« first day (1702 days earlier)      last day (3225 days later) » 
01:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

1:20 AM
I was checking through the block list just now - it looks like Mirrodin or Kamigawa might be the time when MTG became less "let's print cards around a theme!" and more "let's tell a sort-of-epic story about some planes and their struggles, and print cards reflecting that!". Is that sort of accurate?
or was it like that all along?
(I'm under the impression that at least in the Masques block around 2000, cards were just themed, but blocks didn't have stories behind them)
 
So, because of that question earlier, I was looking through the Urza block, because it was from 1999
And it really seemed to have some continuity
 
Right, the Urza block itself might be a case of an actual story-driven set
... I might ask this on main site.
 
That was just an example. The Mirage block has books set in it. I'm pretty sure the Invasion block is the story of the invasion of Dominaria by Phyrexia
 
@Rainbolt: Please do not use this chat for complaining about or belittling other site members. It is distinctly unpleasant, and not in compliance with our Be Nice policy.
 
If you just go and read the names of sets, it feels like there is some continuity
Like Invasion->Planeshift->Apocalypse or Odyssey->Torment->Judgement
 
1:33 AM
@murgatroid99 Yeah, but then I visit the Masques block, and the salvation wiki page includes a quote saying they just chose a greek theme plus names people would have trouble spelling for laffs.
 
@doppelgreener I suspect that the truth is that sets like Arabian Nights and Mercadian Masques are the exceptions, and that most other blocks really do have a story
 
@murgatroid99 hm, ok.
I guess nowadays we're actually also in an age they can readily publish and share that story.
 
To be clear, I'm not discouraging you from asking about this on the main site
 
Their ability to actually convey the story in previous years would've been limited.
 
@doppelgreener there are novels from the old sets
 
1:35 AM
@murgatroid99 Right, it's good to be aware of the complexity of the situation at least.
 
The following is a list of novels based in the setting of the collectible card game Magic: The Gathering. When Wizards of the Coast was asked how the novels and cards influence each other, Brady Dommermuth, Magic's Creative Director, responded by saying "generally the cards provide the world in which the novels are set, and the novels sometimes provide characters represented on cards. But cards also introduce their own characters that might not appear in the novels. In short, the Magic creative team and the novelists work largely in parallel and inform each other as much as possible." All of novels...
That's actually more than I would have guessed
Note the 3 novels in the Masquerade Cycle
 
Wow. So for loads of these blocks, they were releasing one novel per set.
 
The lore of Magic is large and fascinating, and you'd probably be surprised by how big a part Phyrexia played in it
 
@murgatroid99 I would. I thought they were only present in the Scars of Mirrodin block, so you saying that Invasion was about Phyrexia is pretty surprising.
 
Even Urza's block was about Dominaria and Phyrexia
And I think original Mirrodin involved Phyrexia
Actually, the summary of the book Odyssey says that the sets Weatherlight through Apocalypse were about Dominaria fighting Phyrexia
Just the Phyrexia wiki article is fascinating. Interestingly, it's also a mechanical world, like Mirrodin
Anyway, I have to go for now
 
1:52 AM
@murgatroid99 [READ READ READ]
this is excellent
 
2:14 AM
It's somewhat comparable to the newer sets, where the release of the Eldrazi on Zendikar were a major driving force for multiple recent blocks
Well, "driving force" may be a bit of an exaggeration, but it was relevant
 
@murgatroid99 Multiple!? I thought it was just about Zendikar and now the new Battle for Zendikar. Did it relate to something else too? (Was it related to Alara?)
 
Sorin Markov was lord of Innistrad (Innistrad block) and traveled to Tarkir to get Ugin's help sealing the Eldrazi
Gideon Jura traveled to Ravnica (RTR block) to get other help fighting the Eldrazi
The thing with Sorin was particularly important, because he caused a timeline shift, which caused FRF and DTK, which also caused Ugin to be alive to help with Zendikar
Storywise, I think that's why we're going back to Zendikar next: those who went off to get help against the Eldrazi have gotten it
Wizards frequently posts short stories related to the current block on their website (that's how I know the stuff about Sorin).
 
