« first day (1921 days earlier)      last day (3002 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

12:01 AM
@ACuriousMind Well, I used my newfound power to look at those rants saying this whole site is a sock-puppet show run by me.
All I can say is, wow. That person was upset.
 
@DanielSank Yeah. Still not sure why they picked you as the puppetmaster, though
 
Friendly people are easy targets :P
 
@DanielSank Maybe you find this deleted post funnier (I like the combination of the original title, dmckee's edit and the "non-mainstream" close reason)
 
Have you guys heard of the unit of beauty needed to launch one ship?
 
Hurrump. I'd never seen a Putnum before. Those are reasonably evil. I can see where the exam's reputation comes from. I can see possible ways to start A3 and B3, but it's not clear how either of them finishes.
@guest The millihelen. A classic.
 
12:16 AM
:D
The reputation of math 55 is worse.
 
It doesn't help that I'm not particularly strong on sets of series. But they look like at least some are done by induction which I'm usually giddy about.
 
@ACuriousMind wtf?
@dmckee I tried one long ago. I got half a problem right.
 
hey guys, what did we call it when you used a metric such that your constant was equal to one
like when we use c=1 for relativity calculation
 
We call that "clever" :P
@user507974 But it's one part of what is called natural units, to give a serious answer
@DanielSank That's not even the most disturbing one.
 
thanks
i wanted to play around a little bit and create a modified metric system based on natural units
see what it would kind of look like
 
12:30 AM
Sounds like a great exercise in dimensional analysis.
 
12:45 AM
@FenderLesPaul It looks like Tuesday things pick up big, and really big on Wednesday
 
@ACuriousMind I absolutely loathe that this is called natural "units".
 
@DanielSank I know, we've already talked about that, and I mostly agree
 
1:04 AM
A "unit" is what a mathematician calls 1 :P
 
1:16 AM
btw, for some reason trying to ask a question on firefox triggers a mathjax script error and freezes the browser. Any idea on how to fix that
 
@user507974 Use Chrome?
 
well yea...but i like firefox
 
I have the same "browser freeze" problem with Mathjax
 
@user507974 I like it in principle, but it doesn't work :\
I keep wanting it to be better than Chrome but it's not.
 
Chrome is very "robust."
 
1:19 AM
Chrome rusts
 
It is.
 
Well, I guess it flakes
 
@KyleKanos Only it it's plated badly.
 
And then the metal underneath can rust
 
Slowly :P
 
1:20 AM
@KyleKanos You must own a crappy chrome plated item.
 
I don't think I have any chrome plated anything
 
@KyleKanos Just flaky impressions?
 
Waiting on the airport on my way to CA. Just now I remembered how I hate airports
 
@DanielSank Probably
Where's my book?
 
They've changed my boarding gate more times than I changed my choice of major
 
@KyleKanos excuse me, what book?
 
@ACuriousMind you around?
 
Jan 17 at 4:16, by Kyle Kanos
Hmm. Physics probably should just be taught entirely using bra-ket notation linear algebra
Jan 17 at 4:17, by DanielSank
I actually wrote a book doing this.
 
@KyleKanos Oh right.
Yes fixing that up is on my todo list. Let me see...
 
Never got around understanding bra-ket
Never tried too hard either to be honest
 
1:26 AM
@KyleKanos I have to submit some interview feedback and make some slides first.
 
@DanielSank My email won't be moved from my profile, so whenever you're ready for it, I still aim to read the shit out of it
I'm in no rush
 
@KyleKanos Ok. I'll probably just put it on Github when I fix the really obvious holes.
 
Github...I've almost forgotten about my stuff on there
 
@DanielSank, talking about GitHub I've been wanting to show you this for a while: wtfpl.net
 
MIT license is pretty good...
 
1:32 AM
@KyleKanos Ahhhh excellent.
It's like MIT but more in your face.
 
I used to be a GPL guy, but then I changed my mind and decided it was anti-freedom and overly restrictive
I use MIT now mostly
 
@DanielSank Seems that way. But I'm not sure I like the changing it is allowed as long as the name is changed. bit
 
@KyleKanos I balked at that too, but that's for the license itself, not the licensed software.
I agree that any such rule is sort against the intended spirit.
 
BSD is nice too
 
I think that if I wrote something & someone else used it for their own project, they should include the original author's name somewhere (for historicities sake or something)
 
1:36 AM
I think it would be truly awesome to have a license which requires good deeds on the part of those using the software.
For example, you can use this library in your project, but you have to go hug your mom each time you compile.
 
