« first day  last day (15 days later) » 

user105491
12:45 AM
Do you think we can use dessin d'enfants for this?
 
9:02 AM
@SanathDevalapurkar And how do you propose to use dessin de'nfants?
To my understanding, G-T theory is no use here.
 
 
6 hours later…
user105491
3:17 PM
@Balarka I was just thinking of perhaps relating dessin d'enfants to this inverse limit construction and then using the fact that, from Belyi's theorem, $\mathrm{Gal}(\bar{\mathbf{Q}}/\mathbf{Q})$ acts on the collection of dessin d'enfants.
 
and how do you propose to "relate dessin d'enfants to this inverse limit construction"?
there's no apparent connection. do you have something else in mind?
@SanathDevalapurkar
 
 
1 hour later…
user105491
4:57 PM
@Balarka I don't know yet, I'm still thinking about it. I thought you may have had some ideas about that, so I threw it out there.
 
8:12 PM
I kind of have something of an idea, if you must know, @Sanath, but it's not entirely interesting.
Probably irrelevant
@Sanath digression : if you have an algebraic variety X over $\bar {\mathbf Q}$, and you have the corresponding dessin $\Gamma_X$, shouldn't $\text{Gal}(\mathbf Q(X)/\mathbf Q)$ act on $\Gamma_X$ by isometries?
was just wondering, because if it does, then this galois group must also act on the collection of little nbhds around the nodes of $\Gamma_X$ on the corresponding $\{0, 1, \infty\}$-branched Riemann surface transitively, so one should be able to realize this thing as a subgroup of automorphisms of the Riemann surface.
and then one should be able to tell something about the order of this, I suppose, by Hurwitz's theorem.
 
user105491
9:20 PM
Hello, @Julian
 
Hello @Sanath
Oh. I thought this was the Homotopy Theory room that you mentioned in the regular chat. I will leave
 
user105491
Did I really mention the homotopy theory room in the chat?
 
user105491
@Balarka: Yes, I believe so. I think you can Belyi's theorem here, but don't take my word for it.
 
I have just used Belyi's theorem right up there
there would be no $\Gamma_X$ if there was no Belyi.
 
user105491
right, sorry. i guess i only read the first sentence.
 

« first day  last day (15 days later) »