« first day (1368 days earlier)      last day (2035 days later) » 

1:02 AM
Wow... didn't realize that the \infty-operadic Grothendieck construction wasn't really written down anywhere except for Gijs's work using dendroidal sets...
 
1:27 AM
@TylerLawson regarding your answer to my question, I suspect the functor Ass^⊗-->Cat_Δ should only be lax monoidal? Does that seem right?
 
2:25 AM
I was thinking of the functor that quite literally sends <n> to M^n (plus-or-minus taking cofibrant-fibrant objects inside M)
I think that's at least strong monoidal
 
2:56 AM
Oh, maybe I misinterpreted, it's probably a lax functor / pseudofunctor (there's a natural iso from F(g) . F(f) to F(gf))
 
 
13 hours later…
4:10 PM
Let a commutative group G act on a scheme X. We can then form the quotient stack [X/G] and there is a very nice description of the inertia stack in this situation. Is there a similar nice description of the inertia group of [X/G] when G is a commutative group scheme? That is, when G is not necessarily the associated sheaf of a constant group functor?
 
 
6 hours later…
9:59 PM
A sanity check : G is a finite group, and assume M is a module over the constant Mackey functor of integers, or equivalently M is a cohomological Mackey functor in the sense of Thevenaz-Webb, could we build a Moore spectrum of M in the sense that the integer-graded homology is concentrated in degree 0 and is M?
The homology has coefficient the constant Mackey functor Z
 
10:22 PM
no - for most groups, there's no Moore spectrum for the constant Mackey functor
in fact, for any nontrivial group
this was shown to me by @Tyler
oh, I think I might have misinterpreted the question - you're talking about homology with coefficients in the constant Mackey functor, so the sphere is a Moore spectrum from the constant Mackey functor in this sense
I strongly suspect the answer is still no
I don't think the constant Mackey functor has well-enough behaved homological algebra for this kind of thing to hold
 
10:46 PM
@SaulGlasman Yeah, after thinking for a while I believe the answer shall be negative
I need a resolution of length 3 or more in general to resolve a Z module, and it seems that there are a lot of obstructions of recovering a G-CW-complex out of it
 

« first day (1368 days earlier)      last day (2035 days later) »