« first day (26 days earlier)      last day (3744 days later) » 

3:00 AM
!taf kfll
!!taf kfll
 
KFLL 130245Z 1303/1324 VRB04KT P6SM SCT030 SCT250
FM131200 12008KT P6SM SCT050
 
There you go, I updated the suggestion to make it more clear. That's breaking the "if you have to explain it" rule about jokes though.... ;-)
 
@lnafziger added a screengrab from the latest dTERPS frontmatter
0
A: When conducting a circling approach, how close do you have to stay to the airport?

egidFor approaches that use the new criteria, both Aeronav and Jeppesen charts show an inverted "C" in the circling minimums section of the approach plate. This signifies that the approach uses the new, altitude-dependent circling radii. Aeronav (NACO) format: Jeppesen format: As far as figuri...

 
@egid Cool, thanks!
@egid It's pretty easy for the Cat A guys, lol.
You could just memorize it.
 
yeah. especially if you're a lowlander.
then again i almost always wind up operating as Cat B
at least during training
 
3:04 AM
@lnafziger lol, I like it! (I think we could "actually" do this :p)
just like a "tip of the day" kinda thing
 
i thought the command explained you how to use otto
 
aka "give me a random bit of info of how to fly" :p
 
"teach me to fly Otto" rather than "teach me to fly, Otto!"
 
@DannyBeckett Haha, that would actually be pretty funny (and useful)!
 
;P
 
3:05 AM
yeah Louis clarified his answer
> Free flight instruction from our chat bot "Otto the Autopilot" would be great!
@lnafziger haha I agree! :p
 
Agreed. Shorten the command though. !!teach
 
and a very easy command to add too
 
@egid Oh, I just noticed. The question isn't specific to the new circling minimums, but just "how do you determine the distance...." and you don't mention the "standard" circling minimums.
 
@lnafziger i suck at reading ;P
 
@egid lmao, and I'm really picky before I accept an answer. Or I can just wait for someone else to put a better one up. ;-)
 
3:07 AM
could you guys come up with a few short sentences? I could make this command in no time (like within the next 15 mins), with a few phrases initially
 
"Keep the shiny side up."
 
lol!!
 
"Don't forget to lower the landing gear before landing (unless you are in a seaplane)!"
We can make it all slightly funny phrases which have real meaning. :)
 
(let's face it, we're basically just re-implementing the Unix command interpreter in the bot one command at a time)
 
@lnafziger yeah
 
3:08 AM
Since this is basically $fortune aviation
 
@SteveV. Haha, kind of!
 
I believe there's probably already a similar command already made
 
!!norris i believ
*believe
 
or at least I know there's definitely code I can pinch
 
@SteveV. That didn't make much sense. Use the !!/help command to learn more.
 
3:09 AM
hehe, no Chuck Norris for you
 
except that one hits an external database
 
> I've deleted some commands that were specific to programming, or unnecessary: awsm colors cowsay domain firefly github hangman jquery mdn mustache norris stop urban vendetta xkcd zalgo
 
cowsay, there you go.
 
yup! :)
 
@DannyBeckett Post a new meta question asking for suggestions for funny quotes that Otto can use when "teaching" people to fly. Make a CW answer and let people keep updating it over time. :)
 
3:10 AM
We need an ASCII Otto to replace the cow.
Or an ASCII tower, and pipe in BOFH-excuses
 
@lnafziger I was thinking that but wondering if it was too OTT to post a Q
 
@DannyBeckett We aren't too strict on meta. :)
 
FSDO-excuses
 
posting a question :)
can anyone think of a good title?
"Give us some funny quotes for Otto to teach people to fly!" sounds crap
 
Anonymous
@lnafziger no rep no fun, again
 
Anonymous
3:13 AM
why CW ;_;
 
@DannyBeckett Haha, your edit to my answer makes it more clear that it is a joke.
 
