« first day (1500 days earlier)      last day (3428 days later) » 

12:10 AM
Presumably, she never turned black but was so born.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:19 AM
@MattЭллен flagged for vulgarity
Even you!
 
1:52 AM
I want to change ELU’s bold so that it is small caps instead.
 
@tchrist We do not.
We have talked about this.
 
It is much more tasteful, traditional, and NON SCREAMY-SHOUTY!!!!!!
 
And hello.
 
Screw bold.
It distorts the color of the page.
Where by color, I mean the technical typesetting term.
 
Maybe if you hadn't used CAPITALS IT WOULD HAVE BEEN LESS SCREAMY-SHOUTY.
 
1:54 AM
No, it would have been.
Iᴛ ᴡɪʟʟ ᴀʟʟ ʙᴇ ʙᴇᴛᴛᴇʀ ɪꜰ ᴡᴇ ᴅᴏ ɪᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ I ᴀᴍ ʜᴇʀᴇ.
 
Ugh.
 
That is the traditional way of doing these things.
Maybe you like being bashed by type. I don’t.
 
@tchrist You sound like the computer in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
 
That looks disgusting.
One uses italic for titles.
 
Specially for you.
 
1:55 AM
One does not use bold.
You should not use bold.
Nobody should #$^@$%&@#$%^&$^@&@$%&$%&@$%^!#$%#$%&@$^&# use bold.
 
Only bold was appropriate under the given circumstances.
 
What are you wearing Tom?
 
I.e. teasing you.
 
A nice argyle sweater, jeans, trail-runners.
 
And is fuck broken?
 
1:57 AM
Bold is the last resort of the incompetent and unlettered and uncultured.
2
And using the font’s small capitals is just about infinitely nicer looking than the Unicode versions I just used.
That requires CSS magic.
 
You have attention to details.
I'm the only one with OCD in the project. The rest of the guys just type harder if there is a turd on the keyboard.
Cleaned up a copy-paste fest today. A method was copy pasted ten times.
And if that was not enough they had dumbed before copying the first time.
All broken.
 
@tchrist I use bold for the essence of my answer, usually one or two words, so that it may be immediately found at a glance.
 
So much for the nice policy.
 
@JohanLarsson That is a nice description.
 
2:21 AM
Nice description of something not so nice
 
2:56 AM
Hola
 
 
5 hours later…
7:52 AM
Matt have you ever seen anything this beautiful?
 
@Mitch I didn't realise vulgarity made you tired. I'll be more careful in the future
 
8:32 AM
Even you? :-/
 
8:44 AM
It appears that once semantic satiation sets in syntactic indigestion will soon follow.
 
 
6 hours later…
2:26 PM
Who is this 'Ving'? — Mitch 50 secs ago
@MattЭллен It's where the rubber meets the road.
 
the tread?
 
2:42 PM
:D
 
3:01 PM
Your slip is showing.
 
It's better when they show you their slip than when they give you lip.
 
:0
 
what does this say about science?
 
3:15 PM
Science needs to adapt to zero more than zero needs to adapt to science.
 
But its notation explicitly refuses to adapt
btw this also applies to negative numbers
 
"The special case of 0 does not have a unique representation in scientific notation" does not mean that it cannot be written in scientific notation.
As that page shows.
 
there is a mistake there
1<= |a| < 10
a =/= 0
 
0 x 10¹ satisfies that condition.
 
0 x 10 to the anything satisfies the condition
 
3:25 PM
So it's a special case, having both valid and invalid representations. Does that make all representations invalid?
 
a X 10^p
 
Oh. Right. I may have misread something.
Crawls back under stone
 
np pal
:D
 
 
1 hour later…
4:43 PM
@skullpatrol bridges start falling
Thanks. That's what you get when you say stuff like that out loud.
 
@Mitch I just find it amazing that I have never thought of this question :-/
 
Wouldn't convention say "just use 0"?
 
I don't understand what you mean pal.
The convention says "you cannot write zero in this notation" @Mitch
Or any negative numbers.
Scientific notation, by definition, is only for positive numbers.
Zero is neither positive nor negative.
 
a can be negative: "...is a real number satisfying 1<=|a|<10."
actually it seems it means that 0 cannot be written in that definition (therefore my suggestion that should be written as '0')
@skullpatrol For the French, 0 is both positive and negative.
 
