In connection with the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected from an earlier thread have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Not every question was compiled - as noted, we o...
I have no idea where to find the official answer, but based on what happened on ServerFault last year (where I had +22/-12 and the other guy had +27/-17), in the case of a tie in the primary, the person who was nominated first goes on to the final Election.
I don't know if this is still the case...
Not that it would make a difference for the questionaire who banned anyone, let alone the exact circumstances of each and every little 30 minutes chat suspension. I guess as we all know, they're not particularly rare anyway.
maybe its just me, but it feels like we have way more votes than people who could have reasonably actually read all of the nominee's answers and considered them with any amount of seriousness.
especially since only 3 candidates have answers yet
@phantom42 Well, there are at least genuine meta porposals for making answering the questionaire mandatory. Which I think is a good idea (though, of course still won't require people to read 'em).
As I'm sure there's at least one candidate who won't go out of his way to answer it (disregarding if he has a realistic chance of winning anyway).
@JasonBaker Just so you know, even on meta [tag:...] links to the main site tags. There's [meta-tag:...] for actual tags on meta.
Afterall, you're certainly much more likely to need to link to main site tags on meta. There's not many scenarios where you really want to link to a tag in a main site post.
@phantom42 Some people might read the questionnaire just out of boredom before the actual election starts in four days. That could be an advantage of having a primary.
@MikeEdenfield Hmm, I admittedly wouldn't have expected that many downvotes on your answer. (Though, I have no exact breakdown, I just noticed that it got lower and lower while I was reading).
@MikeEdenfield The answer. The nomination still stands pretty well. A few rare downvotes are always in. But seeing how the answer is as good as the nomination (and of course says pretty much the same as all the other meta answers anyway, as usual) it is a bit surprising that it's voted so low. But well, I guess on meta personal factors come much more into play than in the election.
@MikeEdenfield as primary and answer votes come in, it's interesting to see the scores diverge. a highly voted primary nominee with the lowest answer score.
At this point I'd be willing to put money on two of Jason, alex, or null winning, so I'm pretty much gonna tune out for a week unless someone comments on my Q&A.