« first day (96 days earlier)      last day (10 days later) » 

Bml
5:54 AM
@JohnRennie Hi :-)
 
Hi :-)
 
Bml
Shall we see the problem?
 
Yes
yesterday, by Bml
On a platform of mass M = 20 kg, placed on a frictionless horizontal road, is a spring with elastic constant k = 1000 N/m and rest length L_0 = 0.5 m, which has one end attached to the platform and the other in contact with a mass M = 5 kg. There is friction between m and the platform, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is $\mu = 0.5$. Initially, the length of the spring is L = 0.2 m and it is released.
Find:
the velocities V_0 of the platform and v_0 of m when the spring reaches length L_0.
19 hours ago, by John Rennie
user image
 
Bml
The initial energy of the system is 1/2 k ∆l^2 and the final energy is 1/2 m v_0² + 1/2 M V_0². Right?
 
Not quite ... you are not including the work done against the friction.
But your approach is fine.
 
Bml
6:04 AM
@JohnRennie This is the hot spot. My professor and I disagree on this point.
 
OK ...
I suspect your prof might be right on this one :-)
 
Bml
The work against the friction is - \mu mg ∆l, right?
 
Yes
 
Bml
The problem is that I consider ∆l negative (because there is a compression of the spring), so ∆l = 0.2-0.5 = 0.3, whereas my professor considered it positive (0.5-0.2 = 0.3)
So we arrive at two different numerical results...
Who is right and why?
 
It can be really complicated trying to keep track of all the signs with work, so I like to take a step back and think about where the energy is going.
We start with the energy stored in the spring:
E = ¹⁄₂kx²
and everyone agrees on that. Yes?
 
Bml
6:09 AM
@JohnRennie Yes
 
Now when we release the spring some of that energy gets converted to KE and some gets converted to heat by the friction:
¹⁄₂kx² = KE + heat
And both KE and heat are positive numbers.
Yes?
 
Bml
@JohnRennie Yes
 
So we are going to get:
¹⁄₂kx² = (¹⁄₂m₁v₁² + ¹⁄₂m₂v₂²) + FΔx
where the first term is the KE and the second term is the heat.
And both terms are positive.
Yes?
 
Bml
@JohnRennie Yes
 
So the heat term is going to be 25N × 0.3m
It can be confusing about exactly what signs to take, but at the end of the day we know the product must be a positive number.
 
Bml
6:21 AM
@JohnRennie But in this case I would be right, not my teacher...
 
I would say Δx is positive and F is positive, so I'd agree with your teacher.
 
Bml
@JohnRennie I would like to understand a little more about the issue because I am slightly confused
 
What direction are you taking to be positive?
I'm taking right to be positive since that's usual.
 
Bml
If I take W = Final Energy - Initial Energy, I have - \mu mg ∆l = ½ m v_0² + ½ M V_0² - ½ k ∆l², right?
@JohnRennie The spring is attached to a support placed on the right, so it moves to the left. I placed v_0 directed to the left and V_0 directed to the right...
 
So you are saying the final energy is:
½ m v₀² + ½ M V₀² + μmgΔ𝓁
Yes?
19 hours ago, by John Rennie
user image
The way I've drawn it the support is at the left
Did you draw it the other way round?
 
Bml
6:30 AM
@JohnRennie Yes
 
Can we use my diagram since I don't want to redraw it?
 
Bml
@JohnRennie Yes, but isn't - \mu mg ∆l the work done by frictional force?
@JohnRennie Yes, obviously
First I used the theorem according to which W_{friction} = ∆E
 
@Bml No, μmgΔ𝓁 is the work done by the spring
Total work done by spring = work done by spring on masses + work done by spring against friction
Yes?
 
Bml
@JohnRennie And the one done by friction has a minus sign?
@JohnRennie OK
 
The force the spring is applying to the friction points right. Yes?
 
Bml
6:36 AM
@JohnRennie Yes
In your diagram, yes
 
And we are taking right right to be positive so the force the spring is applying against the friction is +μmg
Yes?
 
Bml
@JohnRennie Yes
 
And the displacement of the end of the spring is to the right, so the vector Δ𝓁 is to the right and also positive.
Yes?
 
