« first day (1049 days earlier)      last day (3973 days later) » 
00:00 - 13:0014:00 - 00:00

12:01 AM
a topology $\tau$ is a collection of subsets of $X$ closed under arbitrary unions and finite intersections. one can check that $\bigcap \tau_i$ is a topology if $\tau_i$ for all $i$ are. then, one can define the set $T$ of all topologies containing $\tau_1\cup\tau_2$ (the union need not itself be a topology); then $T$ is nonempty since it contains the discrete topology, and it has a minimum element (namely the intersection of all topologies in $T$)
 
@anon $\checkmark$.
@anon I just realizeed I did not lose the pages where I worked out some problems of P&S, I actually threw them away without realizing. Grrrrr....
 
builds character
 
@anon Come again?
 
@anon Thanks for ruining the problem (:
 
12:09 AM
you're welcome
 
@PeterTamaroff Sorry, didn't get your message. Modding is mostly easy stuff, but it makes it much harder to actually write answers on MSE when you get constant notifications to check. But things are rather peaceful.
 
howdy folks
btw, anybody have the mathjax bookmark handy?
 
@Joe The bookmark is linked on the right side.
 
Its starred -->
 
ty
What that means, btw, is that it claims that f=-(theta/t)
you guys can view it, right?
I mean, it sorta makes sense, physics wise
 
12:18 AM
you probably mean "solving the equation $a\sin(ft+\theta)=0$ for $f$"
the solutions will indeed be of the form $f=(n\pi-\theta)/t$ for integers $n$
 
@anon: ok, that is different. Not exactly what I was looking for, but helpful
 
then what are you looking for?
 
@Chris'swisesister I found another solution: the limit is non-negative; then $$0\leqslant\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sqrt[n^2]{(4^n+1)(4^n+2)\cdots (4^n+n)}}{2^n}\leqslant\lim_{n\to\infty}2^{-n}\prod^{n}_{k=1}\left(4^n+n\right)^{1/n^2}\\\leqslant\lim_{n\to\infty}2^{-n}\left(4^n+n\right)^{1/n}$$
 
@anon: I was hoping it gave a solution for f when a*sin(ft+θ)=anything
 
@Chris'swisesister we now choose a constant $\xi$ such that $4^n + n\leqslant\xi^n$ for sufficiently large $n$. Then $$0\leqslant L\leqslant\lim_{n\to\infty}2^{-n}\left(4^n+n\right)^{1/n}\leqslant \lim_{n\to\infty}2^{-n}\left(\xi^{n}\right)^{1/n}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\xi}{2^n}=0.$$ Therefore, $L=0.$
 
12:24 AM
@JoeStavitsky sure, the solution to $a\sin(ft+\theta)=b$ for $f$ is $f=(n\pi+\arcsin(b/a)-\theta)/t$
 
@anon: could you work that, please?
 
@Chris'swisesister if it's not clear that $0\leqslant L$, consider $4^{n^2}\leqslant\prod_{k=1}^{n}\left(4^n+k\right)$.
 
@JoeStavitsky divide by a, apply arcsin to both sides (which introduces a n*pi factor on whichever side you want), subtract theta then divide by t
 
@anon:ty, I may be back later for other terms :), nbut I will definitely try myself first. BTW, great avatar, no idea where its from (if anywhere)
@anon: heres what the software says, if you care docs.google.com/file/d/0By4cQB8gmcRjbWI0SDM3NDllQUE/…
 
dopamine is a neurotransmitter ...
 
12:39 AM
@IanMateus Your claim follows immediately from the Kate-Blanchett Theorem.
 
bye
 
12:52 AM
@anon Ha! I found the pages.
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez Helloes.
 