2:40 AM
just finished going through the Phyrexia article. That is a lot of stuff those folks got involved in.
@murgatroid99 Oh right, I totally mindblanked on this. Of course. The entire plot of Khans of Tarkir revolves around Sorin and Surrak getting in touch with Ugin in the lead-up to the Battle for Zendikar.
@murgatroid99 I have gone through some of these.
 
 
10 hours later…
1:04 PM
@doppelgreener I wasn't belittling anyone. If Jefromi wants to pointlessly comment on my posts, I will complain about it in here all I want to. When he stops, I'll stop complaining.
Sorry that my complaints are more straightforward than most. Jefromi comments that he is "concerned". I'll tell you straight up that I am annoyed at his annoying behavior. It's the same thing.
Also, I wish you would stop quoting policy to me. It makes you look arrogant. I am extremely familiar with the site and it's policies.
I really think you are just trying to fan flames, because you know I have been here for a while.
Anyway, if complaining about Jefromi's commenting behavior outside of the comments on the main site is against the "Be Nice" policy, then surely you complaining about my behavior is also against that same policy. That makes you a hypocrite.
If you try to lecture me again, I'll just block you, because these back and forths between us are almost always unpleasant.
And if you find my messages unpleasant, you should do the same.
 
1:34 PM
@Rainbolt I will quote you the policies as long as you violate them.
So, here's the thing: I won't block you. I want to be able to enjoy this room, and for it to be a safe place for the community to talk. It is, after all, our entire community's room.
Do come here and vent.
Just, don't belittle people. Like, Jefromi had a disagreement with you? Don't come here and complain about his behaviour. It sucks.
If you block me... that's up to you.
If you violate policy though, I'll flag for moderator attention. So keep your complaints restrained.
Jefromi should be able to enjoy this room too.
Note I don't use this as the room where I complain about what a toxic effect Rainbolt is having on the community.
Or, like, I don't do that anywhere. Ever. About anyone.
@Rainbolt And as for this: seriously, stop seeing arguments everywhere.
(I've probably lectured you now. Do whatever! I don't really care, it might even improve things for me with you not looking for arguments in things I say.)
 
@doppelgreener That is somewhat accurate, Kamigawa block is what MaRo considers the end of the 3rd stage of design, where they pick a theme like Artifacts or Legendary, and not necessarily towards more epic story lines, but better block planning so the story can follow the cards better.
 
@diego Awesome.
 
He gives a brief overview of what he considers the different stages here archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/mm/…
 
@diego Wow, there's actually a deconstruction of this.
That's fantastic. Thank you.
 
1:56 PM
@doppelgreener Why didn't you flag the comment?
@doppelgreener What a hypocrite. I sarcastically call Jefromi a mind reader, and I am "belittling" him. You call me toxic for the community, and you aren't belittling me? Why don't you follow your own advice?
 
@Rainbolt See how it feels? That's why I'm asking you to do it to nobody on the site.
(For the record, I think you've been pretty good recently.)
 
Who said I feel bad about your comment?
I'm calling you a hypocrite
 
You seem pretty flustered by it.
 
I am flustered by your lecturing
 
Ok, then, I'm going to flag this for moderator attention.
 
2:02 PM
Please, do so. I do not feel that it overstepped the bounds of what is considered acceptable.
I have invited Jefromi here before to discuss comments he has made on my posts before. He declines, so I stopped inviting him. Instead, he just continues to comment on the post. Meanwhile, I have been asked to stop entering into exteneded discussions with other users in the comments on the site and to take my longer discussions to a discussion room
 
That doesn't make it ok to complain about him here.
 
I just want to be allowed to disagree with other people peacefully. I don't think it's asking too much.
 
Seems like I am the one to respond to the flag ;-)
 
I can't do it on the main site, and I can't do it in here without being flooded with mods.
 
Indeed, the mods have flooded
 
2:07 PM
@rolfl boop
 
:)
 
Rock paper scissors?
 
So, what's up people?
 
Ohhhh .... so much blue ;-)
 
Another user keeps commenting on my posts, and when I ask him to take the discussion to a room, he refuses. But he continues to comment on all of my posts repeatedly.
So I complained about his behavior in here and got called out for belittling him.
The message was flagged. We are here now.
 
