« first day (231 days earlier)      last day (4509 days later) » 

12:36 AM
@ShmuelBrill, hi.
 
1:00 AM
Test: Can I chat here? (I don't have an account on this site, only on math.SE.)
 
1:12 AM
@Srivatsan I see you fine. Welcome!
 
1:29 AM
Hi @msh210, Thanks.
What do people talk about normally here?
 
I am completely new to this site. Looking around.
 
@Srivatsan Officially, it's the site chat room for Jewish Life and Learning, and a good deal of the chat is actually about that. Otherwise, this and that.
@ShmuelBrill hi
Any of the Lubavitchers here happen to know what Rosh Hashana / Yom Kipur poem I've heard youtube.com/watch?v=I4mDRQgR3EE put to? I can't think what it was....
 
Yaaleh Tachanuneinu
 
@ShmuelBrill Thank you!!! It was driving me nuts.
 
1:42 AM
@msh210 do you think there should be a kerovim-close-relative tag?
for the halachic category of relatives
 
@HodofHod, hi, I've always heard niftar for tzadikim. Perhaps histalek is more common in Lubavitch circles. (You're in them, right?)
@HodofHod as opposed to "for relatives" generally? We have a tag for the latter.
 
@msh210 yes
to the second one
 
@HodofHod I have no objection. Are considering its use for any questions about (e.g.) sisters, or only for those that have to do with a sister's status as a k'rova (e.g. for tum'a of a kohen or avelus)?
 
@msh210 to the first one, perhaps thats why. as to whether I'm in the circle, it really depends on how wide you make that circle.
@msh210 any halachos that involve obligations on close relatives, perhaps yibbum/chalitza,
 
1:47 AM
@msh210 none at all
 
@HodofHod I have no objection in theory. I wonder though whether it would 95% ovrlap with the existing relatives tag
@HodofHod okay, thanks, will do.
 
@msh210 perhaps. what is the "family tree" part there for?
@msh210 btw, theres also an Avraham Fried song with the same tune but different lyrics
 
@HodofHod beats me. It's not like I named that tag. Oh, wait, I did. Well, beats me anyway. I think I wanted to include family and didn't want people to think it was for questions about entire families only, and "family-member" was too long.... or something
@HodofHod It's Yaale tachanunenu meerev I was thinking of. Thanks, though.
 
@msh210 I accidentally created the the "kerovim-close-relative" tag, and now it wont let me add the "s".
@msh210 IAE, thanks for pointing me to that beautiful tune. Brightened my evening.
 
@HodofHod I can move. (For the link: )
@HodofHod I see no questions so tagged.
 
1:51 AM
@msh210 I deleted it from my most recent question
 
@HodofHod Good now?
2
Q: When are converts still related to their relatives?

HodofHodIt is my understanding that when a person converts to Judaism, certain halachic relationships are severed. So I have a couple questions about this. Which relationships are severed? Is a convert still related to their Jewish (from birth) father? If a person and their close relative convert tog...

 
@msh210 Gorgeous, thanks!
 
@HodofHod yw
@HodofHod yw
 
@msh210 Thats so cool! Can I task you to cleanup whenever I see similar no-longer-relevant comments? ;-)
 
@HodofHod @ddress me here, I'll be glad to when I have time
 
1:57 AM
@msh210 cool!
 
Now I must —. Happy Chanuka, all.
 
@Srivatsan I hope you dont mind me asking, but out of curiosity, what brings you to this neck of the woods?
 
2:29 AM
@HodofHod I got lost =)
On a serious note, I just wanted to see what the site is like.
 
@Srivatsan Fair enough. Hope you like, and even contribute.
 
@HodofHod Thanks. I am a newbie to Judaism. I fancy learning about it and checking it out though...
 
@Srivatsan This site can get rather technical, but dont let that bother you. We enjoy any and all constructive questions and answers. =D
 
@HodofHod Oh, I see.
Thanks for the heads up. :)
 
2:45 AM
@Srivatsan Pleasure. I hope to see you around =)
 
 
13 hours later…
3:47 PM
Hi all
@IsaacMoses hey ^_^
 
@Neal Good morning.
@Neal I emailed your mother last night, as promised.
 
@IsaacMoses I saw.
did she respond?
@msh210 Lashers? i dont think ive ever heard of them. they live in NY?
 
@Neal Not yet. If she does without Cc:ing you, I'll let you know.
 
