« first day (1601 days earlier)      last day (2891 days later) » 

Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
7:59 AM
duplicates What about these two questions?
The new question is not tagged proof-verification, but the OP also asks where they went wrong. (But they have already received answer for this and they are probably satisfied with the answer, since they accepted one of the answers.
What should be done with them. Probably close as a duplicate? Choose the older one as a target?
They are not suitable for merging, since the answers to the newer question specifically address the OP attempt.
Are there any ideas how to improve the older one, so that it is not plain PSQ? (The question seems interesting to me, so I would prefer to keep it on the site.)
juantheron: If the main point of your question is to discuss this particular attempt to prove the inequality, you should probably add the (proof-verification) tag. If you are interested in any proof, then it is duplicate of the older question. (And even if it is proof verification question, if you are already satisfied with the comments you have received on your proof, I think that it can be closed as a duplicate. So that if other users are looking for this inequality and find this question, they are directed to the older one.) — Martin Sleziak 19 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
9:26 AM
@MartinSleziak I have voted to close as a duplicate of the newest question. (One of the older questions has no answer. The other one has answer which deals with pings in chat, although the question seems to be about comment-replies.) Feel free to let me know if you disagree with the way I voted there.
 
 
3 hours later…
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
12:32 PM
@DanielFischer It seems that the question was protected automatically. (At least it says " Question Protected by Community♦" in the revision history.)
@MartinSleziak Both of them are closed now.
 
Daniel Fischer
Daniel Fischer
@MartinSleziak It was protected when the third answer by a $< 10$ rep user was deleted.
 
Martin Sleziak
Martin Sleziak
23 hours ago, by Martin Sleziak
The same faq says that: "The system (via the Community user) will automatically protect a question that's had three answers from low-rep users deleted or 5 answers from low-rep users posted in the past 24 hours."
It seems that the system works.
And exactly as you say, the two timestamps (answer deletion/question protection) are exactly the same: math.stackexchange.com/posts/1805657/timeline and math.stackexchange.com/posts/1805312/timeline
BTW if the room info is correct, that was my 2000th message in this room.
I am not sure whether this calls for celebration, or rather for thinking about the ways in which I am wasting my time and what I should be doing instead.
 

« first day (1601 days earlier)      last day (2891 days later) »