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez How is it going?
 
making goulash
:-)
 
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez What is that? I mean, what does it have?
(I know it is food =) )
 
heh
onions, meat and paprika and a little cumin
 
1:01 AM
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez sounds spicy!
 
it is quite sweet, actually
 
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez, a hispanic person making hungarion food? blasphemy =P
 
I am a citizen of the world!
2
Spätzle now... be back later :-)
 
1:22 AM
nobody in cog
lame
bye
 
 
1 hour later…
2:23 AM
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez Awesome! I love goulash! For those who haven't savored "goulash", perhaps Mariano will entertain!
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez Spatzle, now you're making me hungary! . Being of Polish descent, I'm rather fond of Spaetzel!
@JoeStavitsky don't knock it until you've tried it...citizen of the world
I guess I'm rather late for the conversation :-Z
 
@amWhy: I was making a (stupid) joke
 
@JoeStavitsky I suspected as much... ;-)
 
@amWhy: I wanted to find a video of the bugs bunny toon where he is chased by the orange monster - in the beginning the mad scientist promises to reward the monster with goulash
not on youtube it seems :(
 
@JoeStavitsky Now that would be funny!
 
have you seen it?
 
2:29 AM
@JoeStavitsky Not that particular episode, but I do recall bugs bunny quite well.
 
In the end, there is one of my favorite moments in animation (if not film). The monster finally catches up to bugs, and bugs points at the screen (the viewer) and says "look! People!" and the monster runs away screaming
 
2:55 AM
@JoeStavitsky Funny! It's been so long since I've watched 'tunes!
 
I actualy confused the 2 - the scene I was talking about was from here supercartoons.net/cartoon/659/hair-raising-hare.html
 
 
1 hour later…
leo
4:01 AM
Does compact implies locally compact?
 
the whole space is a nbhd of every point no?
 
leo
Yes,
 
it was rhetorical, I know the answer is yes :)
 
leo
I know you know
And now you know I know
 
leo
4:24 AM
I'm having trouble with (g) in here
 
Hi, I have an off topic question. Are there a lot of infinite series which sum to 1? I'm looking for something other than 1/2 + 1/4 +1/8 +.. or any trivial sums which include a 1 and zeros only.
 
leo
With the part in the parenthesis
 
@leo that looks like a good exercise
I feel bad for not seeing how to do it
@TheSubstitute the number of summations which evaluate to a given limit is uncountable. they can be transformed into each other completely trivially: for any sum $\sum a_n=L$ when $L\ne 0$, just consider $\sum a_n/L$...
 
leo
It is indeed. I've done all except the part where it says that "for this last result it is sufficient X locally compact and Hausdorff
 
4:41 AM
How do I expand $2(r^5)^-2$ so that everything is multiplied/to the power how it needs to be?
Whoops The last part should be to the power of -2
 
leo
Say we have a path $\lambda$ which join $f$ with $g$. Then the candidate for homotopy is $G(x,t)=\lambda(t)(x)$. Now consider an open subset $B$ of $Y$. Pick $(x,t)$ in the inverse image of $B$ by $G$. One can use that $X$ is locally compact and Hausdorff to prove that there is a compact $x\in K^x$ such that $ t\in \lambda^{-1}(F(K^x,B))$ which is open. So it only remains to find an open in $X$, say $A$, such that $(x,t)\in A\times \lambda^{-1}(F(K^x,B))\subseteq G^{-1}(B)$
 
Is it just $2r^3$ ?
 
no, 5 times -2 is certainly not 3
 
-10?
 
leo
Yes
 
4:45 AM
Thank you! This is making more sense now! :D
 
$$(r^5)^{-2}=\frac{1}{(r^5)^2}=\frac{1}{(r\cdot r\cdot r\cdot r\cdot r)^2}$$ $$=\frac{1}{(r\cdot r\cdot r\cdot r\cdot r)\cdot (r\cdot r\cdot r\cdot r\cdot r)}=\frac{1}{r^{10}}=r^{-10}$$ etc. Never forget the meaning of multiplication.
 
@mick Are you smoking crack?
 
@BandeiraGustavo please see
 
Awesome, thank you @anon! If I were to simplify $r^10/r^4$ Would it be 10-4 for r^6?
 
yes
 
4:48 AM
So if I wrote it with the fraction $2/25$ where do I put the $r^6$ LOL.
 
um, huh?
 
LOL okay I'm working on this problem... (This is like 3/4 done) $2r^10/25r^4$ So if I can simplify to $r^6$ how do I write it with the $2/25$?
 
type r^{10}. use curly brackets to put more than one digit in a superscript or subscript
 
Ohhh Thank you!
 
anyway, is it (2r^10)/(25r^4)?
i.e. $\displaystyle\frac{2r^{10}}{25r^4}$?
 
