« first day (2302 days earlier)      last day (2652 days later) » 

1:11 AM
@derobert did you had to login again when you restarted firefox?
btw, the whatsapp thingy seems to behave better, but you can still reproduce it
 
2:05 AM
hey, cool about:profiles
 
Ben
I am in dire time constraints to solve a problem, is this the location to ask?
 
If you need immediate help, you may need to get your support hotline. SE doesn't work well with urgent issues
 
Ben
I'm at a loss as to where to find any "support hotline"
 
if you brought your system in a store...?
 
Ben
2:20 AM
No, nor did I buy my Debian in a store, and Debian is that which I have an issue.
I must be in the wrong place.
 
I'm just telling you that "dire time constraints" doesn't work well with SE
 
Ben
So i've gathered. It appears that there is no such thing as "help in a reasonable amount of time" for anything having to do with unix/linux
 
Actually there is... you have to pay for it
2
 
Ben
#debian IRC channel answered my question. thank you anyway.
 
2:38 AM
then it wasn't time constrained as you think it was
 
 
2 hours later…
5:05 AM
I'm afraid of the day firefox will follow the same route...
 
wat
5:43 AM
@Braiam wat.
but muh gnome shell inttegration
 
 
3 hours later…
8:20 AM
@Braiam Oh dear. Is this going to be a problem?
 
 
3 hours later…
11:38 AM
@FaheemMitha only if you need updates of your extensions
 
@Braiam Well, I think one generally does.
@Ben One customarily asks a question on the site.
 
 
4 hours later…
3:30 PM
@Braiam login to what again?
 
Everything cookie based (Google, twitter, etc.)
 
4:01 PM
@Braiam Nope, didn't have that happen
@Braiam that's weird... wonder why they did that.
Is it something upstream did? Could be more fallout from the hellhole known as Windows.
 
A security measure maybe?
 
(Given, it's not Windows' fault that so many things install random browser extensions, which often the user doesn't want)
@Kusalananda Not on Linux, where I'm pretty sure it used to only autoload them from directories where only root could write
But on Windows, quite possibly.
@Braiam and the Firefox folks have been talking about doing something similar for a while. But maybe they were convinced to only do it on Windows
 
4:22 PM
@derobert One should always blame Windows for things if possible.
 
@derobert no, they pass --disable-remote-extensions by default
 
@Braiam doesn't that mean Debian just took the upstream default?
 
@derobert I think they did due extensions being able to propagate themselves
@derobert no, the flag is not passed
Debian controls the startup script
 
@Braiam How so? Aren't all the relevant directories root-only?
 
@derobert Huh? Where? They're normally in your $HOME/.config/$BROWSER/$somecrap/extensions.
 
4:28 PM
@terdon I read that as applying to system-wide ones
 
Are you thinking of flash or something? Thaw as sometimes installed system wide. I don't know of any others that do though.
 
@derobert via profile sync
your windows system installed some crappy extension, wait for it to be installed on your linux profile too
the pts is down...
 
@terdon apt-cache search ^xul-ext for firefox ones, far fewer for chromium
 
and alioth is down too
 
@Braiam ah yeah, is that all they're disabling? But it sounds like special handling for system-wide ones like chromium-lwn4chrome is required...
@Braiam I think those are both at bytemark
Tracker.debian.org too
 
4:32 PM
b.d.o isn't O_O
 
@Braiam that's at OSU OSL
 
5:18 PM
@terdon I stab you
@terdon you are summoned to fulfill your U&L duties.
 
'sup?
@ThomasWard
 
@terdon crossposting
unix.stackexchange.com/questions/340586/… matches the AU post I poked you on
 
@ThomasWard What do you mean? The AU one is closed!
 
@terdon suggesting you move it to SF if you want :p
but you're not wrong
 
@ThomasWard It's on topic here, so I won't move it unless the OP asks for it.
 
