« first day (1200 days earlier)      last day (3290 days later) » 

12:32 AM
@belisarius Depends on what's to be guessed, of course. :)
 
 
2 hours later…
2:55 AM
@brama What do you mean by "interval size"? What do you currently have?
 
 
2 hours later…
4:50 AM
@Guesswhoitis. Of course :)
 
5:01 AM
How are things? I seem to have missed a lot... :)
 
@Guesswhoitis. Well, yes. You went away eons ago :)
Welcome again!
@Guesswhoitis. This site needs you with a machine running Mma at hand!
 
Feels good to be back.. somewhat.
@belisarius I should be able to get my machine back from the pawn shop in a week or so... cross your fingers.
 
@Guesswhoitis. I'll keep them crossed. Meanwhile if there is something we can do to help ...
@Guesswhoitis. Gotta go. It is wonderful to have you around again. Hope you'll be able to get your machine back soon!
 
5:25 AM
@Pickett, Sorry for my unclear description. My question is which function is "difference quotient"
 
@belisarius Thanks for the thoughts. :)
 
5:41 AM
@ShutaoTang Wouldn't it be trivial to define it yourself? Like DifferenceQuotient[f_, h_] := ((f[# + h] - f[#])/h &) and use it like DifferenceQuotient[Sin, 1][E] or even Limit[DifferenceQuotient[Sin, h][x], h -> 0]
 
DifferenceDelta[] is pretty convenient here, if you want the general expressions.
 
@Guesswhoitis. Ah, not quite the same though, but a building block.
 
@kirma Certainly, you still need to divide by the appropriate power of the step size h. ;)
 
Those are divided differences, on the other hand.
 
5:55 AM
@kirma, this is my question abot "Difference Quoient"
 
wow, welcome back @Guesswhoitis.!
 
@rm-rf hey froggy. I am somewhat back, yes. :)
Lots of stuff I haven't seen before on the site; it feels a bit overwhelming. :)
 
6:11 AM
Heh, everything's remained mostly the same, except that these days you can't read two lines in the documentation without running into 5 "Wolfram"s and nothing works without phoning home to W|A to quantity-entitize the expression.
 
Ah, "wolfram this" and "wolfram that"... I've seen the web version of the docs; help just keeps getting less helpful... :P
(I really should ask the "kitchen sink in Mathematica" question at some point... :P)
 
Well, rumor has it that you can install it on your apple watch through the Wolfram cloud :P
We should start on getting you back that diamond
 
@rm-rf That depends on whether the higher-ups still think I'm up for it. (I'd like to think so... :) )
Speaking of which; is it bad that I think the front page looks scarier than when I last saw it? :o
 
@Guesswhoitis. It was removed as part of their routine "6 month inactivity" process. They let us know and we were told that you were mailed about it.
If you come back and you want to be, you can be, is what they said.
 
@rm-rf Didn't get the mailing; they prolly sent it to the dummy address instead of the actual one.
 
6:19 AM
Ok, will ping them.
 
Thanks, dude. :)
 
7:14 AM
@Guesswhoitis. Welcome back!
 
@Szabolcs Thanks Szabolcs. :)
 
7:49 AM
@Guesswhoitis. good to see you're back. I'm curious to the details of your absence, but there is no need to go all public about this. Is there any way we could help you? A little fundraiser or so?
 
@SjoerdC.deVries Thanks for the greets. The past few months have been quite complicated and messy, so it's good that I can go back to you guys again. :)
"Is there any way we could help you?" - if there is, I'll let you know. For now, I'm crossing my fingers that I can get my old computer back from the pawn shop.
(Even if I didn't pawn it, I'd need to mostly install stuff from scratch, anyway; I had a nasty hard disk failure before said pawning.)
 
Ok, just let me know. We got mr.wizard a v10.
 