@lnafziger lol ;)
 
@lnafziger guess what image doesn't exist on any faa.gov domain? google.com/…
 
@PatoSáinz: For the prohibited item question? Because it would be impossible to maintain by myself and I want to encourage other people to edit it. :)
 
Anonymous
@lnafziger for the otto quotes
 
3:14 AM
@egid Haha, not a surprise!
 
found it
 
cough delete "by myself" and it's still true. @lnafziger
 
@PatoSáinz Oh, that's on meta, so nobody gets rep for it anyway, but it does make it clear that we want everyone to edit the existing answer instead of creating a bunch of new ones.
@SteveV. Well, that's the point we disagree on. :)
 
Yes, but one of us is wrong. cough you cough
(:
 
Anonymous
@StackAviation, The Stack Exchange network
A Q&A site for aircraft pilots, mechanics, and enthusiasts
107 tweets, 10 followers, following 0 users
 
3:17 AM
Exciting!
 
there we go
updated
 
Well, I don't mind if the community as a whole doesn't want it... As I said, I was borderline on it anyway (I almost posted a meta question about it instead of the question first, but figured this would garner more attention to the issue.)
 
True, and i'm only being this vocal with my complaints because it amuses me.
 
0
Q: Teach Otto to teach people to fly!

Danny Beckett@lnafziger jokingly said he'd like to see a !!TeachMeToFly command on the suggest new chat bot commands question: The command that I would like to see the most is: !!TeachMeToFly Free flight instruction from our chat bot "Otto the Autopilot" would be great! After a few of us discu...

PLEASE, edit if you can improve it @lnafziger @egid @SteveV.
 
alright. How do you plan to store the database?
(do you know yet?)
Because, if you either have it pull from a flat file or something, I can clone it and then just send you pull requests.
 
3:22 AM
just flat
and yeah, that sounds good. It'll be on GitHub anyway
gonna setup the command now
 
i know, i've already cloned the bot proper, but my version of Fedora doesn't have node.js and i can't be bothered to install it from source.
 
that's ok, it'll just be a flat file
 
0
Q: Teach Otto to teach people to fly!

Danny Beckett@lnafziger jokingly said he'd like to see a !!TeachMeToFly command on the suggest new chat bot commands question: The command that I would like to see the most is: !!TeachMeToFly Free flight instruction from our chat bot "Otto the Autopilot" would be great! After a few of us discu...

0
Q: How could this site best be introduced to other sites, forums, or groups?

egidThere are dozens (if not hundreds) of type-specific clubs and forums out there. They're full of experts on specific types of aircraft, and some of them might be interested in contributing here. What would a good 'letter of introduction' (for lack of another way to describe it) look like to a grou...

 
Aww, the "unless you are in a seaplane" bit is what made it funny!
That would be bad to do in a seaplane landing on water.
 
bot's restarting..
!!teachmetofly
 
3:32 AM
Don't forget to lower the landing gear before landing (unless you are in a seaplane)!
 
@DannyBeckett Preced that with "LESSON: " or "TIP: "
Precede
 
!!TeachMeToFly
 
> The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. -- Douglas Adams
 
Don't forget to lower the landing gear before landing (unless you are in a seaplane)!
 
!!teachmetofly
 
3:33 AM
Keep the shiny side up!
 
(it only has 3 entries so far)
 
@DannyBeckett Actually "LESSON: " not TIP
 
I can put the number in there too :p
Lesson #194: ...
or whatever number it is in the list
ok it's restarting with 7 tips
!!teachmetofly
odd...
!!teachmetofly
 
Lesson #.1: Don't forget to lower the landing gear before landing!
 
:D
!!teachmetofly
 
3:40 AM
Lesson #.3: Right rudder!
 
gonna remove that dot/period - restarting
source code for the new command is here if you wanna submit pull requests @SteveV. github.com/dannybeckett/SO-ChatBot/blob/master/source/plugins/…
 
woohoo!
 
!!teachmetofly
 
Lesson #4: Push forward: buildings get bigger. Pull back: buildings get smaller.
 
:D
lol
 
3:43 AM
:)
 
Lesson #6: There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots!
 
adding your new ones now @abelenky
 
Thx
I'm sure I'll think of more as time goes.
 
yeah they're great for now, thanks!
 
Very nice!
 
