Proposed Q&A site for professional researchers and lab experimenters in the field of Plasma Cosmology, as well as enthusiasts looking for more information about Plasma Cosmology theories.
Currently in definition.
Interesting. A whole SE proposal about a non-standard cosmology
While I certainly agree that the deletion of comments pointing out the error of the (now accepted) answer is not a good idea, I cannot fathom him doing it in a polite manner. Meaning that it was deleted because of the insults, rather than the context.
@0celo7 False, green checks are the answers that helped the OP the most and does not guarantee correctness
@0celo7 Well.. we don't put the check mark there. What we do is up- and downvote, and because OPs can't be trusted to select the best answer, that's why voting is important
How does accepting an answer work?
When should I do it?
Why can't I accept my own answers right away?
Which answer should I accept?
For more information, see "What should I do when someone answers my question?" in the Help Center.
Return to FAQ index
@0celo7 Yeah, while I like Skyrim, I've also lots of other games to play, I don't sink as much time into a single game as I did some years ago. I think I've sunk about 1000 hours into Morrowind, though
I had over 500 hours on my Pokemon Ruby save. I decided to delete it because I wanted a Groudon with nice stats, but lost interest after two days of soft resets.
@ACuriousMind I need to get rid of Serana. "Yes, what did you need" is going to kill me.
My laptop now does this thing where it stops running, somehow gets 6GB of data and puts 2GB of it into virtual RAM, causing everything to lag by 2 minutes.
The only real reason I have a phone is to make sure I read emails from work the moment they are sent, and also to browse the arxiv on the way to work. I'm not sure this is a healthy thing.
The thing I'm having trouble with is that Maxwell's two curl equations contain four quantities, so two more equations seem to be needed to solve the system.
One could let P = X_eE and M = X_mH, but this is not true in general either (AFAIK)
user54412
2:55 AM
Random question for any Europeans: From everything I've heard, automatic transmissions are almost unheard of there. Is this true? And why exactly is this?
user54412
Is driving stick seen as more fun? More masculine? Less American?
I also wonder if manual cars stall. I mean, my parents tell me about the bad old days, when everything was manual and cars stalled if you looked at them the wrong way, but maybe modern manuals work just as well as modern automatics?
I've not had a stick in about 10 years, but I don't recollect a difference between the 1990 Sentra (had no power anything) and the 2001 Protege (power everything)
Talk of a dark matter particle is pure speculation.
'DARK ENERGY/DARK MASS: THE SILENT TRUTH'
https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/dark-energydark-mass-the-silent-truth/
"That is, all that we are certain about [is] the dark mass, not dark matter, let alone to say about the dark ‘particl...
oh. I don't recall buuuuut it sounds familiar... sneaking around with the water pumps after a boss fight?
user54412
@KyleKanos You know, I've come to believe there's a certain linguistic pattern to crackpot posts. A certain... scatteredness. I wonder if text comparison software could identify such posts without even looking at content.
@ChrisWhite It's my understanding that the fuel efficiency is better with manual transmission, and that they need less maintenance and are cheaper to repair. I've been told that automatics a couple of decades ago did not handle cold weather very well. You also obviously get more control over the car with a stick, for example you can use the gears to slow down instead of hitting the breaks. I've driven plenty of both, and I don't really have a preference.
@alarge The issue of fuel economy was true for a long time, but start ing the early 1980s (with luxury cars) and continuing into the late 1990s automotic transmissions improved in design and control system until you had to be a very attentive manual driver to beat them for fuel economy. Maintenance has also improved for automatics: they are still very expensive to repair, but they don't breakdown as often any more. The ice and snow traction issue I'm less familiar with.
Anonymous
@vzn No it's not - there was a temporary period of dryness around the time you posted that comment, but it's pretty much fine now. It's a small community, but stable, productive, and satisfied.
@Dimensio1n0 ok actually good to hear a contrary pov. think diversity in different online social/ scientific communities is defn a good thing, to be encouraged & se culture is sometimes too constraining & approaching a "monoculture". ppl on se sometimes forget that its a human constructed system and involves design choices/ emphases, sometimes verging on biases or blind spots. youre a mod on physicsoverflow right? maybe state that in your se profile.
When I typing my post MathJax re-render the preview after each key press, leading to an annoying flicker in the preview area as I'm typing. When there are lots of formulas it also slows down the entire thing making my characters appear in the editing window with a noticeable delay as it renders. ...
@0celo7 Yeah, it's serious because I don't get what the user is asking - Lagrangian->Hamiltonian is not a one-way street, so I would not call that a sequence, you might as well go momentum->velocity.
@ACuriousMind What he means is this: We have a position. From this position calculus gets us a velocity. We can get the momentum by taking the velocity derivative of the Lagrangian. Suppose we have an angle. Calculus gets us the angular velocity. We can get the angular momentum by taking the angular velocity derivative of the Lagrangian. The third case is left to the reader.
@0celo7 Well, there are topological obstructions to choosing a gauge globally (Gribov obstructions), but I'm not sure if that's what is question is supposed to be about. It seems more to be about "admissible" gauges.
I think it's just something one should be aware of - if your attempt at gauge-fixing gives back weird stuff, you probably ran into a Gribov obstruction, but it doesn't mean your theory is doomed^^
@ACuriousMind RM is outdated because it is an incorrect interpretation of the equations which leads to a very poor semi-Newtonian understanding of the theory.
From Yahoo answers.
@dmckee High school teachers talk about relativity? My Princeton educated physics teacher couldn't tell you the first thing about special relativity.
@0celo7 Nope. Not really, at least. We had a weird "field trip" where we were supposed to spend the weekend learning a bit aboutit, but, well, it was a trip, soooooo...not much learning going on :P
@ACuriousMind - Quick question, probably more within the realms of Electrical Engineering, but how conductive is a glass tube filled with water? Is it more or less conductive than, say copper?
You know the conductivity of salty water must be less than copper, or else the telegraph wires they laid on the bottom of the atlantic would have been pretty pointless.
@Richard, certainly. Just like you can get shocked in the bathtub. You're completing a circuit from the wall to ground through the bathwater and yourself.
@Richard where do you plan on getting your emf? Or creating nontrivial circuit elements? You could fairly straightforwardly replace all of the wires in a standard electrical circuit with glass tubes filled with salty water, and just pay the cost of increased resistance
I'm planning to incarcerate a supervillain who has the ability to attract and control metal. As a minimum, I'd quite like to light his cell but obviously putting even small amounts of metal into his proximity (100+ metres) is extremely dangerous.
Is there a way of creating an electrical lighting...