« first day (646 days earlier)      last day (253 days later) » 

6:24 AM
Trick or treat :D
 
No candy for you.
 
[candies] [candies] [candies]
 
7:12 AM
I'm uncertain of my answer regarding a/the majority: Google returns meagre results for phrases of the kind "the\a majority of the voters" (with both "a" and "the")
http://ell.stackexchange.com/questions/38244/what-is-the-difference-in-meaning-between-a-majority-of-and-the-majority-of
 
FWIW, I think you got it right in your answer.
I think its definiteness works exactly the way a typical a or the works. But it would need a plural verb the way a lot or a number of needs.
 
Thanks, Damkerng! So "A majority of the students is expected to vote" would look unnatural?
 
7:33 AM
Yes.
Students are
 
very strange
I've found mentions of it. A quote: "Here’s a trick from my grammar book Woe Is I: The word “the” before a collective noun (“the majority”) is usually a tip-off that it’s singular, while “a” before the noun (“a majority”), especially when “of” comes next, usually indicates a plural."
So in partitive of-structures the collective noun "majority" flips to its plural sense, it seems
Would this sentence look unnatural: "She has already bought the majority of the Russian history books she needs. "
 
7:56 AM
I think I tend to think of "majority of X" as plural. But I think it's not wrong to use a singular verb when we think of the phrase as a collective noun.
> Majority” is one of those words that can be either singular or plural. Common sense works pretty well in deciding which. If you mean the word to describe a collection of individuals, then the word should be treated as plural: “The majority of e-mail users are upset about the increase in spam.” If the word is used to describe a collective group, then consider it singular: “A 90% majority is opposed to scheduling the next meeting at 6:00 A.M.” If you are uncertain which you mean, then choose whatever form sounds best to you; it's not likely to bother many people.
This Google Ngram chart might also be useful: goo.gl/Y8F50i. Also a similar chart (but this one is the majority of): goo.gl/vtgOyH.
 
I'm wondering why "The majority of the voters" only garners some 370 hits at Google.
 
@CopperKettle I got about 660 hits, only from Google Books.
Weird.
 
Strange, I've got 118 from Google Books. But still, the use of the phrase in books means its a normal phrase, I presume. So we can use THE as well as A there.
 
@CopperKettle I got only one or two pages first, then I got a lot of pages after a refresh. That's even weirder, I guess.
nods -- I think it depends on context.
> Page 64 of about 288,000 results (0.50 seconds)
But I couldn't go beyond page 65 this time.
 
In Google, the first page says boldly of 1 000 000 + results for "The majority of the voters", but then it stops dead at page 5 with 372 results. (-:
Well, I'll probably put a bounty on the question in a couple of days and scrap my answer if it turns out to be wrong. (0:
 
8:18 AM
Damkerng T.
 
 
3 hours later…
11:13 AM
morning
 
11:28 AM
@fahdijbeli Oh, hi!
 
11:41 AM
@fahdijbeli good evening
 
thank you :)
 
 
2 hours later…
Anonymous
1:24 PM
@CopperKettle Generally speaking, you have no way to tell how many Google results a query returns
 
Anonymous
Google doesn't tell you
 
Anonymous
It provides results estimates only, and these estimates may be wildly off the mark
 
Anonymous
What they do allow you access to is a set of 0-1000 results
 
Anonymous
The most you can possibly get is 1000. However, after they've grabbed 1000 results, they do culling
 
Anonymous
So even for a very common query it's very likely you'll see less than 1000 total results if you go to the final page.
 
Anonymous
1:26 PM
You can't use Google searches as a corpus for testing frequency because they simply don't allow you access to frequency information
 
Anonymous
That's one reason balanced corpora with directly accessible results and exact result counts are useful
 
Anonymous
Although Google's basic web corpus is much, much larger than COCA, it's much less useful for frequency analysis
 
Anonymous
The Google Books corpus is more useful than their basic web search, but it still has certain unfortunate limitations
 
Anonymous
(Of course, no large corpus is perfect.)
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. That seems exactly right to me
 
Anonymous
1:32 PM
@CopperKettle I've never heard of "Woe is I", but with a title like that, you have to assume the book isn't going to be particularly accurate
 
Anonymous
When you choose a hypercorrection for the title of your book, you're signaling that most likely the book contains one of two possible sets of contents, either advocating or criticizing that sort of error
 
Anonymous
And it seems that in this case the author is advocating―am I mistaken?
 
