« first day (461 days earlier)      last day (4124 days later) » 

3:25 AM
@JonEricson They were finding the right things without help? Ok, not what I expected. I hope your question gets some answers. :-)
 
3:39 AM
writing my response to interpreting Revelation... might take awhile
 
 
1 hour later…
5:03 AM
Still writing haha
 
@DanO'Day Interested to see what the final word count ends up being :)
 
I actually spend more time re-reading and cutting my own content than anything else
and I am getting tired so I am starting to be more succinct
I started taking notes on what I wanted to write yesterday, though. So I have a decent outline
 
I'm the same way often times; I get one paragraph out of three that I write
But I feel that's the spirit of why it's called an 'essay'
 
yes indeed
 
6:06 AM
the hardest part is finding OT prophecies to support my principles of interpretation. I know there are tons but don't remember all the references offhand
and my brain is shutting down - I'm trying to finish before it quits :P
I'll probably go back and edit this in the morning in horror
 
 
2 hours later…
8:02 AM
my brain is shot - my best for now. One area still needs a little editing but I'll get to it another day: hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/a/2931/423
0
A: Are there any rules on which things in Revelation must be interpreted literally and which symbolically?

Dan O'DayI will attempt to propose a hermeneutical approach to the translation of the book of Revelation. I am going to approach the text from a Christian perspective (as this was the intended audience). I would not call these 'rules,' but rather 'principles' of interpretation that I believe are helpful f...

 
 
1 hour later…
9:05 AM
Thanks for the laugh @JonEricson. I was going through the new-post review queue and was quite puzzled to find one by you in there. Even when I scrolled far enough down to see that the author was something else, I believed my instinct more than the label. The revision history confirmed what I already knew.
If you ever want to really hide, here are some ideas:

* Run some of your paragraphs together. Randomly re-order the whole post so the thoughts don't lead cleanly to a conclution.
* fail to capitalize at least half the time, randomly allcap some WORDS.
* Link using full http://example.com/long/useless/url/full/of/%12%13percent%34codednonsense rather than [clean urls](http://example.com).
* Don't use blockquotes for verses or headings of any sort, much less logical useful ones.
 
 
5 hours later…
2:07 PM
@Caleb bahaha
 
@DanO'Day I haven't yet read your whole answer, but this caught my eye: "Was he talking about the end of the world? Nope. This prophecy was fulfilled when the Medes destroyed Babylon in 539 B.C."
are you arguing against 'double fulfilment' ?
(thanks for taking the time to produce such a weighty answer btw)
 
 
1 hour later…
3:16 PM
@JackDouglas nope, the section immediately preceding that one gives an example of double fulfillment (Is. 7:14)
but I am saying that if you're looking for another fulfillment of that passage, it probably won't be the "end of the world." It would most likely be another political judgment (a nation being invaded by another most likely)
 
@DanO'Day ha, yes, I skipped straight to "Heavenly Disturbances Are Symbolic" following the link on Mike's question :)
 
I would have elaborated my last section to say that all the prophecy in scripture finds its fulfillment in Christ but didn't want to venture too far beyond the text into doctrine
 
@DanO'Day what do you make of Mark 13:24 then out of interest?
 
I'd have to break down the entire Olivet Discourse and parallel it to Matthew and Luke to answer that in a coherent way that would make sense, and I don't have time to do so right now :P
 
@DanO'Day :)
 
3:22 PM
but generally speaking, I would say that deals more with the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in AD 70 than it does with the end of the world
 
@DanO'Day interesting. So both then but more the temple destruction.
One thing I love about Mark 13 is that Jesus is just so 'Old Testament' :)
2
A: What are the limits to the Christological hermeneutic?

EpagaFor a detailed explanation on Christo-centric preaching (and thereby indirectly the hermeutic), I highly, highly recommend Keller + Clowney's 16-part seminar they held on "Preaching Christ to a Postmodern world", available for free(!) on iTunes U. Here is the link: https://itunes.apple.com/us/itu...

This user has just answered 2 questions after being a member for 11 months
Good answer too imo (though it probably needs a bit of neatening up)
 
yes the imagery by Jesus in his Olivet Discourse is very much drawing on Daniel and OT prophecy in general
 
3:37 PM
@DanO'Day ... nice work
4
A: Are there any rules on which things in Revelation must be interpreted literally and which symbolically?

