@Zanna What about creating a "filter" for new users and their questions before they land on the site ? Answering questions and helping new users generally is time consuming work and it makes no sense to answer questions when they get deleted some longer time later.
Hmm. I have to say that while that was an awful question and should not have been answered or asked here in the first place, I'm not sure what the point of deleting was. Please avoid deleting questions that are already closed as duplicates. They can act as useful signposts for the dupe target.
@Zanna and another thing : the name of the site is misleading somehow as it seems - Ask Ubuntu means you can ask - right ? we can't expect that new users study overly long tutorials how to do this and that if they just want to have a problem solved, it would be different if we called it ubuntu wiki or something like that. :)
@terdon the dupe target is also a bad question imho. Also I don't think it's good to have loads of bad dupes, especially of a bad question... broken windows
@Zanna All of them are crap. I changed the target to the actual dupe target to avoid having dupes pointing at dupes. But, in general, there's very little point in deleting a dupe and often it's a bad idea.
The broken windows thing has i) never been proven despite how often its been touted as a reason to delete and, more importantly, ii) cannot really apply to questions that are closed. They're closed, after all, so can't be an indication of the type of thing we like here.
Hmm just cleaning up the stuff that doesn't belong I thought. It would be different if the dupe target was something we consider on-topic/good for the site
@Zanna off-topic leads me to a question : you once asked how to pronounce xubuntu - what for me is totally fine (too many things are considered to be off-topic on AU) - but wouldn't you say that this is also what is considered to being "too broad" in many cases ? :)
Also sometimes stuff gets closed as a dupe to point OP in the right direction when their question is really useless even as a signpost (because we have umpteen signposts there already) and since those crappy questions will otherwise be here forever, voting to delete them after time has passed, is keeping things tidy I think
@Zanna Yeah, that is indeed a borderline case. It's just that dupes are a special case. largely because "good" here is very subjective. Good is anything a clueless user might type that could land them on the question. It is impossible to predict what that might be.
Yes. Again, what purpose is served by deleting them? You never know where someone will land (remember that the vast majority of users come here through search results).
@terdon if a question is closed with the wrong reason, I don't usually think it's worthwhile to open it again just to get the right reason. I'm talking about unanswerable questions... every case is different of course. I try to think about possible value a post could have
Yep. Just consider dupes as having value almost always. They generally do.
I repeat that the particular one you deleted here wasn't very useful, it's just that it also wasn't doing anything bad so I see no benefit in deleting it. Even if it only ever helps one user out of thousands, that's a small benefit for no cost.
Ok, I will try to adjust my thinking... but some cases where I really want to delete are when the target is bad, and when the question adds nothing and has bad answers...
@Zanna "possible value" is subjective and individual ... do you think that how to pronounce xubuntu is more valuable than how to install nvidia drivers properly, which was closed when I created a Q+A for unexperienced users ? :)
@Zanna But what does deletion add? What's the benefit? I rarely see much point in deleting closed questions. They're closed after all, and many will eventually be deleted automatically.
@cl-netbox Why are you making this personal again? This isn't about "but you also asked something bad". We are talking about how to deal with useless, yet closed questions, in general.
So a question that is not too broad (how is Xubuntu pronounced is perfectly answerable), is on topic and wasn't closed or deleted is irrelevant.
@Zanna Hmm. I wonder how true that is. Given that, as you pointed out, search is crap, I feel that deleting makes it less likely you'll stumble upon what you're looking for, not more. It's not like users go around browsing. They land here from search engines.
@cl-netbox It's pretty personal. You started by mentioning that you started your week with -10 and implying that it was Zanna's fault. You then continued to mention some random question of hers that apparently rubbed you the wrong way and then brought it back to some other random answer of yours that was deleted. Those are three personal examples. Let's try and keep this general.
@Zanna On the other hand, if they're searching for crap, I'd rather they find it than not. Otherwise, they might feel we need some crap and oblige us by asking it again.
I'm currently running Ubuntu 16.04 Desktop.
I'm looking for a way to start Bluetooth OBEX server that allows me to save to given location without any prompts. Something along these lines would do:
$ bt-obex -s /path/to/downloaded/item
however, this keeps asking for yes/no when an upcoming tran...