Let's make one @DanielSank
I'm totally for that
 
What do we call it?
 
Hmm, what about the case that your mother has passed away?
 
Good Deed License, GDL for short
 
1:37 AM
@KyleKanos zomg that's so good.
 
Sounds good to me
I can draft it on the plane!
 
@KyleKanos Then you have to say something nice to a stranger.
@BernardMeurer Go for it. We can use it in cappy.
 
The more complex the code is (McCabe) the more kind your deed must be hahaha
Awesome @DanielSank!
 
You know, being the only Fortran guy to answer questions on Code Review can be a little frustrating.
 
@KyleKanos FORTRAN? Yikes
I signed up for a course in a couple of weeks
Not very excited
 
1:42 AM
Not FORTRAN, Fortran
 
Is there a difference? Or did I just write it wrongly?
 
The difference is about 13 years (the latter indicates the 1977 standard, the former indicates the 1990 standard)
 
Oooh
Well I don't I'd like either
But God it's a fast language
It only gets better if you're writing bloody assembly
 
F77 only sucks when the user starts writing with goto and writing spaghetti code
 
Spaghetti code is my middle name
Just kidding I'm actually paranoid about code standards
 
1:45 AM
1990 is pretty damn good; easy to read & write and still hella-fast
 
I don't know how @DanielSank hasn't murdered me yet over me complaining about PEP-257
 
2003 & 2008 standards allowed for more OOP concepts (biggest hurdle is whether runtime polymorphism would be added, most are against it)
 
I think km going for C++ tho. It's fast enough for what I do and I feel it will be far more useful
Want to mess with fortran tho, just to beat my deadly fear of it
My uncle worked with it, I grew up listening to tales about the evilness of fortran
 
Yeah, one can be evil with it, abusing memory mostly
But good programmers don't do that
 
Good programmers are a legend in Brazil :p
 
1:56 AM
@GBeau ah
 
Gotta board my plane now. You guys have a good one
 
yeah I think UChicago and all the big guys are coming out this week.
@BernardMeurer Have a safe flight!
 
2:22 AM
@BernardMeurer Coding style is important.
 
user116211
2:53 AM
@FenderLesPaul @BernardMeurer: Are you going somewhere?
 
@user36790 not me, no
 
user116211
@FenderLesPaul: Nope!
 
user116211
Is Bernard going somewhere? The plane??
 
@BernardMeurer Fortran is like a lot of old systems languages: unforgiving. It does what you tell it to do without making any allowances for human frailty. But it's not out-n-out evil like tcl/tk or perl.
Well, I may make an exception for the array sub-set processing hack. That's pretty much evil
 
4:00 AM
This game has some interesting physics in it

If you turn the red region into green, thus removing that boundary in the middle, sometimes the squares will redistribute and end up pushing the orange region as indicated so that the region end up fused

I am suspecting some kind of energy minimising principle is at play here, simialr to how fludis tend to reduce the surface tension by reducing the surface area

should read up more about fludis in order to model this game more properly
I wonder how the "minimising surface tension" phenomenon arise from just the forces between each fluid particles
 
user54412
@Danu I just realized that question, which I was going to link to you for getting 10k, is one of the ones @ACuriousMind recently linked. And now ACM is showing DS all the good stuff. Lesson learned: never try to beat ACM at this chat.
 
@ChrisWhite Why do many small oil droplets on water will fuse into a larger droplet?
Isn't that for a fluid to minimise surface energy, it will try to minimise surface area thus the fusion of two droplets into one will go against this since the resulting droplet surface area is larger?
 
user54412
4:16 AM
@Secret recheck your surface area computation
 
user54412
or maybe the misunderstanding is that it's total surface area that matters for the system's energy
 
@ChrisWhite
I see
in that case:
Before fusion
$$4\pi r_1^2+4\pi r_2^2=4\pi (r_1^2+r_2^2)$$
After fusion
$$4\pi r_f^2$$
where $r_f^2$ has to obey $\frac{4}{3}\pi(r_1^3+r_2^3)=\frac{4}{3}\pi r_f^3$
Thus
$$r_f^2=(r_1^3+r_2^3)^{\frac{2}{3}}$$

And since the surface area is minimised, $r_f^2 < r_1^2+r_2^2$ (though I am not sure how to prove that...
 
user54412
4:34 AM
$(x^3+y^3)^{2/3} < x^2 + y^2$ iff $2 x y < 3 x^2 + 3 y^2$ (cube and cancel)
 
user54412
solve the equality for positive $x$ given positive $y$; conclude there is no solution and thus the inequality is either always true or always false; test for any choice of numbers
 
$$2xy < 3x^2+3y^2 \Rightarrow 0<(x+y)^2-\frac{8}{3}xy$$
Minimum when $(x,y)=(0,0)$ thus inequality has no solution

I see, thanks!
 
