« first day (1192 days earlier)      last day (3201 days later) » 

12:34 AM
\o @san
 
yo
 
It reads 5:04 a.m. and I'm still not asleep. O.O
 
tsk
 
Have you seen the latest meta.SE featured thingy?
I wrote an answer for that, which stands at +17. ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
 
link?
 
12:36 AM
43
Q: How do we encourage edits to obsolete/out of date answers?

bluefeetAs the network ages and we have answers that are 7+ years old, we run into situations where changes in technology, etc. result in a once great answer becoming out-of-date, obsolete, or somewhat problematic. We don’t want to lose or delete these answers, due to legacy applications that still need...

 
+18
 
I love you.
 
lol
 
I've recently turned meta.chem into a sitcom.
 
sitcom eh?
 
12:40 AM
Look at the last five meta Qs.
Holy crud.
 
just had a glance - lol, I see what you mean
I haven't being doing much on the site lately
 
You're feeling like me.
Even though you're weird, we end up being the same.
 
nah been busy in RL
being weird is a good thing
 
Which brings me to my next question: How is my new profile pic?
 
symmetrical
 
12:46 AM
Its small version looks like a butterfly.
 
which chemical is this?
 
It's a window. A fenestrane.
I've added a stat in my profile: An up-to-date description of the profile pic.
 
i just got a gold on meta.SE
 
Lunatic?
Hullo @Curt!
 
Hi guys!
 
12:58 AM
How're you doing?
 
hi @CurtF.
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M electorate
 
@santiago Yay!
 
just waiting for the cache to catch up
 
Cache to wait for the ketchup?
 
ha
am looking to answer something on SO, have 4 answers (+2, +2, +1 accept and +0)
 
1:04 AM
That's one hell of a record.
 
not really
 
Theoretically.
 
SO is super hard.
 
You mean harsh, or stiff?
 
yup, it is all of the above
 
1:06 AM
I mean to get upvotes for your answers is difficult.
If you answer a question older than one day, even an unanswered one, IME you don't often get upvotes.
 
Burn SO!
 
@CurtF. true and even less chance of an accept
 
There's often a race to post answers for the easy questions. If you lose the race, no upvotes for you!
My best SO answers have no upvotes and the mediocre ones I submitted quickly do the best.
 
Then I hereby invite you to write answers for meta.SE.
No expertise needed, you just need to know a lot about meta and think meta a lot.
So that either people agree with you, or you make them agree with you, or you put a lot of meta memes there, and then you get tons of rep.
 
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M i have written 7 answers there and 2 questions
@CurtF. looking...
 
1:11 AM
Heck, my newest answer in meta.SE is +20 @Curt. I couldn't earn that after almost a year participation in chem.SE.
 
@CurtF. I see what you mean - your answers on SO are great!
upvoted 2 of them - will look at more a bit later on (so the serial robot doesn't sting us!)
 
I'll sting if you want.
 
lol
you should join SO @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M
 
I should. Doesn't mean would.
 
@CurtF. we should conscript @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M into SO
one of us, one of us...
 
1:17 AM
Bring in an army with ya.
I've decided not to sleep.
 
uh oh
 
 
8 hours later…
9:45 AM
HAHAHAHHAAHA
 
hi
 
wrote a question on Earth Sciences
 
9:50 AM
jealous
 
ಠ_ಠ
 
lol
just been downvoting on SO
 
FFFFFFUUUUUUNNNNNN
 
it is
my job interview went well yesterday
but who cares? right?
anyway, how is your day?
 
Ice cream-y.
 
9:59 AM
eh?
 
Eh. Just has five.
-1 for giving away my secrets. ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) — inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M 1 hour ago
 
1
Q: What geological structure(s) is responsible for the recent Queensland earthquakes?

santiagoRecently, south-east Queensland has been rattled by 2 moderate earthquakes - a 5.3 a couple of days ago (News report) and a 5.7 tremor just a few hours ago as of writing this post (News Report). These are significant as they are the strongest earthquakes experienced in Queensland. The location o...

 
@santiago @Santiago.
That was an easy one.
 
eh?
 
10:19 AM
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M what? what?
 
ಠ_ಠ
o/
 
hi
 
everything is fine?
 
just realised that I've not answered anything in over a week, nor asked a question in over 2 weeks - I start writing an answer (or question) but then stop myself
@PH13 easiest to assume so
There was one question a couple of days ago, I had researched and written the answer, and pressed 'discard' after some thought
 
@santiago why that?
 
10:33 AM
self concious probably
 
that's a hard problem ... solve it :)
 
meh, I'll get my confidence back for here eventually - but are doing the background stuff in the meantime
 
bakcground stuff is also important
 
though I am not editing much at all either
heck, I am not even 'greeting' as much as before
but are always lurking around the review queues and commenting on occasion
@PH13, you and @Martin-マーチン were right in pulling me up on my contributions (especially lately)
 
11:13 AM
hi @diffracteD
 
11:24 AM
I think I'll just quietly contribute in the background...
 
 
1 hour later…
12:46 PM
@santiago I think you should answer the questions that you want to answer
 
 
3 hours later…
3:41 PM
Hi!
 
3:54 PM
='.'=
=(^.^)=
:D
 
@Wildcat of course I meant $\ce{AB^{n+}}$ ... dumb me ^^
 
@PH13, sure, I knew that.
But still thought it is a good idea to clarify.
 
sure, of course!
 
Still trying to find some info on HHe2+...
:D
 
I would like to see read about it
you do not coincidentally work from time to time with openbabel ?
 