4:51 AM
Yeppers!
 
you could write it inline as (2/25)r^6, or 2/25 r^6 perhaps, or $\frac{2}{25}r^6$ or $\frac{2r^6}{25}$ with more room to write
 
@anon I'm always curious: Does he really believe that bulk of bullshit?
 
he's 14 apparently
 
@BandeiraGustavo You should've saw the argument he had with me earlier. Quite explosive and to no end. :P
Thank you so very much @anon! <3
 
@Shayna I've read everything. MSE users should pay you a session in a SPA for that.
 
4:54 AM
LOL my fault. I fed the troll! @BandeiraGustavo
 
normally I am getting paid to tutor intermediate algebra...
but I don't have much better to do
 
@anon I have a question for you.
Let me get my abs algebra book.
 
Awe, @anon if you were here I'd so pay you to tutor me! I'm taking the course by distance and I live in a small town... There are no math tutors here to my knowledge. :(
 
@Shayna You have MSE.
 
@BandeiraGustavo Yep, it helps a ton (understatement)! I'm actually trying to learn it not copy off of something else. I'm doing this math for teachers class post-BA to get into a Bachelor of Education program... So basically... I'd hate to teach kids how to do their math incorrectly!
 
4:58 AM
@Shayna I have a friend who says that psi/sociology is useless.
He usually depresses me when he says that.
 
@BandeiraGustavo LOL is your friend's name mick?
 
@Shayna No. :P
@anon I thought you were teaching subplatonic metanonimic super categories for invisible sets in the unkwnown degree. (?!)
 
@BandeiraGustavo Actually... Tell your friend to look into the psyc studies on sleep vs wakefulness and circadian rhythms on effectiveness of those who work long shift work... Such as that in nurses. If he does, he'd have a hard time saying it doesn't exist. ;)
 
@Shayna You may be of help. Every time I try to refute that bullshit, I use some naive examples. What else should I suggest?
 
no, I'm teaching virtual link-knot-braid actions on categorified quantum sl2.
(I feel scared saying that around Mariano - he'll swoop down and actually talk about that stuff with authority...)
 
5:02 AM
@anon XD
 
Without Sociology, we would have a lot fewer qualitative studies and thus probably less on the news. ;)
We all know how much the news likes to infer causality from a correlation heheheh.
 
science reporting leaves much to be desired regardless of which branch is being discussed, yet the public's perception of science is mainly through this and hearsay.
 
Or you could describe the work of a social worker
 
though to be fair evolutionary psychology is just awful
 
5:04 AM
So very true @anon
Even behaviorism has it's flaws @anon
 
@Shayna What doesn't have flaws?
 
Funny how all my breaks from doing math lead to math.se...
 
@BandeiraGustavo So very true... Some things certainly do have more flaws than others though.
 
@BandeiraGustavo Jesus, our lord and savior.
 
@anon XD XD XD
 
5:05 AM
IHah
 
@Bageer Hahahaha I know, right?
 
I think I've finished my homework... I'm just too scared to scan it in and submit it. :/
 
@anon I'm laughing a lot. I would never expect you to answer that. XD
 
normally I restrain my juvenile impulses to 10%
 
5:08 AM
I wonder how much of the bs evolutionary psyc is just people who don't really know what they are talking and that at the expert level there is actually something there or whether the field is just all bs
 
If you do that more often, It'll give me a sense of equality. When you guys talk only about serious inteligent stuff, I feel dumb. Is that a social problem @Shayna ?
@anon Btw, my question is based on this definition.
The second definition seems weird to me. Shouldn't that be only a polynomial multiplication?
 
such a painfully obscuring definition
 
@BandeiraGustavo LOL I don't think it really qualifies as a social problem, although it may have something to do with one's sense of self... Possibly being a psyche problem where for one feels as if they are alienated by lack of ability to partake in all events. I'll let you call it a first world problem if you want though. ;)
 
I mean, it defines $c_1=a_0b_1+a_1b_0$. Shouldn't it be something like the multiplication of $(a+b)(c+d)$?
 
no, think $(a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+\cdots)(b_0+b_1x+b_2x^2+\cdots)=a_0b_0+(a_1b_0+a_0b_1)x+(a_2b_‌​0+a_1b_1+a_0b_2)x^2+\cdots$
 
5:11 AM
@Shayna I"ve spent like 2 years to starting making questions here.
 
