4:42 PM
We each have a different interpretation of that criteria.
Editing is a good way to help people, especially new people. It's considered important to the system. This is explained on this page of the help center.
gardening.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/edit: "Any time you feel you can make the post better, and are inclined to do so. Editing is encouraged!"
From the same page: "We believe in the power of community editing."
@stormy That's why we do a lot of editing here (I'm not patting myself on the back, I promise!). It can help teach people what the site standards are, and help make the questions more "voteable" for some people.
Anyway, I totally apologize to you and Bamboo for passing judgment on the choice of criteria.
The reputation rules can be rough, like you have to earn a certain amount before you can post pictures or comment.
You have to have 15 rep to even upvote on other people's questions and answers, other than answers to your own? So a new user can't even vote and improve the quality of the site until they have 3 upvotes on their question.
They can't even comment around the network until 50 rep, which is 10 upvotes if it's a question, and 5 upvotes if it's an answer.
I didn't even realize people can't downvote on posts other than their own until 125 rep. I don't make the rules, but this is probably so people won't run around downvoting willy nilly, and makes good sense.
@stormy I think this is why I don't like to hold users to a crazy high standard, because if we don't vote, they won't spend enough time to learn the system and how to write better questions.
I have a lot of questions I don't ask because I fear they don't live up to the standards of the veteran users like you. I know you don't want me to feel this way, so I'm not blaming you for that. Trying to please all people all the time is a problem of mine, and I'm trying to get over it!
Okay, that's all for now. I'm sorry if I overwhelmed you.
I want to make it abundantly clear over and over that you and Bamboo and @Stephie, @Shule, @J.Musser, @NiallC., @kevinsky and everyone else keep the site quality high.
@sormy, I forgot to say I think the fast answers people get are really encouraging, even without the votes. It shows immediate love and care, and make people want to stay here. I look at other sites on the network and they don't even have any answers, so because of you guys, we're a site with extremely high quality, reliable information! I apologize deeply for not putting the emphasis where it belongs. I need to learn to be more humble!
Ooops, I spelled your name wrong stormy, but it was too late to edit that comment! I love you and thank you so much for everything!