« first day (1616 days earlier)      last day (2782 days later) » 

11:00 AM
Mg(OH)2 (s) + HCl (g) -> MgCl2 (s) + H2O (g/l) ?
 
Human thingies crave new things
 
How does this happen not in aqueous medium...
 
so travelling would be the ultimate fun
all-expenses-paid travelling
 
@orthocresol @Wildcat I think this explanation is quite good
representation is just homomorphism...
 
I always hated videos
I only did reading
 
user116211
11:03 AM
@Rubisco ME TOO ;((
 
I still only do reading.
 
@Rubisco I always hated reading
 
user116211
@Rubisco Yeh, yeh.
 
I only watched video
 
user116211
@DHMO bleh...
 
11:03 AM
I still only watch videos.
 
@DHMO En garde
Well, my theory is that you only really learn through reading. Since you're the one controlling the reading's pace, but they're the one controlling the video's.
 
do you stress on "ir" or "rep" in "irrep"?
@Rubisco my theory is that books cost money
 
user116211
You should try Herstein Topics in Algebra; it acts as a good introduction to abstract algebra @DHMO.
 
@MAFIA36790 sure
Is there an infinite number of generalized point groups?
By generalized point groups I mean that C2v C3v C4v ... count as one
 
@Rubisco Amen to that, I hate watching videos.
 
user116211
11:06 AM
@orthocresol I never watched a single video till today.
 
@Rubisco no, you can always pause and rewind
 
I disagree with you guys. Videos might be quite good.
 
@Wildcat yay
 
user116211
@Wildcat Books!!
 
@MAFIA36790 It works for some, and good for them if it does. Just not quite for us, I suppose.
 
11:07 AM
@Wildcat
 
@DHMO That's spirit-killingly cumbersome
 
user116211
You can feel the books!!
 
4 mins ago, by DHMO
@orthocresol @Wildcat I think this explanation is quite good
 
@MAFIA36790 books & videso & lecture notes & internet sources...
 
11:07 AM
4 mins ago, by DHMO
representation is just homomorphism...
 
user116211
They have distinctive smell!!!
 
@DHMO Well, so you live in a world dependent on YouTube
 
@Rubisco no, it's just one button for me
 
user116211
Dover books, if I specify ;))
 
@Rubisco yes I do
 
11:08 AM
I watched few videos from the TMP Chem guy. They are quite good, in fact.
 
@Wildcat yay
 
@Rubisco Jan has 39 and Loong 36.
 
user116211
@orthocresol wow!! @jan @jan!!
 
That meddling Jan
 
> Mg(OH)2 (s) + HCl (g) -> MgCl2 (s) + H2O (g/l) ?
How does this happen not in aqueous medium...
 
11:09 AM
No one has forty I reckon
 
@Rubisco Even Martin has "only" 39.
 
He has a collection of videos on group theory.
 
@DHMO Owing a lot of your marks to a website is futile
 
@Rubisco i'm not in university
yet
 
user116211
11:10 AM
@Rubisco Yup!!
 
user116211
I very much agree with @Rubisco!!
 
Our other mods jonsca and Manish have 15 and 22 respectively. f'x has 27.
 
@DHMO Owing a lot of your marks to a website when you're still in high school is even more futile :P
 
Is there any molecule with C7 or C7v or C7h or anything?
 
user116211
@orthocresol What about Mart?
 
11:10 AM
@Rubisco I don't owe a lot of marks to videos
 
@orthocresol I can keep banging on the drum that I have more score thingies than Jon.
 
@MAFIA36790 39, it was above :P
 
user116211
@orthocresol Ohh!!
 
user116211
Mart is AI
 
user116211
He uses the Force!!
 
11:11 AM
Ahh, people who pronounced "gerade" as "je-ra-de"
 
@DHMO Haha chill dude. You don't need to prove anything
You're just hilariously unmatched
 
@Rubisco Do you know any?
It looks like "jerade" is the common pronunciation amongst anglophones
 
@DHMO Any . . . good ice cream stores?
 
@Rubisco any molecule with C7 or C7v or C7h or anything
 
Oh God
 
11:13 AM
I suppose cycloheptane lol
 
Lunch is on fire
BRB
Now it's less on fire
 
@KaumudiHarikumar hey dont do cliffhanger
 
user228700
So I was watching a video about the ionic product of water on YouTube and in the comments section, I saw this:
 
user228700
 
user228700
But in my textbook, they have included water too, to calculate $K_w$! Look:
 
11:20 AM
@DHMO It is possible that a molecule have a 7-fold rotational axis.
 
