« first day (1234 days earlier)      last day (3689 days later) » 

5:00 AM
@Robusto Every time I ask a well thought out question, he posts a comment about how it is not a valid supposition to ask . . .
 
Read his doctrinaire comment on a question Kosmonaut (another linguist) and I put together to field the many questions we got on time expressions in English. He couldn't get around his notion of tenses being used "incorrectly" by us.
87
A: How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another?

Robusto EDIT: Added past continuous, trimmed image so it would be slightly larger, and gave it a transparent background. EDIT: Added middle line, made some adjustments per @Kosmonaut.

I ended up sticking a small pin in him. Or his buddy.
@GastonÜmlaut: I guess that's just one more piece of evidence that linguistics isn't settled science. — Robusto Apr 14 '13 at 11:30
 
I was just reading that.
I liked it.
 
And I hate their insistence that pronunciations only be given in IPA, as if IPA is even close to the real phonemes used in different languages.
 
IPA is a bunch of fucking squiggles.
 
@Cerberus even once suggested (possibly jokingly) that languages should only use IPA alphabets. Which would mean that pen would be written differently in Michigan and Alabama.
 
5:06 AM
I answered a question once on how to pronounce people. The OP asked is it like pee-pole? And, I said no, it's pee-pull.
 
More to the point, our audience isn't linguists. Respelling is more helpful to the sort of people who come to this site.
 
So, Reg and bunch of other people got up my ass.
Agreed.
 
There are pockets of orthodoxy here that would be more at home in a synagogue.
 
Hahahahahaha
We Jews love to argue . . .
 
As the saying goes, Jews are just like everybody else, only more so.
 
5:09 AM
Yup.
Are you a member of the tribe?
 
Not really. My maternal grandmother was Jewish, so I could claim membership, but I have absolutely zero interest in doing so.
 
@Robusto I don't blame you.
I'm about as secular as it gets.
Jewish when it helps me win an argument.
;-)
 
That said, I get along well with Jews. They tend to be smart and have a good sense of humor. If they don't take the religion thing too seriously, it's all good.
I'm an atheist, but I wore a yarmulke to a friend's wedding last year, if that gives you any idea.
 
Being an atheist doesn't have to mean not respecting the traditions of others. (i.e. Atheist doesn't have to equal asshole ...)
I'm an agnostic.
Very agnostic.
But, as a scientist, I cannot rule anything out entirely. Nor do I accept anything without proof.
 
@DavidM Yeah, that's the one thing that makes me tired. One of my Jewish friends insists on taking every one of my jokes out to six decimal places and explaining in what contexts it doesn't work.
 
5:15 AM
@Robusto He's just an ass . . . It's not his religion . . .
1590s, formed from dilate on the mistaken assumption that the -ate in that word was the Latin verbal suffix (it is instead part of the stem); the proper form, dilatation, is older (c.1400).
Shit.
 
@DavidM There's precious little proof of anything religious being "true" in a scientific sense. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that if truth were gasoline, all the religions in the world wouldn't have enough to drive a piss-ant's go-cart around the inside of a Cheerio.
 
@Robusto Fair enough!
I did say I don't believe. I just cannot rule out for lack of evidence either way. The experiment is still collecting data. The day I die, I will conclude my study.
 
And everything else with it.
The Greek poet Simonides used to write epitaphs for people. Two of his that I remember (somewhat) are: "My name is Brotachos of Euboeia, and I did not come here for death but weighty business." And: "Sir, you are not looking at the grave of some great Lydian king, for being poor my gravestone is small — yet still too much for me."
Simonides is the one who wrote the epitaph for the 300 Spartans: "Tell them in Lakedaemon, passer-by, that here, obedient to their will, we lie."
 
That's good.
 
My view on death is just this: I'll fall off that bridge when I come to it.
 
5:22 AM
@Robusto Precisely
I had a long discussion with Terdon last night about how I enjoy toying with the God Squad types.
 
Hello.
What are those?
@Robusto I don't remember...
I doubt whether that was a serious suggestion...
 
@Cerberus I will give you the benefit of the doubt.
 
I like benefits. They're good.
 