3:46 AM
new ones now added
 
@egid If you actually want the communities opinion, you may want to wait to accept the answer until more people have had time to look at it (on the "Too Specific" question on meta). :)
 
2
Q: Possible need for a 'Too Specific' option when voting to close?

egidIn a couple of cases, we've had questions like this one that are asking very specific questions. Currently, the options people seem to use are either "off topic" or "too broad". Adding a "too specific" option, like "this is a very localized question" or "this only refers to one single model of a...

link for the lazy
 
@DannyBeckett BTW, could probably be replaced by .
 
yeah probably (it already existed)
"terminology" is what I would've chosen
!!tell Pato teachmetofly
 
@Pato Lesson #6: There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots!
 
3:51 AM
@DannyBeckett Then again, could probably be replaced with (or something similar) too.....
 
!!tell voretaq7 teachmetofly
 
@voretaq7 Lesson #5: Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, in that order!
 
!!tell BretCopeland teachmetofly
 
@BretCopeland Lesson #9: To land: Airspeed, Centerline, PAPI (repeat)
 
That one I'm most serious about....
 
3:55 AM
lol, yeah I'm not sure how you could make that funny
 
I repeat that on tricky landings... and I'm convinced that if Asiana 214 had been saying that, the airplane would've made it.
 
hmm :(
 
After the published pre-landing checklist, those three are the only things you need.
If you're at the right airspeed, on the centerline, and see the proper PAPI... you'll probably land just fine.
 
@DannyBeckett - new pull request.
 
Assuming that there is a PAPI. Maybe "Airspeed, Centerline, Approach Angle"
 
3:58 AM
Just say "stabilized approach" and have done with it.
 
ok so you'll have to excuse me @SteveV., I've never handled a pull request before... what exactly am I doing here? (It says We can’t automatically merge this pull request. Use the command line to resolve conflicts before continuing))
 
Except that none of my students seem to know what that is.
 
only just started using Git... always been used to SVN
 
well, yes, but: adjust as needed. But PAPI expresses the idea, if not the literal meaning.
 
@DannyBeckett merge conflict, we both edited at the same time.
hold on, i'll fix it on my end and resubmit.
 
3:59 AM
thanks :)
 
Not appropriate, but funny: "The odds against there being a bomb on a plane are a million to one; and against two bombs, a million times a million to one. Next time you fly, cut the odds and take a bomb."
2
 
LOL....
I'm up to #16 now...
 
@DannyBeckett - try that one
 
that worked :)
will adjust the whitespace and reload the bot in a sec
 
4:07 AM
so another one: or ? I'm leaning towards the second one....
 
2nd
 
!!teachmetofly
 
Lesson #10: The propeller is just a giant fan to keep the pilot cool; if it stops, the pilot starts sweating!
 
#21... thats enough for tonight. Maybe more later.
 
trying to keep up with you guys!
 
4:10 AM
Anybody else?
Okay, changing them then. :)
 
restarting
!!teachmetofly
 
Lesson #10: A superior pilot is one who uses his superior judgement so that he does not have to use his superior skills.
 
!!teachMeToFly
 
Lesson #42: Some pilots will declare an emergency for high oil pressure. Others, upon losing a wing, will ask for a lower altitude.
 
4:17 AM
Haha, nice.
@DannyBeckett How about !!teachmetofly 26 (so that we can get a specific lesson)?
 
ahhh, good idea!
gonna go for a smoke in the freezing cold outside and I'll add that when I'm back :)
 
Make sure to error check that one, lol.
Haha, enjoy.
 
!!weather lpl
 
LPL/EGGP: Liverpool John Lennon Airport • Observed: 29 mins ago • Wind: 190°/S @ 8kts • Visibility: 6.21mi/9.99km • Clouds: Few @ 4,000ft • Temperature: 5.0°C/41°F • Dewpoint: 3.0°C/37°F • Pressure: 29.62" Hg/1,003mb • Conditions: VFR
 
5 degrees, not too bad lol
 
4:43 AM
@lnafziger implemented!
!!tell lnafziger lesson 4
 
@DannyBeckett Command lesson does not exist.
 
whoops :$
!!tell lnafziger teachmetofly 4
 
@lnafziger Lesson #4: Push forward: buildings get bigger. Pull back: buildings get smaller. Pull back harder: buildings get bigger again.
 