@snailboat Yay!
How was the Halloween night?!
 
Anonymous
It rained!
 
Oh! That's a little disappointing!
 
Anonymous
1:34 PM
Not very many trick-or-treaters came by.
 
Is raining common during this time of year?
 
Anonymous
> This is an essential handbook for any grammar Nazi. Prepare to have many persistent doubts dispelled and nagging questions settled - not only about grammar and spelling, but also pronunciation (including that of the word "pronunciation"). This book will help you feel even more annoyingly superior to the uneducated unfortunates around you.
 
Wow!
 
Anonymous
I wonder what it says specifically about woe is me
 
1:38 PM
Oh, this is her website: grammarphobia.com. I remember I landed on her site sometimes. It's quite good.
 
Anonymous
Is it better than the review makes it sound, then?
 
Anonymous
This page seems good: grammarphobia.com/grammar-html
 
Perhaps. From a few pages I have read there, I think she is quite a sincere person.
Rather down to earth, if you ask me.
 
Anonymous
This page seems good too: grammarphobia.com/qa#a1
 
> Why do people pronounce “ask” like “axe”?
I heard that sometimes!
 
Anonymous
1:44 PM
It's not known for certain which was the original pronunciation
 
Anonymous
That's an example of metathesis
 
Anonymous
I don't agree with everything in this page in the details, but overall it seems pretty decent
 
nods
 
Anonymous
> But despite the language mavens, the use of “fun” as an adjective is so common nowadays that someday it will undoubtedly become accepted.
 
Anonymous
It's not accepted yet?? :-)
 
Anonymous
1:47 PM
In my natively acquired English fun is a completely regular adjective
 
Anonymous
I think for some older speakers it isn't, though
 
I agree. It's a little risky in writing, perhaps.
 
Anonymous
Well, maybe in very formal writing.
 
Anonymous
Fun is a bit of an informal word.
 
nods
 
Anonymous
1:49 PM
But I think that's true whether you're using it as an adjective or not
 
I can't think of the word fun in an academic paper!
 
Anonymous
Yeah, that's what I was thinking. No matter how you use it, fun doesn't seem particularly formal
 
Anonymous
I guess I can see why people would find funner and funnest to be more markedly informal
 
Anonymous
That is, fun may be informal, but funner is informal-er :-)
 
And funnest is informal-est? :-)
 
Anonymous
1:52 PM
Does that seem like a reasonable description?
 
Anonymous
Ha
 
I think it does.
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
This is a cute snail :-)
 
That's quite a big one!
 
Anonymous
1:56 PM
Uh-huh! We can't have big snails like that in the US
 
Anonymous
It's from the pet snails forum
 
Ahh
 
Anonymous
It's an Achatina reticulata
 
Eh? I think I can see four eyes in that photo.
 
Anonymous
Snails have two pairs of feelers (tentacles). The upper feelers have eyes at the tips in most species, so they're called eyestalks
 
Anonymous
1:58 PM
The lower feelers are shorter and don't have eyes
 
Anonymous
 
I don't know if they have a nose.
 
Anonymous
Can you see the lower feelers?
 
Anonymous
Snails do not have noses.
 
@snailboat Yes, I can!
 
Anonymous
2:00 PM
Land snails have only undergone partial cephalization
 
The lower feelers look really like eyes.
 
Anonymous
Cephalization (from cephalo- 'head') is the evolutionary trend of concentrating nervous system cells (including sensory cells) at one end of the body, forming a 'head'
 
Online dictionaries are very handy!
 
Anonymous
Humans of course are completely cephalized, having complete brains and sensory organs mostly concentrated in the head region
 
Anonymous
Snails, on the other hand, only sort of have what you could call a 'head' or a 'brain'
 
Anonymous
2:01 PM
Technically, they have a pair of cerebral ganglia, which you wouldn't call a brain
 
Anonymous
They have other ganglia (such as the pedal ganglia (pedal = of feet)) as well in other parts of the body
 
Anonymous
And most of their sensory cells are spread out
 
Anonymous
They can taste or smell using cells all across the surface of their body
 
Oh, it's kinda like they have a distributed brain!
 
