« first day (1325 days earlier)      last day (3701 days later) » 

1:10 AM
is there an algebraic proof that the least squares polynomial of an even function is even?
 
1:32 AM
@Alex: I never thought about it, but least squares is given by an orthogonal projection, so it should follow from linearity.
 
@Jasper, I was taught by Protter 's son last semester.
 
@JessyCat he is not gonna like the ' s
 
@skull, why not?
Why? What I wrote was correct.
 
Protter's not Protter 's
 
Oh. Well, that was a typo.
Not an act of ignorance.
 
1:38 AM
np
 
Anyway, I ranted and raved about grammar earlier today because some dude posted a question on here, and the guy obviously could not write his way out of a paper bag.
Then, Karl said some things, and then deleted them before anybody could see what he wrote.
 
Like you said, we're not the grammar police :-)
 
I think he does that often, though.
So, I didn't take it personally.
 
Why anyone would take anything personally on the internet is beyond me pal.
But that's just my opinion.
 
 
1 hour later…
3:06 AM
 
@Mike no. if he keeps posting crappy questions, though, he'll be warned by the moderators.
 
 
1 hour later…
4:33 AM
@AlexanderGruber Warning is a strong word there, considering this is not a crime, lol.
Morning @robjohn!
 
@JasperLoy morning? it is 9:35 at night ;P
@JasperLoy good morning
 
Do you recommend I learn integration techniques? I'm in High school.
 
4:56 AM
@JasperLoy it should be imo
@user4140 what kind of math do you know? what classes have you taken?
 
 
2 hours later…
7:15 AM
@Mike If a user posts too many questions, they will run into problems with question quota 50 q/30 days, 6 q/day.
If you wish, you can leave a comment for that user about this, there is even a comment template.
 
Thanks, @MartinSleziak
 
However, this is for posting many questions, whatever kind they are. Not specifically for homework questions, or any particular type of questions.
But I only see 2 questions on the profile page of that user. (And I am not entirely sure how the quotas work for unregisterd users.)
 
@MartinSleziak At the time of posting, he'd put up 2 questions within about an hour of each other asking for help with the same thing - though it was less asking for help, and more asking for a solution.
Anyway, if it discourages a user from posting a lot of low-effort questions in a shrot period of time, I'm all for it.
 
r9m
7:35 AM
@robjohn Can you check math.stackexchange.com/questions/718166/… ? .. my arguments look too cheesy .. too many loop holes :'( !!
and also how to solve a Delayed DE ?
 
8:34 AM
@skullpatrol Do you know that the T20 World Cup is going on by the way?
 
No, what sport is that, cricket @sawarnik?
 
@skullpatrol Yup!
 
Cool :D
 
8:50 AM
What does := mean? Is it the same as =?
 
@Sawarnik Yeah, I read it as "defined to equal"
 
@KarlKronenfeld I feel like I'm getting bogged down in topological annoyances at the start of Lee
 
@Mike Hm, like what?
 
Does the fact that we have a countable precompact basis and shit like that actuall ymatter?
 
8:52 AM
damn
 
partitions of unity, etc
 
good point
the proofs are easy, they're just a tad annoying
 
@swarnik some things are just true "by definition" like % := 1/100.
 
Ok.
 
Sorry @Sawarnik :-/
 
9:04 AM
=) [I have such a silly name.]
 
Sa-warn-ik
Saw-ar-nik
 
@Mike You'll be happy to hear that Lee starts his discussions in the more general topological case whenever possible. :P
 
Some authors like to define % as /100, but I prefer 1/100 because it makes more sense @Sawarnik, right?
 
What is /100?
 
"divided by 100"
That^ is the tradition way of teaching/learning it :(
 
9:15 AM
_____
 
*traditional
...and it is still taught that way, to this day.
 
9:38 AM
@Mike You on, brohamine?
 
10:30 AM
@DanielFischer Hi :)
 
Hi, @Complexanalysis.
 
@DanielFischer for what $a$ does the limit of $\lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{(2n)!}{2^{n+1} (n!)^2}. n^a$ exist ? i can't get it.
 
@Complexanalysis If you count $+\infty$, for all real $a$.
$$\binom{2n}{n} \sim \frac{4^n}{\sqrt{\pi n}}$$
 
@DanielFischer I would like to exclude $+\infty$ .
 
