« first day (2297 days earlier)      last day (2626 days later) » 
04:00 - 18:0018:00 - 21:00

4:34 AM
Does the narrator in this video have an accent at all? youtube.com/watch?v=OnZBsco6XDo
Is this general American accent?
 
4:48 AM
Another question: is it natural to say "That's the the year I was born in?" Or would you get rid of "in" at the end?
 
@key_asdfg yes
 
Oops. I put an extra "the" by mistake. *Another question: is it natural to say "That's the year I was born in?" Or would you get rid of "in" at the end?
 
I would get rid of "in" at the end @key_asdfg
 
Thanks! And no southern accent in the video in the link I posted?
 
5:04 AM
Slightly but not overly strong.
 
5:31 AM
@skill I see, thanks!
 
Thanks for asking :-)
 
5:48 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, bad keyword with email in answer, email in answer: Why Is "And Then" Incorrect? by DrMax on english.SE
 
 
3 hours later…
8:39 AM
Why do you think this author omitted "the" before the "media" that appears at the very end of this sentence?: "Most, if not all, media players available today, including video streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Instant Video, utilize the spacebar as the shortcut for playing and pausing media." howtogeek.com/243362/…
Also, is this question natural? I wanted to ask the reason you would guess on why this author omitted "the," not the reason why you guessed this author did so. The latter would be really weird since you didn't guess anything before I asked this question.
Is it just more normal to omit "the" in this context?
I googled both "pause the media" and "pause media" and the former had about ten times more results!
 
 
5 hours later…
1:49 PM
@key_asdfg In this sentence, it's fine to leave it out. A media player plays media. Media is plural or a mass noun (depending on how you're using it), so it's fine to leave out the the.
If you wrote the sentence with video instead of media it'd be ... video players today ... utilize the spacebar as a shortcut for playing and pausing videos.
 
Few and far between are those sentences containing utilize which cannot be improved by its excision.
 
well, yeah, but I didn't want to distract from the question
 
2:13 PM
Hi guys. Is "lunatic" a word that could be used to describe mood swings?
in my language (italian) a lunatic is a person who has mood swings
I'm not sure that in english the meaning is the same
 
in English, "lunatic" means someone who is crazy
 
I'm curious
about the ethimology
 
Lunatic is an informal term referring to a person who is considered mentally ill, dangerous, foolish or unpredictable, conditions once attributed to lunacy. The term may be considered insulting in serious contexts in modern times, but is now more likely to be used in friendly jest. The word derives from lunaticus meaning "of the moon" or "moonstruck". The term was once commonly used in law. == History == The term "lunatic" derives from the Latin word lunaticus, which originally referred mainly to epilepsy and madness, as diseases thought to be caused by the moon. By the fourth and fifth centuries...
 
2:32 PM
Are questions looking for technical or mathematical terminology appropriate here, or is that better suited for a topic specific site?
Specifically, I'm looking for a term in the same family as average, mean, median, mode, but with a different mathematical definition.
 
They are the definitions
Or are you looking for something more specific?
 
I'm saying, mean is specifically sum/count, median is center term, mode is most common term. I'm looking for a term for (max+min)/2
 
You might have better luck on a math or stats site
 
just average or middle point is fine
 
max+min/2 is not the average unless you only have two values
 
2:45 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Thanks, I'll try it over there.
@user8469759 Middle might work, but average most definitely does not. Mean, Median, and Mode are all 'averages'
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 it's a type of average. mean, median and mode are also types of average
 
I guess.
wikipedia suggests "mid-range"
In statistics, the mid-range or mid-extreme of a set of statistical data values is the arithmetic mean of the maximum and minimum values in a data set, defined as: M = max x + min x 2 . {\displaystyle M={\frac {\max x+\min x}{2}}.} The mid-range is the midpoint of the range; as such, it is a measure of central tendency. The mid-range is rarely used in practical statistical analysis, as it lacks...
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Perfect, thanks!
 
np. I found that on the wp page for "Average", actually, because of Matt's comment.
 
:-o I was almost helpful!
I'll have to brush up on my vacuousness
 
2:52 PM
@MattE.Эллен DOOM IS COMING
 
DOOM IS MY DOOM
 
3:09 PM
@MattE.Эллен No, I think you were actually helpful! I know! I was surprised too!
 
