« first day (381 days earlier)      last day (4486 days later) » 

7:12 AM
Is this the new DB room?
 
 
1 hour later…
gbn
8:13 AM
@Raynos yes
If you check the roll call, you'll see some familiar names who hang around on SQL questions on SO, SF and of course here
 
8:43 AM
I see. This is actually useful I can ask occassionally questions
Like "If I still don't understand indexes should I stop touching databases?"
 
gbn
@Raynos That's many folk I'd like to say that too
But it keeps me employed and keeps my rep flowing
 
I feel like "Shit, I do maths, Y I NO LEARN RELATIONAL SET THEORY BEFORE I TOUCH DATABASE"
That's why I jumped ship into noSQL \o/
I now just push json around and forget about understanding things
 
gbn
@Raynos I'm sure you'd cringe if you saw me throw together some web site
2
No matter what language
 
9:15 AM
I'd cringe if I saw me throw together some web site
 
 
5 hours later…
2:17 PM
@Raynos That's probably the most damning thing I've ever heard about NoSQL actually...
 
JNK
Depends on your use case
NoSQL makes a lot of sense for a lot of web-based things
 
I never used one, so I guess I shouldn't judge, but too often it seemed like it was used as an alternative to properly managing a relational database
And I can only imagine what sort of clusterf*ck that results in
 
JNK
2:38 PM
social networking is a good example, BASE is alright since it isn't vital if you get your friend's status now or in a few minutes
eventual consistency is OK for that stuff
it's also OK to have undefined data structures since you basically are just displaying the data and not doing much with it
it's not OK for business intelligence or accounting or transaction processing
 
Is this actually one of our error pages? meta.dba.stackexchange.com/questions/310/… It's not the 404...
 
3:24 PM
@BenBrocka yessirree dba.stackexchange.com/error
and this is the 404 dba.stackexchange.com/404
(yes, you can type any gibberish instead of 404 at the end of that URL)
bbl
 
@NickChammas arg, the jpg artifacts
Crap, why is it smaller?
 
4:02 PM
I'll try and fix it later
 
@BenBrocka jpg? it's png sstatic.net/dba/img/error.png
 
I noticed, the original image clearly was a JPG though, it has the compression artifacts
 
perhaps you can explain what these artifacts be
ah
 
I removed the bad ones but apparently fixed a smaller version of the image
 
yeah I think i pulled it from teh webs as jpg
and then paintitized it to this
and saved as png
 
4:08 PM
Yeah, I just wanted to fix the artifacts around the text
 
4:19 PM
@jcolebrand I've updated the BI Merge question to trim some of the crud from the OP. Everyone happy with that?
 
@BenBrocka when you post the cleaned version (how are you doing that btw? I'm curious) ping jcolebrand so he can ping Jin to have it deployed
 
@ConcernedOfTunbridgeWells I think that'll work
 
@NickChammas I was just clearing the artifacts around the text with blackness, nothing fancy
 
ah ok
1
Q: SQL Server Configuration Manager changes effected via Central Management Server

Eric HigginsWhen using Central Management Server (CMS), under Central Management Server Actions, SQL Server Configuration Manager (SSCM) is an option. When launched, the GUI reflects the information of the CMS. Apart from what the GUI shows, I'm hopeful that changes made will affect all CMS managed instance...

flagged for here
 
4:44 PM
1
Q: How can I profile SQL Azure?

user380719I am writing web site on Azure. It uses SQL Azure heavily. However, it is painfully slow. Is there an easy way to profile on the live Azure site?

also flagged
 
 
1 hour later…
5:46 PM
Interesting question where the poster has found the issue but is too dumb to realise
0
Q: Table variable performance on SQL 2008 R2 server with TDE enabled

user1160835I have the following situation: I have a SQL 2008 R2 Enterprise edition where I have enabled TDE encryption in one of the databases. One of the stored procedures from the encrypted database is using a table variable (@t1), table that gets populated with almost 600K records. Then there is a select...

As Mr Mackey would say "Table Variables are bad, m'kay?"
 

« first day (381 days earlier)      last day (4486 days later) »