« first day (1641 days earlier)      last day (2762 days later) » 
01:00 - 17:0017:00 - 23:00

5:00 PM
Things have quite a lot changed around, we got new mods, huh?
 
5:12 PM
@DeNiSkA Yeah, the election was over a week ago or so
 
@M.A.R. would you like to help me today...? :-)
 
Sure, if my connection doesn't die
 
Hahaha can u make a chat room if you don't mind :-) pls
 
No, I think we can just chat here
That other chat was a special occasion
I had something important to post into this room and I didn't want it to get interrupted with our conversation.
But there are no conversations going on, so.
 
Okay actually some may find it an off topic
It's related to physics
 
5:19 PM
Oh, I learn some physics and forget it the next day.
So I might not be able to help as readily.
 
If I try to pull a 10 kg object with 98 N would it ever come off... ? Consider there exist a constant g =9.8 ms^-2 ..
No problem if you can't answer instant :-)
 
@ffahim Pull? Come off? You mean 'pick up'?
 
Yep
 
Well, you would make N = 0.
After that the slightest force would move it upwards.
 
Okay I think I got that... as the net force is Zero there won't be any distance change? Is it so?
 
5:24 PM
Yes
 
Tell me another thing ... whenever I say an object is 10 feet above from the ground ..... what do I actually mean? Do I mean that its centre of gravity is 10 feet above?
 
No, that it's 10 feet tall.
 
Oh let me clear ... I meant I lifted up that object to 10 feet above from the ground...
 
@ffahim to be precise, it depends whether you consider the object a point particle or not?
 
@DeNiSkA let's think us not
Let's think its vertically @DeNiSkA
Well I am referring to potential work = mgh .... @M.A.R. @DeNiSkA
 
5:29 PM
@ffahim Then the object has a height of 10 feet. That is, it's lowest part is 10 feet above the ground.
That's really semantics, not physics.
 
@ffahim wait! you have to calculate the work done by gravitational force in moving object 10 feet above the ground?
@M.A.R. I remember you were good at english!
 
@DeNiSkA I'm not good at English. I'm just not bad.
 
-.-
!beer
!!beer
 
Yeah so when I calculate work done there is h .. in what just h means ? Is it simple height or the distance of the objects centre of gravity to the ground from where it's lifted up? @M.A.R. @DeNiSkA
 
5:32 PM
@DeNiSkA If I'm good at English, then what will we call all those profound linguists?
 
Oh come on pls....
 
@ffahim It's delta h. How much you have lifted the thing.
 
::*I can smell confusion*::
 
@ffahim If you calculate it from the 'center of gravity', it still yields the same result.
 
So if the cover distance wats not pverpendicular ... I meant slightly turned ... then?
 
5:36 PM
then answer will vary
 
Pls let me clear? :-)
Vary... why?
 
@ffahim Cos pi/2 = 0
So whatever work has been done parallel to the ground is NOT gravitational work.
 
Hmmm .... then?
 
@ffahim have you studied dot products
 
You only should calculate that vertical thingy.
Ugh, I'm not used to physics terminology in English, it seems.
 
5:38 PM
As far as I learned that two dot product of vector is scalar
 
Ok cool then you should know that work done on a body is not just force times displacement, it is force (dot) displacement. And here force is mg and displacement is h
and because dot is there you can't just multiply them
 
Not a big deal at all... I can understand that and that's enough English for me to understand... I am not also fluent in writing or spoken English.. as u have seen before ... @M.A.R. :-)
@DeNiSkA I think I need to learn vector first
Thanks @M.A.R. @DeNiSkA ... both of u guys... :-)
 
bye @ffahim
 
Gd night... sweet dream @DenisKa
 
nailed fellas on old game :D
 
6:09 PM
This guy is prolly gonna be added to the list of my YouTube heroes
 
6:26 PM
@DenisKa lol... you are correct here. you have to consider the object a point particle or else it kinda devolves into semantics.
Anyway, isn't that what high school physics is all about? Point particles, no friction, etc. etc.
Massless rope, frictionless pulley...
 
yeah! haha @orthocresol
 
@M.A.R. Just curious, do you get a message when I edit your chat messages?
 
@orthocresol Nope
 
edits all past messages
 
6:29 PM
You're just jealous of my badassnessity. Tongue
 
I find it a little bit upsetting that the Resources post is only at +5..
invokes mod powers
 
@orthocresol You can doez nothing MWAHHAHA
 
@M.A.R. I could unlock the post and upvote it and lock it again
Ezpz.
 
That's just one vote. Pfft.
Akin to nothing.
 
I could create many new accounts to upvote the same post.
How do you know I haven't already done so on my own answers?
 
6:51 PM
@orthocresol You don't got the guts
 
 
2 hours later…
8:58 PM
0
Q: Will supercritical nitrogen stay supercritical if we raise temperature and pressure high above critical values?

RudyNitrogen's critical temperature is -146.96 °C and critical pressure 33.96 bar. If we maintain nitrogen at 220 bar and 400 °C. What will be the state of N2; will it be still supercritical? I know that phase diagram says after critical temperature and pressure we have supercritical. But no graphs i...

 
 
2 hours later…
Bob
10:53 PM
 
01:00 - 17:0017:00 - 23:00

« first day (1641 days earlier)      last day (2762 days later) »