(gonna add an alias for !!lesson actually)
!!tell lnafziger lesson 9
 
@lnafziger Lesson #9: Small mountains will kill you just as dead as big ones.
 
5:08 AM
room topic changed to The Hangar: Try the new command !!teachmetofly (no tags)
 
@DannyBeckett Awesome! You should probably alias "!!lesson" for "!!teachmetofly", especially since people will be seeing "Lesson #..."
 
I did already ;)
 
Nice!
!!lesson
 
21 mins ago, by Danny Beckett
!!tell lnafziger lesson 9
 
Lesson #27: If your flight is going remarkably well, you obviously forgot something.
 
5:09 AM
!!lesson
 
Lesson #13: The propeller is just a giant fan to keep the pilot cool; if it stops, the pilot starts sweating!
 
lol, gotta be the easiest command to make, and it seems the best received so far :p
 
@DannyBeckett Okay, one more suggestion... Every 60 + Math.floor(Math.random() * 20-10) minutes he should send a lesson to the room.
 
hahaha awesome idea
I'm not completely sure how I'd do that actually
since usually the bot listens for !! and just replies
 
Yeah, I thought that might be a little tougher... Surely there's a way though.
 
5:16 AM
I'll have a chat with Zirak tomorrow :)
 
haha, cool. I'm off to bed for now though. Have a good night!
 
me too, night mate!
 
Thanks for all the help!
 
hey no worries man, thanks for the suggestions!
seeya :)
 
@DannyBeckett - have the bot listen for a regex that matches any string, and then have it send based on a very low probability random chance
 
5:19 AM
cya
 
You get the same effect but you don't have to write a timer-driven handler, you can keep it event-driven.
Plus, that way the bot isn't spammy when there's no activity in the channel for several hours.
 
the only thing is, bot.invocationPattern = '!!'
 
Or better yet, check the time that you determined that you wanted to send a message (based on the random time calculated after the last message that you sent) and if it is past that time you can go ahead and send it.
 
it's a good idea though
 
Again, it will keep him from saying random things when the room is empty.
 
5:21 AM
> And the listener regex looks like this: /^give ([\w\s]+) a lick/

> When the bot sees something isn't a command or any other prefix-having functionality, it runs over all the listeners, and when one matches, execute it.
 
ah cool
 
Same idea as @SteveV. but if he sits for a long time, he will send the message as soon as someone says something.
 
will look at it tomorrow, thanks!! :)
 
cya tomorrow guys
 
 
1 hour later…
6:28 AM
@voretaq7 @BretCopeland - Can one of you kill all the comments on this question please? aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/952/… (presuming the flag isn't handled before you see this)
 
 
2 hours later…
roe
8:43 AM
!!metar KJFK
 
METAR KJFK 130751Z 25006KT 10SM CLR M01/M03 A3013 RMK AO2 SLP202 T10061033 $
 
roe
@DannyBeckett as you're not interpreting the metar and taf, it should be a pretty simple replacement to just grab NOAA's. $.get(...) and you're done, pretty much.. :) Wouldn't bother with the 'weather' command though.
 
posted on January 12, 2014 by Bryan Swopes

12 January 1961: Major Henry J. Deutschendorf, United States Air Force, 43rd Bomb Wing, Strategic Air Command, flew from Carswell Air Force Base, Texas to Edwards Air Force Base, California with Convair B-58A-10-CF Hustler, 59-2442, Untouchable. There, he flew two laps of a 1,000 kilometer circuit between Edwards and Yuma, establishing six new Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) speed

posted on January 12, 2014 by Bryan Swopes

12 January 1962: The first helicopter assault, Operation Chopper, took place when 33 United States Army CH-21C Shawnee transport helicopters of the 8th and 57th Transportation Companies airlifted 1,036 soldiers of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) into battle against an insurgent  Việt cộng (National Liberation Front) stronghold approximately 10 miles (16.1 kilometers) west of Saigon.

