« first day (840 days earlier)      last day (4197 days later) » 

12:00 AM
@jdoe This was a contest question. I found the answer too, by the way, as it was given (sadly, only after the stupid thing was over)
 
the nice thing about this is addition and multiplication give you back a number of that form: (a + b \sqrt 2)(c + d \sqrt 2) = (ac + 2 bd) + (ad + bc)\sqrt2
@Argon, so if I was to answer this quickly by hand I'd use the contined fraction to find that smallest solution (3,2) then perform something like (3+2 \sqrt{2})^5 by hand
by binary exponentiation
actualy that's ridiculous
 
With a calculator
 
I'd just compute convergents of the continued fraction until I found x/y with x>100
that's much easier
 
@jdoe So can you explain this to me? Why continued fractions?
 
@Argon, let x/y be a very good approximation of sqrt{2} (that's what continued fractions give you' the best possible rational approximation)
then x^2 - 2y^2 is going to be a very small integer but obviously it can't be zero
 
12:03 AM
@jdoe With Newtons method or something?
 
hm?
(no, but what do you mean)
 
@jdoe Nevermind
 
newtons method is not used in this
 
@jdoe But it will give a great rational approximation to $\sqrt{2}$
 
quadratic irrationals have periodic continued fractions which are easy to find, e.g. \sqrt 2 = 1 + 1/(2 + 1/(2 + 1/(2 + 1/(2 + 1/( ...))))
so 1 + 1/(2 + 1/(2 + 1/(2 + 1/(2)))) = 41/29, for example, is a great approximation
and 41^2 - 2*29^2 = -1
 
12:06 AM
@jdoe Could I use any approximation that is close?
 
if your approximation p/q isn't the convergent of a continued fraction it wont be 1/q^2 within the sqrt{2}, so you'll get p^2 - 2*q^2 = +/- something bigger than 1. This is legendre theorem from the theory of continued fractions.
 
P.S. 3 iterations w/ Newtons method gives $\frac{577}{408}$!
@jdoe Ok
 
ok now I know what you meant about newtons method
 
Anyhow, so now I have $p$ and $q$ from a truncated continued fraction.
 
user19161
@Argon You like continued fractions? I know nothing about them, not even the definition!
 
12:11 AM
@WillHunting I'm not a huge fan, because they are generally not so useful. They are quite fascinating though!
 
you might be surprised what you can compute with continued fractions
you can find primes of the form x^2 + y^2 and things
 
@jdoe Haha, $577^2 - 2\cdot408^2= 1$!!!!
HOW?
@jdoe Why does this happen?
 
what?
 
@jdoe The numerator and denominators suffice the equation!!
 
(p/q)^2 - 2 = 1/q^2
i.e. p/q is very close to sqrt{2}
 
user19161
12:19 AM
@Argon What? A and B suffice C? Is there such a sentence?
 
user19161
Oh, actually there is.
 
Hahahahahaha! Stumped the great Jasper!
@jdoe Ok :)
I like this
 
does that make sense?
 
user19161
@Argon Rather, the little banana.
 
Not exactly
@WillHunting Nope, great Jasper
 
12:20 AM
well look at it this way
$$p/q \sim \sqrt{2}$$
 
user19161
@Argon This reminds me of GC's "How long is your banana?"
 
$$p^2/q^2 \sim 2$$
 
@WillHunting Hahha I remember that... and the flagging!
@jdoe Ok!
 
$$p^2 \sim 2q^2$$
 
@jdoe Ok
 
12:21 AM
$$p^2 - 2q^2 \sim 0$$
 
Right
 
user19161
@Argon Haha, I got flagged once too for saying "Between you and me, we have two bananas and four nuts"!
 
but because $\sqrt{2}$ is irrational it can never actually equal 0, so it'll just be a very small integer
 
@WillHunting HAHAHAHAHA!
@jdoe Right
I got that part
But why $\frac{1}{q^2}$
 
$$\left|\frac{p}{q} - \sqrt{2}\right| < \frac{1}{q^2}$$
 
12:23 AM
Ok
Oh @Will y, the blue boy No, he's not, he's Jasper Loy- M
@jdoe But we want the RHS to be 1!
 
user19161
I now have over 32k SE wide, yay!!!
 
YAY!
 
Hi Again!
 
Hi, @Link!
 
user19161
@Argon My usual question: have you finished your HW?
 
12:26 AM
@WillHunting Sorta
 
user19161
@Link Hey Max!
 