5:23 PM
(I don't think it's a truly good fit on U&L though, ESXi is tricky)
ok
 
There are quite a few sysadmin types hanging around here.
 
@ThomasWard that doesn't sound like a very nice thing to do. If you put too many stab holes in him, vital fluids will leak out
And further, make a mess on the floor.
 
@derobert and we all know terdon doesn't make a mess on the floor, he just messes up other people's computers!
3
 
@derobert Unless it's his soul getting stabbed, in which case there's no fluids or mess
he just loses a fraction of soul
 
@StephenKitt well, I guess those rm -Rf's in ~/.bash_profile do tend to clean up the floor (and everything else)
 
5:25 PM
@StephenKitt Dammit! You make one lousy mistake. . .
 
@derobert that's one way of seeing it ;-)
 
@ThomasWard what'll you do when we wind up with a soulless mod?
 
Nah, the worst I did was forgetting a flag and getting a user locked out of their account.
May 7 '16 at 13:32, by terdon
NO! WAIT
:(
 
@terdon I think Chernobyl knows what you are talking about
 
Heh :)
@derobert better than a heartless one, surely!
And, as far as I'm concerned, I don't have a soul anyway. Nor do any of you lot.
 
5:30 PM
@terdon But what if we own a James Brown CD?
 
Ah. That kind of soul I may well have :)
 
Seems like the only type that's susceptible to stab damage.
 
@derobert so that's why storing music in the cloud is useful...
 
@terdon What's a soul? That thing at the bottom of shoes? Or a variety of fish?
 
Something like that, yes.
 
5:35 PM
@FaheemMitha soul blues
 
@FaheemMitha I think that's a sole. At least the shoe.
 
I think he knows that.
 
a genre
 
Actually, it's quite impressive how many meaning the word sole (and its homophones like soul) has.
 
@derobert sole or soul? What's a couple of letters between friends?
 
5:37 PM
Sole (only), sole (shoe), sole (fish), soul (imaginary thing), soul (music)
 
It sounds the same, which is all that matters.
 
@StephenKitt Makes it stab-proof, but gotta watch out for strong winds dispersing your music.
 
@derobert yes indeed
 
@derobert panic. because he becomes my chaotic-evil minion :P
 
@terdon That's typical of those small innocent-looking English words. They accumulate meanings over time.
They're sneaky like that.
 
5:39 PM
@terdon wait, what's the "sole of your feet"?
 
Yeah. Bastards.
@Braiam The underside of your foot. Also of your shoe.
 
@FaheemMitha run is worse. Once had a dictionary that had something like 170 definitions for it.
 
Hmm. What is it in Spanish? I don't remember.
Sola, right?
No, can't be.
 
Suela for shoe
 
Yes, suela. For the foot also, right?
 
5:40 PM
planta for foot
planta de los pies; suela de los zapatos
nope
 
Planta! Yes. Speaking of words that have may meanings. . .
 
Is Spanish less wacky than English?
 
Suela too. Actually, Spanish is just as bad as English when it comes to small words with many meanings.
@FaheemMitha By far when it comes to pronunciation and grammar. Vocabulary... less so.
 
@terdon Good for Spanish.
 
Yeah, it's a WYRIWYS language.
what you read is what you say
 
5:43 PM
BTW, someone just told me yesterday that the Spanish economy isn't doing to well. Or maybe it's just the housing market. The conversation was about housing prices.
 
@terdon spanish vocabulary is rich, thought
 
Unlike English which is WYRMBWYSOIMBSCDAU.
 
o.O
 
what you read might be what you say or it might be something completely different.
 
@terdon normally we just say English is a WTF language...
 
5:43 PM
@Braiam Indeed. So's English. So are most languages, for that matter.
@derobert That too.
 
It's odd that such a idiosyncratic language has become an international standard.
And rough on people trying to learn it.
 
@FaheemMitha Apart from the obvious geopolitical and historical reasons, it is also a very easy language to learn to speak at a basic level.
 