Anonymous
But they have a concentration of cells around the mouth and they have primitive eyes
 
Anonymous
2:03 PM
Yes, parts that sort of think separately
 
Anonymous
The cerebral ganglia may be the core of what may one day involve into a brain, mainly having to do with processing sensory input right now
 
Anonymous
They have four other pair of ganglia and one unpaired ganglion
 
have a question! Should my English be uniform (the point in question is BE, AE)?
 
It should be. :-)
 
Anonymous
It's less distracting that way.
 
Anonymous
2:05 PM
If your goal is not to distract the reader, then yes
 
@snailboat who would want that seriously! :)
I'm using the word levelers and am confused whether to use double l or single one
 
I think one easy way to solve your problem is to pick one dictionary as your favorite and stick to it.
 
@snailboat er, I meant who would want to distract the readers
 
Anonymous
I understood!
 
2:10 PM
Which column is South Africa?
 
@snailboat that link, what does it say, apart from what I could guess is Leveller is more common
 
ZA?
Ah, yes. I think it's ZA.
 
Anonymous
It says that in American English, we typically write leveler, while in British English, they typically write leveller
 
Anonymous
However, it's not an especially common word, and particularly in the US people might be less certain how to spell it
 
Oh, of the big 5, American English is the only one that prefers leveler.
 
2:13 PM
@DamkerngT. don't know but they use what others don't, for example, they doen't use SI units, don't know why, though
 
Anonymous
That's because we had our very own Noah Webster
 
Hehe!
 
Anonymous
Noah Webster pushed a lot of spelling reforms, a few of which caught on in the US, but most of which didn't catch on elsewhere
 
Anonymous
One of those was to not double the L when adding -er or -ing, so he wrote traveler rather than traveller
 
@snailboat ah great!
 
2:15 PM
That makes sense.
 
Anonymous
He wanted to make things simpler.
 
Anonymous
Even in the US, though, most of his reforms didn't catch on.
 
Anonymous
He wanted to get rid of every silent letter and come up with a uniform spelling for each sound.
 
And we could have less headaches!
 
then, in his mind, Sunami was more appropriate, I guess
 
Anonymous
2:17 PM
He thought that if our pronunciation was completely predictable from spelling, that English would be easier for second language learners, and that it would somehow prevent the language from changing and unify pronunciation across the country
 
Anonymous
No, tsunami had not yet been borrowed into English
 
Anonymous
That happened fifty years after he passed away
 
Anonymous
But he certainly would have been against the 't' :-)
 
borrowed?I knew it would be that, for it sounded odd. BTW from where did that word come from? Japan is my guess
 
Anonymous
Some English speakers do pronounce the 't', by the way, but most don't
 
Anonymous
2:19 PM
Yes, Japanese
 
Anonymous
English phonotactics (the rules for how sounds fit together) don't allow /ts/ at the beginning of a syllable
 
I have a hunch that he would have suggested respelling my country name, too. :-)
 
Anonymous
So we naturally simplify it to /s/
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. You know, even though we know Thailand isn't pronounced with an English th sound
 
Anonymous
I don't think most people understand that the h indicates aspiration
 
Anonymous
2:20 PM
That is, most people in the US
 
nods
 
Anonymous
So when we're confronted with place names in writing we don't know the pronunciation of, such as Phuket
 
Anonymous
I think we tend to misinterpret them
 
Anonymous
That is, we think "Oh, ph, I know how to pronounce that, it's like f!" :-)
 
I don't know if it's fortunate or unfortunate!
 
Anonymous
2:21 PM
It's certainly not phortunate
 
But I know that it's become a well-known place for tourists.
 
Anonymous
Phuket is well known to tourists from other countries too, isn't it?
 
Anonymous
I don't know what the demographics of Thai tourism are like
 
Well, I know some things about Thai
 
@AmitJoki Yay!
@snailboat I'm not sure about that either.
 