@terdon yes it took me a lot of thought to understand this - it was something jokerdino said. But if a question with the title you want already exists, you have to pick something else. But that question might be unanswered or closed because it's a bad question. And closing good questions as dupes of bad ones is a bad thing that could happen if there are lots of bad questions around
@Zanna Yes, but deleting all the things seems like a bit of a radical answer to that. I'm not saying one should never vote to delete crap questions. I'm just saying that one should very rarely vote to delete closed dupes.
@cl-netbox Well it is kinda crap in that it is obviously not researched at all. I'd probably downvote that. But, depending on the question and how it was written, I'd probably not close (well, as a dupe, perhaps).
@terdon DV is too harsh ... I took the example because it was easy to answer and you said : crap != easy to answer. Or, rather, easy to answer != crap :)
@cl-netbox While I personally rarely downvote... "DV is too harsh" is something I hear a lot. What's so bad about a DV and when do you think we need to do it?
@Zanna no not a clean freak ... believe it or not : I really appreciate keeping things accurate and clean - the reason why I often polish my answers later ! :)
@JourneymanGeek I think the problem with DV is that often the first 3-5 questions a new user asks will be dovnvoted which can be rather demotivational (through that happens more often on stack overflow in my experience)
@JourneymanGeek Hello ! :) I am against negativity generally ... I only downvote rude and dangerous posts ... I prefer constructive criticism and write comments or improve posts myself instead of downvoting. :)
@cl-netbox No it's not. The primary reason for downvoting is "no research". Questions that have simply been dumped here with no reasearch should be downvoted. If we don't downvote bad questions, there's no point in upvoting good ones.
@cl-netbox And you have been told multiple times that that is wrong. Don't downvote rudeness, flag it.
Downvote answers that are wrong and questions that are not researched and unhelpful.
@terdon Very often when dealing with a new subjec on one of the stack exchanges I start by asking a general question that is poorly researched because I don't know about the topic and then quickly try to use the comments in order to do my research and update my question
@terdon in your very special case it is okay for me because you proved many times that you use DVs to improve the posts and later you removed the DVs after the posts got improved ... but you are an exception ! :)
@terdon I don't but I have found that after I research a topic more extensively googling the question again often gives me the right answer as the first result rather then the 12th page.
@cl-netbox Only because I spend enough time on SE to come back and check. However, downvotes are not negativity. That's like saying that a teacher is being negative if they give a bad grade for a wrong answer!
Same thing as when I currently google "artistic style" the first page is filled with neural networks and computational intelligence rather then what most of you will get
Downvotes are essential for the site. Without them, the entire concept of SE is useless.
@Thijser Of course, because at that point you know what to search for. No, I am talking about cases like, you know, "how can I copy a file in Ubuntu" where any effort whatsoever would have shown the answer.
@terdon I understand your opinion because you also give upvotes ... many users prefer downvoting and forget about upvoting ... again : you are the positive exception for me ! :)
I think in those cases a comment explaining how to find the answer and a close as duplicate is warranted yes, however if you are nice you can then extent an invitation to chat with someone to explain the basics of ubuntu (that way he is far more likely to stay around and develop)
@cl-netbox I've never seen a user with more upvotes than downvotes. In my experience, most users only upvote and don't downvote and so actively harm the site.
@Thijser No, no, no! Down (or, for that matter, up-) voting has nothing to do with the user. Your vote should never be affected by the user. If the post is good: upvote, if it is bad: downvote. If it is neither, just meh, don't vote. Who posted it and whether they should or should not knkow better is irrelevant.
@edwinksl Yes. I'm sure there are such users, I've just never seen one.
@Zanna the magic word is SHOULD ... but (mostly) humans vote - right ? and please don't tell me that well honored users get treated the same way than others ... :)
@terdon The problem is the reputation part ... wouldn't it be good idea to do it like on meta ? no reps at all ... then only the content counts and nobody gets hurt. :)
I do think I am a little softer on downvoting questions from newbies if they will get closed anyway... It's answers that are not researched or thought about that I think should get no mercy because askers don't claim to know what they're talking about XD
@cl-netbox No. The whole point of the reputation system is to act as an indication of how much the community trusts you. So it should go down when you post wrong answers. However, if people are getting "hurt" over downvotes then that is what they need to change.
