« first day (1613 days earlier)      last day (2793 days later) » 
03:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

4:00 PM
@orthocresol I thought hybridization is a lie...
This also fails to explain why having a Ph group replacing the H makes it more stable
like PhCC- is more stable than HCC-
 
user116211
@user34388 It's not a lie ;(
 
um, phenyl is electron-withdrawing?
 
To set things right first - hybridisation is only a mathematical process, a human construct. It does not involve any physical movement of electrons. Therefore hybridisation cannot "happen" in any sense. Trying to make hybridisation happen is like trying to make a half-empty glass "turn" into a half-full glass. — orthocresol Sep 9 at 4:39
 
user116211
@user34388 Where was it written as lie?
 
@ortho seal How does Ph make it more stable?
@MAFIA36790 a construct
 
user116211
4:02 PM
@user34388 So?
 
@MAFIA36790 a construct isn't real
 
user116211
So, how can it be a lie?
 
what.... i'm not into philosophy
let's just say i was wrong.
Can anybody explain to me how phenyl being electron-withdrawing stabilizes C#C- ?
 
user116211
When a theory contradicts tested hypothesis, then it's false; it's a lie. Just because it is a mathematical concept, doesn't mean it is a lie.
 
@MAFIA36790 my fault
 
4:04 PM
@Wildcat Well, there is a fair bit of QC stuff that I just upvote as well. I don't understand most of it but I just trust that you guys know what you are doing. Like this chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/31358/…
One day I will try to learn it, but that time has not quite come yet :)
 
Does the phenyl group somehow increase the s character of the sp orbital?
 
MOs are also a construct
we cannot solve the SE for many electron systems
so that is the best we can do, and it works for us, so we accept it.
 
Everything is a construct
We are in the matrix
we just haven't been offered the blue and red pill yet ;)
 
Look, I was wrong, ok?
@ortho seal Has the SE for H2 been solved?
 
also, EWG means inductive effect
not as far as i know, in any case, even H2+ which was "solved" invoked born-oppenheimer, so that is not even a full solution
if i remember correctly
 
4:10 PM
(pretending to understand) I see
 
@user34388 basically we most often can't obtain nice analytic expressions.
 
@getafix I see
 
However, a few approx. make the problems more tractable
the idea behind born oppenheimer is that the motion of electrons and nuclei can be separated...
so the total wavefunction can be written as a product of an "electronic" and a "nuclear" wavefunction
 
I see
 
@getafix I think they're in high school
 
4:14 PM
of course if you need more details you should ask someone who is smarter than I am..lol
Oh i see..
 
@pentavalentcarbon That never stopped us from telling them that hybridisation is a lie.
 
@pentavalentcarbon look, your high school isn't my high school
 
I think we say it a bit too often..
 
@user34388 what is that supposed to mean?
 
@ortho seal in what aspect is hybridisation a lie?
 
4:16 PM
I suppose I'll be quiet now...
 
In mathematics, a Lie algebra (/liː/, not /laɪ/) is a vector space together with a non-associative multiplication called "Lie bracket" [ x , y ] {\displaystyle [x,y]} . When an algebraic product is defined on the space, the Lie bracket is the commutator [ x , y ] = x y − y x {\displaystyle [x,y]=xy-yx} . Lie algebras were introduced to study the concept of infinitesimal transformations. Hermann Wey...
 
@getafix that my high school does not even teach orbitals.
...
 
HAHAHAHAH
 
@user34388 not a big deal, since they don't exist. :D
 
@Wildcat I see
 
4:18 PM
@Loong, are you there?
 
I always pronounced it as "Lee" algebra though
 
@orthocresol ?
 
@getafix which is the correct pronunciation.
 
oh okay lol
 
@Loong I just wanted to tell you I hate everything of Atkins.
 
4:19 PM
I just felt like my whole life had been a "lie"
 
@orthocresol aha
 
@Loong You know, his books are the only popular science books in my library.
 
@getafix Lie is a Norwegian surname.
 
He donated free copies to the library.
 
Atkins is not that bad, in fact.
 
4:20 PM
@orthocresol I know how you feel.. :/
@Wildcat not that good either
 
(Don't take me too seriously. I still use his textbooks.)
 
but I guess I got used to his style..
 