@IsaacMoses lol kk
 
 
1 hour later…
5:09 PM
Hey y'all. What's this week's discussion?
 
@HGabriel Vayigash, starting in 17 minutes, but feel free to start posting ideas early if you want.
 
I mean do you guys know the precise topic?
 
@HGabriel Whatever people want to chat about.
... it's not predetermined.
 
@IsaacMoses Would it mateer if we started now?
I'm bored waiting
 
What about in the last aliya where it says that Yaakov was brought to give a Beracha to Paro. Why would Paro need a beracha if he was god?
 
5:23 PM
@HodofHod Like I said, fire when ready. The official "We're starting" message will be at 17:30 UTC.
 
@IsaacMoses Sorry missed that
 
@HodofHod or @IsaacMoses do you guys have any ideas?
 
Just a general Q then. Where did Yaakov live at the time of this story? Chevron, right?
sorry
this story, means this weeks parsha
 
@HGabriel In a polytheistic belief system, no god is all-powerful, so they can each use help from each other, I suppose.
 
@IssacMoses that could also answer the question about Yosef when he answered "G-d gave me the power."
 
5:30 PM
@HodofHod Not sure if it's obvious from the text. Not Shechem. Are you sure it's not Be-er Sheva, like his forebears?
Begin Parashat Hashavu'a Chat #4 - Vayigash 5772
Hi, @MonicaCellio. We got a bit of a head start.
 
Well, in todays portion (revii) it says " וַיִּסַּע יִשְׂרָאֵל וְכָל אֲשֶׁר לוֹ וַיָּבֹא בְּאֵרָה שָּׁבַע"
@IsaacMoses So he started out from somewhere else. l'chora
 
@HodofHod Guess so. Good point. I wonder why he didn't settle there. Isn't that where he grew up?
 
@IsaacMoses It seems according to here that he did live in chevron mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0137.htm#14
 
Welcome, @Alex.
 
@IsaacMoses thanks
 
5:34 PM
Hey @alex, @MonicaCellio,
 
@HodofHod That, plus in Vayishlach it says that he came back to Chevron "where Avraham and Yitzchak had lived," and it doesn't say anything about him moving away from there
 
@HodofHod Ah. 37:14 " So he sent him out of the vale of Hebron, and he came to Shechem."
 
@IsaacMoses np - catching up now
 
@Alex Am I wrong in my impression that they lived in Be-er Sheva?
 
@IsaacMoses They did for a time - evidently they were living there when Yaakov left for Charan (Gen. 28:10, "Yaakov left Be'er Sheva"). They seem to have moved around a lot between there and Chevron, though.
Look at Avraham (Rashi to Gen. 21:34): in Chevron from age 75 to 100, then in Be'er Sheva from then to age 126, and then back to Chevron.
 
5:37 PM
( 8P en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beersheba is blocked by my office filter: "This Websense category is filtered: Alcohol and Tobacco. ")
 
@Alex and right before he went to Egypt Yaakov went to Be'er Sheva, meaning he wasn't already there.
 
So it seems that Yaakov lived in Chevron. So why did he travel to Beer Sheva to bring a korbon?
 
@Alex Why all the moving back and forth?
 
@HodofHod I'm fairly certain R. Hirsch says something on the subject, but I don't recall it.
@IsaacMoses On a simple level: maybe because the pastures for the animals were getting depleted in one place? Though I'm sure there are deeper reasons too.
 
I gotta remember to bring my copy of his commentary with me on Wednesdays.
... Maybe we should each agree to have one commentary available for reference.
 
5:39 PM
@Alex this is what I thought too -- 25 years in one place seems long for livestock.
 
@Alex Is his commentary available online?
 
@HodofHod The last time the Torah mentions Be'er Sheva, Hashem had reiterated His promises to Yitzchak. Maybe that had something to do with it.
@HodofHod Not that I know of.
 
@Alex R' Hirsch does assign different symbolism and psychological import to different locations. I recall that he has Shechem as a gathering place for resistance against tyranny (Yosef's brothers and then again later in Nach)
 
@IsaacMoses Interesting, because the Gemara (Rashi quotes it to 37:14) says that Shechem is מקום מזומן לפורענות! Maybe that tells us something about the different views in Judaism about whether revolution is good or bad.
 
@Alex Sounds promising.
 