@SjoerdC.deVries Okay, let me reconsider that offer... :D if memory serves, the installer I still have is version 8.0.1.
Might be nice to see what's driving you guys crazy these days. :)
 
8:08 AM
@Guesswhoitis. we got many new features but also a plethora of new bugs.
 
Sounds like painful fun. :D
 
8:24 AM
@Guesswhoitis. We've Dataset which sounded really useful, but which is currently far from that as the current implementation with Association takes about 10 times the memory a normal table would take. It's query syntax is quite complicated too, and I often find it necessary to convert from and to lists using Normal for many tasks.
 
@SjoerdC.deVries "convert from and to lists using Normal" - sounds like something I'd avoid using...
Ugh.
 
 
5 hours later…
1:35 PM
@Guesswhoitis. great to see you (somewhat) back again. The site's missed you. Hope everything is good in your life.
 
@OleksandrR. I'm touched by all the concern; thanks. :) It's... okay here, but it could be better. Nevertheless, I should be able to contribute again. Maybe more when I get my computer back. :)
 
@Guesswhoitis. well, I hope your reappearance here is a sign that things are improving for you. It's been a long time. I really missed your contributions. (You're far better at math than I am and much better read in that field, so I learn something from practically everything you write!)
 
That's high praise. :D Not a bad compliment for a guy with a peculiar "hobby". :D
 
I've been indulging one of my hobbies (electronics) a bit more, recently. I wouldn't say I'm particularly good at it though.
 
1:50 PM
I miss holding a soldering iron...
 
2:14 PM
@SquareOne CurrentValue is one that it's probably easiest to just read the doc page. Regarding language design, I definitely think it should be expanded to include all keyboard keys instead of just modifier keys. There are also potential suggestions if some other values (besides MousePosition, MouseOver, etc) are common enough to warrant additional shortcut symbols.
 
2:36 PM
Hello Oleks & Michael
Can anyone comment on the following difference (is it expected)?
{Block[{max = 10}, BarLegend[{Blend[{Red, Green}, #/max] &, {0, max}}]],
Module[{max = 10}, BarLegend[{Blend[{Red, Green}, #/max] &, {0, max}}]]}
 
@IstvánZachar It works with With. The syntax coloring of max is a little different with Block then with Module or With.
 
But nothing indicates in the help that arguments of BarLegend are held.
 
@IstvánZachar What does Attributes[BarLegend] return?
 
@Guesswhoitis. I wasn't precise: nothing AT ALL indicates that arguments are not evaluated right away.
 
Ah, then that's a different kettle of fish.
 
2:51 PM
@IstvánZachar @Guesswhoitis. It's the holding of max within Function that messes up Block, right?
Table[1/max &, {max, 10}]
 
@MichaelHale Prolly.
 
@IstvánZachar @Guesswhoitis. Ah, BarLegend has to delay evaluation of the colors until displayed I would guess because it doesn't know its size or how many samples of the blend function are needed until displayed.
 
@MichaelHale to be correct: it holds the first argument, if I'm right.You must be right @Michael, but I simply did not expect BarLegend to act as a scoping construct...
 
Ah. "BarLegend is displayed in StandardForm as a graphics object. In InputForm, it is displayed as an explicit list of color function, data range, and contour values."
@IstvánZachar Well it doesn't hold them. It's just the first argument is a function, which is held, that doesn't get applied to any values until the legend is displayed in standard form. By that time max has been reset.
I've noticed there had to be something different about legends because they aren't selected as part of the graphic when you select a plot that has a legend.
 
 
4 hours later…
acl
7:25 PM
@Guesswhoitis. Welcome back!
 
 
2 hours later…
8:56 PM
@Guesswhoitis. You need to send an email to Shog9 to reactivate.
 
 
3 hours later…
11:31 PM
@acl Hi acl!
@TheToad Alright, will drop him one. Thanks.
 
11:57 PM
@Guesswhoitis. Wonderful to see you back. I like the new avatar!
 

« first day (1200 days earlier)      last day (3290 days later) »