@tchrist you successfully eschewed utilizing 'utilize'
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 chokes this is my Kryptonite
 
@user8469759 Lunatic does not directly mean mood swings between calm and excited. It means crazy (or excited in a very crazy way). If you call someone a lunatic it's not implying that they go back and forth.
@MattE.Эллен You should take smaller bites.
 
@Mitch I'll only bite the left handside
 
Won't that upset the polarity and cause a rift in the space-time continuum?
Whenever that happens I feel like instead of complaining, the engineers should use that as an opportunity.
For example, every time you run across an disruption of the warp core that causes an excess of chronotron particles, well, right there, exploit that disruption, make it happen again more reliably and you got yourself a time machine.
Basic physics
As an aside, I'm upset that 'chronotron' is flagged as 'not a word'.
Same engineering principle as once you figure out wheels and levers, extrapolate and voila... pyramids.
lays out plans for world domination based on winning one game of rock paper scissors
Dangit. Already been done.
 
3:23 PM
@Mitch I'm sure that's because it's spelt chronoton
 
@MattE.Эллен What time line are you from? The one where neutron is spelled neutron or where it is spelled neutron?
 
the latter
 
google seems to search over many time lines.
 
neutron, electron, proton, graviton, meson, boson. there are inconsistencies in my timeline that I can't explain
 
voltron, baryon, lepton
consistently inconsistent
 
3:31 PM
ενα λεπτο
 
bless you
 
if you insist
 
is that 'a minute' as in 60 seconds, or 'a minute...' as in something really small?
 
60 seconds
it must be related to lepton though
 
Then it's not as short as chronon.
there's a rhetorical device... prolepsis? which means ... something I'm sure.
 
3:35 PM
χρόνον is time
 
"the anticipation and answering of possible objections in rhetorical speech."
which doesn't ring a bell
turn on a light
puts a pig in a poke
 
λεπτο also means cent
 
pokes a pig in the ...
 
and thin
 
@MattE.Эллен probably means metaphorically 'a little bit'
 
3:37 PM
probably
 
cents tend to be thinnish
a thick one wouldn't be right
 
indeed. it's possible to (at the moment) fool vending machines by sticking pennies together to make it register a pound
soon the pound will have a new shape, so that won't work
 
life hacking
also ruins the vending machine
 
which is best for everyone
 
vending machines retaliate by being the 5th most frequent cause of trauma death
 
3:40 PM
no more snacks that are bad for your health and no more restocking the vending machine
@Mitch by falling on people?
 
#1 is hwy fatalities, #3 is iphone/bus trauma
@MattE.Эллен yes. the snack gets stuck and people try to rock the machine back and forth and they don't get out of the way in time.
but it gets worse.
they usually don't die immediately
VMs are usually in low traffic areas. the bodies are usually found Monday after expiring sometime between Friday evening and then.
Protip - ask someone else to get you your snack.
give them extra to buy themselves one.
 
oh, I thought that what happens is the machine window breaks, allowing all the snacks out and they die of diabetes some years later
 
they're insidious
 
@key_asdfg The reason is that you already have all and most.
 
diabetes insidious
 
3:45 PM
a well known Sith lord
 
You don't normally say most the things, and all things is mostly used instead of all the things.
 
[insert obligatory hyperbole and a half image]
 
So is 'Vader' really for 'father' or is it for '_in_vader'?
 
The Alþingi (anglicised as Althing or Althingi) is the national parliament of Iceland. It is one of the oldest extant parliamentary institutions in the world. The Althing was founded in 930 at Þingvellir, the "assembly fields" or "Parliament fields", situated approximately 45 kilometres (28 mi) east of what later became the country's capital, Reykjavík. This event marked the beginning of the Icelandic Commonwealth. Even after Iceland's union with Norway in 1262, the Althing still held its sessions at Þingvellir until 1799, when it was discontinued for 45 years. It was restored in 1844 and moved...
 
3:47 PM
lol
 
@key_asdfg The, most and all are determiners, and you normally only need to use one determiner (though not always).
@tchrist I know...
But that's a different thing.
 
Al
 
@Cerberus This is the most reasonable exception I can demonstrate. =P
Though in that case most is acting as an adverb rather than a quantifier.
 
Agreed.
Notice also that I said need only, not should only.
 