5:43 PM
@Alex That actually makes a lot of sense, b/c in the next pasuk, G-d appears to Yaakov and tells him not to worry. Rashi says yaakov was worried about leaving the Holy Land. So we might be able to say that Yaakov traveled to the place where G-d had most recently iterated his promises, to (so to speak) remind G-d of them and ask for guidance and protection before heading to egypt.
 
@Alex and then Yaakov goes there and God tells him to go to Egypt. Yitzchak never left Cana'an; I wonder if Yaakov thought (once he was back) that he shouldn't leave again and needed to be told? Just thinking out loud, not sourced.
 
@Hod, @Monica, good points.
 
@Alex I think R' Hirsch was leaning on Sforno there, FWIW.
 
0
Q: Auto-generated chat event announcement says "right now" early

Isaac MosesWhenever we have a scheduled chat event that's about to start within the next half hour (I think), we get a auto-generated banner on the main and meta sites saying, e.g.: Visit our Parashat Hashavu'a Chat, going on right now. Because this comes up early and says "right now," people invaria...

 
@IsaacMoses btw, is this one of the intended uses of system messages?
 
5:45 PM
@HodofHod Chat events get auto-announced. This was put there by SE devs, so it's definitely intentional.
 
@IsaacMoses ok, cool
 
If it's ok to change topics...
 
@MonicaCellio go ahead, by all means
@yydl, welcome!
 
Hey, @yydl
 
I was wondering about the shepherds. Yosef tells his family to say they're shepherds because that's abhorrant to Egypt (so they'll get sent off on their own), but when Yosef is managing the famine later the Egyptians pledge their livestock (sheep are specifically mentioned). ?
 
5:48 PM
@MonicaCellio Good question!
 
@HodofHod Thank you. Happy to be here. The first Parsha chat I could make it to...
 
Welcom @yydl.
@IsaacMoses I didn't think to check commentaries this morning and don't have books here with me at the office.
 
@MonicaCellio Maybe the Egyptians objected only to eating sheep, but not to keeping them for wool or milk?
 
@MonicaCellio Well, if no one here comes up with anything, you could put it up on Jewish Life and Learning
 
@IsaacMoses true, after I do a little due dilligence at home. :-)
@Alex hmm, maybe -- I wonder if "shepherd" means "keep for food" and they called keeping for wool something different?
 
5:51 PM
@Alex How would that explain their considering shepherds abhorrent? Unless the job description is somehow shepherd/butcher.
@MonicaCellio I guess you may keep the sheep differently, depending? Different feeding practices?
 
@IsaacMoses Dunno, but maybe they just figured that foreigners - barbarians, from their point of view - are more likely to eat the sheep.
 
@IsaacMoses Maybe they fattened up meat animals even then, but for wool and milk that doesn't matter?
@Alex Good point.
 
@MonicaCellio That would make sense.
 
@MonicaCellio or before, if you want. You could write the question while the curiosity is fresh, and an answer later.
 
@IsaacMoses Ok, will do after we're done here.
 
5:53 PM
Hello, @ShmuelBrill
@MonicaCellio Cool. You might as well include the line of speculation we're developing here. Maybe we'll get an answer from an expert on ancient shepherding practices
 
Wow, good crowd here. Welcome @Shmuel
 
Did anyone here come as a result of the new sidebar ad?
 
@IsaacMoses Didn't see it yet. But the system message did the trick...
 
@IsaacMoses I think so
 
5:56 PM
Any other ideas regarding @HGabriel's question about Paro's attitude toward God?
 
@IsaacMoses I think you pretty much nailed it. It would be the same way as with the Roman emperors who considered themselves gods, who nevertheless sought the blessings of other gods in their pantheon.
And here even more so, maybe, since Pharaoh (and lots of the ancient pagans in general) did accept that Hashem is "the G-d of gods," just that He doesn't involve Himself with our material world.
 
@IsaacMoses Did the other nations (like Egypt) perhaps see blessings from others as acknowledgement of their divine status? (Presumably Yisrael didn't or he wouldn't have given it.)
 
@Alex wouldn't this be like the Pope asking for a Beracha from Rav Elyashiv, no?
 
@HGabriel Is that a hypothetical, or something that happened (just curious)?
@MonicaCellio I don't know, but my impression is that recipients of blessings in the Torah are mortals all the time
 
@HGabriel But the Pope thinks that his G-d is the same as ours (which is true to a limited extent - his involves shituf); Pharaoh didn't equate himself, or any of his other gods, with Yaakov's G-d. Anyway, though, where do we see that Pharaoh asked Yaakov for a blessing? Yaakov seems to have given it on his own, unprompted.
 