4:08 PM
@PH13, worked with it few years ago. Wrote my own crappy molecular viewer in C++ using OpenBabel. :D
 
cewl
I try to use obconformer with confab but have to change somehow the force field that is used ... do you know how to do that?
the current command is from "documentary"
obabel bostrom.sdf -O confs.sdf --confab -nconfs 100000
and it uses mmff94 ... but I want uff
 
--ff <name> - select a forcefield (default = MMFF94)
Works?
 
D:\Theoretische Chemie\confab>obabel borons1.sdf -O confs.sdf --confab -nconfs 100000 --ff uff
**Starting Confab 1.1.0
**To support, cite Journal of Cheminformatics, 2011, 3, 8.
..Input format = sdf
..Output format = sdf
..RMSD cutoff = 0.5
..Energy cutoff = 50
..Conformer cutoff = 1000000
..Write input conformation? False
..Verbose? False

==============================
*** Open Babel Warning in OpenBabel::OBGlobalDataBase::Init
Cannot initialize database 'types.txt' which may cause further errors.
it's the boron that makes the problems
 
Hmm... Strange...
 
at least the force field related ones ^^
 
4:14 PM
maybe capitalise the UFF word?
-ff UFF
--ff UFF
I mean
 
nope
nothing changes
how long will you stay online? I have to go for shopping now ... will take some 30 mins, or so
 
I'll be here. :D
Confab is now part of Open Babel, and is no longer available from this website.
Maybe confab is outdated.
And you better go with Open Babel itself.
 
hmmm
I treid using confab, because this paper states, that confab together with rdkit is one of the best free choices to search conformers
but I'm unsatisfied with rdkit, because It generates so many similar/identical structures because it's a random approach ... and I don't know how to delete the duplicates
 
Yes, but it is said that confab now is part of Open Babel.
 
I know
I read that :D
I mean ... I think that I use obconformer from within openbabel
 
4:25 PM
Then I think you have to download OB and give it a shot.
what is the version then?
obabel -V
 
Open Babel 2.3.90 -- Jul 1 2015 -- 16:39:46
 
the recent one
 
yeah :D
 
well then there is some problem with setting up UFF for your molecule
some not parametrised in UFF atom type
 
in avogadro UFF works with it
but I don't know how to save all conformers in one file with avogadro
 
4:31 PM
a have no idea as well
 
and for sure I don't save each conformer at it's own
 
I used a python script to do it
 
avogadro and obabel are imo heavily underdocumented
now shopping, cu later
 
that is my old script
it is from 2011
so might not work without modifications
basically it reads a geometry from a Gaussian out file
then does conformer search
and creates an input file for each and every conformer
and yeah you need Python bindings for OB
 
4:53 PM
Hi. How is everybody?
 
5:05 PM
@getafix, hi!
 
@Wildcat I will have a look :D
 
5:45 PM
@Wildcat it's a secret file ... mysterious
@Wildcat how to use your script?

python main.py name.log?
 
@PH13, gimme a minute. I"M ANSWERING A QUESTION!
:D
 
@Wildcat answer it, captain capslock!
 
6:03 PM
@PH13, input file name is fixed in the source code. :D
input_file_name = "job.out"
 
saw it now :D
why do you use weighted rotor?
 
it is just an exmple
 
which unit is the threshold?
 
change to systematic
in the unit of energy of conformers which Open Babel uses :D
 
ok ... then I have to find out what they use
 
6:04 PM
but for systematic search it should not be used by the way
the problem is with random/weighted search usually
 
do I have to set it to 0.0 then?
 
let me read the code
to recall the details
 
 
yeah, set it to zero
:D
but there will be dupes then
you see
 
and without dupes? :C
 
6:07 PM
there is a parameter called optimization_steps
basically each and every conformer is optimised at the MM level
for this number of steps
 
yes
 
even if you do systematic search
the optimisation will run then for each and every conformer
 
when I set the steps to 1 or 0? ^^
 
well, that is the question!
1 or 0?
:D
 
intuitively I would tend to 0
 
6:09 PM
my guess is 1! :D
 
xD
 
WE NEED TO PERFORM AN EXPERIMENT! :D
 
as you command, cpt. capslock!
script is made for linux, right?
@Wildcat
 
should work on win as well, in principle :D
 
D:\Theoretische Chemie\confab>C:\Python32\python.exe main.py
File "main.py", line 18
print "\nSystematic rotor search started."
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
:O
 
6:13 PM
yeah
Python 3 syntax is different :D
it should be print("\nSystematic rotor search started.")
print is now a function
let me work on it myself
i will try to update it for Py 3
and test
 
I changed every print now ... let's see
he dies now instantly after start xD
 
yeah, same for me
ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found.
:D
 
i have both installed ... i'll try the other version
2.7
 
Typical Python.
That's why I hate it.
In fact, OB should die.
With all respect to its devs, it is a mess. :(
 
@Wildcat why that?
^^
 
6:26 PM
RDKit is way better.
 
ok ... then tell me how to properly create conformers with it xD
 
Ask RDKit peoples!
Maybe, you can ask even here at Chem.SE.
I did conf. analysis just once.
 
I thought of asking for an easy way to generate conformers.
 
Many do that stuff regularly, so they must have ready-to-use solutions.
You have to make them share their workflows!
:D
 
then I will make it so
 
6:44 PM
this would be offensive, right?

The first thing that I have in mind is Avogadro (in Geoff's version I guess everything works fine)
 
 
5 hours later…
11:23 PM
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M you should go to bed as I do now o/
@inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M ಠ_ಠ
 

« first day (1192 days earlier)      last day (3201 days later) »