5:06 AM
typo" Maximum
 
 
2 hours later…
6:44 AM
oh, that looked like a fun talk i missed
 
7:38 AM
@DanielSank Congrats!
 
8:02 AM
I'm afraid you'll soon overtake me!
 
user116211
@DanielSank: Carry on! Feed us with your answers; we would take you over Motl and Rennie:P
 
10:19 AM
@ChrisWhite I am learning python on edX now, it seems to be a very good starting point for programming, pretty easy and intuitive so far (yet I still keep making mistakes :/). Thanks for the advice months ago :D
 
That's some very unhelpful diagram
 
10:58 AM
I agree.
 
 
2 hours later…
12:32 PM
Arrived in Washington
@dmckee have you heard of the inverse square root hack? That's pretty damn magical
 
user116211
@BernardMeurer: Oh! Gone to Washington. Why?
 
1:51 PM
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/02/160202124003.htm
Here's an example of economics x physics that might have consequence to GDP
 
user116211
2:29 PM
@Secret: Econophysics...
 
how acceptable are the copy-paste answers?
0
A: Why don't electric fish shock themselves?

mitesh gandhithe electrical eel is a variety of freshwater fish with specialized organs that discharge energy. Many species use those jolts to experience their environment or communicate (as in courtship). some species, such as electric powered eels, electric rays, and electric powered catfish, can emit enoug...

 
2:53 PM
@BernardMeurer Fortran, C and C++ all just compile to machine code, so one is not automatically faster than the others. Fortran is a higher level language (so not really designed as a systems language; in its original form e.g. abstracting away pointers) aimed particularly at numerical computation typically in an imperative/procedural manner, and has some assumptions built in that help the compiler emit fast code (like arrays are non-aliasing).
With C++ the hope is that you can create all these rather high lever wrappers enabling the user to write safe code with the compiler still being able to emit code running at C-like speeds. Or when needed, just write in C, which itself it so close to the hardware you can almost imagine the emitted machine code. Especially when you code in intrinsics. Or better yet, (inline) asm.
 
@gonenc where were you???
 
3:37 PM
0
Q: What constitutes an answer to a physics question on this forum?

Stephen J. CrothersOn this page Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille: On the Validity of Kirchhoff's Law there are the following comments this might enlighten you rationalwiki.org/wiki/Pierre-Marie_Robitaille . There was a discussion here on his cosmic background radiation ideas, which really are bizarre. – anna v Sep 1 ...

 
4:30 PM
So... by now I'm well known at LMU for having typed solutions to many courses, and I get daily requests for my notes. Today, however, I got an unusual one: Someone offered me a 100 euros to solve last year's exam for QED with him.
I don't really know how to respond.
 
-1
Q: Einsteins Cold Fusion and Black Holes

JenHow does a magnetic field heat and Cool objects? Would an Atom rapidly cooled with a magnetic field release photons? Can solid magnets be used in the same manner? Einsteins cold fusion formula is impossible here but can it be possible as a black hole if the black hole magnetic field was rapidly ...

 
4:56 PM
@3507 you know, studying and getting used to another country :D
what have you been doing
@Danu like cheating in an exam or like a Tutorium
if it is like a tutorium I'd do it
 
@gonenc I now think the situation is like this:
The professor for QED is well-known for giving away all exam questions. He does this every year. This guy now has this year's exam questions, but doesn't know how to solve them and (I guess) doesn't feel confident that he'll figure it out in time.
Therefore, he's asking me to solve this year's exam for him, so that he can use those solutions on the actual exam.
 
lol...
 
It doesn't feel 100% kosher to me :P
 
@Danu what a nice prof... :D
 
what a nice @Danu if he actually carries out with this for this guy
 
5:04 PM
I think it's kind abad.
@mreyeglasses Well, he's offering me 100 euros so it wouldn't just be "nice guy"
 
oh
yea seems a bit morally conflicting
i guess you have to trust your ethics now Danu
 
@Danu I think I wouldn't do it
 
unless you are starving and desperately need the money to eat
 
I don't really need it. I guess I should refuse.
 
good job Danu
 
5:06 PM
it wouldn't be a problem for last years questions or whatever but it is basically doing the exam for another person
which is kinda cheating
 
why does the professor do this anyway
 
on the other hand the damn prof gives away the question it is not like stolen
I dunno it is hard to decide
 
@mreyeglasses He thinks he's a mothafuckin' gangsta
 
@mreyeglasses our religion teacher in high school did that too but I doubt that it is comparable to that
 
5:08 PM
why doesn't the guy just study hard for the entire semester..
 