2:24 PM
that its Elephants are white in contrast to grey everywhere, and its first women president was Yingluck Shinawatra!
 
@AmitJoki nods -- True!
Though not all elephants here are white.
 
Anonymous
@AmitJoki I did not know about white elephants!
 
Anonymous
A white elephant is a possession which its owner cannot dispose of and whose cost, particularly that of maintenance, is out of proportion to its usefulness. The term derives from the story that the kings of Siam, now Thailand, were accustomed to make a present of one of these animals to courtiers who had rendered themselves obnoxious in order to ruin the recipient by the cost of its maintenance. In modern usage, it is an object, scheme, business venture, facility, etc., considered without use or value. == Background == The term derives from the sacred white elephants kept by Southeast As...
 
@snailboat man you've got to be kidding!
 
Anonymous
I didn't know about this, either!
 
Anonymous
2:25 PM
@AmitJoki Nope.
 
Anonymous
You'd be surprised how much stuff I don't know. :-)
 
In the old days, nobody but the King could own white elephants.
 
Anonymous
Ah, they're albinos!
 
Yes!
In Thai, the phrase white elephant could also mean English's diamond in the rough or one in a million.
 
so, is it really that melanin pigment is absent in them?
 
2:28 PM
nods -- I think so.
 
Anyways, Pandas and Elephants are both adorable and cute!!!
 
LOL
 
Anonymous
I love pandas! :-)
 
Believe it or not, my cable TV had a channel dedicated to a panda!
 
Anonymous
Misuse of the English language: techtimes.com/articles/19175/20141101/…
 
2:30 PM
god must be a great photoshopper for having created them @snailboat
 
Anonymous
Wow!
 
24x7, one panda!
 
@DamkerngT. I'm jealous!!!
 
Kinda like Big Brother the reality show, but we have just one panda!
 
do they have any ideas of broadcasting it in India?
 
Anonymous
2:32 PM
When was this?
 
About a few years back.
Lin Bing, (Thai: หลินปิง, Chinese: 林冰) (also called Lin Ping) is a female giant panda in Thailand. Born on 27 May 2009 at Chiang Mai Zoo in Chiang Mai, Thailand by Gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) to Lin Hui and Chuang Chuang, it is the first giant panda born in Thailand. Its name, meaning the "Forest of Ice," was chosen after a nationwide name selection contest that attracted 22 million votes. "Bing" also sounds similar to the name of the Ping River, which flows through Northern Thailand, where the zoo is located. Like her parents, Lin Bing is considered the property of China. Therefore,...
That's the panda.
 
Anonymous
Has that Wikipedia page not been updated since 2011?
 
Oh, only the English one, perhaps.
Hmm... She should've been back to Thailand now.
They sent her to China last year to pair her with a male.
 
@DamkerngT. are they yet to become 3? Their population is countable! :(
 
The plan was she would stay in China one year, hopefully picked a male she would like, and then come back to Thailand and stay with us for 15 years.
 
2:38 PM
aww!
 
Before she went to China, we broadcasted her 24x7 on our cable TV! :-)
Ah, she's still in China!
@snailboat Do they misuse the language?
> The U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has revealed that its latest Orion spacecraft is complete. Orion is expected to assist human travel into deep space such as Mars.
 
Anonymous
3:07 PM
Hehehe
 
Anonymous
Yes, Mars is in another star system, across deep space! ;-)
 
Anonymous
I don't think they know what interstellar means
 
Anonymous
A friend sent me the link and grumbled about it :-)
 
Anonymous
And I figured since grumbling about language is a fun group activity, I'd link it here!
 
Perhaps anything beyond our Moon is deep for them. :-)
 
Anonymous
3:11 PM
Though it could just be a factual error rather than a language error if they actually think Mars is in another star system. But, y'know, I'm assuming not. :-)
 
:-)
 
Anonymous
It seems mean to assume someone thinks Mars is in another system.
 
Anonymous
But assuming someone misused the word interstellar? Much more believable
 
Anonymous
People misuse words all the time. I do, too!
 
nods
 
Anonymous
3:13 PM
Though I try not to.
 