I'm just afraid of ever meeting him (I had the opportunity to last year)
 
I do too....don't really have a choice since my instructor uses it
 
@orthocresol In physical chemistry, we had no choice.
 
4:21 PM
I supplement it with Donald Mcquarrie
 
@Loong Atkins used to teach thermodynamics, until he retired several years ago
I believe it was in 2007.
 
user116211
@orthocresol Did you get his real class!!
 
I have actually wondered what he would be like in an actual lecture
 
I also used a German book by Gerd Wedler, which has good thermodynamics.
 
@MAFIA36790 Nah, I started uni in 2014 ;)
 
user116211
4:25 PM
For Thermodynamics, lectures by Fermi is the best, I have seen so far.
 
@MAFIA36790 Any more discussion and I risk revealing my real identity, so I will stop here :D
 
I like studying more advanced topics in Thermo/Stat Mech or QM from physics texts though
 
user116211
@orthocresol sure. I like ambiguity ;))
 
user116211
@getafix they are indeed physics.
 
yeah i know.
 
4:28 PM
@MAFIA36790 I am quite sure that if one really wants to, they can easily find out who I am.
 
user116211
For adv. Thermo, the version of Caratheodory really thrilled me.
 
But oh well..
 
@orthocresol I guess, our German translation of the physical chemistry book by Atkins was from 1996.
 
@Loong The thermo lecturer who succeeded Atkins says that the earlier editions were better
 
user116211
@Loong Wait, I thought there is only an English version...
 
4:29 PM
@orthocresol You're white, fuzzy, and live somewhere cold. Duh.
 
And since he added Julio de Paula, the quality dropped
@pentavalentcarbon My SE profile tells you all about my location anyway
 
Near the North Pole, that helps me.
 
user116211
@pentavalentcarbon ;P
 
I also found you in my copy of the Merck Index when I was looking up chloroform earlier...
 
user116211
Apart from Mart, we are all anonymous ;P
 
4:34 PM
0
Q: Would magnesium and calcium hydroxide undergo a single replacement reaction?

SigismundCan calcium hydroxide react with magnesium (if given sufficient activation energy) to produce magnesium hydroxide and calcium, in the same way that NaOH + $\ce{Mg} \ce{->} \ce{Mg(OH)2} + \ce{Na}$ ? Or, is calcium's electronegativity (or some other factor) prohibitive of this?

Does anyone actually know this lol
looks easy
 
Those are both pretty insoluble, if I remember correctly.
 
@pentavalentcarbon nobody said the environment must be aquatic...
and limewater is slightly soluble
 
The implication is usually an aqueous environment.
> Calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2, is sparsely soluble in water (1.5 g/L at 25 °C[1])
 
hmm, actually google doesn't turn up anything revealing for "orthocresol"..
so i am not that discoverable..
 
@ortho seal it returns the wiki page for me
 
4:44 PM
I think that's you.
 
@orthocresol is it good or bad?
 
@pentavalentcarbon No, he is @ortho seal
 
@pentavalentcarbon deanonimized!!!111 :D
 
@Wildcat I don't benefit from anybody knowing who I am, anyway. :)
@pentavalentcarbon Literally melting right now then...
 
Speaking of books, the Merck Index is actually extremely nice.
I never use it but I'm glad I have it.
 
4:46 PM
 
@pentavalentcarbon what is the compound in your icon?
 
@pentavalentcarbon ...
!!img/methanium
 
No result found.
 
In chemistry, methanium is a positive ion with formula CH+ 5, namely a molecule with one carbon atom bonded to five hydrogen atoms and bearing a +1 electric charge. It is a superacid and one of the onium ions, indeed the simplest carbonium ion. Methanium can be produced in the laboratory as a rarefied gas or as a dilute species in superacids. It was prepared for the first time in 1950 and published in 1952 by Victor Talrose and his assistant Anna Konstantinovna Lyubimova. It occurs as an intermediate species in chemical reactions. The methanium ion is named after methane (CH 4), by analogy with...
 
4:48 PM
I am meant to be the undergraduate mistake, not the actual molecule.
 
@orthocresol degrees Fahrenheit?
 