@Wildcat cycloheptane?
I dont think it is
 
user228700
Oh, crap, no, they haven't. And OK, @JR said before that the activity of water is 1 so alright, OK, never mind me. Sorry :P
 
@Wildcat maybe we need (c7h7)+
 
@DHMO maybe something awkward like this :D
cause I could not come up with a real-world example
 
@Wildcat what about c7v? i thought c7h7+ is real
 
11:25 AM
@DHMO It might be real, but I'm not sure about its geometry anyway.
And what's the point?
I mean, nature is almost entirely asymmetric.
 
sure
 
So, yeah there some simple small molecule which are highly symmetric.
But that is all to it.
And besides, nuclei are in constant motion.
And besides, the whole notion of a molecular geometry is an approximation.
 
sure
molecules are stretching all the time
 
So, I don't quite understand why do you even bother with SALC?
Do you need it for a job?
 
to construct LCAO?
no
 
user228700
11:28 AM
Actually, no. In the context of that picture that I uploaded, can anyone please quickly tell me the difference b/w writing $H_2O$ (l) and $H_2O$ (aq)..?
 
If not, ignore it.
@DHMO you don't need to symmetry adapt LCAO
 
@Wildcat thats such a good news to me
then how?
 
You can just completely ignore the symmetry of a molecule.
Unless you absolutely need it.
 
@Wildcat then how do i find the coefficients?
 
@DHMO you don't, programs do.
 
11:30 AM
I need molecular symmetry for my grandchildren
 
@Wildcat how do programs do it?
 
@DHMO they solve special equations
 
such as?
 
All in all, different LCAO results in different energies of a molecule.
Programs find one particular combination that results in the minimum energy.
Well, that's not the whole story. :D
 
... alright
 
user228700
11:40 AM
Anybody..?
 
user228700
No? OK :-(
 
@DHMO The tropylium ion is D7h.
 
(aq) simply means that the corresponding substance is dissolved in water, i.e. is a part of an aqueous solutin
 
@KaumudiHarikumar that picture is OK at simplistic level, but really, it should use activities, not concentrations.
trying to rationalise something at the simplistic level, only leads to more problems.
 
@orthocresol thanks
 
11:47 AM
@Wildcat was a good summary, ;)
 
> To make the harder things simple, first you need to make the simple things harder.
Now, can someone come up with 15 resonance structure of H2?
 
@KaumudiHarikumar Anyway, whether you write (l) or (aq) does not affect the ionic product. The water does not care what you call it - it only cares that its activity is 1, or pretty darn close to 1.
It's not possible that the way I, or you, write the equation, can change what's going on in the system. So, those post hoc justifications in the comments are off-track.
The idea is that, $$K_w = \frac{a_{\ce{H+}}\cdot a_{\ce{OH-}}}{a_{\ce{H2O}}}$$
 
Well, that's what I thought
 
But $a_{\ce{H2O}} = 1$, so you drop it from the equation, and therefore this simplifies to
 
But I thought maybe it's a creepy foreign high school thing
 
11:53 AM
$$K_w = a_{\ce{H+}}a_{\ce{OH-}}$$
and because the activity, numerically, is approximated by the concentration, at a lower level, this is often simplified to $K_w = [\ce{H+}][\ce{OH-}]$.
(Yes, Loong, I was lazy to type \mathrm{w}.)
 
Bad boy! :D
 
We should immediately get Ortho to make some badass chemistry video
@Wildcat Inconsistent boy
 
If I asked every unanswered question I asked here (in chat) on the main site, the main site would be down
 
Hey yo, guys, today we'll be learning about why your high school chemistry is rubbish.
 
@orthocresol should be punished by, say, an examination in the IUPAC naming rules!
 
11:56 AM
@orthocresol I seriously look forward to that
 
@orthocresol I'm imagining a seal doing hip hop dance
 
If you liked this video, please subscribe and share this on Facebook, Twitter, and tell all your friends about me.
 
(by the way, why?)
 
Ugh, all you dang Europeans have the good discussions while I'm asleep.
 
@pentavalentcarbon americans
 
11:58 AM
It's my payback for everything else in life being American-centric.
 