Then, for no $a$, @Complexanalysis. It's asymptotically equal to $$\frac{2^{n-1}}{\sqrt{\pi}}\cdot n^{a-1/2}.$$
 
10:43 AM
@robjohn I miscalculated.
 
@DanielFischer Stirling gives me the approximation . ok ok. =)
 
11:24 AM
@robjohn see this please
 
11:50 AM
what does tangent space to a matrix $M$ mean ?
 
 
1 hour later…
12:55 PM
@Vrouvrou so how does this cause a problem with my answer?
 
i dont understand what happen at infinity ?
 
@Vrouvrou what do you mean? If the book says the things vanish, they vanish. That doesn't conflict with what I said.
@Vrouvrou I don't know what $H_k$ and $\beta_k$ are, so I only know what you tell me the book says.
 
1:14 PM
ah ok so they want to say that at infiniti $\sum M_k=\sum \beta_0=$
H_k is the the k-th singular homology
and $\beta_k$ is the beti number
 
1:35 PM
@Mike I took some classes in olympiad math because I was picked to represent my city. Other than that I self-learn random stuff all the time. But I haven't taken anything equivalent to a full university course as such.
 
 
1 hour later…
2:53 PM
@user4140 instead of choosing random stuff, try starting from the beginning of any good first year calculus textbook and systematically working your way through it.
 
@skullpatrol You just gave me inspiration to open my calculus book.
 
3:38 PM
Hi, everybody! I've just created the following Chat Room: Conversas sobre Matemática/Chatting about Mathematics (in Portuguese)
Chatting about Mathematics for Portuguese speaking users or users interested in learning Portuguese for Mathematics
http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/13749/conversas-sobre-matematica-chatting-about-mathematics-in-portuguese
 
Thanks for sharing :-)
 
@skullpatrol You are welcome! Is "Chatting about Mathematics (in Portuguese) " grammatically correct?
 
yep
 
@Mike Thanks!
 
3:54 PM
What is this "rarely if ever expressible as a ratio of integers" in the chatroom description referring to?
 
the joke is that we're usually irrational
 
Ah. My first thought was that it is the ratio of general : maths questions mentioned just before that and that is obviously false. So it has to be something else.
 
4:13 PM
Some of the questions are irrational too :-)
 
Is there any complex analytic proof of Mellin inversion? I wanted to ask this for a long time as I feel quite uncomfortable with real analysis, especially Fourier. CA is much more natural to me.
 
0
Q: Showing something is a smooth solution of a Laplace-like equation

Jessy CatLet $(M, g_{ij}$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. Let $f \in C^{\infty}(M)$ (I.e., $f$ is smooth on the manifold) be a given function. Consider the family of equations $\Delta u-4u^{3}+tf=0$ (*) for each $t \in [0,1]$. And let $I\equiv \{ t \in [0,1]; \text{ (*)}_{t} \text{ admits a smooth solu...

 
Hi @JessyCat!
 
4:35 PM
Brian Scott is getting so much rep even when not around, lol.
This chat is dead. All the kids are out partying this weekend.
 
@robjohn Hi! Can you link me that triple sum with the i!j!k! I cannot find it on the main.
 
5:03 PM
Daniel Fischer might be able to help.
 
t('-' t)
 
-_-
 
5:25 PM
I think I have an elementary proof of the Prime Number Theorem, given the version of the PNT involving the average order of the von Mangoldt function. Should I post it?
It is not exactly rocket science.
Wikipedia:
The prime number theorem is equivalent to the statement that the von Mangoldt function Λ(n) has average order 1
$$\displaystyle T = \begin{bmatrix} +1&+1&+1&+1&+1&+1&+1 \\ +1&-1&+1&-1&+1&-1&+1 \\ +1&+1&-2&+1&+1&-2&+1 \\ +1&-1&+1&-1&+1&-1&+1 \\ +1&+1&+1&+1&-4&+1&+1 \\ +1&-1&-2&-1&+1&+2&+1 \\ +1&+1&+1&+1&+1&+1&-6 \end{bmatrix}$$
You see the average of the rows is $1$ for the first row, and zero for the rest. The von Mangoldt function is in turn the sum: $$\Lambda(k)=\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{T(n,k)}{n}$$
@skullpatrol What do you think?
 