Can you keep David amused. He's bored and I'm falling asleep.
 
Unlike...pollution.
I'm afraid It's way past my bedtime.
 
5:25 AM
Anyway, good night all. be of good cheer.
 
Night!
Always.
 
Good night.
 
Good night to you, whenever that be.
 
I'm going to bed shortly.
0
Q: What is the real difference between dilation and dilatation?

David MIn the medical profession we use the terms dilatation and dilation with great frequency. And, yet I've never gotten a sufficient answer as to why we use one vs. the other. Some, try to claim that dilatation is an active process (like dilatation and curettage), and dilation is a passive process....

Wanted to post that first.
 
 
5 hours later…
10:05 AM
@Robusto not sure about all of us. I do.
 
Matt get vs 2013 imo
gonna play with fft today
 
 
2 hours later…
11:47 AM
@JohanLarsson Fast Fourier Transforms?
 
We came within ken of land, we were relieved.
ken means sight.
A little lesson.
 
12:03 PM
@Robusto yeah I can push a thing if you want to review it
 
 
1 hour later…
1:06 PM
@user4550 Also knowledge or understanding, which is where the "sight" meaning comes from. From OE cennan, to make known.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:16 PM
@JohanLarsson I've been looking at that, for work. We have an open source c# implementation, but I'm trying to understand it because of the weird things that inverse FTs do.
 
 
1 hour later…
3:34 PM
posted on March 29, 2014 by sgdi

Please grab a beer an a chair We’re not gonna go anywhere Relax and sit down There’s no need to frown You’ve run out of reasons to care

 
> About this Add-on
Comment Snob filters out undesirable comments from the Web. It comes with support for YouTube by default, but you can add support for many other sites by installing Comment Snob rules. For each rule that you install, you can choose from the following filtering parameters:

Number of spelling mistakes
All capital letters
No capital letters
Doesn't start with a capital letter
Excessive punctuation (!!!! ????)
Excessive capitalization
Profanity
Filtering on custom words and phrases
 
lol!!!
 
lambOmatic's comment (on the addon) is one I want to hide
 
3:51 PM
So apparently if I download Visual Studio Express (for Desktop) from here:
http://www.visualstudio.com/downloads/download-visual-studio-vs#d-express-windows-desktop
I need a microsoft account and if I go to here:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=40787
I don't need one?
Um, could anyone tell if both the downloads are the exact same?
They do look the same.
Not sure why Microsoft would make it so that it is impossible to download from the visualstudio.com site without an account but provide a no-restriction download from its download center
assuming that they really are the same.
 
4:13 PM
@MattЭллен But WHY!!?11
 
Anyway, I was thinking of downloading it because I'm learning C++,
but I'm not sure
 
@Cerberus Grammar r harden
 
700 MB is a lot
 
@MattЭллен Ah, poor you.
@Alraxite Microsoft is just Microsoft!
 
probably 600 mb is stuff that I'll never use.
 
4:15 PM
@Alraxite it's very bloaty. the one at visualstudio.com is the online version. I don't know about the other one
 
@MattЭллен Oh, it's online?
 
@Alraxite yeah
 
Well, then those two are completely different.
 
Everyone wants to be in the cloud these days. Every purveyor, that is. That way they own you.
 
join us join us join us join us
 
4:20 PM
Well, how was I supposed to distinguish between them. The one at visualstudio says nothing about online. Gah
I'll probably download CodeBlocks
20 MB
 
yeah, it doesn't make mch sense
 
4:32 PM
@JohnLawler: I responded to the the title and the first sentence only. Part of the new Summer of Love tolerance program. Peace and love, brother. — Robusto 8 secs ago
 
4:45 PM
@MattЭллен I don't even remember the maths, hacked and dumbed my way to something that worked. Broke it now :). Get 2013 man, I think the trial for VS is 90 days.
 
@JohanLarsson I could get express. I think that's free forevs.
 
yea
if you use R# express will be pain,no plugins for express I think
 
@MattЭллен Yeah, but try to do anything useful with it.
 
@JohanLarsson that's true
 
the guys in the maths chat are not very chatty when I ask noob questions :)
not that i blame them, drive-by askers don't add much to a chat in general.
 