Darth Digenous
 
4:02 PM
@Cerberus Hmm, I suppose "should usually" would probably be the best way to put it. I can't think of too many cases where two words would be used as definitives consecutively...
 
normally ≈ usually
 
usually
 
@Tonepoet Most of the people. All the people. His two sons.
I think there are enough cases that I wouldn't tell people not to use it.
The last supper.
I could go on.
So I inverted the advice: you often don't need to use an article when you already have another determiner.
 
I thought in English you can have at most one determiner (certainly only one article, which is sort of a subset of determiners)
 
@Mitch Kind of. It's a bit more complicated than that, but mostly.
> Determiners may be subcategorized as predeterminers, central determiners and postdeterminers, based on the order in which they can occur. For example, "all my seventeen very young children" uses one of each. "My all seventeen very young children" is ungrammatical because a central determiner cannot precede a predeterminer.
 
4:32 PM
@Cerberus The first example is not really consecutive usage of determiners. The preposition "of" serves a very important semantic function of taking most away from the people. I would consider the second example to merely be an elliptical duplicate of the first. I'm not sure if his should qualify as a determiner or a pronoun.
 
@Tonepoet I would not call that an important semantic function!
Semantically, most determines people, and the does so, too.
@Tonepoet Many determiners are pronouns, just as many determiners are adjectives or articles.
And articles are often considered a type of pronoun, and a type of adjective.
 
@Cerberus That's what the always said.
 
@Cerberus Before you make that determination, I would suggest reading Noah Webster's definition of the word "of". It's written quite nicely compared to most other dictionary definitions, even compared to other words, almost as if it was an answer for this very website.
I fixed the link.
 
> John's accusation of sexual assault
Is the accusation made against John or by John?
 
4:45 PM
I think both can be, but does one of them come to mind more readily?
 
@MattE.Эллен Oh.
 
I see. Is there a reason? Or should I just memorize it?
 
I actually agree it could be interpreted as either, but it would usually be by.
 
4:46 PM
Hmm. I guess you're right.
 
@MattE.Эллен If it was "Mary's accusation of sexual assault" would you come to the same conclusion?
 
I don't think an accusation can be "owned" by the defendant (as it were)
@Tonepoet yes
someone is accused by Mary
Jim's accusation of theft
Caroline's accusation of fraud
 
I think in X's NOUN, X is more often the agent than the object.
 
Hmm, actually I misinterpreted this conversation entirely, so I choose to gracefully resign my position. XD
 
4:49 PM
I can't think of an example where X would more probably be the object.
 
@Tonepoet I am not familiar with Webster, but I know the semantic functions of of.
 
thinks
 
@Cerberus I'm assuming that means you hadn't looked at the fixed link.
 
@Færd When you use a verb of action with a possessive modifier, I believe the default reading is that of the possessive modifier as the primary complement of the verb, the subject.
 
Ah, the subject is the primary complement. Right.
 
4:51 PM
But, with other verbs, or other modifiers, the same construction could be read differently, as you suggest.
I accuse you. My accusation.
But: my accusation of you (though unusual).
 
Both your examples are the same in this regard?
 
Of x is also a possessive-like modifier.
 
I thought you meant to say my accusations by you.
 
But the presence of my forces one to read of x as the secondary complement of accuse.
@Færd Nope, I would say my is read as the primary complement there.
 
Would you say by is impossible there?
 
4:55 PM
In my accusation of you, yes, I would say my must be primary.
 
OK. Thanks.
 
In a contrived example, though, perhaps my could be read as secondary.
 
Care to contrive one?
 
When context forces that reading.
I'll try...
> ? The vice-consul accused us of various crimes. My accusation was much more serious than yours, though.
 
a: I've been accused of fraud!
b: you, too, eh? Well, my accusation of fraud came from Caroline
 
4:57 PM
Good! Good!
 
Jinx!
 
I agree with Matt that a passive preceding was accused makes a secondary reading of the subsequent my more believable.
 
Subtle point.
 
Because the primary complement of a passive verb has the same semantic role as the secondary complement of an active verb.
 
4:59 PM
And the noun is the same for both.
 
@Tonepoet Perhaps later. But honestly I think I understand the construction well enough...
@Færd Yes.
Nouns can't have subjects or objects, not even verbal nouns / nouns of action.
 
What do we call the words that are semantically their objects/subjects?
 
They use a preposition or possessive instead to mark the semantic roles normally represented by subject and object.
 
Agents? And ...
 
Modifiers?
They modify the noun.
 
5:01 PM
Unlike worth.
An idea worth consideration.
 