}:)
 
@WillHunting, congrats on 32K!
I'm almost to 3K >.>
 
I'm almost 6k
 
user19161
@Link Yup, though you don't really use many of the 101 accounts. =)
 
12:27 AM
Who me?
:p
Yea, it just auto connected when I checked the site through googling :p
 
What kind of problems are solved w/ abstract algebra?
 
user19161
@Link I deleted 8 accounts that I didn't use very much, so now left with 3.
 
@WillHunting The magical kind :p
 
user19161
@Argon Well, for example, insolvability of the quintic equation!
 
Mine kept auto-connecting, so I thought, screw it.
 
12:29 AM
@WillHunting Cool
 
user19161
@Argon Also, some number theory results.
 
:)
 
Any ideas for a senior quote for yearbook? I have 100 characters, preferably something witty :p
 
@Link Haha - I was actually thinking about what I would write for next year, this morning on my way to school - and came up with zilch.
 
:p
I was thinking of a quote
But didn't know which
 
12:36 AM
to show that p^2 - 2q^2 = 1 and no bigger you actually need a stronger result, that the approximations have quality $\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2} q^2}$
 
Fancy stuff!
 
I don't even understand the question :p
 
@Link Well, I want to find integer solutions to $x^2-2y^2=1$
 
i might have that wrong
 
Oh, okay
So just a hyperbola?
 
12:38 AM
@Link Yup. But with ints
 
@Argon, I thought of this one: “People say nothing is impossible, but I do nothing every day.” -- Winne The Pooh
 
@Link Hahahhahahaha! That's great :)
 
I know
its pretty good
 
The fact that it is by Winnie the Pooh is the icing on the cake :)
 
I know right? I have this one too from calvin (Calvin and Hobbes) "(During a test.) As you can see, I have memorized this utterly useless piece of information long enough to pass a test question. I now intend to forget it forever. You've taught me nothing except how to cynically manipulate the system. Congratulations."
But it doesn't fit the 100 character limit
 
12:41 AM
I'm sure the teachers would love that one :) Hahahahaha
 
I was thinking about using that on a test, but my teachers usually never ask for dates, just events on that date, instead of the date of the event. :C
@Argon, look at this math problem
Especially the top of the line
 
Hahaha :)
That's great
 
@Argon, are you a junior in college?
 
Bye guys, I must be off!
@Link Grade 11
 
Oh, okay
Well get started on your college applications now!!!!!
They are stressful :p
@everyone else, so what else is new guys?
 
user19161
12:47 AM
@Link Nothing, just waiting for your next physics question. =)
 
@WillHunting, I got nothing, ended the quarter today, so no idea what the next unit is, maybe just a bit more forces :D
@WillHunting, are you in college?
 
user19161
1:06 AM
@Link No, done long ago. Now taking a long break before possibly going to grad school.
 
user19161
@wj32 No, never studied, just browsed through some books.
 
user19161
@Link What will you be doing in college?
 
@WillHunting, what did you major in? Math, and are you an engineer?
 
user19161
@Link I did math. What happened after I graduated which was years ago until now is one of my secrets!
 
Okay then.
 
user19161
1:12 AM
@Link Will you be doing math?
 
@WillHunting, not really, probably double major in premed and english
 
user19161
@Link Ah, no need for too much mathematics in your areas then!
 
Yea
Probably just calc and stat
 
Hey guys
 
Hi @Jordan
 
1:19 AM
I am trying to solve this physics problems. if an object is 400 N on earth, what does it weight on a planet that has twice the radius and 4 times the mass of earth?
 
400N/9.81 = 40.77 KG
 
I am suppose to use the formula $ F = G * \frac {m_1 * m_2}{r^2}$
where m1 is the object, m2 is earth and r is the radius of earth
 
yep
 
you sound like a complete tool
 
@Jordan Really?
 
1:23 AM
Why?
:P
 
All I did was ask a question and you reply "gl"
I don't think luck will be helpful, it is basically like saying "no"
 
Happy, now? Seriously, you solved it, good job.
...
How old are you?
 
25
Or if I wanted to answer like you I would have said "gl"
 
Well, I'm sorry Didn't know people get so sensitive.. However you solved the problem by yourself.. Would you like me to write it all out for you?
 
@Jordan You really cant stand a complete stranger wishing you good luck? I mean, he's not compelled to help you.
 
1:28 AM
I didn't solve anything, I asked a question and was given the answer of good luck
I have no idea how to solve this problem or what to plug in, there are too many variables
I think I have to solve for the mass of the person first which gives me 1.5 * 10 ^ -18 which is way off
 
Very well then. Lets start fresh
The object weighs 400N on earth correct?
Now given gravity is 9.81N/KG
mass of object is 40.77 KG
 
But I am suppose to work with the new formula we got
 
Which is?
The one you posted above?
 