@pentavalentcarbon the undergraduate "mistake" is an actual molecule
 
@user34388 Not when you're in high school or undergraduate organic chemistry it isn't.
 
@pentavalentcarbon the education system is a failure
 
@Wildcat Celsius
 
4:49 PM
I disagree.
 
@orthocresol over +30 and a rain? :O
 
@Wildcat All year round, no less!
 
@pentavalentcarbon I approve your disagreement.
 
@orthocresol Do you live in tropics? :O
 
@Wildcat Only during holidays :)
Staying in the North pole all year round is a little cold. Also the polar bears are dangerous
 
4:53 PM
Well, not close enough... :(
 
Aug 17 at 11:36, by Leaky Nun
So my education is bullshit.
 
That's cold
 
Aug 17 at 11:37, by DEAD
@LeakyNun Heh, you should've drawn that conclusion much earlier.
 
In Oxford, it's still only 15-20 degrees
Then again, Oxford is pretty far south already, I suppose.
 
@orthocresol ... I thought you were referring to "so my education is bullsh*t"
 
4:55 PM
@orthocresol winter is coming! :O
 
@pentavalentcarbon DEAD disagrees with you
 
@user34388 That is an incredibly poor way of viewing things.
@user34388 I'm ok with that. Most people disagree with me.
 
@pentavalentcarbon +1
 
@pentavalentcarbon Look, orbitals are not taught in my school
 
@user34388 That is only looking at an individual tree in the forest, to use a crappy analogy.
 
4:56 PM
@Wildcat Indeed.. But it is coming late, it seems. Summer came late as well, this year. Very weird..
 
@pentavalentcarbon look, i'm not serious lol
 
user116211
@orthocresol Oxford has a good climate.
 
@user34388 Sarcasm doesn't translate well on the internet, which is why our enzyme friend sounds weird most of the time.
 
@pentavalentcarbon enzyme?
 
@user34388 He's RuBisCo now.
 
4:58 PM
right
what was he?
 
@MAFIA36790 Oxford is actually a really nice place, I'm lucky to be there.
 
He was DEAD.
 
user116211
@orthocresol ;))
 
is DEAD an enzyme?
 
user116211
@user34388 google
 
4:59 PM
Diethyl azodicarboxylate, conventionally abbreviated as DEAD and sometimes as DEADCAT, is an organic compound with the structural formula CH3CH2O2CN=NCO2CH2CH3. Its molecular structure consists of a central azo functional group, RN=NR, flanked by two ethyl ester groups. This orange-red liquid is a valuable reagent but also quite dangerous and explodes upon heating. Therefore, commercial shipment of pure diethyl azodicarboxylate is prohibited in the United States and is carried out either in solution or on polystyrene particles. DEAD is an aza-dienophile and an efficient dehydrogenating agen...
> sometimes as DEADCAT
:(
 
...
 
@MAFIA36790 Apart from the hordes of tourists! In summer there's just tons of them...
 
@pentavalentcarbon where does "CAT" come from?
 
@pentavalentcarbon :O
 
It's basically like a foreign invasion.. the sidewalks are full so you have to walk on the roads..
 
5:00 PM
@Wildcat :O
@user34388 Must be the carboxylate part. Never heard of that before.
 
@pentavalentcarbon that's creative
 
@user34388 CArboxylTe, probably.
 
@Wildcat thanks
 
CArboxylaTe, or CarboxylATe :D
 
user116211
@orthocresol ohh.
 
user116211
5:05 PM
@orthocresol O.o
 
user116211
Anyways, @ortho, did you visit Cambridge any time?
 
@MAFIA36790 Quite a few :)
I have a good friend there.
 
user116211
@orthocresol You need Trump now!!
 
user116211
@orthocresol Ah ;))
 
@MAFIA36790 I voted leave and I am a UKIP supporter.
 
user116211
5:07 PM
@orthocresol stares at Ortho
 
user116211
But I respect your opinion.
 
@MAFIA36790 ;) I'm not.
Politically, Oxford (and Cambridge) are a really small bubble.
If you look at the referendum results, for example.
 
user116211
@orthocresol Oxbridge, as is popularly called ;)
 
And even the 2015 general election
Most people here think that UKIP is the devil's spawn.
 
user116211
Anyways, @ortho, have to go back to my study...
 