6:03 PM
@IsaacMoses hypothetical
@Alex Wouldn't this be the same idea that he wouldn't go to the bathroom in front of them? He was afraid to show any signs that he was human.
 
@Alex There's also the question of whether they were speaking directly. If Paro didn't speak Hebrew and Yaakov didn't speak Egyptian there would have been translators; in modern diplomacy they sometimes advise people of what to say. So a courtier could have suggested the blessing.
 
@HGabriel I kind of wonder whether that was true of the Pharaoh of Yosef's time. If so, then that would open up a different problem: how could Yosef swear by his life (in last week's parsha)? You're not allowed to swear by the name of an idol.
 
@Alex good question. Do you have an answer?
 
And he himself does acknowledge G-d's power, when he tells Yosef that "since G-d has told you all of this, there is none as wise as you..."
@HGabriel That's what leads me to believe that maybe this idea of Pharaoh considering himself a deity came along only later, in Moshe's time.
 
@Alex Clearly, these two Pharaohs had different attitudes toward God, if the former received His blessing and the latter said "Who is that?"
 
6:06 PM
@Alex as for the last statement, he could have considered a lower level diety
 
Hi, @msh210
 
@IsaacMoses Well, you could nitpick there: in talking to Yosef he uses the name Elokim; with Moshe he says "Who is YKVK?"
 
@Alex Does that square with what secular historians say about the development of religion in Egypt?
 
@Alex brings another famous question from later Parashiot, how didn't this "new" king know Yosef?
 
@Alex Interesting. In that case, in the former case, he may have only been acknowledging God as "a god" (chas veshalom) but still wouldn't have been cool with the universal YKVK concept.
 
6:08 PM
@Alex not really nitpicking. He could understand a "G-d within Nature" but not a "G-d higher than nature"
 
@IsaacMoses No idea. (And that would anyway depend on where in known Egyptian history the whole story of Yosef is slotted in anyway.)
@ShmuelBrill OK, but that wouldn't really bear on whether he should let the Jews go for a three-day furlough.
 
@HGabriel Good question -- it's only a few generations and the new Paro doesn't know Yosef? On the other hand, maybe something happened during that time to prompt revisionist history?
 
@MonicaCellio "We have always been at war with Eastasia..."
2
 
@Alex Exactly. (Was trying to think of a real-world example but, well, if it worked I wouldn't know. :-) )
 
@MonicaCellio Depends on what "know" means. It could just mean "acknowledge."
 
6:11 PM
@MonicaCellio And all the more so in a society where literacy existed but was far from universal.
 
@MonicaCellio that's like saying that a 30-50 year old American man not know who George Bush is. How did he not know him? "Asher Lo Yada Et Yosef- That didn't know Yosef." Maybe it means it literally- he didn't personally know him, meaning he was a new king.
 
@Alex And in a society that considers its rulers gods, they would want to credit the ruler, not one of his subordinates, with the great feat of managing the famine.
 
@IsaacMoses Actually, that's true, because if it just meant knowing that Yosef had existed, it might have used a term like הכיר rather than ידע.
 
@Alex that's what I'm saying, not everyone knew him personally.
 
@IsaacMoses and @Alex, oh, good point.
 
6:13 PM
@HGabriel look up history in the Soviet Union.
 
@ShmuelBrill what exactly do you mean?
 
@HGabriel Historically, he might indeed not have known him. Yosef died in 2309 and the enslavement of the Jews began in 2361; with the low life expectancy of those days, his grandfather might have been the last Pharaoh to know Yosef personally.
 
@IsaacMoses Hi (and to all); sorry, was backreading.
 
@Alex but they didn't learn history and the stories of amazing viceroy Yosef who saved the country?
@msh210 Hello
 
@HGabriel Whenever someone was put on the "public enemy" list, he not only was public enemy now, but also was always a public enemy
 
6:16 PM
@HGabriel Yeah, but like Monica and Shmuel are saying, it might have been more politically convenient not to.
 
@HGabriel Maybe not if it's more politically expedient to tell tales of amazing Paro Senior who saved the country.
 
And, BTW, these were well known high up people who were seen by the masses on TV.
And this change from "most beloved" to "most evil" could take place within a few DAYS.
 