$400N = G * \frac {m_1 * m_2}{r_e}$
 
yes, i was getting to that
and no, it wouldn't equal to 400
$Fg = \frac{G*m1*m2}{r^2}$
 
1:32 AM
$r^2$ r^2
 
since that is the valueon earth
so mass of object is 44.77kg
G = 6.674 * 10^-11, universal gravitonal constant
then new planet has 5.97219 × 10^24 kg (mass of earth) * 4
 
Isn't the problem right now $400N = G * \frac {m_x * 5.9721*10^24)}{150^2}$?
 
where did you get the 150?
 
the radius of earth
 
in Km?
what unit?
 
1:35 AM
Km*10^6
 
okay, before going on that, using google here: raidus of earth is 6 378.1, so new planet is 6 378.1*2
and then square that
 
I am getting 56
 
$Fg = G\frac{m1*m2}{r^2} = 6.674*10^{-11}\frac{ 2.3888 × 10^{25}kg*40.77kg}{12756.2^2}$
and solve for that
one sec
 
I am solving for mass of x
$m_x = \frac {(150 * 10^ 6 ) ^ 2}{ G * (5.9721*10^24)}$
 
why?
 
1:42 AM
so I can use it in the other equation to find the force
I think there is an even easier way to do this by playing around with the 4 and 2 for the size difference from earth, without solving for anything except the answer
 
wait, why do you need mx?
what is it supposed to be?
 
user19161
Hey @joseph I see you have come here now!
 
Ah, Mr. @Will Hunting!
 
user19161
@JosephWeissman There is no map game here though!
 
Yeah, another that's on my fav list. Just lurking...
 
1:45 AM
@Jordan, my bad, the raidus needs to be in meteres
 
user19161
I only hang out here nowadays.
 
wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%286.674*10%5E-11%29+*+%28%2840.77*%282.3888+%C3%97+10%5E25%29%29%2F%2812756200%5E2%29%29
wait, one sec
 
mx is the unsoled mass of the object
 
By unsoled, do you mean without any gravity?
beacuase I already told you the object has a mass of 40.77kg
 
mx=(150∗106)2G∗(5.9721∗1024)
But I have been saying that 40kg does not match what I got
 
1:50 AM
okay
 
I have a question I'm afraid is stupidly simple, yet for some reason I'm having a hard time figuring it out.
 
what do you get?
 
Was wondering if someone here might be willing to help with chat, or if I should post it to the main site.
 
56kg
 
Okay, honeslty no idea then, haven't done it in a whille :p
sorry
@Iszi, is it anything below calc level?
:p
 
user19161
1:52 AM
I am going to bed now, see you all in my dreams.
 
Good night.
 
This is why I hate physics, so arbitrary
 
Ah, severe headache... OTL
 
@Jordan, Ikr, I had to deal with this all week
sorry
but with currents :p
 
@Link Pretty sure it is. I'm pretty much trying to figure out how to process cards such that I get a certain amount out of the sale after the card processor's fees. The processor charges fees based on a percentage of the sale.
(i.e.: Processor takes 2%. If I submit a $100 payment, I get $98 out of it. I need the formula to figure out what size payment I should submit to get $100 in my account.)
 
2:00 AM
@Jordan Let $m_E$ be the mass of earth, $r_E$ be the radius of earth. Likewise define $m_P$, $r_P$ for the other planet. We know $m_P=c_1m_E$ and $r_P=c_2r_E$ for some arbitrary constants $c_1,c_2$. Then we are given $400N=G\frac{m_xm_E}{r_E^2}$. We want to determine $$G\frac{m_xm_P}{r_P^2}=G\frac{c_1m_xm_E}{(c_2r_E)^2}=\frac{c_1}{c_2^2}G\frac{m_‌​xm_E}{r_E^2}$$ but we already know all parts of the final expression. You plug in the constants $c_1,c_2$ and plug in the weight on earth.
 
Ack, there it is.
I'm looking for $\frac{p}{.98}$ where $p$ is the base price.
 
Where does the 400N fit into, or doesn't it?
 
Dunno why that's been so hard for me to figure out until I wrote the problem up in here.
 
@Jordan The whole factor $G\frac{m_xm_E}{r_E^2}$.
 
but I dont know m
 
2:05 AM
We don't care. You just substitute $400N$ for the factor I wrote.
 
Is my answer suppose to be Kg or N? I don't understand how I know this
 
Weight is always a force...
 
I don't quit understand how that equation was formed
oh
so the word weight implies Newtons?
 
Yes, and is dependent on the surrounding objects (planets, galaxies, whatever).
 
how do I determine the position of the coefficients?
 