2:08 PM
Hi. Background: I'm asking Rainbolt not to complain directly about site members who he is actively hostile toward (search posts containing Jefromi here, by Rainbolt).
I made that request here and it got met by disagreement.
This is already an hostile room at times.
(A lot of conflict. This site's members have not yet learned to get along easily.)
(I'm one of those! I have disagreements too.)
 
I think the word 'hostile' might be an overexaggeration.
Disagreement != hostile.
 
We all have disagreements with each other at times
 
Extremely is actually.
 
Some people/sites more than others
However, it's important to remember to not bash other users
 
@Waterseas I mean hostile as in antagonistic.
 
2:10 PM
Every time I disagree with anyone doppelgreener throws a meta post at me
 
Focus on the problematic behavior, and not on the problematic users.
 
@doppelgreener Doesn't change that the word itself is an exaggerated version of antagonistic. Antagonistic is far more accurate.
 
@Waterseas Yes, fair enough.
 
I don't see anything particularly offensive in the transcript. It looks like we have a couple of users who don't get along (Jefromi and Rainbolt) for whatever reason. Rainbolt has complained about it but, from my quick search, without actually being offensive at any point.
 
@terdon Correct
 
2:12 PM
Tis true.
 
I am asking him to deal with Be Nice though.
 
People have a right to not like each other. Fighting it out in the public chatroom is not very helpful but I don't see anything particularly egregious here.
 
> Rudeness and belittling language are not okay. Your tone should match the way you'd talk in person with someone you respect and whom you want to respect you. If you don't have time to say something politely, just leave it for someone who does.
> Be welcoming, be patient, and assume good intentions. Don't expect new users to know all the rules — they don't. And be patient while they learn. If you're here for help, make it as easy as possible for others to help you. Everyone here is volunteering, and no one responds well to demands for help.
 
No does it really say that? whom you want to respect you?
 
Complaining isn't 'rude or belittling'.
 
2:12 PM
Now he's throwing meta post quotes at the mods...
 
(which is about new users, but I think the "be welcoming" thing extends to not driving individuals away from the community room by complaining about them.)
 
@Waterseas Complaining and ranting about a specific user is.
 
I actually do complain and rant about Jefromi quite often
 
Avoid signaling out specific users and pointing out their many flaws
 
^^
 
2:14 PM
If you have a problem with any specific behavior that you observe, or a problem with some type of content that you see on the site, complaining/ranting about that is fine, and is even encouraged.
The line is when you start talking about specific users (and repeatedly too)
If you find yourself mentioning a user by name or linking to their profile, rethink your position, please.
Not because you may be wrong or right, but because ranting about a specific user never helps in any way
 
@MadaraUchiha That actually doesn't make that much sense. That means saying 'God I hate it when people do X', even when its obvious you're talking about one specific person, is fine, but simply adding their name is not.
 
Deal. Next time this user responds to a comment on main, I'll ask him to join a discussion room like I have been doing lately. If he refuses, I'll just leave it at that.
 
@Waterseas You can fix (or at least, work to fix) bad behaviors, if you get enough support.
 
I won't come here and complain about him.
 
You can't do anything about "I don't like person X"
 
2:16 PM
Here's an example of what sets me off: boardgames.stackexchange.com/q/24772/6692
 
@MadaraUchiha Except that's not all he's saying. He's saying 'I don't like person X because they do Y'.
@MadaraUchiha And the Y is an actionable item.
 
@Waterseas Great, then there's no need to mention X.
 
@Rainbolt Sounds great. You should also feel free to bring in your site's mods. Sometimes, people are just too pissed at each other. That's one of the things the mods can help with.
 
@MadaraUchiha Indeed there's no need to, but again, if its already implied, what's the difference in actually stating it?
 
@Waterseas Well, for starters, you won't create a stigma with users who aren't already familiar with the strife between the two users.
@Waterseas Take this example
 
2:18 PM
@Waterseas One difference is they can stroll in obliviously later and say "hey guys, sup, how you doin' murgatroid, what's up doppel, hey rainbolt"
peoples' names leap out at them.
 