But he uses 0 in his example at the end @Mitch
 
4:58 PM
0 is in [1,10) so he is breaking his own rules.
 
This definition has been taken from his encyclopedia of math
When he talks about "not unique"
 
so are you suggesting it should be "a in [0,10)"? that would give nonunique reps for n with a in [0,1)
 
I am not suggesting anything @Mitch I just want to know if zero can be represented in scientific notation by that definition.
 
5:15 PM
$ printf "%e\n" 0
0.000000e+00
 
5:26 PM
Does the program @tchrist use the definition we are talking about here?
 
It is simply a way of specifying floating point numbers in a uniform manner.
$ printf "%+e\n" 5 50 50000 500000000000 -5 -500 -0.5 -0.00000000005
+5.000000e+00
+5.000000e+01
+5.000000e+04
+5.000000e+11
-5.000000e+00
-5.000000e+02
-5.000000e-01
-5.000000e-11
 
icic
Having no "formal" representation of zero in scientific notation is no big deal :-)
nbd
 
5:42 PM
@skullpatrol but you should complain to mathworld about the problems with their entry.
 
From a learning point of view it is good to have a notation that can get arbitrarily close to zero and leave zero itself as a "special case". If you know what I mean @Mitch
 
@skullpatrol what are the alternatives?
 
Complain to them as you said. But this is a matter of definition.
I don't think they are going to change their definition.
 
6:02 PM
If anyone has some ideas about what to do with this question, I’m all ears:
-1
Q: Is there any institute that can create a word which it would mean he or she, or creation of any other word?

SaeidWe continuously experience creation of new words in science and technology and after a while people start using it ; it would be much less hustle to use the created word,instead of using he or she or he/she.if we use "they" it would be in plural form. meanwhile my question is about the institute...

The OP has changed it since I closed it, and now I am at a loss to figure out how to edit it so that it can be understood, let alone answered.
 
@tchrist It's closed as it should be (it's a dupe, the answer is 'no', etc) The edits don't realy change anything.
 
I think perhaps now that it is a duplicate of this question:
2
Q: Does the English language have an official Academy?

AnonymousFor some languages, there are academies that decide topics such as grammar and spelling of things, for example, for the Spanish language, there are 22 academies in 22 different countries, all making decisions on spanish grammar in their country. I would like to know if there is something that ser...

I’ve added a comment that it is also a duplicate of that other one.
 
I think, in order to answer that question properly, we should form an official academy. Supported by the American government. And the UK and everyone else will have to follow it. What we says goes. 'gifting' is not a word.
 
Lawler did this already.
 
The Lawler academy?
 
6:08 PM
:D
The long arm of the Lawler.
 
That academy has no standing with people that matter. The British Monarchy is moribund to the point that 'monarchy' is not a word in the officially sanctioned English. What is the government of the UK? There's no word for it.
 
I’ll be sure to let them know you said that.
 
Anthenum?
 
Can someone give this question a better title? english.stackexchange.com/questions/216046/…
 
6:19 PM
I wish such titles were banned.
 
@tchrist Yeah, my bot picked it up because it's so bad. :P
 
@hichris123 Done.
 
@JasperLoy Thanks!
 
Well done.
 
Hi @simchona hope you are well.
@skullpatrol That would be one million dollars.
 
6:38 PM
posted on December 20, 2014 by sgdi

This whisky is rather nice Once it’s been diluted by ice The burning sensation From this libation Has turned into something with spice

 
@JasperLoy pricey!
 
7:03 PM
@Mitch I see you often come here on Sat as well. Is your life that boring?
 
This is a wonderful distraction.
 
OK, I did not think you needed a distraction. I thought I was the only one who needed it.
 
All work no play makes Johnny a dull boy.
 
@skullpatrol Oh, Ted called me obnoxious in the math room, I was a bit upset.
 
7:24 PM
I saw pal @JasperLoy
 
@skullpatrol Anyway I am alright now, I should not overreact, lol.
 
@JasperLoy have you ever seen the water roll off a duck's back?
 
@skullpatrol No, what about it?
 
@JasperLoy name calling is like the water. Never let it get inside.
 
@skullpatrol Oh well, I guess it was just a little misunderstanding.
 
7:32 PM
There was nothing to understand @JasperLoy you were giving your opinion and he did not like it. What is there to misunderstand?
 