@BandeiraGustavo Awe, at least you're learning and you're certainly doing a lot better with math than me. :P
The only time I EVER can show off with math is by doing all of my stats for a paper by hand to check SPSS/PASW LOL
 
I've seen SPSS give output errors LOL and caught them!
 
@anon I guess I do not fully understand, but I get the idea.
Getting paper and pencil.
 
@BandeiraGustavo start multipling out the two general polynomials on the left and collecting like terms, see for yourself
 
5:16 AM
@anon You're so sweet, helping everyone! :D
 
in general, the terms will be $a_nb_mx^{n+m}$ so when the terms are collected the coefficient in front of $x^k$ is the sum of all $a_nb_m$ for which $n+m=k$
 
@Shayna Anon is one of the coolest guys I know. Polite and smart. I would recommend him for mariage for my friends.
 
@BandeiraGustavo You can look at it combinatorially to get individual terms, say you want the coefficient on x^3 look at all the ways you can get x^3 through distributive property.
 
Sweet? I am a bastion of steely manliness. Harumph.
 
LOL @BandeiraGustavo what is this now? A dating site? :P ... I mean, if he's cute... LOL
 
5:18 AM
-What's the perfect guy/girl to marry?
-1: create an acc on MSE, 2: make some question and earn some rep, 3: Go to the chat and find anon. He's the guy/girl.
@Shayna Sometimes it is. :P
 
@BandeiraGustavo LOL! You forgot to throw in the cute part somewhere! How can SE be a dating site? :P
@BandeiraGustavo For all we know... @anon could be a 12 year old super genius! :/ That would be pedophilia in nature LOL!
 
my age is not a secret, I am 22
 
47
Relationships and Dating

Proposed Q&A site for people seeking answers to questions about dating, long term relationships, love, marriage or other commitments, and everything else typically considered a "relationship".

Currently in commitment.

 
5:21 AM
@BandeiraGustavo @anon See, he's a bit young for me!
 
@anon But we're not sure. Hmn...
 
@BandeiraGustavo Maybe you could ask @anon on a date my dear. Surely he could stimulate your cortex. ;) AHAHAHA sorry, couldn't resist!
 
@Shayna Er.......
 
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez Yes, that it does. Especially when she's like Penny on The Big Bang Theory. :P
@BandeiraGustavo I'm sorry, didn't mean to ruffle your feathers. Just a little psychology play on words
 
@MarianoSuárez-Alvarez Mariano is also a great guy. But he's more like a wise warrior: Featuring polictical activism and eventual charming sarcasm.
 
5:24 AM
haha
 
And a good cook
 
I would consider @anon as a mage.
 
LOL
 
@Bageer But being a warrior already counts for that. He needs to cook during the battles.
 
Ohhh jeeze! I step into MSE and now they're trying to hook up up... Or so it seems. :/
 
5:25 AM
:-D
 
4 hours ago, by Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
making goulash
 
LOL that's what it was... Wasn't it?
@Bageer Goulash = guy's definition of Godly food.
 
@Shayna I forgot about something.
 
@BandeiraGustavo Si?
 
The was the original intent of the creators of math.se was to have company of people in their own image (math people)
 
5:29 AM
Check the message I replied to.
 
the math site is more of a side affair, the programming sites are the main (and were the original) focus
 
Blasphemy.
 
LOL @BandeiraGustavo very funny my dear.
@BandeiraGustavo I actually had a real picture of myself up on the site until I got a few... Suggestive comments LOL.
 
@Shayna What? 0.0
@anon So, the polynomials are multivariable?
 
@BandeiraGustavo I put up a legit profile pic and I kept getting hit on LOL! In very inappropriate ways!
 
@Shayna Oh, yes. It's the same to me. Usually girls appreciate my beauty too much.
 