I think
@pentavalentcarbon I am not a European thing
 
I would like to say that HS chem isn't really rubbish. It's a stepping stone towards understanding things better. It's just like learning classical mechanics in physics, which is not really correct, but for the most part it works and you can learn QM and relativity when you are ready for it.
2
 
Close enough for me...
(I jest)
 
@pentavalentcarbon Did you just assume my continent? Triggered
 
11:59 AM
Sure, the American shows up and now all serious discussion goes away. Psssh!
 
Would the 1s orbital of He be different from that of H?
Should we calculate all the orbitals again for each element?
Like, we just solved the equation for H
but not He
 
Orbitals in He are not derived by solving SE for He.'
Their existence is an assumption.
 
Then they solve meta.SE
 
That's exactly what I mean
 
Anyway, the orbital will certainly be different.
 
12:01 PM
Has anyone solved the SE for He?
 
And people do chuck computer power at trying to calculate the orbitals.
 
user116211
@DHMO O.o
 
@MAFIA36790 ?.?
can anyone explain to me what x^2 + y^2 means?
 
@DHMO It is not exactly solvable, only approximately.
 
@pentavalentcarbon I see
 
12:02 PM
A closed-form solution to the Schrödinger equation for the helium atom has not been found.
 
@orthocresol i think you should know what x^2+y^2 means
 
IIRC, we had a question on that matter...
 
It means what it is.
 
@Wildcat is there anything found except for H?
 
It means that a function $f(x) = x^2 + y^2$ transforms as whatever irrep you found that listed as.
 
12:03 PM
@DHMO well, any one-electron system
 
oh...
 
hydrogen-like atoms as we call them
Li+
for instance
 
@Wildcat so you mean we have solved He+?
 
:D
 
wait, I thought Li+ has 2 electrons
 
12:04 PM
Oh yeah, He+, of course.
and Li2+
 
@Wildcat Gosh, go back to high school!
 
Li^2+
 
Much insight in quantum mechanics can be gained from understanding the solutions to the time-dependent non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in an appropriate configuration space. In vector Cartesian coordinates r {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} } , the equation takes the form H ψ ( r , t ) = ( T + V ) ψ (...
 
@orthocresol :D
 
@orthocresol I learned something new today already, didn't know that list existed.
 
12:05 PM
4
Q: Why cannot the Schrödinger equation be solved exactly for systems in which more than two particles interact?

YodaMy question is simply this: "Why cannot the Schrödinger equation be solved exactly for systems in which more than two particles interact?" Is it so because it is impossible to solve mathematically? If so, why? Or is it possible to solve the equation mathematically, but no physical interpretation...

11
Q: Analytical solution of the Schrödinger Equation for AB^+ systems

pH13 - Yet another PhilippAccording to Wikipedia, there are not many problems for which the Schrödinger equation can be solved analytically. [1] The $\ce{H2+}$ ion is probably the most complex molecule that can be treated this way. As far as I know, every diatomic homonuclear system like this can be solved, e.g., $\ce{U2...

 
Did we assume that He+ consist of one proton?
 
not a proton
 
This is a list of articles that are themselves lists of articles that are also lists on the English Wikipedia. In other words, each of the articles linked here is an index to multiple lists on a topic. Some of the linked articles are themselves lists of lists of lists. == General reference == Lists of academic journals Lists of important publications in science Lists of unsolved problems == Culture and the arts == === Literature === Lists of books Lists of 100 best books Lists of banned books Lists of The New York Times Fiction Best Sellers Lists of The New York Times Non-Fiction Best...
2
 
a single nucleus
 
@Wildcat so one particle
 
12:07 PM
we don't care about the composition of nuclei in chemistry
yes
 
alright...
 
@orthocresol OHOHOHOHOHO
 
@orthocresol LOL
 
This is really great.
 
Does the list of all lists list itself?
 
12:08 PM
@orthocresol You! Take a theory of computation class!
 
@orthocresol doesn't qualify
 
In the foundations of mathematics, Russell's paradox (also known as Russell's antinomy), discovered by Bertrand Russell in 1901, showed that some attempted formalizations of the naive set theory created by Georg Cantor led to a contradiction. The same paradox had been discovered a year before by Ernst Zermelo but he did not publish the idea, which remained known only to Hilbert, Husserl, and other members of the University of Göttingen. According to naive set theory, any definable collection is a set. Let R be the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. If R is not a member of itself...
 
user116211
@pentavalentcarbon I know that!!
 
user116211
I'm reading Jech's Set theory!!
 
user116211
It can be extended to the fact that universal set doesn't exist in ZFC.
 