posted on January 13, 2014 by Bryan Swopes

13 January 1908: Henry Farman flew a circular one kilometer course at Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, in 1 minute, 28 seconds to win the Grand Prix de l’aviation, a prize of 50,000 francs, which had been offered by Henri Deutsch de la Meurthe in 1904. Henri Deutsch de le Muerthe (1846–1919) was a wealthy French businessman with a strong interest […] The post 13 January 1908 appeared fi

 
!!metar EBAW
!!metar EBBR
 
METAR EBBR 130820Z 23012KT 9999 -RA BKN045 07/05 Q1012 NOSIG
 
8:53 AM
@DannyBeckett hmmm... I'm not sober. I probably shouldn't be "moderating" at the moment.
 
@BretCopeland :-D
@DannyBeckett That question on the fuel senders/transducers you have edited is really improved now. Good job.
2
 
roe
@BretCopeland Kudos! Good for you, not everyone would have that kind of self-control.
 
@Roe it just indicates he is still sober enough to have self control :-)
 
roe
@DeltaLima Hmm... good point :)
Wow there's a pile-up of these lately, isn't there?
avherald doesn't seem to have picked it up yet though
 
9:19 AM
@DannyBeckett - I think you can disregard this: http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/13153384#13153384
I didn't read closely enough.
 
 
3 hours later…
12:13 PM
posted on January 13, 2014 by Bryan Swopes

13 January 1942: “. . .The first ejection seats were developed independently during World War II by Heinkel and SAAB. Early models were powered by compressed air and the first aircraft to be fitted with such a system was the Heinkel He 280 prototype jet-engined fighter in 1940. One of the He 280 test pilots, […] The post 13 January 1942 appeared first on This Day in Aviation.

posted on January 13, 2014 by Bryan Swopes

13 January 1942: Chief Test Pilot Charles Lester (“Les”) Morris (1908–1991) made the first flight of the Vought-Sikorsky VS-316A at Stratford, Connecticut. The first flight lasted approximately 3 minutes, and by the end of the day, Morris had made 6 flights totaling 25 minutes duration. The VS-316A (which was designated XR-4 by the U.S. Army Air Corps […] The post 13 January 1

 
@BretCopeland How are these "This Day in Aviation" posts created? Are they automatically create from an RSS feed? If so, may I suggest to also add the skybrary.aero feed?
 
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
1:30 PM
@OttotheAutopilot thanks otto now i feel prepared to take the pilot exam, brb
 
2:00 PM
!!teachmetofly lesson 1
 
Lesson #30: Never fly in the same cockpit with someone braver than you.
Lesson #41: Pilots talk about women when flying, and flying when with women.
@DeltaLima You must choose a number between 1 - 43 (or omit the number entirely).
 
!!teachmetofly 1
 
Lesson #1: Don't forget to lower the landing gear before landing!
 
Anonymous
2:37 PM
i can review now
 
Anonymous
hehehe
 
posted on January 13, 2014 by Bryan Swopes

13 January 1982: At 3:59 p.m. EST, Air Florida Flight 90, a Boeing 737-222, N62AF, began its takeoff roll at Washington National Airport. The airliner, with a flight crew of two and three cabin attendants, carried 74 passengers enroute Fort Lauderdale, Florida, with an intermediate stop at Tampa. The departure was delayed 1 hour, 45 […] The post 13 January 1982 appeared first on This Day

 
Anonymous
1
A: Can Air Traffic Controllers participate in Q&A?

DeltaLimaI am not aware of any legal limitation for air trafic controllers to speak out on a public website, but there could be one. StuckMic.com is however an ATC forum in which FAA ATCo's seem to participate actively. This leads me to believe that they are allowed to speak out on a public website. The...