The subject of a verb is often an agent, but not at all exclusively so—and it works the same way with non-agent subjects.
 
In John's accusation John is not a modifier, is it?
 
> She appeared strong.
> Her appearance pleased the vice-consul.
@Færd The modifier is John's.
 
@tchrist Right, but worth is one of those prepositions.
 
The verb appear does not have an agent in this sense.
Its subject has a different semantic role.
And yet her still 'represents' the subject, the primary complement of the finite verb.
 
5:04 PM
Right.
 
@Færd 'worth' like that is a preposition?
 
@Mitch I'm not sure.
MAybe an adjective.
 
you can sub in other prepositions, but it's had to find an adjective that fits
 
An adjective conventionally.
Some people consider it a preposition.
 
maybe an adverb?
 
5:06 PM
@Færd No, it makes sense to call it a preposition in that context. But I've never seen it in lists of prepositions.
 
no, not an adverb
 
I think there are argument for adverb, yes.
 
MW has it as a preposition (for one entry)
 
But I think adjective is best.
 
ODO as an adjective.
 
5:07 PM
> He is worth twenty drachmas. The vice-consul will buy him.
 
that feels very prepositiony to me
 
yes
He is up twenty drachmas
 
*He is tall twenty feet
 
*he is happy twenty drachmas
 
@Cerberus There's something going on with you and vice-consuls today.
 
5:08 PM
woo hoo party! He's buying!
 
Either you analyse it as a preposition, because there are very few adjectives that can have simple nouns as objects/modifiers.
 
First they claim that a preposition doesn't have to go before another word, then they claim that a preposition doesn't have to be positional...
 
Or you analyse it as a postpositional adjective that has a simple noun as a modifier.
 
@Tonepoet that's a very modern 'redefining' of preposition. ignore it for now here in this conversation
 
@Mitch 20 drachma ~= 0.06 euro
 
5:10 PM
(I don't buy it at all, I think it confuses things rather than clearing them up))
 
@Tonepoet Hmm isn't that one and the same claim to those people?
 
@MattE.Эллен Oh. Don't spend it all in one place.
 
goes to dinner
 
@Mitch Not even for 40?
Historically, worth is an adjective.
Many adjectives can come after nouns.
 
@Cerberus ?? 40 drachmas?
 
5:11 PM
And worth was declined like other adjectives.
And it is clearly an adjective in other languages.
 
@Cerberus sure, but in 'X is worth 20 drachmas' it looks like it is acting like a preposition.
 
So the novel interpretation ignores both diachronicity and comparative linguistics.
@Mitch Only based on certain aspects of its word order.
 
@Cerberus "arguments" may be the word you're looking for there.
 
@Cerberus I think it is a modern change in definition of the word, similar to how astronomers changed the definition of planet. Pluto is still doing its thing, just ...
 
@tchrist Well, I'm not sure I would call modifiers arguments?
 
5:13 PM
@Cerberus Both of which would require actual work studying, which is why synchronic analysis is so voguish right now.
@Cerberus You indeed would not. But objects and subjects are arguments, as is the thing that worth takes.
Name a verb which, discounting the subject, takes three arguments.
 
@Færd you leave just as you stir the bees nest.
 
@Mitch It's not as if there is consensus. And in linguistics it's really counter-productive to change terminology locally. Especially when the same change isn't even possible in the linguistics of other languages, where e.g. waard is more clearly an adjective.
 
@tchrist riffles furiously through pile of documents
 
@Mitch That's nonary.
 
@tchrist You may be right...but sometimes it also seems like a kind of Anglicist supremacy, though probably unintendedly so.
 
5:16 PM
@tchrist I should get me to one.
 
@Cerberus By positional I mean there is a spatial relationship rendered between words.
 
@Cerberus You know I'm not that sort.
@Mitch Unary.
The English enjoy a spatial relationship with the Americans.
 
@tchrist I'm not sure why you would say that? I have to admit the definition of argument has always remained a bit vague to me—I think perhaps different definitions are used—, but I would usually use it when talking about verbs and when I want to include both complements and non-complements.
 
Englisch über alles
 
@Cerberus I'm not sure which direction you're going. I've never labeled 'worth' as a preposition (always wondered what it was without bothering to think about it)). But then MW labels one meaning of it as a preposition.
 
5:18 PM
@Cerberus I bet you five bucks trinary verbs exist. :)
 
@tchrist I exchanged two boys for sixty drachmas with the vice-consul?
 
