, he deleted it.
 
1:54 AM
One more candidate and we have ourselves a nomination phase.
 
So as not to confuse people.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Yes! You should run.
 
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 You mean the primary?
 
Great idea.
 
runs
@JasperLoy I do.
drinks
 
drinks water
 
1:55 AM
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 No, no. That way. points at nomination board
 
@KitFox that wouldn't work out so well, I bet.
 
What's the harm? You probably won't win, so might as well drag it out as long as possible.
 
Haha.
 
Seems perfectly reasonable reasoning to me.
 
Remember: the last candidate that probably didn't win was Kit.
 
1:56 AM
You can't win if you don't run.
 
Oh. Well. There was that.
It was rather an accident.
 
So, is Sim okay?
BTW
 
OK in what sense?
 
I've no idea who's okay and who's where at all. But all mods keep visiting at least from time to time.
 
The Simple Minds sense.
Alive and Kicking.
 
1:57 AM
Yes.
@RegDwigнt I'm here! I'm OK!
 
Even Kosmo visited but a week ago.
@KitFox and I'm not here! I'm in bed!
Mr Shiny takes over from here.
 
you always leave just when I arrive
 
I wonder what'll happen if a moderator seriously runs though.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 hey just because we're the same person doesn't mean you have to blow our cover.
 
So, has anyone brought the news on Meta that the system allows moderators to get more diamonds by nominating themselves?
 
1:59 AM
Night all!
 
Night!
 

« first day (1308 days earlier)      last day (3624 days later) »