Bml
@JohnRennie Wait: isn't the spring compressing?
 
No, we start with the spring compressed i.e. the initial state is with the spring compressed. Then we let go and the spring expands to the right pushing the block to the right.
 
Bml
6:42 AM
@JohnRennie Ah, OK, so yes, ∆l is positive
 
So the work done by the spring is +μmg × +Δ𝓁
 
Bml
@JohnRennie OK
So the final equation is...?
 
¹⁄₂kx² = ½mv₀² + ½MV₀² + μmgΔ𝓁
i.e. initial energy = final energy
 
Bml
@JohnRennie OK, so my professor was correct
Thank you :-)
 
You're welcome :-)
 
 
1 hour later…
Bml
7:51 AM
@JohnRennie Hi... Do you remember this experiment?
 
Yes
 
Bml
Length at rest 8.2 cm
I have to attach different masses to the spring, right?
 
Yes, and for each different mass you measure the extension.
 
Bml
8:26 AM
Length at rest 8.3 cm, sorry
With 205.042 g, we have a length of 22.5 cm
With 49.920 g, length = 11.6 cm
With 25.077 g, length = 10.0 cm
With 19.970 g, length = 9.6 cm
With 9.992 g, length 8.9 cm
With 100.219 g, length = 15.3 cm
 
That looks pretty good.
 
Bml
@JohnRennie Wait: x is the final length, not the elongation...
 
It doesn't matter. The gradient will eb the same anyway.
And the y intercept will give our unloaded length.
 
Bml
@JohnRennie OK
So, I should do mg- k∆x = 0, right?
 
No, just use a linear regression
 
Bml
8:38 AM
@JohnRennie OK, but I should evaluated k
So I have to use ∆x = g/k m
 
This is what I get. The blue points are your data and the red line is the fit.
 
Bml
@JohnRennie OK, so I have to equate g/k to gradient, yes?
@JohnRennie In this graph, if we put final lengths instead of elongations, the line does not pass through the origin. If we put elongations instead of final lengths, the line passes through the point (0,0), so it passes through the origin...
 
9:05 AM
In my fit the line passes through 8.2cm
So it's giving the relaxed length at 8.2cm whihc is very close to your measured value of 8.3cm.
 
Bml
9:25 AM
@JohnRennie OK, but if we put the elongation x instead of the final length, the first point will not be (0, 8.3), it will be (0,0), no?
 
Yes, but the gradient will still be the same.
 
Bml
OK, thanks
The documentation says: 1) determination of k_el from the relationship F = - k_el x and checking linearity... For what values of the elongations x of the springs is the linearity of Hooke's law not verifiable? Remark: the measurement of elongations is a relative measurement...
 
So you've done part (1) because the gradient is k/g so you've found k.
To do part (2) you need larger masses because the graph is linear for all the masses you used.
You need to keep increasing the mass until the points deviate from your straight line.
 
Bml
9:42 AM
@JohnRennie Isn't it g/k?
 
Oops yes.
mg = kx so x = (g/k) m
 
Bml
@JohnRennie OK
 
I think I was mentally graphing x on the x axis and m on the y axis.
 
Bml
@JohnRennie The fact is that we don't have larger masses in Lab...
And what does it mean "the measurement of elongations is a relative measurement..."?
 
Can you attach more than one mass?
If not then your conclusion will be that the extension remains linear up to the maximum mass available. That's a perfectly good conclusion.
 
Bml
9:50 AM
@JohnRennie I don't know
I don't understand "the measurement of elongations is a relative measurement..."
 
That statement does seem a bit odd.
 
Bml
10:33 AM
After this, they say: 2) Perform comparison between 3 equal springs: quality control.
3) Pendulum... with springs: T = 2π √(m/k_el)
 
I guess the point is that the three springs are supposed to be all the same, so they should have the same force constant.
So part 2 is just repeating what you did with two other springs of the same type to see how similar they are.
Then part 3 is setting the mass bouncing on the end of the spring and measuring the period.
So if you graph T² against m you should get a straight line plot.
 
Bml
11:08 AM
@JohnRennie I have to measure the period with a stopwatch?
 

« first day (96 days earlier)      last day (10 days later) »