12:12 PM
And I still haven't finished reading Goedel Escher Bach. Take that.
 
user116211
Of course, you can extend ZFC. But that's a different topic.
 
user116211
My last post on Set theory:
 
user116211
2
Q: Why are the Separation axioms 'too weak to develop set theory with its usual operations and constructions'?

MAFIA36790I was reading Jech's Set theory; there after introducing Russell's Paradox, he asserted: The safe way to eliminate paradoxes of this type is to abandon the Schema of Comprehension and keep its weak version, the Schema of Separation... Once we give up the full Comprehension Schema, Russ...

 
user116211
As usual, Asaf answered it ;)
 
@pentavalentcarbon "Dad, you say that I ate this ice cream and I say that I didn't. Since neither of us is . . . you know . . . wrong, I propose we present this as a mathematical paradox."
 
12:14 PM
@Rubisco Those were simpler times.
 
in Language Overflow, Sep 3 at 18:40, by DEAD
Aug 28 at 18:15, by DEAD
Now you're just showing off
 
@MAFIA36790 I don't understand half the words in there. I barely remember what a power set is.
 
@pentavalentcarbon You do bodybuilding with it
 
user116211
@Rubisco Yes, I'm showing that I've read it recently!
 
user116211
@pentavalentcarbon ohh.
 
12:15 PM
@Rubisco it's impossible to stop feeding the troll, I see
 
@pentavalentcarbon yes, I'm having lunch
 
@Rubisco Damn, you're good.
 
@pentavalentcarbon No, I'm Rubisco
 
Looks like dad jokes span the globe.
 
user116211
Russell's Paradox simply tells that the Axiom of Schema of Comprehension i.e., there exists a set $Y= \{x:P(x)\}$ where $P$ is a property is false.
 
12:18 PM
They're just no longer dad jokes at this part of the world
@MAFIA36790 I inherently won't want to parse any unparsed Mathjax in this chat
 
@MAFIA36790 The bit after the i.e., fine, "Axiom of Schema of Comprehension" I would never guess what that means.
 
@pentavalentcarbon It's sci-fi talk
 
Just taught someone about the spherical cow.
A spherical cow is a humorous metaphor for highly simplified scientific models of complex real life phenomena. The implication is that theoretical physicists will often reduce a problem to the simplest form they can imagine in order to make calculations more feasible, even though such simplification may hinder the model's application to reality. The concept is so commonly known that it is sometimes referred to in scientific discourse without the need for further explanation. == Details == The phrase comes from a joke that spoofs the simplifying assumptions that are sometimes used in theoretical...
Look at that gif! It's beautiful.
 
@pentavalentcarbon I'm gonna tell you a little secret. Whenever I'm bored and supposed to wait somewhere . . . like in a line or a bank or in the middle of the exam so the everyone doesn't get crept out how fast I finished it . . . I remind myself of that GIF and spontaneously, awkwardly laugh.
 
user116211
If the axiom were true, you would get $S= \{X:X\notin X\}\,.$
 
12:24 PM
I don't do it in a restroom though since it would be dirtily messy.
 
user116211
That's why the weak version of Schema of Comprehension i.e., Axiom of Separation is followed:
 
user116211
> If $P$ is a property, then for any $X,$ there exists a set $Y= \{x\in X: P(x)\}\,.$
 
user116211
See, the set is pre-defined, as is done in the form of $X$ here.
 
54
Q: How to make a Spherical Cow?

SumitBeing a theoretical physicist, I always have a great respect for Spherical Cow. So I thought about making one myself. I am not sure how can I create (something considered to be the simplest!) this marvel. One possible way could be using the ExampleData for Cow and map it on a sphere - something ...

 
user116211
@Rubisco NOO!!
 
12:27 PM
@MAFIA36790 It's NO2 then?
 
@Rubisco I felt awkward just reading that.
 
@pentavalentcarbon In my defense, people don't stare at me as bad as you think they stare at me. This ain't America
 
user116211
@Loong How does $\textrm{Theoretical Physicist}~\equiv~\textrm{Spherical Cow}\,?$
 
Or even Murica
 
user116211
@Rubisco bleh...
 
user116211
12:29 PM
@pentavalentcarbon Tell me the meaning of Comprehension; if you know then you got that.
 