@BandeiraGustavo no, a polynomial in the variable $x$ is of the form $a_0+a_1x+\cdots$ with coefficients $a_i$. a multivariable polynomial has more than one variable.
 
@anon And I suppose if you add in attractiveness it makes it worse?
 
naturally. internet.
 
@anon Oh, yes. I confused the coefficients with the variables. :P
@Shayna You should have told 'em you're a shemale.
 
5:36 AM
@anon I suppose. Maybe the joke about those in the maths/sciences being a little... Excited around women are somewhat true.
@BandeiraGustavo LOL I don't lie!
 
as it happens, the term shemale generally implies sex work and hence is considered derogatory (also the stereotype of being "traps" or "lying"...)
actually the term trap seems to have gained much more acceptable ironic usage, if 4chan and blogs are a good barometer
 
XD
@Shayna Your question in multiplication/systems reminds me of when I was trying to learn monoids.
 
I don't think 4chan is a good barometer to figure out what is acceptable
 
@anon Thanks for the help.
 
@BandeiraGustavo Hahaha I haven't done this kind of math in... Well, I graduated from high school in '07... I took math 12 in '05. Most of this stuff hasn't been touched on since 9th grade math (if that LOL!). So I probably haven't even seen it in 11 years or more. :/
 
5:49 AM
@Shayna Get Lang's Basic Mathematics.
@Shayna It's kinda the same for me. I hated math - as you can see in the profile.
Later, I discovered I hated my teachers, not math. :D
 
@BandeiraGustavo Ha! No need. Thursday is my math final. Never taking math other than stats again after this :D
 
@Shayna Do you know about Lazarsfeld?
 
Yes, what about him?
 
@Shayna He's one of the creators of mathematical sociology I guess.
I'm curious about those ideas.
@Shayna So, after the test you'll leave us forever? =(
 
 
5:56 AM
@anon XD XD XD
Dude. I've tried to read it...
 
There is some pretty funny amazon reviews on Basic Algebra I and Basic Algebra II by Jacobson
(on the same line as A course in arithmetic)
 
@Bageer Link?
@anon I'm still laughing. XD XD
I' even posted it on facebook.
 
@BandeiraGustavo Probably not. I'm still on lots of the other SE sites. Might drop in to say hi LOL.
 
@anon Can you explain in a simple way what the $E_8$ is? (I'm not looking into rigorous stuff, just light talk about it).
@Shayna hiLOL ~ Hello.
@Bageer XD XD XD
 
6:01 AM
do you know what a group is?
 
His grandson opened the book and thought: "WTF?!"
Yes.
@Bageer I'll but that book only because of that review. XD XD
 
do you know what a manifold is?
 
@Ian Mateus brilliant work. :-)
 
@BandeiraGustavo sigh funny one, aren't ya?
 
@anon Nope.
 
6:04 AM
If you have amazon prime book 1 and book 2 are $25 (in united states) so it is a great deal if you are serious about learning algebra
 
basically, a manifold is the mathematical gadget that describes curved spaces, where locally around every point it looks topologically like euclidean space
e.g. surface of a torus is a 2-dimensional manifold
 
The site seems eerily quiet tonight...
 
@anon Got it.
 
a lie group is something that is both a group and a manifold, where the group operations are all smooth maps
as you might guess, simple lie groups have no (connected) normal subgroups, and of course mathematicians wanted to classify these
 
is confused already LOL
 
6:07 AM
@anon What's the meaning of algebra in that context? I mean, I've studied college algebra, boolean algebra and a little of abstract algebra. It seems to be about systems of rules for dealing with certain objects. Is that the case?
@Bageer Lol 21 people find this useful Hahahaha
 
an algebra, in the context of universal algebra, is a set with various n-ary operations possibly with extra properties satisfied by them (e.g. distributivity). A lie algebra is a vector space with a bilinear operation called the lie bracket [-,-] satisfying the jacobi rule. the lie algebra is essentially a "linear approximation" of a lie group at its identity element, and the lie bracket corresponds to conjugation in the group
 
@anon Got it. Proceed.
 
hehehe
 
as with the case of finite groups, the classification of all simple lie groups essentially boils down to a handful of parametrized families of them (like {A1,A2,A3,...}, {B1,B2,B3,...}), but there are a handful of exceptional cases that do not belong to any families and stand on their own. one of these is E8.
it is the one with the highest number of dimensions
 
@anon 248, right?
 