^lol
are you really asking that?
 
i thought it's reasonable :(
 
Not saying it isn't to me, but to a lot of others it's probably not :)
 
@Danu he looks like it too :D
a bit
 
5:12 PM
Wait, you know the guy?
 
@Danu internet is a beauty :D
 
So what's his name?
 
stefan hoffman
 
:D haha
 
*hofmann
@Danu it wasn't really that hard to find out :D
@Danu why are you typing the solutions to psets anyway?
 
5:13 PM
I'm having a hard time finding a picture though
 
@gonenc For my own benefit.
I type everything (academics-related) that I do
I hardly work with paper anymore.
 
@Danu do you like think in $\TeX$ or what?
 
Sure
I can do most calculations without writing down anything by now :)
Well, most calculations that one does in physics courses (easy ones, that is)
 
@gonenc I didn't really do much.
 
5:15 PM
@Danu how did you achieve that
 
Practice
 
@Danu are you hawking?
 
Lolnope
 
@Danu I guess they are not that strict there about handwritten psets...
 
@gonenc Eh... Why would anyone insist on that?
 
5:17 PM
@Danu why would anyone insist on doing the pset with another person?
 
@gonenc what courses are you taking?
 
@Danu "Sie bearbeiten die Übungszettel in semesterstabilen Zweiergruppen und geben sie handschriftlich ab. Jeder Teilnehmer muss in der Lage sein, seine Lösung im Tutorium an der Tafel zu reproduzieren."
 
Collaboration is allowed on every problem set ever
Just not on exams :P
@gonenc Yeah, and I'm not violating any of those things.
 
Exp1, Teo1 Ana1 and LA1
@Danu no I mean why would anyone insist on that :D
I didn't say you violated them :D
 
Oh, I am violating handschriftlich
 
5:19 PM
that was one of the rules of Ana1
 
well, I don't think anyone would actually protest texed solutions
Also I solve them alone
So you're a lehrämtler?
 
@Danu NO!
I'm studying vanilla physics
 
what is lehrämtler
 
I just like taking maths classes that are not mandatory
@mreyeglasses teacher education basically
 
@mreyeglasses Guy who does special "Lehramt" i.e. teaching degree
 
5:21 PM
why doesn't Google Translate even know
 
@gonenc and you take LA math?
lel
 
@Danu LA is mandatory!
Ana isn't
 
So you are Lehramt? :P
 
lollllll
 
@gonenc did you see acm?
 
5:23 PM
@Danu that is a real insult :D worse than calling an engineer :P
@3507 I do sometimes but we haven't met in person
 
Ahhhhh
LA=Lineare Algebra
hahaha
Here in Munich, that'd be LehrAmt
 
jesus! ;D
Ana=Analysis btw
:D
 
I know that
 
what is analysis
 
5:25 PM
really?
 
@mreyeglasses inspection of metric spaces
 
No, you're supposed to be a math. student
 
oh
i thought it was some physics analysis or something lol
 
@Danu taking these maths classes I realized something
physicists are really doing really dirty maths
ie non-rigorous
 
@gonenc Join the club of disillusioned physicists
 
5:30 PM
@Danu everytime I want to write $F=m \ddot x$ I have the tendency to write Let $x : A \to R$ be a twice cont. diff-able function for $A \subseteq R$ is a perfect subset of $R$
but then I realize that it is physics and just don't do it
 
ain't nobody got time for that
 
@mreyeglasses but seriously the rigorous mathematical background is a indispensable for physics
I mean $\ddot x = \sqrt x$ doesn't have a unique solution for given initial conditions. How cool is that?
 
my advisor does some mathematical physics i think
 
@mreyeglasses and you are a mathematician saying that it deeply hurt my rigorous heart :D :P
 
i think everybody is guilty of notation abuse
 
5:37 PM
@mreyeglasses there are people here claiming $\nabla$ is a vector and write $\vec \nabla$
 
Let he who never used a differential as a variable cast the first stone
 
a vector in $R^3$ that is
 
i guess we just don't want to get too pedantic
 
@Slereah $\require{cancel}$ $\frac{df}{dx} = \frac{\cancel d f}{\cancel d x} = \frac f x$
 
user116211
$\bf \nabla$ is a vector...
 
user116211
5:40 PM
used by Feynman in his Lectures.
 