Which would you prefer? "I hate Indians because the speak in Hindi in our chat rooms" or "I hate it when people don't speak in English in our chat rooms"?
 
your own name is one of the easiest words to notice.
 
@MadaraUchiha Except that's entirely different, because the issue in that example is the generalizing racism, not the specification itself.
 
@Waterseas Alright, How about "I hate user X because they speak in Hindi in our chat rooms"?
The problem is the non-English, and yet you instantly gave the picture of X being a problem user, even when that's not necessarily the case.
And even if he is, no one likes public shaming.,
 
@MadaraUchiha Compared to saying "I hate it when people speak in Hindi in our chat rooms"? when its obvious that there's only been one person speaking Hindi in the chat room?
 
2:21 PM
The user is going to be called out either way. I don't think either of those options look good
 
Exactly
Tis equivalent
Difference is implication versus specification.
 
I realize that complaints are unpleasant but when one user keeps setting you off over and over, you are going to find an outlet to complain.
And everyone is probably going to know who you are talking about
 
@Rainbolt That's fine - I get the same with others sometimes (not you, just so you don't wonder), just that the outlet should not be the very same public space they should be able to share in.
 
Although, to be fair, from the sounds of things, he directly avoids chat XD
 
So a separate discussion room? I tried to move the last argument that happened in here and the two other parties were opposed.
 
2:23 PM
@Waterseas No, he's here from time to time.
 
I think it's a good idea, if others are willing to move
 
This stuff should probably just stay here out in the open.
Specifically, this conversation we're having now.
(not, like, the complaining stuff. that should definitely be behind closed doors.)
 
Alright. I will complain here about things I do not like, and I'll also speak about things I do like (like this bad boy), and as long as I don't mention anyone by name or use bad words, I don't expect to have any more meta posts thrown at me.
Wait
Confused now. So this conversation about behavior needs to be in main chat, but my complaints about behavior needs to be behind closed doors?
 
@Rainbolt If you would be gracious about it, thinly veiled passive-aggressiveness should also be avoided. The likes of which Waterseas was poking at - "I hate when people do X" when there is only one person who ever does X.
@Rainbolt I'm just saying this conversation we're having now shouldn't move to another room so we can keep it here and refer back to it if we ever need to.
 
I just want to be clear on one point: either we all get to discuss behavior in here or none of us do.
@doppelgreener I understand that, and I want to make sure we are consistent.
 
2:28 PM
Discussion about identifiable actionable behaviours is often going to be good. That is fine.
 
@Rainbolt No. Nothing behind closed doors. The point is that ranting about other users is rarely, if ever useful. You can use a dedicated room to hash it out with the user in question and, with luck, reach an agreement.
Just don't bring your fights to the main room where the rest of the site's users will be subjected to them.
 
Well look - if you have a problem with my tone then say that. But I get to speak in the same room that everyone else does.
About the same topics that everyone else gets to talk about
 
@terdon Well I mean like, if I have someone who's really pissed me off, I probably go to my private friend or housemate and unbottle so I can stop holding it in. Letting things out behind closed doors is healthy sometimes. (Very unhealthy at other times, as you may be describing.)
 
So either this discussion never happened, or I get to complain in here.
Someone tell me that isn't fair and explain
 
@Rainbolt Absolutely! I never meant to imply otherwise. All I'm saying is that complaining about other users by name is non productive.
 
2:30 PM
Right, I agreed to stop mentioning others by name (and I will try to be sensitive of making it obvious who I am talking about)
 
@doppelgreener Look, we've all complained about someone at some point. The problem here is that someone else felt uncomfortable and that is what we're trying to avoid.
And, obviously, it's hard for us to judge since we don't know the whole picture. For all I know, @Rainbolt was complaining about the worse troll on the interwebs. Or, again for all I know, @Rainbolt is the worst troll on the interwebs and is complaining about the most valuable user on the site.
 
@terdon Alright, yes, actually what I said was to deal with something I realise didn't need dealt with. (12:30am. Should sleep shortly. Not reading correctly.)
 
I don't know, and don't really care. We're not here to point fingers, only to make sure that things run along smoothly.
 