7:46 PM
You see jasper people who come into that room and try to dominate it so completely are just another form of a cyber bully.
Here^ is a humorous way to look at it. Don't let it upset you, just leave the keyboard (afk).
@JasperLoy
 
@skullpatrol Will you be spending Christmas alone?
 
Yes.
 
Is there anything at all you need in your life right now?
 
Inner peace is all I want.
 
OK, I pray that you get inner peace.
 
7:57 PM
Why do you capitalize both the O and the K?
 
Because that is the way it is supposed to be written!
 
It reads like Oooh Kaay!!!
 
I prefer writing OK to ok or okay.
 
I think you can check a dictionary and get all the possible forms.
 
8:00 PM
Yes.
 
I also prefer DJ to deejay.
And MC to emcee.
 
Consistent right down to the case of your letters :-)
 
Yes. A clear case of mental illness, lol.
 
Not just consistent to the letter.
It helps in math. @JasperLoy
Consistency is crucial
 
@JasperLoy No. I prefer OK, DJ, MC and PC too.
 
8:06 PM
ic
 
@AndrewLeach Well, you are also mentally ill, in a way, lol.
 
Thanks. Aspergers is not a mental illness. It's a condition.
 
Well, I am just kidding. Don't be too serious.
Anyway, illness or condition, they are all words.
 
Raw nerve. Although it does mean that I like things right and don't like people cutting corners.
Like newspaper editors saving space with Pc instead of PC.
 
I have not seen Pc before.
 
8:08 PM
lol should be LOL
 
PC also means platoon commander to me.
 
Old, but the first example I came across.
 
8:25 PM
@AndrewLeach tragic story
The Taliban story in Pakistan is horrid.
 
Life is full of tragedies.
 
These kinds of deaths are tragic .
 
Jez
9:07 PM
hi all
 
hi pal
 
Jez
sup? im bored
 
9:22 PM
this will wake you up
 
Jez
wtf is that?
 
Old school gangsta
 
9:48 PM
I decided to be blue again.
 
If you have spare upvotes that will expire just two hours from now, you might pitch at some of these:
0
A: Use of "has been"

tchristCorrectness is one things; appropriateness another. It is certainly possible to use the construction: SINGULAR SUBJECT has been PAST PARTICIPLE. However, this works best when the actual agent is named, because otherwise it is an unidentifiable anonymous agent that can sound like pretentious...

0
A: What is the noun in the second sentence?

tchristYou should not analyse things like “a number of” as prepositional phrases, but rather as premodifiers occupying the determiner slot in a noun phrase. Some purchases were detected. Several purchases were detected. Many purchases were detected. Few purchases were detected. No purchases were detec...

0
A: comma with phrases that use "yet"

tchristLike the coordinating conjunction but, the coordinating conjunction yet can coordinate various sorts of things. The difference between them is that yet is even more emphatic when used this way than is but. In short sentences like yours, where the items coordinated are themselves short, a comma ...

0
A: Is "scathingly small" used correctly?

tchristNo, this is an mistake of one or another sort. The adjective scathing per the OED means: Of invective, etc.: Very sharp and damaging; searing, ‘withering’, cutting. And for the derived adverb scathingly, it provides such citations as: 1847 Tait’s Mag. XIV. 238 ― A feeling of his insi...

0
A: Can one ever say for certain a word does not exist?

tchristWords are things people say or write As Lewis Caroll so famously wrote: ’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves             Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy were the borogoves,             And the mome raths outgrabe. Or as another English don would later pen with at least eq...

In one of them, I have realized small capitals by trickery-pickery.
0
A: When did content become a noun?

tchristThe OED has content as a noun as early as the 1500s: 1526 Pilgr. Perf. (W. de W. 1531) 6 b, ― All this worlde with the contentes in the same. 1547 Boorde Brev. Health lxxiii. 23 ― Yf in an urine doo appere a content lyke as heares were chopped in it. However, your particular sense ...

 
10:16 PM
+6
 
thanks
 
np pal
 
11:05 PM
any chance of a single vote?
0
A: What is the expression or saying "I've got butterflies" used for?

Hugo"To have butterflies" sounds like an abbreviated form of "to have butterflies in my stomach", which can mean to be nervous or anxious. See also Wiktionary on that phrase.

 
Done
 
thanks!
 
11:24 PM
Hi @Caleb, how are you?
 
11:51 PM
OK, I think I have tried enough times to talk to him, so I shan't talk to him anymore, lol.
 

« first day (1500 days earlier)      last day (3428 days later) »