@Cerberus I'd have to look it up. There's a quote about this funny case somewhere by a Real(tm) Linguist.
 
@Cerberus I was avoiding prepositions, using positioning alone. Although you are not without a point.
 
@Tonepoet Yes, so what example were you thinking of that those might might call a preposition even though it didn't come before the noun—but that did have a clear positional relation? A postposition, perhaps?
 
5:20 PM
@tchrist I was thinking more of functionally n-ary things one might find in a data base. As to existing English verbs I think more than 2 just doesn't exist, unless you stretch things considerably and say that multiple prepositional phrases are like objects.
 
@tchrist I was not thinking of you, but of certain linguistic schools.
 
@Cerberus Your vice-consul has a problem.
 
Why can’t we say that people with colds have catarrhine troubles? :)
 
because they sneeze before they get the message out
 
@Mitch I wasn't arguing with you, but rather with those pesky linguistics! Or, rather, I wanted to point out that it wasn't like "this is now modern and everybody has changed".
 
5:22 PM
@Cerberus Oh.
@MattE.Эллен sniffles
 
@Cerberus If such a thing isn't necessarily elliptical, then it might just be an adverb. Most of the examples of such words seem to come after verbs to modify their manner.
 
> Of course, the point of placing words in categories in the first place is to reduce the amount of descriptive work you have to do. Place words that work the same way in the same category, and you can describe most of those words the same way. When you come across a word like worth which doesn't fit neatly into any category, you can pick any category it's close to and describe its differences from that category. You could, for example, describe it as an exceptional preposition.

What's most important, then, is not which category you place it into, but rather that you know specifically how
It's that it should take an NP complement that so vexes labelling it.
 
One difficulty with 'worth' being a preposition is that it is not very ... spatiotemporal. So it's very much 'not like the others'
@tchrist nice
 
@Mitch prepositionality is a social construct
 
Oh found it.
 
5:24 PM
@tchrist Well, prepositional phrases can be arguments. Otherwise there are only four types of verbal arguments: subject, direct object, indirect object, object complement. And I don't think you can have the last three in one sentence, because it's too hard to determine which is which without prepositions. The witch made her the prince a frog?
 
5
A: What part of speech is “worth”?

John LawlerHere's a paper about the relative grammar and meaning of value, worth, cost, and price. What it says (on p.391) about the grammatical category of worth is: ".. the categorial status of worth is a matter of some dispute. It has variously been claimed to be a preposition and an adjective (cf ...

 
@MattE.Эллен and lamb vindaloo is a lunch construct. which I think I'm about to go deconstruct.
 
@Tonepoet You're saying worth could be an adverb? There are arguments for that.
 
@Mitch Vindaloo is a secret ploy invented by loo vendors to sell more loos.
 
it's true! vend a loo
 
5:27 PM
@tchrist True, of course. But that still doesn't mean choosing between labels is entirely useless, even with edge cases.
@Mitch Mm but I think prepositions are not so super closely linked to that semantic field. Cf. of.
 
they never give loos away with the meal.
 
@Cerberus I don't know quite enough about the worth example specifically to assign it a part of speech. I'm just speaking generally. Most of my knowledge regarding the manner of prepositions is from analyzing the arguments against the "no prepositions at the end of a sentence rule" like this one by Catherine Soanes, who wrote it for Oxford Blogs.
 
@Cerberus We certainly call things like near a preposition when used in phrases like a place near the fire. But then we find it not only accepts modifiers of degree as in a place rather near the fire, but that it even inflects regularly like a normal adverb or adjective in a place nearer the fire.
 
I am near. I am worthy. I am withy
 
winwin
 
5:30 PM
@Cerberus well, that seems to come under calling all prepositions adverbs of a sort.
 
@MattE.Эллен Do you read Charlie Stross?
 
I don't. Or, perhaps, I haven't
 
I keep thinking of you when I read his Laundry Files stuff.
 
:D
It's going on my list
 
English programmer hacker spy necromancer.
Though Charlie I think is a Scot.
 
5:33 PM
Matt, you're a necromancer?
 