Dan O'DayI will attempt to propose a hermeneutical approach to the translation of the book of Revelation. I am going to approach the text from a Christian perspective (as this was the intended audience). I would not call these 'rules,' but rather 'principles' of interpretation that I believe are helpful f...

 
@swasheck thanks. I just updated the section on chronology / circular time and gave an example
A night's sleep makes a lot of difference
the hardest part was not what principles to include - but rather which to exclude. I tried to avoid any principles that have their sole basis in this book (i.e. no good examples outside of Revelation) and those that introduce one-sided doctrinal slants.
 
i find that most people want to overstate the need to completely understand Revelation and, as such, seek a transcendent understanding of the "signs" and hoping to place themselves somewhere in a timeline. that also adds a lot of confusion.
@DanO'Day you did a good job
 
thanks
I didn't even mention the words "preterist," "futurist," "historicist," and "idealist" although I considered doing so
 
I agree with swasheck, nice work @DanO'Day
 
3:57 PM
thanks
 
4:47 PM
@Caleb Excellent advice!
@swasheck @DanO'Day, @Soldarnal, et al: Now that we have a great answer (I haven't read it yet, but I'm sure it is), what should we do about the question? Is it properly scoped?
 
@JonEricson in some ways my response is a way of saying: "It's not as simple as coming up with rules for when to take things literally or symbolically. How do we take it literally, and how do we take it symbolically? Did first-century Jews have in mind the same kind of symbolism we do? What kinds of symbols would they have expected? etc."
So instead I gave principles of interpretation.
but the question itself is not necessarily bad
 
5:07 PM
@DanO'Day Ok. It has been edited recently, so we might be able to leave it be.
 
Oh OK. I edited to deal with grammatical issues, but there is still a stray bracket I want to remove and it won't let me edit one character :P
 
@DanO'Day I just nuked the stray bracket.
 
thanks. stuff like that jumps off the screen at me
 
@DanO'Day Yesterday on Philosophy.SE someone corrected a few dashes in a post and added something like: <!-- The six character limit is stupid. -->. (Not that I recommend the technique, myself. ;-)
 
nice haha
 
5:15 PM
@DanO'Day Me too. One thing being a moderator is good for is no character limits on edits. I'm perfectly comfortable editing for a single character once it catches my eye like that.
 
5:25 PM
I'd like to answer this also but I don't think I'll have time today or tomorrow
3
Q: How are we to interpret the Moon turning into blood, in Joel 2:31 and Rev 6:12?

MikeIn Joel the moon is mentioned as getting 'dark'. The earth quakes before them; the heavens tremble. The sun and the moon are darkened, and the stars withdraw their shining. (Joel 2:10, ESV) Then at a later time in the vision is is said to be turned 'to blood'. The sun shall be turned...

it would have to be a survey response to avoid being doctrinal
 
and why is it tagged acts?
 
@DanO'Day I'd like to hear what EO doctrine has to say on the subject personally ;)
 
@JackDouglas migrate to Christianity
 
@swasheck what! has no-one fixed that yet?
 
i don't think there is unanimity on it - the Fathers discuss everything from eclipses to the end of the world
 
5:28 PM
@swasheck you can't migrate an answer
and avoiding doctrine is doctrinal ;)
 
@JackDouglas true
 
@JonEricson I do agree the scope of the question is too broad; Dan's answer while admirable doesn't even scratch the surface on a number of features of the symbolism (e.g. the roman cult)
 
@JackDouglas done
@JackDouglas yeah :)
 
he's already written quite a lot, so i'm not faulting his answer; it just would be difficult to give a full answer that isn't too long for the medium of this site
 
@Soldarnal I fully agree with you. There are a million other possible directions.
 
5:34 PM
Perhaps it could be broken into shorter questions like "What rules might determine when numbers are symbolic in Revelation?"
But even these are expansive questions
 
@Soldarnal while i wholeheartedly agree, i think that dan's answer comes close to approximating a framework. discovering the roman cult, gnosticism, etc. would be a part of using a framework.
 
@swasheck Yeah, I just don't remember anything in his answer that related to extra-biblical allusions/symbols
 
@Soldarnal no. there wasn't.
 
@swasheck Other than he mentions they are written to particular churches
Which is itself a major interpretive issue...
 
@Soldarnal indeed it is. i tend to just avoid answering questions like this because they seem to be fishing expeditions.
 
5:43 PM
@swasheck I've asked several questions on Revelation; it's tough to answer any of them because they require so much upfront work in establishing your hermeneutic
 
yeah I intentionally began by saying I was taking a Christian perspective
 
@Soldarnal right. and i'm lazy. and generally grumpy.
 