There are also historians who claim that the era of Yosef coincides with the period when the Hyksos (invaders from Asia) ruled Egypt. If so, then when the native Egyptians came back to power (the 18th dynasty), they would indeed have had good reason to try to erase the memory of Yosef and of all of that line of pharaohs.
 
@Alex the Torah won't lie- it wouldn't say "that didn't know Yosef" it would have said "he said he didn't know Yosef."
@ShmuelBrill I don't follow
@Monica I hear that
 
@Alex We know the timeline (when Yosef was; even if archaeologists/historians don't agree). Are historians/archaeologists clear on the Egyptian-history timeline? if so, we can match 'em up easily.
 
6:19 PM
@HGabriel Right, but it might be meant in more than one sense: he actually never knew Yosef personally (having been born long after Yosef died), but more to the point, he didn't care to look up what actually happened.
 
@HGabriel (To show what you're replying to, point your mouse at the right edge of the message you're replying to, then click on the little arrow that appears, then type your reply.)
 
@HGabriel It does say "he".
 
@msh210 It ain't so simple. Various historians reconstruct the dates of Egyptian history a little differently, for one thing. R' Aryeh Kaplan (in his notes to Me'am Loez) tries to put together some such equations, but some of them are a little forced.
 
@msh210 I think he said "asher lo yada et yosef"
 
@HGabriel Yes, that's singular.
 
6:21 PM
@msh210 but still how could he not know him?
 
Before more people leave, anyone else want to volunteer (beli neder) to have a particular commentary on hand in future chats? I've already called R' Hirsch.
 
@msh210 the Torah would not lie
 
Hi all
 
@HGabriel Remember that ידע can also mean "have a close connection with" (as in והאדם ידע את חוה, or רק אתכם ידעתי מכל משפחות האדמה). So it might be meant in that sense too.
 
Hello, @Neal
 
6:23 PM
@Neal hi
 
@Neal hi
@Alex we have to see the Mefarshim to see what it means here, because it has different meanings at different times.
 
@IsaacMoses I'll take Malbim.
 
@IsaacMoses I'll take anything that's online ;-)
 
@IsaacMoses @IsaacMoses Rabenu Bahya
 
@Alex Thanks! jake might want that too, but that wouldn't be a problem.
@HGabriel Great!
 
6:26 PM
@IsaacMoses He can have Abarbanel instead, being our resident expert on it. :)
 
@msh210 I'll take anything online and HTML (I sometimes have trouble with PDFs).
I could take Rashi via that chabad link from earlier?
Or does everybody but me have Rashi memorized? :-)
 
@MonicaCellio Well, we can all look it up easily on chabad.org or he.wikisource.org
 
@HGabriel Onkelos: "Dela mekayeim gezeirat Yosef" hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9596&st=&pgnum=8
 
@MonicaCellio I havent quite finished memorizing Rashi. Theres a couple more chapters in Bava Kamma I have to do.
 
@IsaacMoses ...whatever that means.
 
6:28 PM
@msh210 ok - wasn't sure if we were looking for "designated looker-uppers".
 
@IsaacMoses If jake wants Rabenu Bahya, I'll take Ramban
 
@MonicaCellio That could actually be worthwhile too.
 
@IsaacMoses What decree?? (Translation of Onkelos is "...who was not upholding Yosef's decree".)
 
@msh210 Actually, I'd think that he'd want to keep at least one of Yosef's gezeiros: that all land in the country belongs to the king, and he's entitled to 20% of the crops!
 
@IsaacMoses good find
 
6:30 PM
@HGabriel I'm pretty sure that as Alex says, jake'd actually go for Abarbanel. My mistake re:Malbim
 
@Alex Yeah. What else did Yosef decree?
Exemption for priests? That (according to midrashim) was upheld thereafter also.
 
@msh210 He served as vizier for 80 years; I'm sure there must have been a fat book of his rules.
 
Targum Yonatan: "Dela chakim yat Yosef vela halich binemusoi" hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9596&st=&pgnum=11
 
@msh210 this may be obvious but since he was king Paro would leave the Jews alone- not really a Gezera though
 
@IsaacMoses it's 1:30, if you wanna call it.
@Alex Well, yes but what's Onkelos referring to? Just all his decrees, in general?
/me goes to check onkelos: is it singular or plural?
 
6:32 PM
And the Gemara just says דהוה דמי כמאן דלא ידע ליה כלל - that he acted like someone who didn't know him at all.
@msh210 Possible. He might have arrogantly figured that he knows better than some foreigner how the country should be run.
 