2:09 AM
@Jordan I have no idea what you mean.
 
for example the next problems reverse the situation and asks for the weight on earth and gives the size of the different planet
 
Just write the problem, I don't really know what you are given. :)
 
okay I will solve this one first maybe
oh
how do I know which coefficient is c1?
 
It's the one that relates $m_E$ and $m_P$ such that $m_P=c_1m_E$.
 
So it is the same? 400N?
 
2:12 AM
That is what I got. Pure coincidence, btw.
 
So what about this one then, other planet is five times the mass of earth and three times earth's radius, if the object is 200N on this planet what is it on earth?
This alters the coefficient
 
You actually can call earth's mass $m_P$, radius $r_P$ and solve it exactly like the previous one. ;)
 
Is the coefficient 5/9?
 
You have to be careful. Write the equation relating masses, for instance.
Say the other planet is our reference planet:
with mass $m_R$.
 
hmm
 
2:20 AM
So $m_P=c_1m_R$ what is $c_1$?
 
Would it then be $G * \frac{m_x * m_e / 5}{(r/9)^2}$
 
The radius ratio is 1/3 not 1/9.
but I am afraid you only made this change because you know the other way is wrong.
Hence, my earlier question.
 
I suck at math but I thought if I brought a number into something that is squared I have to square it?
 
Let's just do one thing at a time :)
We have the other planet's mass ($m_R$) is five times the mass of earth ($m_P$). Put that in an equation.
 
c1 is 5 times earths mass
or 5?
I am not sure
$5*m_e$
I am incredibly bad at math, none of this is making sense to me
 
2:26 AM
For instance if I said $x$ was ten times as large as $y$, where they are in units of volume, I would write $x=10y$.
We just need an equation for the line I wrote about masses.
 
so 1/5?
 
That's an expression, we want $\ldots=\dots$
 
$m_p = 5m_e$
 
Right. Now, I did a tricky switch, where the mass of earth is written $m_p$ and the mass of the other planet (the reference planet) is $m_r$.
So just change names in that equation and we are good to go.
 
$m_r = 5 m_p$
 
2:30 AM
Yes!
Now, do the same for $r_p$ and $r_r$.
 
$r_r = 3 m_p^2$?
 
No squares yet. They are directly correlated.
 
oh
 
So the sentence is, the radius of the other planet is three times the radius of earth.
 
$r_r = 3 r_p$
 
2:33 AM
Yes.
Now on which planet do we know the weight?
 
reference planet
so we manipulate earth?
 
@Jordan Exactly.
@Jordan Not exactly. :P
First you write the equation for the force of gravity on the reference planet.
 
Good night, guys!
I love you all! =*
 
g'night, sleep tight, etc. etc.
 
so the same equation as before
 
2:37 AM
Which is..
 
$F_g G * \frac{m_x * m_p}{r^2}$
 
The variables $m_p$, $r_p$ are not correct. Recall that we are on the reference planet.
They are correct, actually, but we are looking for something else.
 
oh
so that is equal to $\frac{m_x * 5 m_r}{3r_r ^2}$
 
You are going ahead of yourself. I will show you what I was looking for: $F_r=G\frac{m_xm_r}{r_r^2}$, where I use $F_r$ to indicate the weight on the reference planet.
However, we know the value of $F_r$, since it was given in the problem statement.
 
would I say $200N = G * \frac {5m_r}{3* r_r ^2}$?
 
2:47 AM
No, we are not going from planet to planet yet. We are still on the reference planet, just seeing what we know. :) So $200N=F_r=G\frac{m_xm_r}{r_r^2}$.
 
yes
 
Now, we go to the other planet $P$, where we write the equation for the force of gravity. Call it $F_p$. Do not make any substitutions, just write it out using the variables $m_p$ and $r_p$.
 
$F_p = G * \frac {m_x * m_p}{r_p ^2}$
 
Yes. We are given that $m_r=5m_p$. This is backward, since we want to substitute $m_p$ into the equation for $F_p$.
So just solve for $m_p$ in the equation that I wrote.
 
oh
$F_p = G * \frac {m_x * m_p/5}{(r_p/3) ^2}$
 
2:54 AM
OK. Move the constants outside the fraction now like I did a lot earlier.
So moving the $1/5$ is easy, just write it first. The $1/3$ is a two-step process.
First move $1/3$ out of $(r_p/3)^2$.
I.e. distribute the square if you remember that.
 
so just 1/9?
so 9/5 is the coefficient?
 