4:57 PM
@JohanLarsson Change your avatar and screen name to Scarlett Johansson and they will be falling all over themselves to answer your noob questions.
 
:D
did you try the baiting tactic? I don't know if it works in maths. "Hey, I bet none of you noobs can prove that 1+1=2"
 
2x haha
I'm gonna try the become reg tactic
the only thing I will be able to contribute with is lame jokes
same as here :)
 
sounds like a fine idea
 
it would be nice to be fluent in Scilab
 
5:37 PM
@EdwinAshworth Yes, but one-off is a comparative newcomer to these cisatlantic shores. Previously it was strictly British, and still sounds somewhat foreign to my ears. The first OED citation is only from 1934, and all citations through the 1970s are strictly British. In America, it would be a one-of-a-kind widget. Sometimes, just a one-time thing works, too. There’s no working around the fact that unique has a unique meaning that has no one-word synonym in English, a word that’s truly sui generis in its uniquity. It’s the onliest word you’ll ever need, or have. :) — tchrist 46 secs ago
 
Unique sure is a one-off
 
Matt, did you know that one-off is both “new” and originally completely British?
 
I didn't
 
I don’t think I heard it here during the 20th century at all.
There’s also a one-shot opportunity.
All these things come back to one, you’ll notice, even uniquity and onliest.
I guess we could get into sole, too.
 
one is the onliest number
I think we have a question about one-off
 
5:41 PM
’Tis that.
25
Q: Word/phrase to mean something that just happens once

TimWhat is the word/phrase to mean something that just happens once? For example, I have often been told/expected to do this and not to do that. I become aimless and gradually lose the idea of who I am. I ask myself "What is the point?" If life is just once thing, why can't I live my life in...

I do so despise SE search.
 
I thought there might be an origins question. can't see it immediately
@tchrist yes
 
Right, because SE search megasux.
Good versus Evil.
4
A: A number off or a number of?

KrisBEN ZIMMER, On Language The Origins of ‘One-Off’: The New York Times (Magazine) July 2, 2010 … this British usage of off typically appears with a number to indicate a quantity of items produced in some manufacturing process. The Oxford English Dictionary, … takes this back to a 1934 quotation...

 
@tchrist ah!
the good search turned up this
1
Q: A number off or a number of?

FiredragonI am reading some technical documents and there is a list of items that make up the product. Throughout the document where there are multiple items, they are listed as 2 off, 3 off and so on. For example it would be similar to this: My product comprising of: 2 off card 1 1 off card 2 1 off ...

 
Same-same. :)
 
So, will one off be understood in AmE today?
 
5:48 PM
1
A: Is "off" also an acronym?

Colin FineThe OED says (s.v. off, adv., prep., n.1, and adj.:) 12 Used with a preceding numeral to represent a quantity in production or manufacture, or an item or number of items so produced. Usu. as one off: see one-off n. Cf. once-off adj. and n. at once adv., conj., adj., and n. Special uses ...

 
yeah, that too :D
 
2
Q: An event that occurs only once

KeyBrd BasherWhat do you call an event that occurs only once in its environment? For instance, birth and death are two events that occur only once in the lifetime of a living thing. I am looking for a word or phrase that would be synonymous to "non-repeating".

2
A: An event that occurs only once

jwpat7Consider the following: One-time, one-off, one-shot, singleton, nonce. Some other perhaps-less-suitable words suggested in Antonym of "recurrent" [closed] include isolated, seldom, infrequent, non-periodic.

These are all rather noncy, don’t you think?
The OED calls them nonce words, not one offs.
 
true :D
 
I voted to close the original question because "rackers" (people who rack/torture) was Shakespeare's poetic/metaphoric usage (torturers of orthography/spelling) over four centuries ago, and there have probably been few if any related usages ever since. I don't particularly mind ELU addressing metaphoric usages in current newspaper articles (that might be repeated, and which native speakers would normally understand). But one-off Shakespearean usages that haven't become well-known to later generations seem to me to be well and truly off-topic (basically, they're Lit. Crit.) — FumbleFingers Apr 14 '12 at 19:57
Look, it even finds them in comments, and on meta no less!
I voted to close the original question because "rackers" (people who rack/torture) was Shakespeare's poetic/metaphoric usage (torturers of orthography/spelling) over four centuries ago, and there have probably been few if any related usages ever since. I don't particularly mind ELU addressing metaphoric usages in current newspaper articles (that might be repeated, and which native speakers would normally understand). But one-off Shakespearean usages that haven't become well-known to later generations seem to me to be well and truly off-topic (basically, they're Lit. Crit.) — FumbleFingers Apr 14 '12 at 19:57
 
clever Google! have a cookie!
 