 
@DannyBeckett !!teachmetofly lesson 1 should work too. :)
 
Anonymous
3:16 PM
 
Anonymous
this is so fucking true
 
@BretCopeland lol! I didn't expect you to even see the message before today. The comments still need cleaning when you get a chance :)
@DeltaLima Thanks! I noticed the guy wasn't familiar with SE and didn't want him to get disheartened from the response.
@roe that's definitely an idea! think I'm gonna leave it for now to concentrate on other commands, but we'll fully switch to NOAA at some point (including for !!weather)
@SteveV. yeah I think it still needs to be invoked with !!. I'll see what we can do!
 
@DannyBeckett Great way of trying to keep this guy interested. The votes have now gone from negative to positive and I hope he gets a decent answer now.
 
roe
@DannyBeckett Fair enough. Did you mention somewhere you had it on github? I could fix it for you if you want.
 
@DeltaLima only time will tell! :)
@roe sure! you're more than welcome to. there are 2 repos on Git: the PHP and the JS. The PHP is at github.com/dannybeckett/so-chatbot-php-helper and the JS is in weather.js of github.com/dannybeckett/SO-ChatBot/blob/master/source/plugins/…
 
roe
3:24 PM
Cool
what's the php for?
 
Anonymous
because @DannyBeckett likes to use the worst languages available
 
@DannyBeckett we could try and make some categories in the lessons from Otto. I was thinking: [general introduction], [pre-flight], [basics of control], [take-off], [cruise flight], [landing] (tons of these ;-), [CRM], [law & regulations] etc
 
@roe it converts the response to JSONP (the format needed by the bot)
It also retrieves basic airport data, such as both IATA & ICAO codes and airport name, and tags that onto the end of the object
 
Anonymous
^no it doesn't
 
Anonymous
!!metar SCTB
 
3:25 PM
@PatoSáinz No data could be found within the last 24 hours for SCTB! Check you typed the correct 3-letter IATA or 4-letter ICAO airport code.
 
roe
@DannyBeckett ok, cool
 
You can see an example request at: dannybeckett.co.uk/AviationBot/…
 
roe
so it's a proxy
 
yeah
(JS is a pain in the arse when it comes to CORS)
 
roe
yeah, can be tricky
need to do iframes and stuff
 
3:27 PM
or proxy :)
 
roe
or that
 
@PatoSáinz That's why @roe is taking a look at it ;)
 
roe
@DannyBeckett Don't feed the trolls.. ;)
 
lol!
Pato's definitely a troll alright :p
(j/k)
 
Anonymous
@roe that's rude
 
Anonymous
3:28 PM
lol
 
@DeltaLima that's also a great idea! I'll add it to the to-do list
@DeltaLima Feel free to write your own answer on meta.aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/186/… instead of editing another
up to you!
 
@DannyBeckett I've added a couple to the list that was made into a wiki. If you can share all the answers that are in use now, I can take a stab at categorizing them.
 
@DannyBeckett Great, I'll give that a shot tonight. Will probably have to change your array structure and response code a bit to make it work. Keep you posted
 
yeah no worries at all! @DeltaLima
any help is always appreciated!
 
4:31 PM
so who has the landing numbers for a 737 on a 3700' runway?
 
heh
 
@Aaron 1.
(you were asking about the number of times you can do it, right? :)
 
:)
 
heh
 
this "land at the wrong airport" thing seems to be becoming a disturbing pattern.
 
4:41 PM
srsly
 
I used to live by the 737 factory in Renton, WA..... I can say that when the planes are empty, their performance is incredible. They can take off very short, and land even shorter than my Cessna.
 
@abelenky I'm pretty sure you can do 3700ft without any problem - certainly empty
 
posted on January 13, 2014

An off-field-landing-of-the-week two-fer... NTSB has some suggestions... And AOPA announced the next big things. Oh, and Jack forgot to say hi to Dave at the beginning. All this and more on the Uncontrolled Airspace General Aviation Podcast. Recorded Jan 9, 2014.

 
5:01 PM
The Renton runway is 5,300 feet... and they blast out of there no problem at all.
 
yeah i was just going to point that out
still, 3700 is a lot shorter than 5300
especially for RTO stuff
@voretaq7 I wonder if own-ship on EFBs would help prevent it? ;)
 
@egid No Comment :-)
 
A little web search says that Santos Dumont takes loaded 737s, at 4,300 ft.
 