Make that a Charles.
The Laundry Files is a series of novels by Charles Stross. They mix the genres of Lovecraftian horror, spy thriller, science fiction, and workplace humor. Their main character for the first five novels is "Bob Howard" (a pseudonym taken for security purposes), a one-time I.T. consultant turned field agent. Howard is recruited to work for the British government agency "the Laundry", which deals with occult threats. In this world, computers and mathematical equations are just as useful, and perhaps more potent, than classic spellbooks, pentagrams, and sigils for influencing unseen ancient powers...
 
not that there's anything wrong with that
 
He makes off-hand remarks about map–reduce to scare the plebes with.
If you're a programmer, you get more of his obscure references than non-programmers normally do.
He gave our keynote at YAPC::NA. One I didn't go to, alas.
 
@Mitch well, being a mod gives one certain... abilities
 
> Obviously I must have had some success with the experiment on applied algorithmic causality violation — that's time travel as applied to computing — that I was thinking about starting some time in the next twenty years, in my next career, as a card-carrying Mad Scientist.
His books sound like that, too.
> Back in the 1990s I used to argue with Perl for a living. These days I'm no longer a programmer by profession: instead, I tell lies for money.
 
5:37 PM
:D
 
Bleh, I wrote manner instead of matter.
 
I think we'd get along
 
Me, I never argue with Perl. What I argue with is massive Möbius frameworks for doing ORM w/ the db, frameworks for massively distributed web apps, and worst of all frameworks for that evil postmodern mindfuck called aspect-oriented metaprogramming. Makes me think about becoming a Walmart greeter so I can get back to the Simple Life.
Mind you, those a perl frameworks I'm arguing with, but it's not perl's fault that it allows such horrors to exist.
I hate every single framework ever written
by anyone else than me. :)
I prefer for my classes and their methods to be named things other than MD5 checksums, thank you very much.
And to be able to determine callable methods empirically.
 
determinism is important!
 
hallo
are both " during the past couple of months" and " during the past couple months" without of grammatical?
 
5:45 PM
@tchrist Yes, that is one reason to continue to call it an adjective. In addition to diachronicity and related languages.
 
I gave an answer here so I thought I'd check if I made any errors in grammar:
5
A: Is it OK for an openly Muslim person to travel to the United States right now?

NoahYes it is perfectly OK to travel to States during these times. I'm not a muslim but I have muslim friends who are devout and have traveled in the States from other countries during the past couple of months. I can just tell you that jerks will be jerks no matter where you go and you encounter suc...

 
@Noah "couple months" is not grammatical in British English.
 
@MattE.Эллен Ok thanks.
 
@Noah where would to fit?
oh :D
 
@MattE.Эллен Sorry, "of".
 
5:46 PM
@Mitch And why not! It is believed that all Indo-European prepositions were originally adverbs. And in many languages, the distinction is often murky. Cf. she came in and she is in the house.
 
Yep :D
 
@MattE.Эллен Cause you spell it coupla.
 
@tchrist egzactly
 
It's these little things that nobody much ever mentions which really stick out worst for one native listening to another's dialect.
 
The other day I was thinking how I say software and there really isn't a t.
@tchrist yes. I find it fascinating that people "write grandma"
 
5:49 PM
It requires too much mouth movement.
 
@Cerberus 'chez louis' from casa a noun
hunh. 'louis' is pronounced like 'lui'
 
"I've never tried, but I think I could do" isn't grammatical in American English. We're always waiting for you finish up your sentence ending in do with a so.
 
@tchrist don't mention it
 
"I called him Friday" tends to bother every Englishman but Defoe.
 
5:52 PM
"does he mind? what's his real name?" :D
 
We seem to get the most thrown off balance about the "little words" that one of us thinks mandatory and the other forbidden. And this is what noöne ever teaches thems who’s neither thee nor me.
 
although, to be fair, I think that one's creeping in
 
@tchrist Will do.
I believe many black people in South Africa have Februari as their surname.
 
Americans still freak out when they're told that the Legislature meant to give power to justices in certain cases to divert roads in future.
 
Because the Dutch met them in February, or such.
 
5:55 PM
*in future
 
Ugh,
That's ugly.
I should hope anyone would object.
 
Cispondian elocution mandates a determiner penultimately.
 
That is, it must be "in the future" rather than just "in future" here.
 
I was trying to figure out what you were saying!
 
5:57 PM
> Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of King's ..., Volume 8
By Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford, Sir Edward Hyde East
Yes, it's more than two centuries old, but I think native speakers throughout the Isle still speak like this — and that we do not. I could be wrong.
 
04:00 - 18:0018:00 - 21:00

« first day (2297 days earlier)      last day (2626 days later) »