5:55 PM
5
Q: Looking for a word similar to "custom-made", but stronger

ttranI am looking for a word or phrase which can describe the situation in which you order a valuable thing (maybe unique) such as a Ferrari or jet or something else. My friend told me that it should be called a custom car (or jet). I agree about that but I know there is another word which sounds much...

 
bbl. time for a film and a cider
 
1
Q: A word describes things that can be used only once

hawkI am wondering if there is a single word that describes things that can be used only once. My focus is links that usually sent to our emails in order to activate accounts or reset passwords. However, I do not mind to find a word for all kind of items that can be used only one time (e.g. Bullets, ...

 
6:35 PM
@MattЭллен Bertrand Russell took 60 pages to prove that very thing.
@tchrist Christians would disagree with the premise.
 
How irreptitious.
 
7:00 PM
@Cerb You have access to better etymological sources than I do. Perhaps you could look for a PIE connection here:
That’s not true about the origin of ravenous: what you have stated is a mere folk etymology for which I can discover no evidence. The (surface?) evidence is that ravenous is not related to raven at all: think raptor not raven here. The common word raven for the bird Corvus corax comes from OE hræfn. Ravenous in contrast derives from medieval French ravine or medieval Latin rapine, both ultimately from Latin rapere meaning to sieze and whence we also derive our own word rape. Whether these is a PIE link between these, however, I have no idea; I suppose it is possible. — tchrist 47 secs ago
 
@tchrist I'll look into it.
You, too, can consult those dictionaries, however.
For the Latin, Google torrent vaan etymological latin.
 
I knew the Dutch raaf per the OED. What I don’t know is whether there’s some pre-Latin connection between rapo and rabo.
 
Hmm Google can't find it, apparently.
I can send it to you, if you like.
Or get it here:
 
k
 
Library Genesis is the best.
 
7:14 PM
Ravenous means rapacious, not “raven-like”. I just don’t know if the oldest forms we find for raven and for rape are related through a PIE sound-change.
 
Raaf is from *kor- "raven", related to crow, corvus.
So most probably not related.
 
k
 
Rapio is from rh1p-, "to seize".
 
Oh right, it’s that kind.
 
So the two are not related.
 
7:20 PM
Hm. Actually, I don’t see how raaf, raven, hræfn might have come from corvus, corax, κοραξ at all. Aren’t your sources just pointing out corresponding words, not related ones?
> The Common Raven was one of the many species originally described by Linnaeus in his 18th century work, Systema Naturae, and it still bears its original name of Corvus corax.[5] It is the type species of the genus Corvus, derived from the Latin for "Raven".[6] The specific epithet, corax/κοραξ, is the Ancient Greek word for "raven" or "crow".[7] The name "raven" has been applied to several other (generally large) species of the genus Corvus, though they are not necessarily closely related to Corvus corax. Some, such as the Australian Raven and Forest Raven, are clearly closer to the other
So the Proto-Germanic is *khrabanas, a far cry from rapio, but perhaps not so far from corvus.
So ok.
 
Yes, it says "verwant met", so cognate to/with.
K often becomes h in Germanic, I believe.
 
I see that now.
I didn’t know verwant.
 
The dictionaries say the word is probably onomatopoeic from the sound a raven makes.
Probably like other Indo-European words denoting a scratching sound, like crepo, scratch...
 
@Cerberus Remember the names of Tolkien’s ravens in The Hobbit.
 
I do not...
 
7:27 PM
Róac and Carc.
 
Ah.
Very ravenish.
 
