« first day (2458 days earlier)      last day (2564 days later) » 

12:00 AM
It's a good thing your aren't in a complete space, @Daminark
Or maybe that is bad.
 
Unbounded sequence of gulps
 
I wonder if I can have a martini on top of the pain killer pills.
 
How strong are they?
 
Not strong enough to kill all the pain yet. But I only took one, about 2 hours ago.
 
And lol @Eric I'm intrigued by stuff like combinatorics and graph theory so if grad schools or later on academic employers are all "Hahahahahah nope" I'll try to see if I can get the tech people to hire me to do that
Still, the anxiety is real
And @Ted it's probably not something like Vicodin then, in which case it's hard to say, but be cautious for sure
 
12:06 AM
Combinatorics is great. I just had an exam in that today.
 
No, not that powerful. Just an acetominophen-hydrocodone mix.
 
@Daminark combinatorics genuinely terrifies me
 
Why is that Eric?
 
Counting is hard!
@Eric: You keep using words you should probably avoid — terror, anxiety, ...
 
@Ted you're probably right.. midterm week is getting to me, I'll do some yoga later to calm down or something
 
12:12 AM
Great idea.
 
@anakhronizein like Ted said counting is hard, I've actively tried to learn combinatorics sometimes and just get nowhere, for some reason it just hasnt gotten through my head
 
What kind of combinatorics?
Generating functions and the likes?
 
whatever is taught in a usual first intro to combinatorics
 
@anakhronizein I've only seen basic stuff in like, graph theory
 
Should try reading Wilf's book. Generatingfunctionology or something like that.
 
12:15 AM
oh ive chuckled at this name before
 
@Eric Talk to Laci at some point in your life. He's harsh but he really makes things clear
 
oh I know, I've seen him lecture a couple times and he's great
 
Daminark, are these people you know in real life? Or on stackexchange?
 
when I was a prospective student visiting chicago I sat in on one of his graph theory lectures and it was fantastic
daminark and I know each other in real life
 
Laci? I know him in real life, he's straight up my favorite teacher, period
 
12:17 AM
Oh I see.
 
Oh I know Eric in real life
 
They're all fakes ... every one of them.
3
 
I was just confused at all the references to exact names.
 
Daminark and I are the same person, running two accounts and masquerading as different people
 
Oh don't listen to strikethroughtextcommandhere{me} him, he's just kidding
 
12:21 AM
Do people do reading groups via the stackexchange chats ever?
 
That actually never came to mind @anakh, sounds interesting...
 
Balarka and MikeM have a joint reading project going.
 
Though the absence of a chalkboard and Hagoromo is perhaps saddening (though LaTeX helps)
 
On what subject, Ted?
 
yeah, I need blackboards, Demonark.
foliation theory
 
12:25 AM
Oh interesting I have never heard of that.
 
@Daminark it's all about that hagoromo
 
Ah, I remember Balarka saying he's doing that. And @Ted the main thing I think I'd lose from doing it over chat is pictures
 
right, Demonark, I concur completely.
That's why I told you you'd have to give me your lecture on Skype.
 
Which may be a bit of a big blow in certain topics since I tend to hash out things through them, but if what's being done is not conducive to pictures, or they're available on wikipedia, I'd be up for one of those
Makes sense @Ted
 
You can always draw on ms paint or somethin
 
12:29 AM
ugh
 
It takes so long to draw things..
I need to draw some things..
 
heya @PVAL
 
@Eric Right? And @anakh why do you say such things?
Next we're gonna start writing everything in comic sans (which I don't particularly mind for some reason...)
 
Hiya @Ted
 
reminds Demonark he has a midterm to study for
 
12:30 AM
I don't think anything is particularly wrong with drawing sketches in ms paint
It's a bit more versatile than a chalkboard
 
Yeah that is true, I should head out at this point
Hibye @PVAL! :P, and bye everybody!
 
Good luck on the exam.
 
Thanks
 
@Ted Did you figure out the star-shaped thing?
 
Indeed, bon chance.
 
12:32 AM
Oh, nope.
 
@TedShifrin what is your research in?
 
I'm retired. I used to do differential and complex geometry.
 
@anakhronizein Bridge and wine
 
@PVAL, and hopefully tennis again.
 
12:43 AM
I guess he might be retired now.
 
Actually, food is high on the list, @PVAL.
 
Axiomatic logicians of the internet, what's your get-quick-rich schema?
 
Conservative extensions to ZFC.
 