6:13 AM
there are other physics and group theory and representation theory connections that I am not qualified to comment on, but that's the basic story
yes
 
I will probably be taking a lie algbras course next spring, should be fun.
 
something I want to learn about
 
I want to read a book on naive lie theory.
One UTM.
 
stillwell's book is mostly a really big table of lists of properties of various matrix groups
 
@anon I've read about the classification of the E8 and all that. Does that mean that after this classification, it may only be used by a computer?
 
6:19 AM
few E8-related calculations are/will be done by hand, if that's what you mean
 
Yes. That's it.
 
particles in the standard model are distinguished by their lie-group symmetries, IIRC
 
@anon I remember the word supersymmetry. Is it related?
 
it is
 
@anon Thanks for the chat. =)
I'm usually dumb to understand everything, but I'm evolving.
If everything goes ok, next year I'll be in the maths course.
 
6:26 AM
@BandeiraGustavo in a lie algebra course?
 
@Bageer No, undergrad maths course.
But I eventually read other math books because I think it's fun.
 
Of course
Always do outside reading
 
I am being able to learn!
And impressed with that.
 
Is there anything you are exited to learn about or plan/are currently learning about
@BandeiraGustavo ?
 
I'm trying to follow cambridge and oxford syllabi, I'm trying to learn analysis, abstract algebra, coordinate geometry, calculus and linear algebra.
But I also want to read some stuff that is accessible to a undergrad student.
That naive lie theory seems really cool.
But it starts with De Moivre's Formula and I still don't know much about that.
I'll read also about trigonometry.
I'm a little stuck in the proof of the binomial theorem - that is a pre-requisite in the oxford syllabus - but I still didn't do it just because I didn't try, went to read about calculus.
 
6:38 AM
The more I learn about linear algebra, the more I think there should be more focus placed on it, it seems it has almost immediate applications to just about every other field (outside and inside of math). (Well my linear algebra class was crappy, at least the first one was)
 
@Bageer Yes. A friend also told me that.
But why is that?
 
Although if they ever do put a focus on it it will probably be a crappy focus like calculus
Why does it have applications?
 
Yes.
@Bageer "crappy focus like calculus" - what you mean?
 
@BandeiraGustavo At least in my college (and I think in most) your first three semesters of calculus will be calculation based/ memorize formula (you mentioned you hated math classes in school, it probably will be more of that)
Basically they take out all the interesting stuff
 
@Bageer Oh, got it. =/
I'm reading Spivak's book.
 
6:44 AM
As for why linear algebra is so usefull, i don't know exactly but fields are usefull and linear stuff is easy to calculate so that is part of the reason
Great!
 
And I'm looking a book I bought yesterday: Calculus and Statistics. It seems interesting.
 
Cool. At the moment I am studying topology, algebra, and linear algebra (and trying to catch up with my rough schedule)
 
I'm looking first to obtain the mechanical way of doing calculus, then I'll focus hard on spivak's. It's requested at the preface.
@Bageer I guess you can answer one question of mine: Sometimes topology seems to be a real thing like geometry. But sometimes it seems to do with sets and a lot of abstract stuff. What is this dicotomy?
 
Not sure if I am that knowledgeable, just got to the topology section of the book today :)
But it is basically they wanted topology that way
From what I understand most of the motivation from topology came from analysis and geometry and they wanted topology to generalize concepts like continuous functions to more abstract settings (that probably come up at some point)
 
Got it.
@Bageer There's one thing that happens with me, the more I read, the more unable I am to tell the difference between algebra, geometry and analysis
 
6:58 AM
true for me too. of course there can be a lot of intersection, I think one of the main problems is that the borders are really fuzzy and you can't really completly seperate them
 
("main problem" as in seperating not that it is a problem in mathematics)
Because like symmetry can be thought of really geometrically but I think symmetry is also a very algebra thing
 
Yes. Keep them mixed to confuse our enemies!
 