I could've got on tangents about extrabiblical literature but no time
I spent too long on it as is :P
The reality is that I'd need to recommend a stack of books to anyone who wants to begin interpreting Revelation
 
the reality is that (i'll go back to this) most of these questions are fishing expeditions.
 
Early on I saw this issue when answering on this site. I even laid out some principles before answering a question one time.
9
A: What does the prohibition against women speaking in church in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 mean?

Dan O'DayIn the spirit of biblical hermeneutics, the general hermeneutic that I will be applying to this text is historical-grammatical-critical. Since no real discussion can occur unless we agree on our hermeneutics, here are some of the hermeneutical principles that I apply as I interpret scripture, inc...

but this becomes exhaustive and I don't have that kind of time :P
 
5:53 PM
@DanO'Day as for the greek ... there's always copy-pasta
 
copy-pasta?
:P
 
copy and paste
 
i know
but i actually like copy-pasta, I think that would be a neat name for something
 
@DanO'Day Maybe we can ask a canonical question (or a bunch of them) and we can link to answers there in answers to more specific questions. "Given the framework described over here, ..."
2
 
6:50 PM
3
Q: What should I do with the 6-character minimum for edits?

PavelI know quite a few posts with small mistakes involving less than 6 characters, but I can't correct them without some more changes in the post, because that "at least 6 characters changed" limit. What to do with it? I can make some invisible changes in addition to the correction, but I'd be happy...

 
7:26 PM
@JonEricson That's essentially what I wrote this question for - so that I could answer your question
 
@Soldarnal We got another question, you got a bit more rep (why am I the only voter on those posts?!?), and the answers are more manageable. A win all around.
 
@JonEricson I think I've seen you do the same thing in a couple places, which I can't remember off-hand; but I think it's an approach that can work, it just takes a lot of time
 
7:40 PM
@Soldarnal I've asked a question on Philosophy in order to answer one on Christianity and so on. ;-)
 
 
1 hour later…
8:51 PM
@JonEricson Oh boy, don't get me started on canon law. I'm by no means an expert on it, but my priest is writing a thesis for a theology degree challenging the application of some of the canons. So if that gives you any idea how I might approach them....
 
9:05 PM
Here is for anybody that wants to see pretty excuses for why I was such a slacker on SE last week:
4
 
@Caleb ahh ... antalya
 
9:31 PM
@Caleb Do I spy a wife in some of these shots? (I can't remember off hand if you are married.)
 
@JonEricson If you do, you've got sharper eyes than I do. Please point her out ;-)
You are probably spotting my sister.
I had two siblings and some friends around over Christmas, so I took them on a bit of a road trip.
I marked most of the people shots as private, but there may be a few where my sis shows up in the frame somewhere.
 
@Caleb Ah. Sister and brother then:
(Ah. No oneboxing.)
@Caleb I'm extremely jealous. We sat around and fretted about the nursery and other baby-related things.
 
@JonEricson Yes.
@JonEricson If you ever make it this way I'd be happy to show you around. I expect twins will keep you tied down for a little while though!
 
9:48 PM
@Caleb Yes. I expect they will bring joy in excess of the burden, however. (Turkey is definitely on my short list of travel destinations when we are able to travel again.)
 
@JonEricson Well being on the short list is good, just don't make it a short trip. There is a stupendous amount of stuff to be seen.
I've been here 6 years, traveled fairly regularly, seen place after place, and yet most of what we you see in that photo set was new to me too. And we didn't scratch the surface at any place we went.
 
@Caleb there's also Efes ... if you're into that sort of thing
 
@swasheck That one I live an hour from and have seen more times than I can shake a stick at.
 
@Caleb i know ... i meant the beverage :)
Pergamon was a favorite of mine
 
@swasheck If you insist, I'd go for something a bit darker myself.
@swasheck Understandable.
 
10:00 PM
@Caleb A few years ago, we did a week in Florence and a week in Rome. On the way home we saw that we had missed half the things on our "must do" list. And in those cities, everything is conveniently pressed into walking distance!
 
@Caleb maybe it was just the thrill of it all.
 
Makes me wonder at the richness of this world.
 
 
2 hours later…
11:54 PM
Hey @JackDouglas: Did you notice how many times I used the phrase "we can be doing" in this post?
 

« first day (461 days earlier)      last day (4124 days later) »