Bye all, for now.
 
12:55 AM
I think it would be cool to start another room for a reading group, and it would probably work best with short things, like a single chapter of a book or a paper or something.
 
hi there, i was wondering if the surface generated from the equation of this answer: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1621403/catenary-equation-of-a-plane-3d/1621554#1621554?newreg=cebfacf3c9d14e3eb262289eac77ce6b

has any specific name.

i mean, i thought it'd be a catenoid, but it seems it's only a catenoid if the revolution is around the directrix
 
hi @TedShifrin
 
@JuanSebastianLozano a short book would work too.
 
@anakhronizein Yeah, it certainly would. What subjects are y'all interested in? I'd be happy to do one on pretty much any area of differential geometry or analysis, or some representation theory, or geometric group theory, or some introductory algebraic geometry.
 
I am basically interested in anything. :)
 
1:11 AM
I've been wanting to read this paper on measured group theory for a while, but I'm not sure who is interested in that.
 
Looks pretty interesting.
I am weak in measure theory, but I would be up for it.
 
I'm pretty good in measure theory (well, I've been working on some projects with it for a while, so I am at least used to it). How good are you with group theory?
 
Pretty decent.
 
[that wasn't meant as bragging, I meant I could help you out if we read it]
 
I don;t know how good this paper would assume though.
I am done my undergraduate degree.
So I have had a few classes on algebra
 
1:17 AM
Alright, cool. I'm currently in my undergrad, but I've had a fair bit of algebra already, so I think we will be fine.
It's a survey article kind of aimed at beginning grad students, so I think undergrad algebra should be enough.
 
Good, good. Then I should be able to manage it easily enough.
 
I started a room where anyone who wants to join the reading group can go: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/57795/…
 
1:49 AM
what are hyperbolic functions
 
hyperbolic trig functions. did you google the term?
 
was looking at steps to get a definite integral and it was in there. I have no idea what im looking at
 
In what context?
Oh, I see
 
$\cosh$ (pronounced either "hyperbolic cosine" or "cosh") is defined to be $\dfrac{e^x+e^{-x}}2$
 
googled it, not sure we're supposed to be doing this yet
 
1:51 AM
where $e\approx2.718\dots$
$\sinh$ (pronounced either "hyperbolic sine" or… I actually don't know) is defined to be $\dfrac{e^x-e^{-x}}2$.
What do these have to do with the regular sine and cosine?
 
cant really determine a definite relation from the graphs i see on wikipedia
 
Well, there's a weird connection that has to do with the hyperbola (that shape with the two pieces)
 
but they look similar to their respective trig functions
 
But the simple version is: the addition formulas and the differentiation formulas for these look similar to the formulas for the regular trig stuff.
For example, $\sin'=\cos$ and $\cos'=-\sin$, but $\sinh'=\cosh$ and $\cosh'=\sinh$ (note the missing minus sign).
 
yess
following
 
1:55 AM
Also, if I recall correctly, $\sinh(a+b)=\sinh(a)\cosh(b)+\sinh(b)\cosh(a)$ (like the regular ones)
and $\cosh(a+b)=\cosh(a)\cosh(b)+\sinh(a)\sinh(b)$ (the regular version has a minus instead of a plus)
Oh, also, $\cosh^2-\sinh^2=1$.
So like the regular version but with a minus.
I think $\sinh$ is pronounced "sinch" by the way
 
oh god more stuff to memorize :( where in calculus is this used extensively? (if at all)
 
Useful in solving some integrals. If you've learned trig substitution - it's like that.
But I don't think it's used a whole lot
Besides, you can always go back to the definitions and rewrite everything in terms of $e^x$ rather than hyperbolic stuff if you want
 
one place where it comes up which is sorta funny is in special relativity
 
thankfully. I have to cram the some of the identities before exams sometimes ;(
 
Have you learned Euler's identity?
The $e^{ix}$ stuff ("what does it mean to raise something to an imaginary power?")?
 
1:59 AM
Not really. It has been touched here and there during lectures, but I don't go to class very often
and it doesnt show up in any of the online quizes or homework either
 
Oh. OK.
To touch on it briefly:
Euler's formula says that $e^{ix}=\cos(x)+i\sin(x)$. (A cool consequence of this is "De Moivre's theorem", which also has another proof that doesn't use Euler's formula).
Another consequence of it is that we get:
$\sin(x)=\dfrac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$
$\cos(x)=\dfrac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}2$
These are formulas for the regular trig functions, not the hyperbolic ones!
The fact that these look so similar to the hyperbolic definitions explains why they have similar properties.
(De Moivre's theorem, by the way, says that $(\cos(a)+i\sin(a))^n=\cos(na)+i\sin(na)$.)
 