There you go.
One problem, that I didn't catch earlier. ;)
@Jordan That $m_p$ should actually be $m_r$, since you substituted $m_p=m_r/5$.
 
that is confusing
so to get the answer it is something like $200N = 5/9?$
or the answer is $200*9/5$?
 
You had the expression $m_xm_p$ and you want to write it in terms of $m_r$. We already know $m_p=m_r/5$, so you just write $m_x(m_r/5)$ rather than the false $m_x(m_p/5)$. Similarly for $r_p$ and $r_r$.
 
oh yeah
 
3:00 AM
Now for your question, we have the equation $F_p=(9/5)G\frac{m_xm_r}{r_r^2}$.
Does $G\frac{m_xm_r}{r_r^2}$ look familiar?
 
oh
200N
 
There, so what is $F_p$?
 
360N
 
Yes.
 
Good job :p
Bye guys
 
3:04 AM
bye
Thanks for the help people
 
You're welcome. Hope my explanation was not overly poor.
 
It was great, it is just slow going online :P
 
I agree.
 
 
1 hour later…
4:13 AM
helloooo
woww.. one hour later :)
 
 
3 hours later…
7:05 AM
@robjohn Would you please comment on my new and hopefully improved posting here?
 
@aDangerousIdea I see a comment, is that what you mean?
 
@robjohn I added in some new material...
I don't mean the comment.
 
@aDangerousIdea There are many edits to the original post. I would have to go through a lot of changes. I have not been following that question.
@aDangerousIdea One needed change is LaTeX.
 
@robjohn Could you please skim over the current version and give me your impression?
 
@aDangerousIdea I don't see anything wrong. There are a lot of basic things there, and it is sometimes easy to overlook something basic that is being assumed which shouldn't be assumed. However, I don't see anything glaringly wrong.
 
7:21 AM
@robjohn Thank you for your time.
 
7:32 AM
@BrianM.Scott Would you like to comment on my new and improved post sir?
 
@aDangerousIdea It’ll take me a bit to get through it.
 
@BrianM.Scott Just a quick slim to give me your impression please.
 
@aDangerousIdea I don’t really like the discussion of the argument from the older edition. I’d say simply that the symbol $a/0$ is by definition the unique $c$ such that $0\cdot c=a$, if there i one. If $a\ne 0$, there is no such $c$, and if $a=0$, there isn’t a unique one, so in neither case does $a/0$ have meaning.
 
@BrianM.Scott Oh? is that what they meant. That helps a lot thanks.
 
You’re welcome.
 
8:05 AM
@BrianM.Scott: hey there.
It's been a while since we've both been active on chat at the same time.
Perhaps that streak has not ended ;-)
 
8:30 AM
@robjohn I’m sort of here. I’m running off to the kitchen occasionally.
 
8:46 AM
@aDangerousIdea Hi, you're back!
 
9:03 AM
I'm looking for a straightforward way to compute $\lim_{x\to0} \frac{\frac{4}{\pi}\arctan \left(\frac{x}{\arctan x}\right)-1}{x^2}$. I'm not yet convinced I might evaluate it in a fast manner.
 
L'Hopital?
 
@JayeshBadwaik: It could be, but it's much work there with l'Hopital.
 
10:02 AM
@BrianM.Scott Hey
Why was my answer downvoted here? math.stackexchange.com/a/241906/38268
It's correct for god's sake!!
 
 
4 hours later…
1:41 PM
hi
 
1:58 PM
Good day!
Is $\omega_1 \rfloor \omega_2$ a standard notation for form $\Omega$: $\omega_2 \wedge \Omega = \omega_1$?
 
hi @Nimza, sorry I don't know about these things
 
hi @jdoe :)
 
2:11 PM
if $L = \int \sqrt{f(x)} dx$ does $L^2 = \int f(x) dx$?
that's completely wrong, why is it in my notes :/
that scary cat is here again
> Theorem. Among all positive integers,
the integer 1 is the largest.

> Proof. For any integer that is not 1, there
is a method (to take the square) by which
one finds a larger positive integer. There-
fore 1 is the largest integer.
 
2:53 PM
@jdoe where did you get this image?
 
wikipedia
 
@jdoe oh, I would like to draw something like this myself, but I don't know appropriate program
 
it's hard work to make good graphics
 
in general yes :(
 
Amongst all integers 1 is the smallest
proof : for any integer that is not 1 , there is a square root which makes it smaller therefore 1 is the smallest :)
 
2:55 PM
lol
 
so 1 is both the largest and smallest
I see Charlie shouting in the starred messages , what is that about ?
@jd
@jdoe
 
hi
 
whats up with the shouting of Charlie ?
 

« first day (840 days earlier)      last day (4197 days later) »