@FaheemMitha Definitely a standard chosen for "political" not technical reasons.
 
Technical too. The basic English you need to order a beer or ask for directions is incredibly simple.
Plus, no gendered nouns, next to no conjugation.
 
@terdon Surely that is true of many languages.
How hard is it to order a beer or ask directions in Spanish?
Or German or French or Italian, for that matter.
 
5:46 PM
Much harder than in English.
3
A: Why did English become a universal language and when?

terdonI am very surprised that none of the answers has mentioned the obvious: English is simple. Speaking English at the basic level needed to order a meal or direct a taxi is by far easier than any other language I know. Speaking English well is another matter entirely but the lingua franca does not r...

 
@terdon That's a good answer. You've obviously given some thought to this.
 
I donno. From what little I remember of the German I took long ago, that kind of basic stuff wasn't that hard in German, either. Though you did have gendered nouns.
And you can figure out how to say a German word just from how it's spelled...
 
Those wacky gendered nouns (isn't there a fancy name for that?) are present in Indian languages too. I never did understand the point of them. Presumably they're a historical artifact.
 
@derobert Yes, but German has declinations and gender and those make everything more complicated.
 
@derobert And apparently you have a lot of freedom to rearrange German words in a sentence.
 
5:51 PM
@FaheemMitha I think (though I am absolutely not sure) that pretty much all PIE-derived languages have those.
 
@FaheemMitha Sure. But you don't need to in order to call a cab or order a beer.
 
I certainly don't know of any language other than English that lacks them.
@derobert Depends on whether you did one first or the other.
 
@terdon PIE?
@derobert True.
 
Proto-Indo-European (PIE) is the linguistic reconstruction of the common ancestor of the Indo-European languages, the most widely spoken language family in the world. Far more work has gone into reconstructing PIE than any other proto-language, and it is by far the best understood of all proto-languages of its age. The vast majority of linguistic work during the 19th century was devoted to reconstruction of PIE or its daughter proto-languages (e.g. Proto-Germanic), and most of the modern techniques of linguistic reconstruction such as the comparative method were developed as a result. These methods...
 
@FaheemMitha proto-indo-european
 
5:52 PM
@derobert Ah
 
Oh wow, the animated gifs onebox?
 
Apparently
 
Well, India's languages fall in that group, I think.
 
Some of them anyway. No idea if all 12000435 of them do.
 
I wonder if anyone has actually studied this—seen how much time it takes to learn basic stuff in various languages. That'd give a good answer to which are actually easiest. Though of course you'd have to have participants with many linguistic backgrounds, would be a #@(# expensive study
 
5:54 PM
@derobert Yeah. And it's hard to be objective. For example, learning Spanish is far easier for a French speaker than an English one.
 
@terdon Right, that's why you'd need many linguistic backgrounds. (Maybe that's not the right term.)
 
@derobert You'd need a group of statisticians to work overtime scrambling everything.
 
@derobert It probably is. I just managed to miss it.
 
@FaheemMitha Yeah.
I'm not sure why anyone would want to pay to collect this data—so I imagine it's never been done.
Maybe you could sort-of get the data from, e.g., testing progress of people who are already taking a foreign language class, and combining data from many countries... But that has so many potential biases in it, that I'm not sure you could really draw any conclusions
oh! Maybe the data exists from people testing different instructional techniques
 
There are people who have an incentive to care about making languages easier to learn.
Or institutions.
 
6:00 PM
Right. So they test different ways of learning language X.
 
But given the universal apathy regarding education, I doubt anyone bothers.
English spelling is really screwy. Even now, I regularly have to check spellings of words as I write.
 
But "well, we need him to work with our client in Spain" is a good reason to find the quickest way to learn basic Spanish. Not a good reason to ask "would it be quicker to learn Italian instead?"
But you might be able to compare the results for all those "quickest way to learn language X" studies...
 
@derobert You think people research things like "find the quickest way to learn basic Spanish"?
 