@AkivaWeinberger but here i would have expected: $$\frac {e^{ix}-cos(x)}{i}$$
is there another identitity/theorem involved which i dont know about?
 
why would you have expected that?
 
That works also, but the point of those is just to use $e$ on the right hand side and not any trig functions explicitly
@arctictern Solving for it
 
2:06 AM
@WillNjundong Remember that $\cos(-x)=\cos(x)$ (it's an even function) and $\sin(-x)=-\sin(x)$ (it's an odd function).
 
@AkivaWeinberger ahh i see
@AkivaWeinberger so I can easily derive the hyperbolic functions from these?
 
To be explicit about the connection between these and the hyperbolic functions: $\sin(ix)=-i\sinh(x)$ and $\cos(ix)=\cosh(x)$.
(How can you take the sine of an imaginary angle? Through those formulas, that's how.)
(Well, I suppose there's another way:
 
one can also talk about hyperbolic rotations of points on a hyperbola (analogous to rotations of points on a circle)
 
Use the approximations $\sin(x)\approx x$ and $\cos(x)\approx1$ for small $x$, which come from the tangent lines to those functions.
Decide that these should work for complex numbers as well, so that $\sin(0.0001i)\approx0.0001i$ and $\cos(0.0001i)\approx1$.
And also decide that the angle sum formula should work for complex numbers, and use the angle sum formula ten thousand times to arrive at $\sin(i)$ and $\cos(i)$.
To get better and better approximations, take the limit as the $0.0001$ part goes to zero.)
 
Of course small here would refer to the modulus, as there is no order defined on $\mathbb C$
 
2:11 AM
Yeah
 
@WillNjundong You could also use the power series expansion of sin and cos over $\mathbb C$
 
(I said "decide" because, technically, we could define the sine and cosine of an imaginary number to be anything we want. But if we want a useful definition, we'd probably want it to satisfy those properties.)
 
Although that is the same thing as exponentials when you think about it
 
(And we'd also need to prove that those properties aren't self-contradictory. They aren't, though, so everything's fine.)
 
Hi
 
2:15 AM
In any case: Doing that process eventually leads to $\sin(i)=1.175\dots i$, and luckily $1.175\ldots=\dfrac{e-e^{-1}}2=\sinh(1)$.
I made a typo above. $\sin(ix)=i\sinh(x)$, not $-i\sinh(x)$.
 
wow...the world of math...
 
Also, I'm kind of getting off on a tangent here, but have you ever wondered what $\arcsin(2)$ could mean?
 
Another example I like is solving $sin(x) + cos(x) = 2$
 
Well, you'd think it's meaningless, since $\sin$ is always between $-1$ and $1$.
But now we've just defined the sine of a complex number, which changes everything.
 
@AkivaWeinberger no, lol
 
2:19 AM
In fact: $\sin\left(\dfrac\pi2-i\ln(2+\sqrt3)\right)=2$.
 
@TimTheEnchanter solving it?
 
That is, the sine of complex numbers need not be contained between $-1$ and $1$.
 
@WillNjundong You can rewrite it as $sin(x + \frac{\pi}{4})= \sqrt(2)$
And take the arcsin of $\sqrt 2$
Which is complex like akiva said
 
TL;DR: Hyperbolic functions are things with properties similar to the trigonometric functions, and their names end in "h" (like "sinh" and "cosh"). They are defined in terms of $e^x$ and stuff. There's a deeper connection between them and the trigonometric functions that involves the complex numbers and Euler's formula.
 
understood
 
2:23 AM
They can be useful in solving some integrals, but they're never necessary since you can always replace them with the $e^x$-and-stuff in the final answer if you want.
 
@AkivaWeinberger just wondering. why was it useful to look into these by whoever established these relationships?
 
Not sure. Googling.
 