@MadaraUchiha Your avatar is a spoiler :( I'm like twenty episodes behind on naruto
 
@doppelgreener My last message was not in reply to yours. (Just to clarify :)
 
2:33 PM
But I recognize the sage of six paths anywhere
 
@terdon understood!
@Rainbolt seven paths; also the path of the mod hat.
(alas that probably wasn't tactful. sorry to hear your thing got spoiled.)
 
OK, I'll leave you all to it. It's nice when people deal with this sort of thing civilly as you all just did. Thanks!
 
@Rainbolt Then you shouldn't have ranted and caused a flag and caused me to join! Now should've you?!
 
@terdon Thanks for stepping in. (And @Madara)
 
No, I suppose not
 
2:34 PM
:P Take care folks
 
Crap more spoilers (I Googled sage of seven paths)
 
np, later all
 
While mods are present, can I get some attention on the meta question about the Catan tag?
6
Q: Changing "Settlers of Catan" tags due to rebranding as "Catan"

ThunderforgeEarlier this year, Settlers of Catan was rebranded so that the name of the game is simply Catan. The expansions were similarly rebranded. For instance, Seafarers of Catan is now called Catan: Seafarers. We have the tag settlers-of-catan, which is what all questions related to the game are tagge...

 
@Thunderforge We aren't mods on this site.
 
Dat plug!
 
2:35 PM
It's been three weeks, we've plenty of upvotes, and nobody has voiced any opposition.
Oh, I thought the blue meant you were mods.
 
We are
Not on Board & Card Games though.
 
Mods on any site are mods on every chat.
 
Moderations have mod superpowers across all chat rooms on chat.stackexchange.com
 
But maybe you can tell me if this would work
We want to rename like five tags
So my proposal is this:
 
Oh okay. I wasn't aware of how that worked.
 
2:36 PM
Create fives new tags, migrate the wiki's, the propose five synonyms
 
Rainbolt: This may aggravate you but I will reference whatever meta posts need to be referenced to talk to anyone.
 
@Rainbolt Mods can painlessly rename tags, there's a tool for that.
 
It is not a secret you've been in direct conflict with mods right on this site before. Your behaviour is not impeccable. Neither is mine, go ahead and quote meta posts at me when I need reminders.
 
Ask your mods to rename the tags.
 
@doppelgreener Can we drop this now?
I am starting to be in a good mood
 
2:37 PM
Yeah, we can. Just responding to something you said earlier.
@Rainbolt This is good
 
Yeah, that's what I suggested in the meta post. Rename the tags .
 
@Rainbolt Are you a Green player generally?
(Given your well-deserved fascination with that green reset card from Origins)
 
I don't have a color, but I am fascinated by a Green sweeper.
Rarely do you get to play control and ramp.
 
@doppelgreener Pretty sure even non-green players are fascinated by the sweeper XD
 
In fact, it's never been possible since I started playing
 
2:39 PM
Also, wouldn't call it ramp necessarily.
 
I figure we should rename [settlers-of-catan] to [catan] and leave the former as a tag synonym.
But I don't have the reputation and so far nobody has stepped up to do it.
 
No, I mean that you can play green control now. The card itself is not ramp
 
Ahh, got it.
 
I'm not sure what more I can do to make it happen.
 
@Rainbolt that's true...
@Waterseas It's totally a ramp if you also dump a ton of tokens the turn before casting it.
 
2:39 PM
I mean, green has some of the better control cards for a mono color strangely enough.
@doppelgreener Agreed, it is a combo piece.
 
@Waterseas For real!?
 
@doppelgreener Tis not inherently ramp.
 
@Waterseas fair enough yeah
What makes you say green has some of the better control cards though?
 
@doppelgreener Beast Within, Krosan Grip, Relic Crush, Bramblecrush (although mostly only good in limited) Vraska (and yes, the - is a green effect).
 
(My group's only recently dipped our toes in anything like Modern, I've recently just been a standard player where Green isn't typically control.)
 
2:41 PM
Elvish Mystic, Sylvan Caryatid, Courser of Kruphix, reset button
 
@doppelgreener Green isn't a color played in control decks.
@doppelgreener Doesn't mean it doesn't have some good control cards.
 