5:09 PM
Ah, ok, I'm going to sleep soon anyway :)
 
user116211
@orthocresol no comments
 
Good luck.
 
Yes, the “lowest sum” method works most of the time. But it does lead to wrong answers sometimes, that's why I'd rather cooperate on propagating the correct way, rather than support wording that suggests that the “lowest sum” is correct. Check the “Don't sum locants!” article by Dr. Ian Hunt, Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, to see clear examples of when the lowest sum can lead to wrong answers for questions. I believe it should never be used, even if it leads to right answers sometimes. — Rok 28 mins ago
 
user116211
Good night all o/
 
Why does this user preach to the choir and still tries to teach me about the wrong “lowest sum of locants” rule, although the question isn’t even related to this rule?
 
5:11 PM
@Loong Maybe he was just too enthusiastic about finding out the truth.
 
hm
 
@orthocresol you always edit anything that floats on top lol
just a link from any comment makes you edit
!!img/tricyanomethane
 
this is very acidic although the acidity comes from the C-H bond...
which is what shocks me
 
Why would that surprise you?
 
5:18 PM
@pentavalentcarbon because i've never seen C-H acids that are considerably acidic
more acidic than carboxylic acids...
God, this is a strong acid...
 
Chemistry is weird. I remember a paper from a few years ago where they made a thorium or thallium complex with 11 bonds.
 
the electron-withdrawing effect of cyano is quite strong...
or is it just resonance
 
The first, not the second
 
why not?
 
I suppose you could make that argument but they're both going to be involved.
 
5:22 PM
@pentavalentcarbon I think the resonance is strong with that one... but is resonance enough?
basically every atom of the ion is involved in the resonance
which is something I haven't seen before...
 
Again, it's probably a combination of both.
I couldn't say one over the other unless you presented a set of similar compounds where you systematically replace the cyano groups with something else and examine the pKa.
 
@pentavalentcarbon Why is -CN electron-withdrawing? Sorry for stupid question
 
It's electron deficient due to some empty pi orbitals that can be filled.
 
wait
empty pi orbitals?
Which orbital is empty?
 
@user34388 What the hell is that?
 
5:27 PM
@pentavalentcarbon hybridization and AO overlap of hydrogen cyanide
yellow and green are p orbitals
 
Looks more like I took some psychedelic drugs and tried to do chemistry.
 
...
 
6
Q: Cyanide ion non-bonding/lone pair?

DissenterWhere's the lone pair on the cyanide anion in this MO diagram? In the traditional Lewis picture there are two lone pairs on the cyanide ion. In the MO diagram though there appear to be no non-bonding orbitals that are populated ... Also how come there appear to be two sigma bonding orbitals...

 
That's a much better picture.
Sorry I was making fun of the other one, just very, uh, odd.
 
5:29 PM
I consider the first picture much better than this one
 
I disagree, too many bright colors with too much going on.
 
@pentavalentcarbon Same question: which pi-orbital is empty?
@pentavalentcarbon at least the orbitals overlap
 
I might be wrong about the empty pi orbital, let me actually read up on it.
 
5:41 PM
Yes, I'm wrong, it's an empty $\sigma_{2p_{z}}$ bonding orbital.
Or, half-empty for the radical.
 
@orthocresol no, his last (now deleted comment) was too much
At least, I have got a nice Disciplined badge.
 
6:03 PM
@Loong o.o I missed it
 
6:13 PM
It doesn't matter. He didn't like my answer; he probably didn't really read it. He insisted on talking about another topic that is not related to the question and that has already been explained in another linked answer, which he didn't read either. After his last rude comment, I deleted my answer and disengaged.
 
Jan
@Rubisco Oh.
 
@Loong oh well... It happens. ):
 
Jan
Damn, I can't find recently owner-deleted answers in the 10k-tools, can't find @Loong's recently deleted post D=
 
That last line of his self-answer is real passive aggressive, haha
 
Jan
> The last line of his self-answer is deleted, haha
^ fixed that for you ;)
 
6:26 PM
@Jan Yeah, even I cannot see my answer in the "Recently Deleted" list.
 
Jan
But it's okay, I just found it xD
Did that guy also submit an edit suggestion to your answer?
 