Sure @Mats posting it sounds like a good idea to me.
 
@skullpatrol Yes, but am I correct or not?
 
Dunno much about number theory, sorry.
 
@skullpatrol Ok, but you do see that average of 1,1,1,1,1,1,... is 1, while average of 1,-1,1,-1,1,-1,1,-1,1,-1,... is zero?
 
5:40 PM
Is that an infinity long string?
 
@skullpatrol Yes it is.
 
I renamed the room "Conversas sobre Matemática/Chatting about Mathematics (in Portuguese)" to the shorter title "Da Matemática/Chatting about Mathematics (in Portuguese)" so that "Da Matemática"(On Mathematics) appears in full. Link chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/13749/…
@robjohn I've created the Portuguese room about Mathematics chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/13749/….
 
@Mats does the idea of "average" apply to such a long string?
 
@AméricoTavares Good luck :-)
 
@robjohn Thanks!
 
5:46 PM
@skullpatrol By taking periods of the rows I believe it does.
 
Hmm... interesting. The -1/12 argument on numberphile is similar.
 
@IanMateus I've created the room "Da Matemática/Chatting about Mathematics (in Portuguese)". Chatting about Mathematics for Portuguese speaking users or users interested in learning Portuguese for Mathematics here chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/13749/…
 
-1/12 is for the partial sums of the sequence, and some zeta function thing.

Partial averages of the sequence:
1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1, 1, -1,...
are:
1, 0, 1/3, 0, 1/5, 0, 1/7, 0, 1/9, 0, 1/11, 0,...
which tends to zero.
@skullpatrol
 
I'm just saying one can look at an infinite sequence in an infinite number of ways.
 
Yes, infinte ways maybe. But the fundamental method of counting is the most analytic.
Fundamental method of counting: one, two, three, four,...
 
6:02 PM
How about 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4,...
 
1
Q: Showing something is a smooth solution of a Laplace-like equation

Jessy CatLet $(M, g_{ij}$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. Let $f \in C^{\infty}(M)$ (I.e., $f$ is smooth on the manifold) be a given function. Consider the family of equations $\Delta u-4u^{3}+tf=0$ (*) for each $t \in [0,1]$. And let $I\equiv \{ t \in [0,1]; \text{ (*)}_{t} \text{ admits a smooth solu...

@DanielFischer, perhaps you might be able to provide some insight?
Or @Tomas
 
@robjohn Yes I swear you have a post
I spent an hour trying to get it through a query :P
 
They would be in chat, but I don't exactly know where. I can post them to chat later, unless you want to ask on main.
 
6:18 PM
@robjohn I remember there being a post that you wrote and you showed the solution
 
I have to go proctor an exam now...
 
OK thanks!
 
Have fun.
 
@Alizter I will look
 
@robjohn It would be good to have a reference on the main
 
6:19 PM
I need somebody who is good with PDEs. Especially on manifolds.
 
@skullpatrol I was away to the shop. Yes that is similar: 1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4,...
 
@JessyCat Would $u_0 \equiv 0$ do the job? If not, I guess there are some theorems about $\Delta$ on a Riemannian manifold that say there is a smooth solution, but PDEs are not my cup of tea, I know very little about them, sorry.
 
@Daniel, I think it would b/c that's how we did an example in class. But how do I know that $u_{0}=0$ here?
 
By inspection. $\Delta 0 = 0$ also on manifolds, I expect, so then you see it is a (the?) solution.
 
Right. That makes sense. Thank you @Daniel, as always, you are awesome! :)
 
6:37 PM
@Daniel have you seen OldJohn around?
 
Not today, @skullpatrol. But yesterday.
 
I see, I see; thanks
I'm sure he'd be interested in the new math educators.SE site opening up soon.
 
Greetings
 
@JessyCat The best books I have seen on PDE on manifolds is Michael Taylor's PDE (Vol 1, 2, 3).
@skullpatrol Hmm, I will take a look too, though I probably won't join.
 
6:56 PM
@JasperLoy you there?
 
@Ethan Yes!
 
I will get it sometime in the next 8 hours I think
 
@Ethan I see.
 
@Ethan Let me know your decision
Your result too
 
@Ethan OK, but UCLA and UChicago are both great.
 