@FaheemMitha I hope they do. I have no idea if they really do
 
Is $8.99 reasonable for a kindle book?
 
6:03 PM
@FaheemMitha Depends on the book. They vary in price from 99¢ up.
 
Are there any good places to get epubs cheap for a large number of books?
 
Of course, if you just want to read it, I've found the local library lends a lot of Kindle books
 
@FaheemMitha That's because it's not English. English spelling was developed for a different language.
 
@derobert Not here, alas.
@terdon I don't follow.
 
@terdon English also seems to borrow words and keep both their spelling and (to some extent) their pronunciation.
 
6:05 PM
They're not strangely pronounced. They're strangely spelled. And every English word is strangely spelled, since English spelling was developed for a different language, and doesn't work very well on modern English. At all. Spelling English words correctly is such a rare phenomenon, in fact, that the National Spelling Bee is front-page news in the United States. Speakers of languages with reasonable orthographies like Finnish or German are always amazed at this. — John Lawler Jun 2 '13 at 16:24
@derobert That too, yes.
 
@terdon What different language is he talking about?
Does he mean Latin?
 
@FaheemMitha English has evolved enormously over the past few hundred years, but hasn't changed its spelling along the way. Which is why you have words like colonel which has kept its French spelling but is pronounced kernel.
@FaheemMitha He means Old English, probably.
Or even Norman, I guess.
 
@terdon Ok
So the ancestors of Modern English.
 
@terdon or lieutenant, or Milngavie
 
Yes.
@StephenKitt Yeah, there are loads.
And then you have things like the great vowel shift:
 
6:09 PM
English spelling and pronunciation is amazingly irregular.
 
The Great Vowel Shift was a major change in the pronunciation of the English language that took place in England between 1350 and 1600. Through the Great Vowel Shift, all Middle English long vowels changed their pronunciation. English spelling was becoming standardized in the 15th and 16th centuries, and the Great Vowel Shift is responsible for many of the peculiarities of English spelling. == History of analysis == The Great Vowel Shift was first studied by Otto Jespersen (1860–1943), a Danish linguist and Anglicist, who coined the term. == Overall changes == The main difference betwe...
 
Not to mention variant spellings/pronunciations.
 
@FaheemMitha It makes a lot more sense if you think of written English and spoken as essentially two different languages.
 
I imagine it must be the stuff of nightmare for people from the Far East, for example.
 
For example, there was a time when the educated classes, the only ones who could write, were essentially French and the illiterate masses were the ones speaking English. That explains a lot of the weirdness.
 
6:10 PM
@FaheemMitha even just for neighbouring Britons
for example, in English English, all vowels are diphthongs
but in Scottish English, short vowels aren't
 
@FaheemMitha Hang on, aren't you from the far East? How far is far?
 
@terdon I was thinking of China and Japan, for example.
 
@FaheemMitha And according to wikipedia you're right:
 
The Indian subcontinent is not conventionally considered "Far".
 
I wonder why they skipped India and whatever part of Russia that is.
 
6:12 PM
Not that such qualifiers make much sense, of course.
Though Indians have plenty of trouble with English too. I get to listen to them butchering it regularly.
 
More interesting is that Australia isn't part of the Far East
 
The product is commonly known as Indian English. They really should call it English Spam.
 
@derobert Or that half of new guinea is.
@FaheemMitha Oh, come on now, do the needful!
 
@terdon isn't that half part of Indonesia?
 
That's Polynesia nd Austalasia.
 
6:13 PM
@terdon Absolutely not.
 
What? No! I looked it up!
@StephenKitt Ah, sorry, yes it is.
 
(frantic web-browsing in the background)
 
Yeah, like I'll admit I don't know shit about geography!
 
I lived in NZ for a couple of years.
 
@Kusalananda that's what happens on Unix.SE chat (whereas on the main site it's frantic searching of the POSIX specs)
 
6:15 PM
:-)
 
@Kusalananda Nice! I was considering moving there at some point. I still might. Seems like a gorgeous place (if a little boring)
 
It's a wonderful country, full of contrasting and exciting nature.
People are nice too.
As is common on small island nations.
 