Hello everyone! Do you guys think this question of mine is worthy of setting a bounty on? I am considering doing so since it didn't receive much attention...
1
Q: At what voltage does the electrodeposition of the metal start?

FreezingFireThe question is as follows: An aqueous solution containing each of $\ce{Au^{+3}, Cu^{+2}, Ag^{+}\;and\;Li^{+}}$ ions each at the concentration of $1 \mathrm M$, is being electrolysed using inert electrodes. The value of the standard potentials are: $$E^{\circ}_{\ce{Ag^{+}|Ag}}=0.80\,\text{V...

 
@MAFIA36790 We have to decide here. Is it sci-fi, NO2, or bleh talk?
 
 
Now this is like how I want this chat to be.
 
12:31 PM
@FreezingFire Well, nobody can decide for you what is worthy or not. If you want to place a bounty, then place one.
 
user116211
@Loong He is not a theoretical physicist, he is a statistician ;((
 
user116211
@Rubisco hmm.
 
@FreezingFire Sure, why not? If you're willing to throw in some cash, then who's there to stop you?
 
@MAFIA36790 erm, not sure I'm comprehending this...
 
@pentavalentcarbon why spherical? point object is much simpler
 
user116211
12:32 PM
@pentavalentcarbon :(
 
@orthocresol Okay then... I do want an answer to it, so I'll put one! :)
@Rubisco :)
 
@DHMO Chemists are dumb, we need infinitely small objects. Physicists have bigger brains and can deal with finite Gaussians.
 
@MAFIA36790 Now I'm wondering what a theoretical statistician'll look like
@pentavalentcarbon I will have to flag that as bitter truth
 
@pentavalentcarbon lol
 
No bitter truths in this chat
 
12:34 PM
@MAFIA36790 I was making a really bad pun, but I honestly don't see how one leads to the other.
 
user116211
@pentavalentcarbon ohh. Wait then... let me see if there is any post on it in Math.SE.
 
Can anyone suggest a mechanism of the following reaction?
Mg(OH)2 (s) + HCl (g) -> MgCl2 (s) + H2O (l)
 
@orthocresol and @Rubicon I have put a bounty on it. Would you like to come and get it? :)
 
21 hours ago, by orthocresol
sorry, electrochem not quite my forte, I have given up on it...
 
user116211
@FreezingFire Who is Rubicon?
 
12:37 PM
@orthocresol Hmm... :/
 
@FreezingFire Hmm, Rubicon . . . it's a nice name
 
Alea iacta est
 
@MAFIA36790 Oops....too much watching "Arrow"... :P I meant "Rubisco"!
 
user116211
@FreezingFire Hey s6 is coming!! It's Arrowverse!!!
 
@Rubisco Feel free to use it!
@MAFIA36790 What?!! When?
 
12:39 PM
@Rubisco I think you're joking here but you're definitely right.
 
@pentavalentcarbon I'm both joking and right
That's why I'd make a bad mod
 
I don't think so.
But that does make for the cruelest humor.
 
Note to self: Make a lot of 'that's why I'd be a bad mod' remarks so Ortho and Wild give up on me.
 
Where is all this "election" stuff anyway?
 
> Can anyone suggest a mechanism of the following reaction?
Mg(OH)2 (s) + HCl (g) -> MgCl2 (s) + H2O (l)
 
12:42 PM
@pentavalentcarbon The process seems to have changed. First, the questionnaire goes to meta, then the election page goes live after a week.
It's better timing but weird.
 
user116211
@FreezingFire October 5.
 
@Loong Thanks. I only saw the link to the question nomination list.
 
user116211
@pentavalentcarbon You want to run?
 
Running is good for health
 
12:46 PM
@MAFIA36790 I would never make it. Not active enough answering and asking questions even though I've been here since the very beginning.
 
user116211
So, NO ONE WANTS TO RUN ;(((
 
user116211
WTH is going on ;/
 
> Can anyone suggest a mechanism of the following reaction?
Mg(OH)2 (s) + HCl (g) -> MgCl2 (s) + H2O (l)
 
user116211
Hey @Martin-マーチン, teach them a lesson ;(
 
@MAFIA36790 They're faking it
 
user116211
12:49 PM
@Rubisco ah!!
 
@MAFIA36790 How do you know that? That sounds like insider knowledge.
 
@DHMO Probably, in the first step, some HCl dissolves in the residual moisture of the Mg(OH)2.
 