@Akiva O/H = 2 means the triangle is laying flat on the ground and you're looking down at it slightly in a line of sight defining a vertical plane with its hypotenuse
can you believe i figured that out without leaving my desk :)
 
@WillNjundong It seems to suggest that part of its history was motivated by the following question: "What shape is a hanging chain?" (It looks like a parabola but not quite)
Turns out, the answer is "the graph of the $\cosh$ function".
 
wow....someone really went through the math to figure that out XD
 
2:30 AM
It was a famous problem for a while :P
 
thanks for looking into it
 
Lots of people couldn't figure it out.
I think one of the Bernoulli brothers first solved it?
In addition to that, if you know what a power series is, it's very natural to go from $\sin$ to $\sinh$ (the power series of $\sin$ has alternating plusses and minuses; if you change them all to plusses, you get $\sinh$). Similarly for $\cos$ and $\cosh$.
 
I don't know what the physical problem is, but the hyperbolic functions are soultions of very nice ODE's similar to the sine functions.
It's easy to imagine these ode's occuring in nature.
 
(cosh,sinh) parametrizes a hyperbola
also, catenary (hanging chain problem)
 
Yeah, "catenary" is the name of the shape.
Turns out that an upside-down catenary makes a good shape for an arch, also.
 
2:35 AM
or a road for a square wheel
 
Huh, never knew that those were catenaries.
 
@AkivaWeinberger any useful application for this?
 
I've ridden on that once :)
@WillNjundong Pretty sure no
 
i think we just found one
 
heh, answered my question befor ei asked ;)
 
2:37 AM
Yeah, makes a fun exhibit I guess :P
 
@AkivaWeinberger but thats one right there
 
I'm not convinced that there aren't lots of shapes, which a square wheel works on.
 
well a square certainly rolls best on something oval like or circular :)
 
what if the square wheel is allowed to slide as long as its center stays level
 
@PVAL-inactive I think it probably would be unique if you want it to roll without slipping
 
2:39 AM
@PVAL-inactive One place in physics where hyperbolic functions show up is special relativity, amusingly.
 
is there another road for a greasy square wheel?
and can you still drive that thing on the catenary with no friction?
 
@semiclassical I suspect they show up there quite directly because they are the solutions to $f'' =f , f(0)=0,1$.
 
it seems like maybe it would slide backwards if both wheels are rolling up the same time
 
Actually, no.
 
2:44 AM
The point is really that a rotation takes a spatial vector gives a linear combination of two spatial vectors, whereas a boost (picking a reference frame that's moving faster in some direction) would give a combination of a spatial vector and a temporal vector.
 
Props to whoever came up with the idea of making it a cone-shaped thingy
 
props to whoever came up with circular shaped wheels
 
@arctictern hey, really nice answer, thank you. I'm still reading it through
 
They seem to work a lot better.
 
Well, I guess it's probably the natural response to "Maybe we should make the tracks go in a circle, how do we do that"
 
2:45 AM
And just as the rotated spatial vector have cos,sine components, so too will the boosted spatial vector have cosh,sinh components.
It boils down to time being equivalent to an imaginary spatial direction.
("What about rapidity?" "Quiet, you.")
 
Special relativity is kind of "special"
 
3:03 AM
That's a fun exercise, DogAteMy — it's in the first chapter of my diff geo text — getting the road for the square-wheeled bicycle
really interesting exercise is: given the path of the back wheel of a bicycle, what's the path the front wheel is following?
(That's for a regular bicycle.)
 
(Sorry, misread)
 
Oh, I missed whatever you done said.
 
I confused it for the one you had in your linear algebra book (figuring out which of the two paths was from the front wheel and finding out in which direction the bike went)
 
oh, not linear alg, but multivariable — yeah, that classic problem led to my writing the other one.
 
What I meant, sorry
 
3:10 AM
It turns out that except for two basic cases, you can't solve the diff eqn in closed form. But it's a great question.
 
It has lots of linear algebra-y stuff in it
 
It's amazing how quiet it is when certain people are actually studying for midterm exams ...
 
hi everyone
 
hi Leaky
 
Per this and this, considering that I will not use my alternative account again, and considering the fact that there has been (and will be) no interactions between the two accounts, I don't see any problem with having a (now inactive) second account.
 
3:24 AM
this is too complicated for me
 
Sigh :( didnt finish my real analysis paper
 
@TedShifrin I'm just doing a disclaimer
 
oh oh @Little
 
@TedShifrin All I mean is, I have a second account that I will never use again.
 
well fine, then, leaky
 
3:25 AM
Basic topology and sequence/series of functions were not tested, sigh
 
@TedShifrin I guess you can figure out who I am
 
I have no idea
 
Instead, countable sets were tested, and i spent 30min doing the 10marks question
 
@TedShifrin you will. I don't feel safe publicly announcing my second account despite what I said above.
We have had quite a few interactions.
 
if i wasnt me
I'd guess me
 
3:28 AM
lol
 
How can i be so unlucky, the only part that i didnt revise is countable sets!!!
 
guesses @PVAL
that's Murphy's Law, @Little
 
@LittleRookie for example?
 