At least they didn't say intergalactic.
 
Anonymous
Hee
 
Anonymous
> The Dec. 4 test flight of the Orion will send the spacecraft 3,600 miles away from the Earth. The test flight will last for about 4.5 hours and will be called Exploration Flight Test-1. The spacecraft will travel in the space beyond any manned spacecraft has ever gone. Orion will return to the Earth at an immense speed of about 20,000 miles per hour and it will generate temperatures of up to 2204 degrees Celsius, or 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
 
I didn't read the details, but I presume that it's an unmanned spacecraft.
 
Anonymous
According to this, 3600 miles away from the earth is apparently "in the space beyond any manned spacecraft has ever gone"
 
Anonymous
3:17 PM
But the moon is two orders of magnitude further away from the earth than that
 
Anonymous
Maybe they've mixed up their numbers here a bit
 
Anonymous
Let's see what NASA says
 
Oh, 3,600 miles away from our Earth is probably the starting point!
 
Anonymous
NASA says:
 
Anonymous
3:19 PM
> During the 4.5-hour flight, called Exploration Flight Test-1, Orion will travel farther than any crewed spacecraft has gone in more than 40 years
 
Hmm... It seems like they mixed up a few facts together. -- nods
Looks like it's another Ctrl-C Ctrl-V article!
 
Anonymous
So it looks like the Orion will go into orbit around the earth for its test flights
 
nods
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. The weird thing is, if they just copied and pasted NASA's blog, the article would have been better :-)
 
Anonymous
Adding their own touches didn't really improve it
 
3:21 PM
Exactly! I think they Ctrl-C Ctrl-V several times. :-)
 
Anonymous
Hehe!
 
And the news mutated a bit in the process!
 
Anonymous
It's like playing telephone!
 
Ah, yes!
I haven't had a chance to play it, though I've seen others demonstrate it.
Oh, actually, I had conducted such a play once! When I was teaching kids up on the hills.
(I mean the hills up north in Thailand.)
 
4:11 PM
Hello!!
 
Is site on "read only" mode?
@JersonZuleta Hi
 
Well, looks like not so many people are on here today.
 
Yes
due to weekend
 
Oh yeah. Haven't had a complete one in a few months.
 
@JersonZuleta Hello!
 
4:22 PM
@DamkerngT. Hey!!
Happy belated Halloween.
 
LOL
I guess Halloween is the reason why we don't see a lot of people in chat rooms today.
 
I'd argue that by asking what kind of candy are they all getting.
It'd better be great candy.
 
:-)
 
I remember once when I was younger and went out to ask for candy & somebody gave me one of those rum-flavoured sweets.
I didn't want to keep eating the rest of my candy.
 
Because of the flavor of the rum?
 
4:28 PM
Yeah.
I've never been a big fan of alcohol.
 
nods -- I don't think that they really have alcohol, though.
 
They taste like it, though. Enough for me to say no to them.
 
Which flavor do you like most?
 
Passion fruit.
 
Oh, that a little unexpected!
(I expected it would be chocolate or strawberry.)
 
4:31 PM
Chocolate is fine but I don't know, passion fruit is just delicious tbh.
 
Hehe! It's nice indeed.
 
Don't know if there are kiwi-flavoured sweets, though. I'd have to test that.
 
Coconut is also nice!
 
I prefer it as a fruit.
Like soursop.
I can eat the fruit but I can't drink the juice.
 
When coconut comes as a flavor, it will be sweet. I'm sure you will like it.
 
4:34 PM
I'll give it a try!
 
Yay!
 
2
Q: Shut and close your mouth

A-friendCan 'close your mouth' mean 'shut your mouth'? I know that 'shut your mouth' is a rude way to say stop speaking. But I need to know whether 'close your mouth' can indirectly mean 'stop speaking' or not?

This reminds me of quit vs stop.
"Quit talking", "Stop talking". "Quit doing that", "Stop doing that".
 
How about, "please secure your oral cavity"?
I guess most native speakers would get the intended meaning, or just say "Huh?". :-)
 
Sounds like something you'd be told in a roller coaster.
 