I was once invited to a B737-500 training weekend, doing lot's of touch and go's with pilots fresh from the flight academy. When doing a full stop landing to take up fuel the training captain demonstrated a short field landing. Landing at the numbers, we just missed the first taxiway of out of GRO RWY 02. I think we reached full stop 750 meters / 2500 ft from the threshold.
So 3700 is plenty.... if you anticipate for it :-)
 
@DeltaLima and if your pilots are on the ball. (i.e. "Perhaps not the same folks who landed it here to begin with...")
 
5:06 PM
also, 2500 remaining or 2500 landing distance? :)
 
Try LEGE
Otherwise known as Costa Brava / Girona airport
 
2500'landing distance
 
just wanted to clarify! that's pretty good, but not that surprising
i mean, the 737 is a smaller derivative of the 727, and lightly loaded...
kept the triple-slotted flaps that made the 727 so good at short fields as well
at least on the -500
 
The runway itself is long enough, that is why it was chosen for touch and go's. We were on board with only about 12 persons, no fuel, no luggage (but a pair of extra wheels, just to be sure :-)
 
5:10 PM
Where can I find runway distances to a particular taxi-way?
I'm pretty sure I've seen 737's land KBFI 31L, and exit B5.
I want to find that distance.
 
Try measuring it at google maps. That works for me
 
+1 there's a google labs add-on for maps that lets you use a ruler on the map
 
Yeah, forgot it's probably a labs add on I have activated. I have the one that has a gazillion units that you can choose from.
 
@voretaq7: I'm good with "Fuel in the truck". If you want to edit the wiki... go ahead. :)
Okay, looks like 31L to exit B5 is about 980m.
 
@abelenky Effort :P
but air in the fuel tanks is pretty useful - the fuel tends to stop flowing if you pull a vacuum on the tank :)
 
5:19 PM
or 3,200 feet. So I am actually kinda surprised the Southwest did it in 3,700 ft full!
Because the crew was expecting plenty of space....
I wonder when they realized they were running out of runway.
It looks like LiveATC doesn't cover Branson. :(
 
@abelenky I would imagine very quickly, but the 737 brakes are excellent :)
@abelenky "Cessna 12345 go around, some idiot landed a 737 on my runway..."
 
LOL....
 
@voretaq7 that's pretty much what was said on an unrelated ATC tape I just listened to...
> An Aerogal Boeing 767 attempts to land on the wrong runway at New York's JFK airport, nearly colliding with a Jetblue rolling for take off. The tower air traffic controller sorts it out and a collision is averted.
 
that sounds pretty JFK honestly
I do love the JFK ground controller tape from a few years back
>JFK Ground: "I told you to go where you are?"

>Jetblue 144: "Exactly"
 
yeah lol that's classic
 
5:27 PM
@DannyBeckett <applause>
 
@voretaq7 huh?
 
@egid there's one from LGA where the ground controller essentially verbally castrates a few flight crews - can't find the link now, but it's hilarious
 
> You' re unable to to do everything, sir, that plane of yours...
 
after she's done it's just a lot of quiet "yes ma'am"'s on the frequency when she's giving taxi instructions :)
@egid "Its funny 'cuz its true!"
 
heh
i miss one of the controllers at KPAE when I was training... he was ex navy, used to work on carriers
"Cessna 345, hold short 34R, there's a Piper launching"
 
5:30 PM
 
@egid Apparently KISP is where they send JFK controllers who burn out
 
Most Extreme Airports - well worth a watch
 
("We'll send you to a nice, quiet airport - no traffic to work....")
 
I'm told that at Seattle/Tacoma, multiple planes have confused taxiway Tango with runway 34C.
 
yeah, Aeroflot i think landed on T
 
5:43 PM
and in hindsight, maybe it isn't so smart to make taxiways parallel to, and same length as runways.
 
maybe paint yellow polkadots on them... or make the edges of them zig-zaggy?
 
maybe it's an aeroflot thing ;) flightglobal.com/news/articles/…
 

« first day (26 days earlier)      last day (3744 days later) »