People who know only crows are unaware of the variety of utterances a raven can make.
Or of the pitch difference.
Although a raven is capable of making sounds higher in pitch should it choose to, its calls are normally noticeably lower in pitch than the crow’s.
Like a bass versus a tenor.
 
Ahh je suis très triste !
:(
Allez, il faut aimer l'anglais !
Bon, j'ai un problem, madames et messieurs...
Je voudrais de l'aide, s'il vous plait !
Est-ce que cette phrase c'est correcte?:

Dahl is very stereotypical of rich people by describing them as “fat” due to their financial support in eating a lot.
Oopss... probleme
 
7:45 PM
Hi all. I was hoping @terndon was still here. If I leave him a comment, will he get it?
@TimTimmy - grammatically? not exactly...
 
Alors ...?
 
@TimTimmy - stereotypical means he was like them, a member of the same group. His comment about fat people doesn't identify him as a member of any group.
 
@medica Sorry, you didn't see the context, he was attributing the "fat" to rich people
I meant this part of the sentence: "due to their financial support in eating a lot."
Cheers
 
perhaps he was stereotyping rich people?
 
Yes, yes
;)
Danke
 
7:49 PM
et bien.
avec plaisir.
 
Sehr nett von Ihnen
أنت كريم جدا
!!
 
(lol) only french, english, spanish, or latin, please
 
And German?
 
maybe portugese and italian,
no german, sorry.:)
 
Hmm... Morse code?
 
7:51 PM
lol... nope. I'm very limited.
 
Convert all your numbers into base-1. The math is easier.
-1
Q: grammatically of "They identify themselves as Pacifist, but the EU as a arrogant power"

Behzadis this phrase correct grammatically? "They identify themselves as Pacifist, but the EU as a arrogant power" i mean, there is no need a verb in the second part?

Candidate for the Winter of Hate.
 
Why don't I make my own language?? Yes, that's it, The TimTim language: Helloz, howz arez youz??
 
That's not yours. The Internetz invented it.
 
WHATZ?!
 
I think I'm right to tell you this.
 
7:54 PM
Whytim notim dotim thistim?
--Tintin--> Timtim
:D
 
I can't think of a single worthwhile word that would be improved by the addition of -tim.
Sorry.
 
Bye! Cabbage!
Cheerio
;)
 
8:16 PM
Boo!
 
8:26 PM
:-O
 
8:46 PM
@DavidM well, to be fair I had not known about the resection back then.
@Robusto things is good, though I am somewhat royally bored. Possibly somewhat more than even yourself. In fact now that you mentioned you are bored as well, I am twice more somewhat royally bored still.
 
How can you be bored with so much on the internet these days?
 
@DavidM BTW, what Prof. Lawler says there is actually quite in line with the general SE stance. Getting questions is trivial. Especially rubbish questions. Getting answers is harder. Even rubbish answers.
@skullpatrol sadly, I've already seen all of the Internet. And let me tell you, most of it will bore you to tears, or possibly death, without resurrection. Children beware.
 
Wow that's breaking news.
 
Indeed the next generation definitely needs to beware.
 
Although the over 9000 Wikipedia articles about Hungarian villages and football players are an endless source of fascination.
 
8:54 PM
So anyway. That whole discussion, or indeed those whole discussions, always miss the point. They only ever talk about newbies posting questions. They never deal with newbies posting answers. Which is because newbies posting answers don't get anywhere as much snark. Unless they are just awfully wrong, in which case more often than not it's a hit-and-run type of answer anyway and you could call their mom a ho without them ever coming back to notice.
Note how medica, who is angsty about inviting her friends over, makes do just fine herself. 15k reps in three months.
Surely her friends could, and would, easily pull off just that. Rather than posting off-topic questions and getting flak for them.
 
Rep shmep I'm just here for the beer :D
 
That, too.
That is actually a very relevant remark.
 
Star please
 
You don't need to participate in the site to find it immensely useful. We have a wealth of excellent information already.
Which has been edited into shape and formatted nicely, and all the discussion is long settled, and all one-off comments removed.
It's high-quality stuff.
 

« first day (1234 days earlier)      last day (3689 days later) »