"small"?
 
NZ is small, isn't it?
In terms of population.
<5 million
 
Oh, yes, OK. Not in terms of actual size though. I mean, not like Malta or other small island nations.
It's twice the size of Greece, for example :)
 
6:19 PM
You drive across the width of the south island in a day.
 
Although half the size of Sweden.
NZ: 268,021 km2
Sweden: 450,295 km2
 
@terdon similar population to Scotland, 3.5× the size
 
Greece: 131,957 km2
 
Yes. We have two fern trees for every sheep ;-)
 
@terdon but more of it's hospitable than Sweden ;-)
 
6:20 PM
@StephenKitt And half the population of London!
@StephenKitt Point.
 
@terdon yup
 
Probably right.
Linux people do so many strange things: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/340607/how-to-unset-date
 
s/Linux//
 
@StephenKitt I stand corrected.
 
Sometimes one wants to go back a decade or two and have a do-over.
 
6:30 PM
@EliahKagan really going back to 1999 with Linux would be a shock to most people I think
 
@derobert Do you look at the IGM forum regularly? I wasn't aware of its existence.
@StephenKitt How so? I was there in 1999.
 
@FaheemMitha Don't regularly look at it, but I've heard of them before
Found that chart via Google
 
@derobert Ok. I did a search to see if they had covered demonetization. If they have, Google couldn't find it.
 
@terdon you have stuff coming over to your site now :P
 
@FaheemMitha Probably not. I mean, seems to have a mostly US and Europe focus
 
6:34 PM
Seems like a good one to ask them. Was demonetization a bad idea, a really bad idea, an appalling idea, a terrible idea, or a really terrible idea?
@derobert Pah. Parochialism.
 
There is a thingy on the site to recommend questions :-P
 
@FaheemMitha the desktop was much less polished than it is now
(but that was true of all computers really)
 
@StephenKitt There also wasn't a free browser.
 
apart from NeXT computers
 
@FaheemMitha konqueror
 
6:36 PM
@FaheemMitha lynx
 
@StephenKitt Well I imagine that the computer would turn into a computer from that time. So you would have to load all the appropriate kernel modules for that hardware first. If you missed a modprobe command or two, it might not be in a usable state upon arrival in the past, and then you could have trouble returning to the present.
 
@derobert Not really a contender in 1999. IMO.
@StephenKitt Oh, please.
 
I mean, I used a Linux desktop in '99. Konqueror was a reasonable choice.
 
@EliahKagan there's a film there somewhere ;-)
 
@derobert I don't recall finding it so. Of course, it's been a while.
I used to use Netscape 4.77, which froze my computer periodically.
 
6:38 PM
And I forget when the first Mozilla milestones started coming out. Certainly a year later you could use Mozilla M16.
 
@FaheemMitha yeah I still used Netscape as well
 
@EliahKagan That sounds like a time travel saga. With puzzle bits.
I was quite happy when Mozilla came along.
 
I used one in 99 too. Wasn't netscape around then?
 
Yeah, Netscape was.
 
Was I using konqueror? I did at some point. Maybe it was then.
 
6:39 PM
@terdon Netscape Navigator yes
 
lol Netscape Navigator
 
Ah, there you go.
 
I thought that died in 1998
 
@ThomasWard Hey, it was absolutely brilliant at the time!
That and NCSA mosaic.
 
@ThomasWard Mozilla was founded in 1998 but the browser wasn't released for a while
 
6:40 PM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… ... so 99 was a year before the first usable Mozilla milestones came out.
 
indeed
@terdon review migrations :P
 
Yeah, I think it must have been mosaic then.
@ThomasWard link?
 
Yes, for a while Linux users were living in the outer darkness. Using Netscape. Like animals.
 
Oh you bastard! You sent us a Kali question?
 