Sounds fair to me
 
@Thunderforge I actually did propose a tag synonym for catan, but so far nobody has voted for it (probably because very few people have enough rep in the tag)
 
@diego I would certainly vote for it, but yeah, I don't have enough rep in the tag
 
I'm thinking B/G control with Kiora because she lets you play extra lands.
Will only be legal for one summer
 
2:43 PM
I find it a bit frustrating that only a handful of users can vote for synonyms. I guess it makes sense for Stack Overflow, but for BG.SE, it really hinders us effectively using tags.
 
But if U/B can play Ugin, U/G aught to be able to play this 9 drop sweeper easily
 
@Thunderforge mmhm, it is a bit of a pickle
 
@Rainbolt Feels very mediocre. Given that Ojutai is a thing now.
 
@Thunderforge I actually thought about voting for the synonym (because I can) but then I realized I would have to do this four more times and that maybe a mod should just do it
 
Yeah, I'd really like to have a mod just do it, but none have stepped forward. I was hoping to catch one in chat.
 
2:46 PM
@Waterseas Ojutai decks are still losing out to Green Red Dragons
 
@Rainbolt Indeed, however red green dragons isn't a control deck. Any control decks in the current meta want to be playing Ojutai.
 
It'll be interesting to see how things go
Typical fault of green control is card draw and sweepers
This one card solves both
Put in a card that cycles your graveyard, and you can get away with playing a single Ugin as your win condition
Oh wait, the sweeper exiles itself
I said now way Ugin sees play at 8, and was instantly surprised when I saw it make a debut in modern
I'll be just as surprised when nobody plays this card, because I am notoriously bad at speculating
no way*
@doppelgreener What color are you?
Oh wait, you said it was past your bedtime
 
@Rainbolt i am staying up for a bit longer to take care of something
because i am great at bedtime management
(that is not a serious statement)
@Rainbolt started out UB, now mostly attracted to GW
 
3:02 PM
I started off Red, but now I don't have a color
I play the winning deck at big tournaments, and I play whatever deck I think can beat my local meta at FNM
The other guys bring the same deck every week
But I share cards with my boyfriend, and he only likes to draft, so we are more flexible
 
@Rainbolt You were surprised that Ugin saw play in Modern, despite Karn seeing play already? XD
 
Honestly yes, but I see now that it makes sense
I didn't really know much about Modern back then, particularly what a "Tron" deck is
 
Fair enough.
 
@Rainbolt That's excellent. My friends and I haven't yet worked out the right way to manage that. I guess having a partner on those terms helps you manage it c(:
 
Honestly wish I'd speculated a bit more on Monastery Swiftspear.
 
3:06 PM
or rather a way to manage card-sharing that works for us. (generally though it's just "hey can i use that?" "sure", seems to work ok so far :D)
 
Our LGS, generally people are willing to loan cards for the tourneys.
 
@Waterseas I started as a red player in Dragons Maze, so when Ravnica Block rotated I tried to play red again. That meant collecting foil Swiftspears. I got six of them, and then they shot to $20
 
I don't tend to play with other groups or at tournaments, so I mainly just make decks that do fun things vs my friends' decks.
(fun for both of us, hopefully)
 
@Waterseas Same. We take pictures with our smartphones of the pools of cards we loan to people and they cards they loan to us
Last time we hit up Fort Worth, TX for a StarCityGames tournament, we had a group of 12 people.
 
@Rainbolt I did a lot of speculating on Khans. Bought 20-30 Swiftspears at 50 cents each. Unfortunately should've speculated more on Swiftspears than a couple of my others.
 
3:08 PM
For reference, our FNM's usually have about 12 people, so 12 people is like our entire standard group packing up and going to the tournament
Also funny: 90% of our players are banned from another store in town. We literally walk in, and if she recognizes us from Facebook because we have our picture on the Geek World page, she won't let us play there.
She lets me play for some odd reason. Maybe because I sweet talk her all the time
 
Seriously? Banning competition?
Is that the only reason, is because you guys go to another store?
 
