last day (16 days later) » 

user105491
4:27 PM
Hey @Balarka
 
Hello.
 
user105491
one sec, let me open the email conversation
 
user105491
could you explain the construction of the solenoid that you mentioned? (through the inverse limits of complex algebraic varieties, i mean)
 
right.
clears throat
 
user105491
:-)
 
4:31 PM
actually the thing is that i have no idea what the solenoid could possibly me, though i have some prototypes.
ok, ok, let's just begin from the beginning.
 
user105491
could i see/hear them?
 
user105491
ok, yeah sure
 
consider the $\mathbf Z_p$. that is, the $p$-adic numbers.
 
user105491
alright
 
this is the simplest kind of infinite profinite group one can think of. now, we want a geometric visualization of Z_p.
i.e., something on which Z_p acts geometrically.
 
user105491
4:33 PM
ok
 
the best way to do it is to look for action of Z/p^nZ on a class of geometric objects and then take the inverse limit.
the thing that comes to mind is the riemann surface of w = z^(p^n). the monodromy of this fellow is Z/p^nZ, so there is an obvious action.
 
user105491
right
 
so take the collection of all riemann surfaces of w = z^(p^i) over C\{0} (galois away from branch points, so chuck out branch point) and take the inverse limit.
one expects that Z_p acts on this fellow "nicely"
we'll show that it does.
first, note that since you've already chucked out {0}, each of the riemann surfaces deformation retracts onto S^1. so this space of ours is really homotopy equivalent to inverse limit of S^1's, with bonding maps z \to z^{p^n}
this is our solenoid.
 
user105491
ah ha
 
user105491
that's cool
 
4:40 PM
? we haven't really begun proving anything yet
 
user105491
i can see what's going on. (i usually need some time to understand things)
 
ok?
 
user105491
sorry, go on. (my friend just came over, he's typing in some random things)
 
so, claim : the solenoid is a Z_p-bundle over S^1
to prove it, note that there is a diagram R \to \lim S^1 \leftarrow Z_p, the first map being induced by the universality of inverse limits, the second map from the inclusion Z/p^nZ \hookrightarrow R/p^nZ
take the pullback of this diagram to conclude the proof.
now it just becomes obvious that Z_p is the monodromy of the projection map onto S^1. so there you have something like a good action.
 
user105491
ok
 
4:48 PM
my goal is now to generalize this thing to realize galois groups geometrically.
one way to do this for Gal(\bar C(z)/C(z)) is to take inverse limit of all algebraic riemann surfaces over C, but i haven't really thought about this.
 
user105491
oh, ok
 
user105491
so you're basically trying to replace $\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}$ with galois groups in the above construction
 
i have thought about a couple more interesting stuff related to this, but nothing too complete to talk about.
@SanathDevalapurkar yeah. and please don't write Z_(p) :P
it looks like localization of Z at (p) or something.
 
user105491
ok :-)
 
user105491
what are the other things?
 
user105491
4:54 PM
by that i mean the other prototypes.
 
nothing fun. a few universal hyperbolic solenoids and associated monodromies. just a step forward at describing Gal(\bar C(z)/C(z))
 
user105491
alright
 
user105491
i'm still reading what you wrote
 
user105491
one minute
 
so, you think you have anything that might contribute to this idea?
 
user105491
5:00 PM
let me see if i've understood it (again)
 
user105491
we're considering inverse limits of algebraic varieties with an action of the galois group
 
user105491
right?
 
nope. i am not sure if that'd be the right kind of solenoid, actually.
actually, yeah, you can think of complex algebraic varities.
okey.
 
user105491
so let $X$ be a connected algebraic variety over $\mathbf{Q}$. Then $\mathrm{Gal}(\bar{\mathbf{Q}}/\mathbf{Q})$ acts transitively on $X$.
 
user105491
actually nvm
 
5:04 PM
huh?
 
user105491
i was thinking of algebraic varieties over $\mathbf{Q}$, not $\mathbf{C}$
 
surely you mean a connected algebraic variety over \bar Q, not Q itself?
anyway, it doesn't matter. it's not "geometric enough"
 
user105491
right
 
user105491
i'll think about it
 
the only thing relevant here is grothendieck teichmuller theory, but it's not related to this approach.
if such a solenoid is found, it'll have some implication towards galois (co)homology, which i'm sure is obvious to you.
 
user105491
5:12 PM
right, exactly
 
user105491
i'll think about it today
 
user105491
i've to go outside with my dad
 
user105491
cya
 
[it's because such a space is K(gal(\bar q/q), 1), homology of which is precisely gal hmlgy]
bubyes
 

  last day (16 days later) »