Hah
it might be better to think of it as more of a continuum, there are no seperate fields but it is usefull to say that they are seperate because it gets a vague idea of what they are about
 
@Bageer Yeah.
In princeton's companion to mathematics, the author (a professional mathematician) starts by saying that he doesn't know how to separate them. :P
 
7:04 AM
Awesome, oh yah I am actually tim gowers (no I am not)
 
Its like if you ask them what you study and you say "I study number theory" to any one that knows math that is about as descriptive as saying "I study mathematics"
even though it sounds sort of specific
 
Oh, Zeno's arrow paradox actually has something to do with derivatives.
 
Next spring I think I will be studying from humphrey's lie algebra book (not sure though, the teacher seems pretty sure though) maybe we can be lie algebra buddies :D
 
I remember the paradox, but I've figured it just now. :P
@Bageer Yep. I just need to hurry in the trigonometry and I'll be able to understand the book.
@Bageer I'm going to sleep. Cya. =)
 
7:16 AM
@BandeiraGustavo Alright see yah
 
 
2 hours later…
9:31 AM
Hi all!
Can anyone suggest some further readings on the topics covered in the WP article on the partition function, and in particular the section I linked to? Unfortunately the article doesn't contain relevant references.
 
@Ian Mateus Do you like my solution? $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sqrt[n^2]{(4^n+1)(4^n+2)\cdots (4^n+n)}}{2^n}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sqrt[n^2]{ 2^n 4^{n^2}}}{2^n}=0$$
 
Greetings :D
 
@skullpatrol Greetings :D
 
@Chris'swisesister How are you?
 
@skullpatrol Today when I woke up my mind was full of ideas, of solutions. It looks like this day is a shiny day! How about you? :-)
 
9:42 AM
@Chris'swisesister Fine thanks :-)
 
@skullpatrol glad to hear that! :-)
@Ian Mateus, above it's $\le$.
 
Are purely reference request questions okay on the site? (And where did the FAQ go?)
 
@skullpatrol a teacher asked me to evaluate the version of $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\sqrt[n]{(4^n+1)(4^n+2)\cdots (4^n+n)}}{2^n}$$
and he recommended me to buy his book where I may find the solution (that to be honest with you looks like s**t).
The truth is the limit is absolutely elementary and I won't buy any book this time.
 
 
1 hour later…
11:00 AM
@Szabolcs it's "under renovation"; changes have yet to stabilize. (Yes, questions are kosher here.)
(If this is still about partition functions, I feel physicists would know a bit more here than mathematicians...)
 
11:15 AM
@JoeStavitsky There are two of those episodes. One of them has the bald scientist with the "Evil Scientist (Boo)" neon on his castle, while the other one has the guy with thick lips. Anyway, the best scenes there are the ones where Bugs pretends to be the beautician. :D
 
11:59 AM
Wow @robjohn this is the first time we have been here alone?
6 hours ago, by robjohn
The site seems eerily quiet tonight...
Now this is eery ... @robjohn
 
is there something like chatjax for android ?
 
12:29 PM
@skullpatrol it is very strangely empty today
@Kasper Not that I am aware.
 
@robjohn and to top it off Kaper the ghost shows up..
 
I've gotten two strange downvotes today. One was while I was trying to ascertain what the OP was asking. The question they were asking was completely different than I think they thought, so I deleted my answer. The other is a good answer, and I cannot figure out why it was downvoted.
@Chris'swisesister The terms tend to $\infty$ like $2^n$.
 
Remember the mantra "voting is capricious, voting is capricious,..."
 
@0x4A4D Thanks! In this case I was actually looking at what mathematicians know about it, that's why I asked here.
 
@Szabolcs: you've decided to join our lonely band?
 
12:37 PM
Sgt Peppers?
 
@0x4A4D: I finally converted your name from hex-encoded ASCII... Heh.
3
 
@robjohn helluva puzzle, wasn't it... :D
 
@0x4A4D I saw that it looked ASCII, and I know what 4A and 4D are, I had just never put it together. I responded to you in the TL and didn't realize it was you.
 
00:00 - 13:0014:00 - 00:00

« first day (1049 days earlier)      last day (3973 days later) »