I just don't get the idea of someone complaining about a downvote. I never have.
Either your post is wrong, so the downvote was justified. or it wasn't, and the downvote was not justified so you shrug, ignore it and go back to your life.
We're talking about -2 rep points for crying out loud!
@Thijser Sure, I remember too. But they're still 2 imaginary internet points and if losing them causes a non-negligible emotional response in you, then you really shouldn't be using this site.
> But sometimes it just happens. A downvote comes in which was not explained, is inexplicable or even unjustified. Nothing we can do about this, really. The more we had contributed, the more we all will be faced with this unexplained downvote. Inevitably.
@terdon True - absolutely true ! But it is not about two points ... maybe I don't like it is because I always was against judgement of other people which I learned hard to be extremely destructive way back in school times. :)
@cuonglm Maybe they don't like your username. Perhaps they didn't understand your answer. Maybe they are having a bad day. Or they thought they were clicking a different post. They might have done it by accident. They might have thought you were someone else. They might always downvote users whose name starts with a c. Who knows? It's never worth it to worry about downvotes unless there is something wrong with your answer.
@cl-netbox Again, if you don't enjoy being judged, then you really shouldn't be posting on a site designed to have other users judge what you post and vote for or against it.
@terdon I enjoy these constructive discussions like the one we having right now and the way YOU are handling DVs and UVs ... what I said was meant to be an explanation for you to better understand my point of view. :)
@terdon you are not as "cool" as you think you are (which is good) and as I mentioned a few times before : you are doing a really good job here ! :) What I especially do like : you stand to your opinion and fight for it ... is something quite the same as what I do - right ? :)
Of course. After all, we're all tech geeks here of one type or another, and a more opinionated group of people than tech geeks is hard to find ;)
In my case, it's even worse: I'm a tech greek.
Anyway, the take home message is i) let's avoid deleting stuff that's been closed as a dupe (with some exceptions, in most cases such posts can be useful) and ii) let's avoid answering questions that are clearly not a good fit for the site (too broad, off topic etc) or, if we choose to answer them anyway, we should be ready for the possibility that the question will be deleted and we'll lose any rep gained by answering.
@JacobVlijm You consider yourself being "cool" ? I have seen some posts from you (on meta and here) that lead to another conclusion ... hahaha ... good morning Jacob ! :)
The three stages after a downvote: how dare you downvote my brilliant work (15 seconds)/ OK, I got a downvote (45 seconds) / Wow, is this coffee nice. A downvote? when? Anyway, who cares. (the rest of the day)
@JacobVlijm nice ... yes ... but what if there is no coffee available ? hahaha :)
@WinEunuuchs2Unix But only for those who are not able to read the (existing) drivers installation instructions carefully and don't act accordingly (even though it's not too hard to do that) ... hope you're not one of them ! :D
@Zanna I hope you don't and didn't take anything I say as a personal offense - it is honestly not meant to be that ! :) The thing is that I always say what I think and that I am "fighting" for my point of view ... if you're ever in doubt, please ask me directly. I really appreciate your good and successful work here ! :)
I didn't take what you said personally @cl-netbox and no doubt I have asked some crap questions and written some crap answers too. I just hope they are all gone :)
Iam installing alongside windows 10 and after entering the setup during the partition the change,+,- buttons are grayed out and i cannot select the memory space i had allocated for linux os
@terdon I have to say, ftr, I still feel I should delete crap, even if it's duplicated crap (surely there's a limit to the quantity of crap we need pointing to other stuff, especially if the other stuff is crap) but I will keep trying to look for value and try to think harder before clicking
@Zanna Great ! :) Makes me happy ... but you and crap posts ? never ever ! :) I took the xubuntu thing as an example because sometimes I really don't know what is considered to be "too broad" or "off-topic" - and my main approach is to just answer questions the users are having. :)
That question solved a real problem for me... after getting the answer I went to a Linux meetup and an employee of canonical asked me what I was running... I was able to tell her with confidence!
