I'm pursuing an idea for a web app I had and I've hit a road block. I've worked with many other JSON APIs using php but I've never been introduced to this RPC side of things. I've done reading but still stuck.
I've set up a local bitcoin server using the bitcoin-qt.exe -server command in windows...
@DavidPerry I am in the process of burninating software as agreed in meta with TimPost, when I just stumbled upon this extensive answer bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/13152/5406. It looks like a valid answer to me, how come it was deleted?
During the process of burninating [tag:software], I stumbled upon a few other ill-defined tags. I would like to start collecting tags that we can tackle together:
Tuesday 8pm UTC
I have scheduled an event for the Bitcoin Lounge: Fixing tags meeting – Focus: Burninating [tag:software] and frien...
Just went through newly created tags and first few pages alphabetical tags and wrote down all tags that don't immediately seem obvious or could refer to many different things: Wrote down 25 tags that either need a definition or should be removed. ;) That was just up to C. ;)
@JacobTorba From reading some of your answers I got the impression you know a bit more about mining. Do you think you could help with this question? bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/21889/…
@DavidPerry One question on best practices here: I have been looking a bit at tags today. I have uncovered quite a few that are in need of having a look taken at them. What do you think: Is it possible to discuss several of them in one Question (e.g. posting each as an answer to the same question) or should I rather create a new post for each?
@Murch depends on the number of them, if it's just 2 or 3 I'd do a Q for each, if it's several/dozens then one question could adequately cover it since the topic is no longer "x y z tags need help" but "holy crap all these tags guys"
@JacobTorba Try to click the downvote again, sometimes you can retract it, I think it is time limited. Otherwise you can probably only change it after the post has been edited, but to be honest, there are few posts that couldn't be improved... ;)
It will eventually disappear from the network. Most clients will remove it from their pool of unconfirmed transactions. When most clients remove it, you can go ahead and send the transaction again, this time with a higher fee. There's not a precise time when the transaction will disappear from th...
I helped a friend of mine putting all his grandma's plants in the house for the winter. She semi-professionally produces jelly. She gave me something like 10 jars. It is sooo good.
I spent a little over a year in culinary school before I realized I was training to spend the next 2 years chopping parsley until someone actually let me cook
To sum, its basically presentation of already fixed bug for verification of registered SSL certificates, which enabled attackers to register domain e.g. thisishackersite.stackexchange.com as stackexchange.com
so he received SSL potentionally https for his malicious website
I also used to kick bandwidth-hogging roommates off the network via arp poisoning
just tell them the gateway IP corresponds to their own MAC address
mean, sure, but it was my equipment and I was paying the bill. plus they sucked at covering their tracks when they pirated movies and I was tired of getting letters from the cable company
@Murch at DC21 they were showcasing a 15-year-old DNS bug that allowed massive DDoS via traffic amplification that was still unpatched, still usable and if it was used on a large enough scale could generate enough traffic to cripple the backbone on a budget even I could afford