Hehe!
I think "Keep one's mouth close" means about the same as "Keep one's mouth shut".
 
Anonymous
4:49 PM
@DamkerngT. That sounds like I should be adding a lock to it.
 
Anonymous
I didn't know there was rum-flavored candy.
 
There is indeed.
If the context is clear, I don't think there's room for misinterpretations
 
@snailboat imagining the lock... perhaps a mask!
 
user116848
5:39 PM
hi
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. It's kind of like the slang "zip it!"
 
user116848
@IceBoy Happy All Saints' Day!
 
@Arrowfar and All Souls' Day if I don't see you tomorrow :D
 
user116848
@IceBoy Okay :D
 
9:23 PM
Why do edits must be at least six characters?
If a person misspells a word, generally it's only interchanging two letters.
Or well, spelling it as something else. E.g definitely as defiantly.
 
Anonymous
It's an arbitrary decision.
 
Anonymous
They'd like you to find something else to fix up in the post at the same time.
 
0
Q: Very beautiful vs. Totally/absolutely beautiful

user11584Can I say "very beautiful" or is it incorrect?? My English teacher(actually she's not a native English speaker) says it's a mistake. Though I saw exsamples of such use on the Internet

Take this one as an example. The only things I'd edit are taking away one question mark, adding a space between teacher and '(', and finally correcting the spelling of examples.
That still does not add up to six characters, though.
 
user116848
9:49 PM
@snailboat Hi snail!
 
user116848
How was your Halloween?
 
user116848
@DamkerngT. Hi Damk!
 
Anonymous
10:16 PM
Hello!
 
user116848
hey
 
user116848
11:15 PM
I am trying to write this sentence but not sure whether I am writing it correctly:
 
user116848
> If A will ignore B then B will ignore A
 
user116848
'If +will' is correct here I think.
 
user116848
I found this
 
user116848
Because I don't want to say it like:
 
user116848
11:17 PM
> If A ignores B then B ignores A
 
user116848
Because the former version looks more dramatic. Latter looks like a sentence from a Maths book.
 
user116848
I want to say it for a human being though.
 
user116848
Or maybe this:
 
user116848
> If A ignores B then B will ignore A
 
user116848
My question is, is the first sentence correct?
 
11:37 PM
I'm not entirely sure, but would "If A is going to ignore B then B will ignore A" work?
 
user116848
Oh, '...is going to' will work too I think. Thanks for jogging my mind!
 
user116848
thanks.
 
No problem!
Glad I could help.
 
Anonymous
@Arrowfar That doesn't quite work
 
Anonymous
It's perfectly grammatical with will
 
Anonymous
11:45 PM
But
 
I found the structure you're looking for, then again it's not from a reliable source.
 
Anonymous
The meaning isn't the same
 
Anonymous
The difference isn't in how dramatic it is
 
user116848
@snailboat So, is first sentence correct to say?
 
user116848
I know third is correct.
 
11:48 PM
" if you will follow another Blind then you both will fall in hole."
 
user116848
Third is the regular grammar book sentence
 
user116848
@JersonZuleta Exactly
 
user116848
Falling in the hole is the result of following the blind
 
user116848
:-)
 
Yup, that's what I found. But as I said, it isn't from a reliable source though it seems to be written by a native speaker.
 
user116848
11:49 PM
I see.
 
"If you will ignore your worldly duties you will become a slave of this world."
Then again, I feel like "if you will" in this example uses will as a verb rather than an auxiliary.
 
user116848
yeah
 
Hold on!
Found your sentence!
"if you will ignore me, I will ignore you because when you ignore me, it means you don't want to talk to me so if you won't put the effort, why should I?"
 
user116848
Ah, I see...Thanks. So, did you make a sentence in mind then goggled it? I mean how did you find it.
 
I simply googled "if you will ignore".
When you add quotation marks to your sentence, Google will try to find that sentence just the way you typed it.
 
user116848
11:55 PM
nods
 
Anonymous
@Arrowfar All three sentences are perfectly grammatical
 
Anonymous
They just don't have the same meaning
 
@snailboat I got another power outage!
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. D'oh!
 

« first day (646 days earlier)      last day (253 days later) »