My favorite notation abuse is when I had to do stochastic shit for QM
 
user116211
$\vec \nabla$ is quite abusive, no?
 
And I could write $dx^2 = dt$
 
@Danu That's the plan.
@gonenc Humbug! We do math just fine.
 
user116211
Where is ACM, David?
 
5:42 PM
@DanielSank I mean seriously put your hand on your heart and your other hand on feynman's book and tell that again :D
 
@gonenc Which book?
 
@DanielSank your favorite one
 
So far I'm largely unimpressed by Feynman's physics books.
Of all physicists to stand for rigorous math... Feynman?
 
I didn't say he was rigorous
 
"Gee, yes, I shall integrate over all possible functions... in some way which we will most certainly not define because holy crap that's complicated... it just works."
3
@gonenc Ah, I see.
 
user116211
5:44 PM
@DanielSank: You didn't like Feynman's Lectures?
 
@user36790 Not really. They're ok IMHO.
 
@DanielSank btw that sounds like a nice piece of physicist maths
 
Yup.
 
Feynman is the great hope of people who think in pictures and weld the math on afterward.
 
user116211
@DanielSank: Have you ever followed Berkeley Series?
 
5:45 PM
@user36790 Purcell is part of those, right?
 
user116211
@DanielSank: Yup!
 
@user36790 Well, Purcell's E&M book was excellent.
I like that it shows how magnetic forces are just electrostatic forces in relativity.
 
Since I do that occasioanally I like his stuff. But I'm not in his league and for some problems I have to lead with the math and figure the implications second.
 
user116211
@DanielSank: Classic? Jefimenko also shows that, BTW.
 
@user36790 Jefimenko's equations or did he write a book?
 
user116211
5:48 PM
@DanielSank: He has his very own book on electromagnetism.
 
@user36790 Wow, the Amazon reviews are rather positive.
There's one 1-star review which says:
> working towards a high degree in Maths before reading this !!!!
 
As long as we're talking about text book, I've been teaching undergrad mechanics out of Marion and Thornton. But all editions are now out of print and the used ones are getting scarce.
 
As there are three exclamation marks, I suppose the author of said review really means it.
 
What books should I consider as replacements for my next run at it?
 
@dmckee I didn't much like that book, TBH.
 
user116211
5:51 PM
@dmckee: Newtonian?
 
Kleppner?
 
I didn't like it much the first time either, and I supplement it several ways, but it has just the right math intensity for my students.
@user36790 M&T start Newtonian but introduce Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics about a third of the way in. and then use which ever framework is most convenient from then on.
 
user116211
@DanielSank: Jefimenko even wrote How to Entertain with Your Pocket Calculator:P
 
And our syllabus says that will will introduce these frameworks, so a replacement has to do something like that. Or at least be amenable to have them given in some supplementary material.
 
i got my hands on an HP-15C
 
5:53 PM
^ Lucky devil.
I still use my 11C and know of three colleagues who also have them.
 
user116211
@dmckee: If Newtonian, then what about French's Newtonian Mechanics?
 
If they die I'm going to their estate sales to get a backup.
 
@user36790 classic
 
user116211
@mreyeglasses: Bought from Pawn Shop?
 
I'm not sure if I can articulate this well, but somehow most of the usual Lagrangian/Hamiltonian undergrad books seems to mix the words "variable" and "function" in some way that is extremely confusing when it comes to changing coordinates.
In fact, I think 90% of all the confusion I experienced as an undergrad came from the lack of a clear description of coordinate and/or vector basis changes.
 
5:58 PM
@user36790 Looks like a nice book, and I'm going to put the epub on my phone. But I doubt it covers the depth I need.
@DanielSank I'd buy that. M&T take a pass as getting it right, but it is confined to chapter 1 and by the time you're ready to apply that stuff in chapter 6 you don't recall any more.
 
user116211
@dmckee: It's for high schoolers, I suppose; but still the explanations are indeed intuitive.
 
That's probably why I like it better now than I did when I was an undergrad.
 
user116211
It talks about time-reversal symmetry in an elaborate manner.
 
His Special Relativity book is good too.
 
^ This.
 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

« first day (1921 days earlier)      last day (3002 days later) »