@msh210 No vav in the text I linked to. Looks singular
 
@msh210 Singular, I think.
 
@msh210 I'm loathe to
 
@Alex maybe his burned his rule book
 
@HGabriel Actually, that's a fair point: it might be referring to the fact that Yosef had designated the Jews as honored citizens
 
6:34 PM
... but, seeing as I ought to return to work, and others probably do too, and without chas veshalom suggesting that people should actually stop chatting if they want to keep going ...
End of Parashat Hashavu'a Chat #4 - Vayigash 5772
Big yeyasher kochachem to everyone
 
Thanks to all!
 
Thanks everyone! Great chat.
 
Thank you everyone! Ashrechem WeAshre Helkechem
 
Yes, thanks to all. I hope to be here for more of it in the future....
 
Same time next week? Same day?
 
6:36 PM
@msh210 what's with this East-Coast-centrism, BTW? ;^)
 
@HGabriel Same bat time, same bat chat room.
@IsaacMoses When in Rome, New York, do as the Romans do.
(And, yes, that is what they're called there, or so I've heard.)
 
@HGabriel If there are any changes, they'll be edited in at meta.judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/520/…
 
@IsaacMoses is it east-coast-centric? I can't think of a better time that works for Israel, the US west coast, and everything in between (if we get any Australians it'll be impossible)
 
And people from Troy, NY are called Trojans.
And people from Schenectady, new York, are called ...
 
@MonicaCellio (I meant his reference to the time in EST terms. It's 12:38 for me now)
 
6:38 PM
"people from Schenectady".
 
@IsaacMoses Oh, sorry.
 
@msh210 This is the Internet. We all think in UTC terms here.
 
@IsaacMoses Okay, fair enough. Then why does the little white tag to the right of my last post here, just above, say "12:38"?
 
@MonicaCellio But yeah, there probably isn't another time that would be significantly better for most people.
@msh210 Aha! So, you're in Central, too!
 
@IsaacMoses No, I'm in Almaty.
(No joke: I have a first cousin who used to live there. He now lives in Turkey somewhere: I think Istanbul.)
 
6:44 PM
Everyone is still in the chat room :)
 
@msh210 Kazakh Kazakh venitkazeikh, then.
3
@HGabriel PS: You can also see the schedule of upcoming events here: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/info/468/…
 
@IsaacMoses thank you!
 
Three more upvotes to make this go live.
 
@IsaacMoses ^_^
 
6:58 PM
Number of pages per chat transcript when I do "Print Preview" (not sure of an easier way to measure legnth): 6, 7, 7, 12
 
@IsaacMoses # of posts is another way, though I'll grant it's not easier!
0
Q: bookmarked conversations should include more metadata

msh210It would be nice if each bookmarked chat conversation would indicate, in the sidebar (where it lists the participants), the number of posts and the length of time from start to end. The former is useful specifically in comparing periodically repeated chats (like our Parashat Hashavu'a Chat), ...

 
@msh210 Wait a second, they do!
75, 88, 99, 184
 
@IsaacMoses Where do you see that?
 
chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/info/468/… Look at each conversation.
The planning meeting had 195 messages.
 
@IsaacMoses Oh, just not on the conversation page itself. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
7:08 PM
An average of ~3 per minute in both the meeting and today's chat. I actually hope it won't get much higher than that.
There was a little bit of slow time today, but not that much. If the messages come significantly faster, I, for one, will have trouble keeping up.
 
@IsaacMoses I can't judge, myself, not having been here. That is, I couldn't keep up, but that's because I was backreading. :-)
 
7:33 PM
0
Q: bookmarked conversations should include more metadata

msh210It would be nice if each bookmarked chat conversation would indicate, in the sidebar (where it lists the participants), the number of posts and the length of time from start to end. The former is useful specifically in comparing periodically repeated chats (like our Parashat Hashavu'a Chat), ...

 
7:52 PM
Hi @MarthaF! How'd you get the SA apron?
 
 
1 hour later…
8:59 PM
@msh210 - She was one of a few high-rep users who got swag.
(I got a messenger bag and a Nalgene bottle from Bicycles, for being a pro-tem mod there. We're a Stack Exchange household!)
 
@msh210 @NeilFein's got it. Check out meta.cooking.stackexchange.com/questions/1239/…
 
It has been recognized by SE that my wife is awesome.
 
@msh210 They may end up selling the aprons in the store eventually, but they
arent' there yet.
 