@Loong is water required?
 
user116211
@pentavalentcarbon Ask anyone; they are all denying to run ;/
 
@MAFIA36790 Well, what are the requirements?
 
user116211
12:50 PM
@pentavalentcarbon Let me begin (coughs):
 
@DHMO I don't know, whether perfectly dry Mg(OH)2 would react so fast with gaseous HCl.
 
@Loong that's a very german punctuation lol (no offense)
 
user116211
You should write first in your nomination bio why you think you can be a good mod.
 
user116211
I mean you would highlight the facts on why we should choose you.
 
@DHMO yeah, I noticed when it was too late
 
user116211
12:52 PM
what are your experiences in reviewing?
 
@Loong it's alright
 
user116211
Tell us.
 
user116211
How would you interact to the community as a mod; do tell us.
 
Huh
 
user116211
Also, mention how far you excel in the respective field you study.
 
12:53 PM
Oh. MAF is teaching penta 'running 101'.
 
@Rubisco he's forgetting "move your legs really fast"
 
user116211
I mean how your knowledge helps in contributing in the site; nevertheless that's not mandatory to mention in the nomination; but it's a common practice.
 
@pentavalentcarbon That's the last step, you're too rash.
 
user116211
Finally after you are done with the nomination bio; go to the Questionnaire;
 
@Rubisco That's always been my problem, I want to run before I can walk.
(I'm still listening)
 
user116211
12:56 PM
and then shew us how you approach those questions; write that lucidly and rationally. That must reflect your perspective, your thinking towards the concerned problem.
 
hm, the link to the election chat room is still the old one
 
user116211
That's it, AFAIR.
 
user116211
Never get involved too much in the drama as it happened in Physics.
 
Thanks for the nice outline. Yes, the Physics drama is garbage; I've read a little bit of it.
 
1:09 PM
1
Q: At what voltage does the electrodeposition of the metal start?

FreezingFireThe question is as follows: An aqueous solution containing each of $\ce{Au^{+3}, Cu^{+2}, Ag^{+}\;and\;Li^{+}}$ ions each at the concentration of $1 \mathrm M$, is being electrolysed using inert electrodes. The value of the standard potentials are: $$E^{\circ}_{\ce{Ag^{+}|Ag}}=0.80\,\text{V...

 
is iodine brown?
I thought brown is bromine...
 
Bromine is brown. Iodine is deep purple.
 
exactly
what is the major product in the reaction of excess n-hexane and chlorine under uv light?
 
@Loong I think, it has rubbed off on me a little bit :p
 
@orthocresol is this called an irony?
 
1:20 PM
No, it is not ironic in any way. I've actually caught myself doing that a few times already.
 
@orthocresol but you made the same mistake while complaining that others make the same mistake
what is this called?
 
Hypocrisy?
I never complained that people made the mistake.
 
perhaps
 
"Rubbed off on me" simply means that I picked it up.
 
oh... english idioms
 
1:23 PM
Hmm... "grated me" would mean that I'm irritated with it
 
I see
 
Anyway, a lot of people here speak English as a second language far better than I speak my second language. So, I have no right to complain.
And if extra German commas are the worst thing about one's English, then it's very good already. :)
 
what is your second language?
 
The Inuit languages are a closely related group of Native American languages traditionally spoken across the North American Arctic and to some extent in the subarctic in Labrador. The related Yupik languages are spoken in western and southern Alaska and in the far east of Russia, but are severely endangered in Russia today and spoken only in a few villages on the Chukchi Peninsula. The Inuit live primarily in three countries: Greenland, Canada (specifically in the Nunatsiavut region of Labrador, the Nunavik region of Quebec, Nunavut, and the Northwest Territories), and the United States (specifically...
 
:o
why
 
1:25 PM
<---
 
@orthocresol Glancing, I thought the image was an upside down world
 
lol
 
ಠ_ಠ
 
@pentavalentcarbon `(.•.)´
 
@DHMO He's an alien. Who can live in such cold places, d'oh.
 
user116211
1:28 PM
@Rubisco PALPATINE!!
 
:D
 
user116211
@Rubisco I thought they were Jedis ;/
 
@MAFIA36790 Well, Jon is Yoda, Manish is Windu, and Mart is Kenobi.
 
user116211
@Rubisco aha!
 
user116211
1:36 PM
And who would be Count Dooku ;P
 

« first day (1616 days earlier)      last day (2782 days later) »