I don't think so.
 
I'll read that tomorrow when I wake up :D
Goodnight everybody
 
@Jan Did you find that here: physics.stackexchange.com/q/281828/59991 ?
 
Jan
6:33 PM
@Loong Busted ;)
@orthocresol No need to read, just look at the pretty pictures
How do I say 'the pKa value is typically lower by <something like 1, 2 or 3; i.e. a small single-digit number>'?
 
Jan
7:13 PM
-1
Q: Identify the name of following compound

SOMANKAR CHAKRABORTY Identify the name of this compound: a. bicyclo[2.2.0]octane b. bicyclo[0.2.2]hexane c. bi

I feel so evil (see my comment).
 
Hm, considering also his other question, he seems to have some technical problems: chemistry.stackexchange.com/posts/59642/revisions
 
 
4 hours later…
10:56 PM
Is there any directional ionic bond?
And by "ionic bond" I mean "predominantly ionic bond"
 
Jan
@user34388 No, unless you count hydrogen bonds.
 
11:25 PM
@Jan I see, thanks
Does H2O contain a 3c2e bond?
 
Jan
@user34388 No. Why should it?
chemistry.stackexchange.com/a/59726/7475 <-- comment thread of the day.
Especially:
@Jan go check it out at wolframalpha.com/input/?i=feet%20of%20mercury. This may explain it to you why theres time in the equation! — user3043098 4 mins ago
 
@Jan but its lowest energy orbital is a bonding orbital containing 2 electrons shared by 3 centres...
 
Jan
@user34388 In molecular orbital descriptions, you will always have orbitals (and thus electron pairs) spanning the entire molecule.
 
@Jan exactly
 
Jan
The difference comes in when you attempt to localise molecular orbitals. It's not until then that you realise you cannot localise the bonds in $\ce{B2H6}$ in a fully 2e2c way.
 
11:33 PM
How do you localize mo?
 
Jan
Linear combinations. (Basically addition)
 
wait, linear combinations of molecular orbitals?
 
Jan
For example, the water MOs. Just so we are on common grounds, please check them out here.
mo2 + mo3 - a little of mo4 approximately equals a sigma bond to the right-hand hydrogen.
mo2 - mo3 + a little of mo4 approximately equals a sigma bond to the left-hand hydrogen.
 
wow...
 
Jan
mo4 + a little of mo2 approximately gives a lone pair on oxygen.
 
11:38 PM
never heard of it before
 
Jan
Each of those contains two electrons and loosely corresponds to a line in the Lewis structure.
(I learnt to draw lines all the time, even for lone pairs. Dots are reserved for radicals.)
Thus, there are only 2e2c bonds.
 
I see
 
Jan
Not the best image for B2H6 but a starting point …
 
sure
@Jan How is the energy of an unoccupied orbital defined?
 
Jan
Homo-3 + Homo-1 are approximately the banana bond around the bottom. It only contains two electrons. Similarly for Homo-1 - Homo-3 and the top banana.
@user34388 You calculate it. (Unsatisfying answer, innit? ;))
Or, you can measure absorption of photons and thereby determine the energy difference between an occupied and an unoccupied orbital experimentally.
 
11:46 PM
What does homo2 look like?
 
Jan
Tbh, dunno ^^'
 
@Jan I see
@Jan and if LUMO was involved there would be 2c2e?
 
Jan
Hmmm, I think you need two LUMOs to turn that 2e3c bond into two 2e2c bonds.
(Basically, you need to more hydride anions and get two BH4- tetrahedra)
 
Alright
what on earth is the left NBMO
 
Jan
Also, I desperately need to go to bed. But I should wait until after 2 a.m. to add another UTC day to my fanatic badge counters xD
@user34388 Lone pair of the upper oxygen.
 
11:53 PM
what are the two small p orbitals
 
Jan
Because that's what the calculations tell us.
 
alright
so LCAO isnt just addition
 
Jan
The better answer is 'because the nodal plane is somewhere on nitrogen, so the oxygens below the plane need to contribute to the MO, too.'
 
Alright
 
03:00 - 16:0016:00 - 00:00

« first day (1613 days earlier)      last day (2793 days later) »