I want a tallit bag and a mezuza case emblazoned with whatever Jin ends up coming up with for us.
 
9:19 PM
@IsaacMoses, Sorry I missed the Parshat Hashavua chat today. I had the opportunity to do some real chavrusa-style learning in an actual, physical Beis Midrash.
 
@jake We missed you.
 
@IsaacMoses - Now that the chat has happened, should I delete the ad in meta or just change it to the next one?
 
I should be around in future weeks, though. In which case, I would be glad to have my Abarbanel handy. Glad you all know me well enough to assume so. (I read the chat transcript.)
 
(I assume the name will change to the next portion.)
 
@jake I got it wrong at first, but yes, please do bring your Abarbanel!
 
9:22 PM
@IsaacMoses Actually, Malbim would have been a close second.
And Alshich
 
@NeilFein The ad points to the generic chat announcement. Only the last link there needs to change and does. No need to change the ad.
@jake phew. I wasn't too off then.
 
Sorry, I thought that was a name of the weekly parsha. Cool.
Maybe we can vary the background color every few weeks, to keep it lively.
 
@NeilFein See the comments here. Ads are generally meant to be static over the half-year period (or in this case, the two months for which we temporarily have this tool).
@NeilFein Sorry about that. I added a translation near the top of the announcement.
 
@Isaac - No worries, people who are the target audience are going to know this.
 
@NeilFein "... and anyone interested in learning more. "
 
9:30 PM
True.
 
@NeilFein Stands to reason.
 
Granted, in the chat itself, concepts fly fast and furious, and people are probably less likely to write accessibly than they are on the main site. However, I'm pretty sure that if it was clear that there was someone present who needed terms translated, people would adjust their style accordingly.
 
OTOH, I wouldn't want to cramp anyone's style.
 
@NeilFein Please don't let that prevent you from coming to the chat some time. The more, the merrier, and you'd probably enjoy it.
 
9:45 PM
@neilfein. I don't think anybody would mind, even if they did have a style to cramp
 
10:15 PM
@Menachem, well done! I'm surprised that @Alex and @HodofHod didn't come up with this during the chat. :)
 
anything going with this?
Hi @NeilFein ^_^
 
@Neal I've announced it to crowds a couple of times here, but no more votes. If people would like to see improvements to it, I hope they'll post comments to that effect.
 
@IsaacMoses I have improved it to the comments...
I am no graphic designer lol
 
@Neal I think you did a fine job. I don't know why people aren't voting it up. But if there's a specific reason, I hope people will say so or post an alternative.
 
@IsaacMoses :-\
:-(
@IsaacMoses i removed the transparent background for the latest version
 
10:22 PM
@Neal Thanks
 
@IsaacMoses check it out in your back method ^_^
 
@Neal Yup, no more checkerboard.
 
@IsaacMoses w00t
@IsaacMoses I guess my mom never responded.
 
@Neal It's not been 24 hours yet. I don't know her daily routine, but she may not deal with that email address except in the evening.
 
@IsaacMoses lol true :-P
 
10:33 PM
I heard (years ago and not from any particular authority AFAIR) that one should give as long for an e-mailed reply as for a snail-mailed one.
As always, CYLEE.
 
@msh210 :-P
 
@msh210 That doesn't make sense. The latency is much shorter, and the communication style in play varies much more.
@msh210 Electrical Engineer? The people who wrote about computers before computers became their own specialty? That would explain the archaic convention.
 
@IsaacMoses :-) Etiquette expert.
@IsaacMoses I agree.
 
@msh210 Pre-Internet poet Cummings who ahead of his time, disregarded proper grammar in his writing?
 
@IsaacMoses That'd be CYLee.
 
10:38 PM
... but anyway, she has no obligation to reply at any time, much less immediately.
@msh210 touche
 
10:49 PM
1
Q: Shouldn't people be notified when a voted upon answer is later edited?

MenachemThis ones been bugging me for a while. Many times, people will vote on my answers, and then I'll edit it afterwards. They should be notified when I edit it, so that they can choose to see if they still agree with their vote, in light of the changes made to the answer (or question). Unless I'm ...

 
 
1 hour later…
11:51 PM
@Neal @IsaacMoses - I already left a comment about the ad. Others may disagree, but I think the calendar grid makes the text hard to read. With an ad, people look at it for maybe half a second if you're lucky.
 

« first day (231 days earlier)      last day (4509 days later) »