It was a rather straightforward question, but i took longer than requored because i didnt revise countable sets since recess week
 
From countable sets to uniform convergence is a huge amount of stuff
 
3:31 AM
Can I share a thing?
 
Suppose given a finite set A and a countable set B where both A and B contain distinct elements and the intersection of A and B is empty
 
For obvious reasons, I don't believe in Ted talks unless I'm talking
14
 
Prove the union of A and B is countable
Its a straightforward question
 
OK, that shouldn't have taken too long
 
I took 30mins!
 
3:32 AM
oh dear
1, 2, 3, ...., k, k+1, k+2, k+3, .... k+n, ....
 
just relabel the elements
 
Do you understand what I just wrote, @Little?
Huh?
 
Never mind, I read it wrongly
 
How do I biject $\{1,2,3,\ldots\}$ with $\{1,2,3,\ldots\}\cup\{a,b,c,d,e\}$?
 
Yes i did that
 
3:35 AM
(All of my finite sets contain at most 26 elements)
 
I guess I've been saying too much
 
Oh, but you've already solved the problem now, yeah? @LittleRookie
Do you know how to show that countably infinite plus countably infinite equals countably infinite?
 
But took me 30min of my exam time
 
Oh, this was on an exam!
Oh, no :(
 
It means you need to practice writing basic proofs more quickly ... practice is the key for most everyone.
 
3:38 AM
@AkivaWeinberger did you read what I said above?
from here
16 mins ago, by Leaky Nun
hi everyone
 
We had a question on countable sets for midterm and i believed other topics like basic topology is important n will be tested for finals instead
I am wrong :(
 
This was the final?
 
Finals are usually comprehensive, but I would have expected more on the part of the course that had not been tested yet.
 
Yes, thats what i thought so too
Apparently my Professsor dont believe in this
 
3:40 AM
I would tell my students to expect certain things if they'd messed them up before, though. Sometimes they showed up; sometimes I figured scaring them into studying was enough.
 
:D
I compensate some of the 30min spent on countable sets by doing the question on proving the bolzano weirestrass theorem quickly
But it was not enough :(
I left part c) of my last question undone
 
 
2 hours later…
5:59 AM
Omg, the question that i had no time to attempt
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/197400/if-sum-a-n-converges-then-sum-sqrta-na-n1-converges?rq=1
 
6:22 AM
@LittleRookie was it an exam?
 
6:59 AM
3
Q: On reducing complex ODE's to Bessel's form

Naveen BalajiI am trying to reduce the following ode to bessel's ode form and solve it: $$x^{2}y''(x)+x(4x^{3}-3)y'(x)+(4x^{8}-5x^{2}+3)y(x)=0\tag{1}$$ I tried to solve it via the standard method,i.e., by comparing it with a generalised ode form and finding the solution from then on. The general form (as giv...

 
7:15 AM
@SoumyoB yes T_T
Real analysis I
 
8:07 AM
@LittleRookie that's why always have a glance at all questions before answering them
 
 
3 hours later…
11:16 AM
Hello my peoples
 
Yes oh lord
 
11:32 AM
Does it take time after registration to get access to the MAA e-Library?
 
12:11 PM
Speaking of which, do we mathematicians generate big data as well for not so applied fields?
e.g. I imagine we the maths community should already have libraries of algebraic structures somewhere given how much effort we have put in classifying finite groups alone...?
 
Hi @MikeMiller.
 
When it makes sense, we do make libraries and/or classifications
 
Ah nice
 
morning
 
12:16 PM
Hi @Alessandro.
 
12:48 PM
Hey Balarka :)
 
Hi. Do I know you?
 
Nope
@BalarkaSen I just saw that your name resembles and Indian name and pinged you up :)
 
Ah I see.
I thought your gravatar looked familiar so I thought I'd ask
 
@BalarkaSen No issues. Where are you from? Are you a grad student?
 
West Bengal. Nope, not a grad student. I suspect you are?
 
12:56 PM
Yeah I was No i am not into anything. Just trying to clear various Grad School exams in India
 
Gotcha.
 

« first day (2458 days earlier)      last day (2564 days later) »