@FaheemMitha as were Windows users still then, IE wasn't all that popular yet
 
6:41 PM
@terdon and another question too :)
 
@StephenKitt I thought they were all using Internet Explorer. Which presumably was better than Netscape.
 
@FaheemMitha it came out in 1997 so yes, but Navigator was very popular
 
@ThomasWard oh
 
@terdon enjoy your evils :P
 
6:42 PM
@ThomasWard Please don't migrate crap though. That Kali one is awful. It has no usable information.
 
@StephenKitt No, IE was >60% by '99
 
Good point
 
@derobert wow
 
@terdon feel free to reject, i'll burn it on AU
 
The usage share of web browsers is the proportion, often expressed as a percentage, of visitors to a group of web sites that use a particular web browser. Web browser usage share varies from region to region as well as through time. Depending on how "usage share" is defined, the results can vary greatly. In particular, page views versus unique visits will produce different results. == Accuracy == Measuring browser usage in the number of requests (page hits) made by each user agent can be misleading. === Overestimation === Not all requests are generated by a user, as a user agent can make requests...
 
6:42 PM
I'd forgotten it was that fast
 
@ThomasWard Pretty sure the community will close it.
 
but yes everyone was predicting the demise of Navigator given how long Mozilla was taking to be released
 
Wow. I hadn't realized firefox was so far down these days.
 
@terdon you have a flag to handle
also gonna drag you to AU for your duties there, I'm too tired for this one flag
 
Wow, does Chrome really have half of the browser market?
 
7:10 PM
probably
 
7:21 PM
can anybody tell/share why I'm getting close votes ? unix.stackexchange.com/questions/340619/…
 
@FaheemMitha yep
 
7:49 PM
Damn, I'll have to find another browser to go use.
 
@shirish They were votes as unclear. Probably before your edit.
 
This might be worth a star or two:
“systemd is like Trump. We're stuck with it so we might as well make the best of it.”
 
Heh
 
lol.
 
@NathanOsman who tweets those?
 
That yours?
 
The account was created by Seth but I made the app.
 
@NathanOsman And how does it choose? Starred posts?
 
It doesn't.
One of us goes in and reviews the ones it has auto-selected.
Then we "queue" them for tweeting.
 
How does it select?
 
8:07 PM
The app tweets items in the queue once per day.
 
Random + stars?
 
@terdon Based on the number of stars and special "key words".
 
Like bacon, obviously.
 
It is configurable.
@terdon Yes :D
 
8:37 PM
@NathanOsman I'd wonder who sysvinit was then, except wondering that would support Godwin's Law.
 
Heh.
 
@derobert suppose you have noticed meta.stackoverflow.com/q/342386/792066
 
@Braiam Goes to the top for me in Chromium
 
@derobert yeah, it's only on Firefox 51
 
hah, yeah, it is... I hadn't tried editing on in Firefox. I mostly use Chromium for the SE stuff
 
8:49 PM
I expect Chromium to follow the standard... someday
 
I did just have an odd thing happen though. The Chromium window... vanished. It wasn't iconified/minimized. The little desktop preview in the desktop switcher showed it. But it wasn't there.
Only got it back by killing chromium and re-launching it.
Alt-tab ignored it
 
You browser was in another castle!
 
@Braiam Apparently.
 
9:04 PM
@derobert Typical Alt-Tab behaviour, can't trust'em.
Oh, we're not talking politics any longer, are we?
 
@Kusalananda I hope not, or the Alt-Tab is going to be jerks drinking Tab cola.
 
"put it on my tab"
The Alt-Right is angry, it's Alt-Gr...
 
@Kusalananda Just think, if we got them all Macs, they'd be the Command-Right.
 
@derobert They'd be walking in circles.
 
@Kusalananda And thus unable to make it to the ballot box. Would solve some problems.
 
9:12 PM
Indeed.
 

« first day (2302 days earlier)      last day (2652 days later) »