@Zanna we're nearing each other ... me personally, I think your xubuntu question was perfectly fine ... but others are as well, for a new user who wants to know where he finds valuable information about ubuntu or the terminal and gets a matching answer, this answer solves HIS problem, right as the answers helped you. :)
@Zanna by the way, we all come from different countries, so pronouncing words "correctly" is not an important "decision" in many cases - example : nearly nobody in the world outside of Germany pronounces the capital city Berlin correctly ... and, does it matter ? No, so absolutely no reason to loose confidence ! :)
@Thijser I thought about your subwoofer problem and did some research. Maybe I found a solution and so, I left a comment under your question, please try it out. I didn't write an answer because I'm not able to test it, my notebook doesn't have a subwoofer. In case it solves the problem, I can write an answer later ... good luck ! :)
The answer was down voted because I lost my keys. Please, stay with me, let me explain this odd chain of events.
Earlier today I couldn't get to the store on time because I could not find my keys. That caused me to miss the opportunity to run over a golf ball, which would have bounced between a...
Hello. I have a question that I don't seem to find an up to date answer. How can you change the dpi in Ubuntu (my version is 14.04) apart from scaling from System Settings > Displays (I am already doing that, but, as you know, that doesn't work for most apps - and it's quite annoying for stuff like Nautilus or Libreoffice). If there isn't such setting because the dpi is System Locked, would it be a solution to just us a lower resolution?
And one more thing, why is everybody talking about dpi, while it's actually ppi which is about screens?
Anyway, this sort of thing is much better asked on the main site where more people can see it and you have a better chance of finding someone who can answer.
There is a thread "How do I show active dhcp leases"
The thread is locked by Eric Carvalho while ALL answers there are only partial.
I couldn't find a way to contact Eric personally (didn't find the inmail possibility).
I have spent 2 full workdays creating the working solution for the above pro...
@WinEunuuchs2Unix : I see that jarno, the bug report person, chimed in on your selective kernel purge question / answer. I had pointed him to it on the bug report. However, he still has not offered to let me try his script.
@VannTileIanito if you're on an XServer you can use this answer: askubuntu.com/a/12618/3940 for adjusting screen geometry (i.e. display size in pixels width x heigth).
It is strange this morning. I tried to enter on my account, but when I enter my password, the screen was black and came back on the login page (login loop). I have easily access to the terminal with CTRL + ALT + F2. I am using the version 16.10 on Ubuntu, and I can't find the file .Xauthority. Co...
Pretty urls was working on when it was on "http" using this tutorial (https://laravel.io/forum/09-15-2015-removing-indexphp-from-url-laravel-5116) i figured it out but as i configured the "https" it stopped working, what did i do wrong?
by the way i am using an ubuntu cloud server 14.04
@JacobVlijm askubuntu.com/q/892702/295286 Not a duplicate ! 1) OP asked about the workings of GNOME shell , they're not seeking any command to close windnows. 2) they edited the post stating it's not a duplicate.
@JacobVlijm that's correct. In particular, I want to know exactly what command/script gnome shell executes to accomplish this, as wmctrl and xdotool workarounds are prone to bugs. — Andrew Horváth11 mins ago
@JacobVlijm We can always close it later if it is indeed a duplicate. But in this particular case it is not. And again, OP has edited their post explaining that the post you suggested doesn't fit them. By definition, it's not a duplicate then
Totally answerable. You just have to tell them exactly that: there is no command. Sometimes appropriate answer that they seek is "no, we don't have stuff like that"
@terdon That might have been true in the past, when windows were instructed to catch SIGTERM and whatever else. Nowadays, programs are instructed to catch window closing event. In particular , this is how wmctrl works
@JacobVlijm Ewwww. I don't remember when I last used a terminal that would give me that crap. I think gnome-terminal did, but I haven't really used it. I went from xterm to aterm to gnome-terminator.
Heh, I never got into it. If I want a new terminal, I'll open a new terminal. I always map terminator (or whichever lightweight terminal I'm using at the moment) to Ctrl+Z and that shortcut is very deeply ingrained.
I don't get the point of tabs. If I can't see what's running there, why have it in the same window?
It's just quicker ( at least for me ) to open a new tab than window, plus i can take up exactly same amount of window real-estate ( meaning, unchanging window size )