There are many reasons
The store is for kids, and she wants to create a safe environment for them
 
>.> How is that relevant?
 
They have more fun in they win in their casual environment
 
@Waterseas Rainbolt makes decks that win. c(:
 
3:11 PM
I'm actually not banned
 
is that around the mark?
 
So... they ban people because they win too much?
 
oh right asdflkasgljadsgkjadg I should just sleep
 
Essentially?
 
Goodnight, you two.
 
3:11 PM
Night
Well now
 
There is actually a group on Facebook called "banned from the castle"
 
Chief of the Foundry is a card
 
Anyway, half of the people are banned because they are too good. A few are banned because of profanity. A few are banned because they attempted to trade (trading is against the rules). A few are banned because they disagreed with her rulings (probably rudely).
 
That first thing is dumb, also, what, why is trading against the rules?
 
She told me that I can't respond to Regenerate. She also ruled that if my Ugin wasn't on the field when his -X ability resolved, that it didn't happen (i.e., the source needs to be on the battlefield still)
She isn't a good judge, and it makes people mad
 
3:14 PM
Welp. That's dumb.
 
@Waterseas To protect the kids from card sharks I suppose
 
Would suggest seeing if there's a texas MTG judges group and make this known to them.
 
The store I frequent took a picture holding a box of Khan's before Khan's was released, and she called DCI and tried to get the store shut down.
 
Bahaha XD To be frank, she sounds like a bit of an a hole.
 
The very next day, we get Freedbirds to sponsor our Prerelease Events on Saturday and Sunday. She calls Freebirds and says they it isn't fair that they are sponsoring only one store both days.
 
3:16 PM
That logic
 
So they call the store I frequent and say "Sorry, but this lady is complaining and we need to be fair."
Like she couldn't have just called Chipotle...
 
Not actually sure what 'Freebirds' is though
 
It's a fast food burrito place. She's also banned from every Chik Fil A in East Texas, every Chipotle in town, two churches, and a bunch of department stores.
 
Wait, what? >.>
 
But I'm still nice to her because she has Game Day at 9:00 AM and my store has Game Day at 7:00 PM. So I get to go to both.
And the kids love her, so whatever right?
 
3:18 PM
Meh, not really
 
Let her have her strange environment
 
Damages kids' mtg experience if they go to play somewhere else, and find out the rules they've been informed of are incorrect.
 
Oh, someone got banned for giving her bad reviews on Facebook. Literally all they did was click on the 1 star button.
Glad I found out about it before I followed suit.
 
Should consider sending Wizards a message about this.
 
I might if she pulls anything weird rules wise in front of me
 
3:20 PM
: p Then its just revenge though.
 
No, I just refuse to submit a formal complaint about something I didn't see for myself
Doesn't have to affect me, I just need to see it
 
Fair enough
 
I'm also really bad at calling judges out for bad rulings
I usually wait until next week to explain it to them
But I don't go there every week
My usual response is "I disagree with your ruling but if that's final then we'll play like that."
 
Generally, unless you have a specific example that points out them being wrong, tis the best way to handle it.
Although generally if I give a ruling I'm unsure about or the person disagrees with, will quickly double check on my phone.
 
Oh, I got someone to certify me finally
This next Prerelease, I'll be tested
 
3:25 PM
For judgeship?
 
Yup!
 
Done the practice tests on DCI?
 
Yes. I can consistently make 95% to 100% on the L1 practice using online resources. I make 70-80% without.
 
Nice ^^
 
This site makes learning the rules inside and out a breeze
However, I feel that we are weak on tournament policy
 
3:27 PM
Tis the case with most new judges anyways
me included.
 
There is a goldmine of good subjective questions that we could ask but I don't think would be well accepted unless that were asked in just the right language
 
Tis not really an issue for just judging FNM type events though.
 
At FNM honestly things get weird. You "fix" the game more often than you hand out warnings or losses
And you have to make subjective decisions often
 
Almost never should be handing out warnings or losses at Regular REL.
 
3:58 PM
I can't wait to judge
I want to bring joy to people by making good rulings.
 
01:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (1702 days earlier)      last day (3225 days later) »