6:58 PM
of course it does you no harm to wait until the April 15 deadline
@Daniel Can I ask how you learned all your math? A curiosity?
 
@Ethan No point doing such things, just wait.
@Ethan I wish I can redo my undergrad, lol.
 
@JasperLoy why
 
@Ethan Well, I kind of didn't take the courses I should.
 
why can't you teach yourself
 
@Ethan I can. So it's not a big deal, lol.
 
7:02 PM
@Jasper, take them now as a non-matriculated student at the best university near you. That will look good on grad school apps.
That's what I'm doing.
 
@JessyCat I see. I upvoted some of your posts just now. =)
 
@Jasper, thanks, guy!
 
@Ethan Actually, I find it best to learn myself from books. Anyway, take all the math courses you can as undergrad.
 
@Mike A long time ago, I studied mathematics. Since then, I've occasionally read this or that book on topics I didn't study, some of it I have not yet forgotten.
 
@Ethan, where do you go now, just out of curiosity.
 
7:04 PM
@Daniel You certainly have better retention than most I know.
@Jessy He's a high school student looking at undergrad schools
 
@Ethan, oh you're in HS.
 
@Ethan I was in a good high school, but went to a bad university, lol.
@Ethan However, many people think that the university I went to is good, lol.
 
You're from the inner city; don't discount that. That gives you a better perspective than a lot of people.
 
Just take care of your mental health and soon you will be a great mathematician @ethan.
 
For one thing, I think you appreciate your opportunities more than a lot of the overprivileged undergrads who have had everything handed to them, and waste their time in uni partying and not going to class.
 
7:07 PM
@JessyCat jasper or me haha
 
And then wondering why they're not doing well.
You, @Ethan.
 
I applied to Cambridge but did not get a place. I will try to go there next life.
 
@Jasper, any reason why you can't try again?
 
@JessyCat Well, I was talking about undergrad Cambridge. Now I will just apply to grad schools, if I do.
 
There's a guy in one of my classes who has a masters from Oxford. I'm not that impressed with him.
 
7:10 PM
@JasperLoy at cambridge they give you an interview and ask you about what your majoring in
if they consider you I think, so thats good
 
@Ethan US and Canada would be my choices for grad school. Easier to get funding.
 
@Jasper, I think you should! You should apply to places in the states!
 
@JessyCat Yup, I will. And I hope to migrate there too, lol.
@JessyCat A Masters from Oxford is pretty impressive.
 
@Jasper, who knows? Maybe we'll end up in the same program.
 
@JessyCat Hehe, I won't be going there too soon, need to get better first.
 
7:13 PM
@Jasper, you think it would be, but I have to tell you sometimes things aren't as impressive as you think they should be.
 
@JessyCat My email is s8124939c@gmail.com, if you wanna email me.
 
:)
 
@ethan So do you go to university later this year?
 
@JasperLoy the characters before @ look like the code of a prisoner. :-)
 
@Ethan You take SAT verbal and math right?
@Chris'ssis Hehe.
 
7:14 PM
yea they don't count the new writing section
@JasperLoy I sent them a bunch of my work though lol
 
@Ethan They must be impressed!
@Ethan My only "work" is the paper I sent you. I am quite happy with it.
 
not too impressed lol their are some really amazing people out there
 
@Ethan But I think you are amazing too.
@Ethan I got 680/800 for verbal and 790/800 for math, IIRC.
@Ethan Oh yeah I remember.
@Ethan The reason for my not doing too well in verbal is my extremely small vocabulary. I know very few words.
 
I'd like to meet such amazing people, but in the real life, not on internet. I'd be curious to see how they would cope with my last 3 multiple integrals in terms of fractional part. (I mean those amazing people from MIT, Princeton,Harvard and so on)
 
@ethan LOL at your (removed).
@Ethan You can learn to abandon your fears slowly...
@Ethan Gradually do more and more things you cannot do, until you are completely free from OCD.
@Ethan It's alright as long as you are not committing a crime, lol.
@Ethan Well, if you did you would not even apply to X, so it does not matter.
:14417416 The university I went to was ranked 9th in the world by subject mathematics ranking last year on topuniversities.com, but to me the syllabus was crap.
 
7:24 PM
I wouldn't necessarily trust any particular ranking system
 
But the Cambridge 3 year undergrad course is to me one of the best in the world because I am really impressed by the curriculum.
No where else in the world can you learn so many topics in 3 years.
 
i don't understand
 
Don't understand what? I meant math topics, lol.
 
oh
 
Math, math, and more math, and nothing else, lol.
I think forcing you to take other courses is pretty stupid.
Oh, Jessy has left, lol.
Bye @ethan, email me when you get news!
 
7:35 PM
alright later
 
@Jasper Make sure to email me when Erhan gets news, lol
 
(in this life I mean)
 
I think I've read a paper which shows how to evaluate similar looking integrals lol
 
@Ethan I really doubt ... (especially for the last one)
brb, I have some some things to do ...
 
7:59 PM
How do you taylor expand at infinity?
 
OMG, so many (removed), lol.
 
8:33 PM
@Anthony taylor expand f(1/x) at x=0
for instance say f(x)=x/(x-1). then f(1/x)=1/(1-x) has maclaurin expansion 1+x+x^2+x^3+...
and therefore the original function has the taylor expansion f(x)=1+1/x+1/x^2+... around x=inf
 
9:25 PM
@Ethan here is another cute limit you'd probably like :-) $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n\log(n)}\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \csc\left(\frac{k\pi}{n}\right)$$ (newly created)
 
9:37 PM
Da Matemática/On Mathematics (in Portuguese) chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/13749/…
 
@Alizter I don't think I answered that on main.
 
@Chris'ssis I would strongly suggest you to write a book on limit and integral problems =D
it would be super cool
 
9:53 PM
@Complexanalysis :-))) Thank you. I really wanna write a book since I have lots of such problems, but ... who would read the book of someone with no background in mathematics :-(?
 
I would @Chris'ssis
@Chris'ssis you will be a good mathematician :D
 
@Complexanalysis OK, one reader! Thanks! :-)
 
although don't make it too expensive :P @Chris'ssis
 
@Complexanalysis Some copies can be given for free I suppose. Let's say one to you if this ever comes true. :-)
 
In that case i would definitely want one , I would definitely buy one even if i don't get it for free @Chris'ssis
@Chris'ssis It will definitely come true i guess but hopefully soon enough :D
 
10:01 PM
@Complexanalysis :D
 
i guess you already have a soft copy of lots of problems and solutions
 
I have some. Maybe you like this one I created yesterday. Prove that
$$\int_0^1\int_0^1\cdots\int_0^1 \log\left(\log\left(\frac{1}{x_1 x_2\cdots x_n}\right)\right) \log\left(\frac{1}{x_1 x_2\cdots x_n}\right)^{s} \ dx_1 \ dx_2\cdots dx_n=\frac{\Gamma'(s+n)}{\Gamma(n)} $$

where $s>-n, \space n\ge 1$
 
@Chris'ssis looks dangerous , i feel scared by seeing such ones :P
 
@Complexanalysis No, no danger around. This is meant to be aestetically nice. :-)
 
@JasperLoy have you seen the curriculum of UNAM?
 
10:10 PM
@Chris'ssis I can't think of an idea on how to start .
 
10:29 PM
@Complexanalysis Everything can be done in a very brilliant way (it's possible a dream solution). You don't have to do it now, I only showed you its beauty.
 
@Chris'ssis yes :)
 
@Chris'ssis It would look nicer with $\Gamma(n)$ in the denominator
 
@robjohn Yeah, far nice. Could you change that please?
@robjohn thanks!
 
How can I prove if in a binary relation a(ba)=b always then (ab)a=b always??
 
10:48 PM
And this is $$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n\log(n)}\sum_{k=1}^{n-1} \csc\left(\frac{k\pi}{n}\right)=\frac{2}{\pi}$$
 
11:07 PM
I meant binary operation sorry
 
@user4140 do you mean binary operation?
 
My first attempt at proof, is it correct?
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/721418/elementary-proof-of-prime-number-theorem
 
I already figured it out though
 
@user4140 yeah, then those are the exact same condition
 
no, we don't know if the operation is associative
or conmutative for that matter
 
11:08 PM
oh I see it's on the other side
my moment of dyslexia has passed
 
lol
 
11:43 PM
I don't understand this solution at all
Could you please help me?
I'm desperate
 

« first day (1325 days earlier)      last day (3701 days later) »