« first day (1025 days earlier)      last day (2155 days later) » 

12:00 AM
RELOAD!
 
@ThunderFrame ah I c
 
 
3 hours later…
2:34 AM
> ClassModule IClass1:
```
Public Sub DoSomething()
End Sub

```
Class module Class1:
```
Implements IClass1

Private Sub IClass1_DoSomething()
End Sub
```

Class module Class2:

```
Private Sub RefTheInterface()
Dim c1 As Class1
Set c1 = New IClass1
c1.DoSomething
End Sub

Private Sub RefTheInterface2()
Dim c1 As Class1
Dim c2 As IClass1
Set c1 = New Class1
Set c2 = c1
c2.DoSomething
End Sub
```

Run Refactor->Rename-> choose a val
 
 
7 hours later…
10:06 AM
user image
4
@PeterMTaylor How's that? Same as existing RD BusyIndicator, only with ducks!
And I have it working with XAML too, so I can get real alpha transparency.
(as opposed to this ^ GIF which doesn't have alpha)
 
10:48 AM
Much much better and relevant @ThunderFrame
So got comparison side by side with and without alpha as we could see the difference I suggest as an issue for discussion and vote
Well done ✅
Be interesting what black screen shows with that kind of blue
 
@PeterMTaylor doesn't matter - the BusyIndicator only appears in front of CodePane and Inspections, and TestExplorer, IIRC.
 
11:11 AM
 
11:37 AM
Agreed simple of places then. @ThunderFrame
 
 
2 hours later…
1:08 PM
> Is there a way of knowing from this which source line it as at? I could post the code then.

`2017-03-27 14:04:54.1281;TRACE-2.0.13.32288;Rubberduck.Parsing.VBA.ComponentParseTask;Starting ParseTaskID e9c6ddcc-819c-4db4-8626-4b9c928559a5 on thread 16.;
2017-03-27 14:04:54.1561;ERROR-2.0.13.32288;Rubberduck.Parsing.VBA.ComponentParseTask;Exception thrown in thread 16, ParseTaskID e9c6ddcc-819c-4db4-8626-4b9c928559a5.;System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Length cannot be less than zero.
Param
2
 
1:41 PM
@ThunderFrame PR!!
 
2:01 PM
@Mat'sMug @Comintern @ThunderFrame I got promoted this morning, and they had an extra surprise for me. All of my macros (except where there are multiple in the same file) are started with Ctrl-Shift-Q, so they got me a shirt that says Ctrl-Shift-Q on it :)
 
ha nice!
 
I have a good workplace :)
 
Kaz
2:47 PM
hey @Mat'sMug If you think it's something people might find interesting, and nobody's done it already, could you put a reminder up in the 2nd: a piece of history is (probably) going to be made on Wednesday. The first rocket ever to go to space twice. 8:55pm UTC onwards.
 
3:36 PM
@Kaz Huh? They reused the rockets for the space shuttle.
They didn't reuse the fuel tank, but I think that was the only major component they didn't reuse.
 
first rocket != first shuttle
 
@Mat'sMug They reused both.
They reused the shuttle and the solid rocket boosters.
 
the point is that the boosters alone wouldn't go far
what's shooting to space wednesday is quite different
 
> After burnout, they were jettisoned and parachuted into the Atlantic Ocean where they were recovered, examined, refurbished, and reused.
@Mat'sMug First two minutes of flight--they went pretty far.
Oh, maybe they didn't actually get to space, though.
 
> Sorry, I missed that. Do you want to delete this? Or leave it in as the error is specifically shown in the subject?
 
3:44 PM
Oh, are you all space fans also?
 
Not so much.
 
not all
 
I'm more of a science fan than a space fan, but I read the space news and I know exactly what Kaz is talking about.
 
4:02 PM
@ThunderFrame Awwww yeah! I like that.
 
@puzzlepiece87 I don't read the space news, but I suspect that SpaceX is re-launching their rocket that landed in their barge a while back.
 
4:28 PM
@Hosch250 That's exactly what's happening :)
 
Hmm, can we reference tags cross-site?
Doesn't look like it.
That's an interesting one...
 
Kaz
5:09 PM
@Hosch250 Ish. Giant metal cylinders that cost nearly as much to refurbish as to just build from scratch again. A whole rocket is something else entirely.
 
5:45 PM
@Kaz Going to space is expensive.
 
6:04 PM
Ok look, I'm done wasting my time here and wish you the best of luck - the code you've got here does not clear anything (nothing sets the "filled square"), and you still haven't answered whether that else block runs if you put a breakpoint - "does not run the code" makes no sense - an event handler can't be deregistered magically in VBA. So put a breakpoint and step through your code and debug it; the code you're showing us obviously has nothing to do with the code you're looking at, so good luck. — Mat's Mug 41 secs ago
#Vampire
 
 
2 hours later…
7:43 PM
> Code Explorer, Inspection Results and Test Explorer are now completely
ducked. Thanks to PeterMTaylor for strict design oversight!
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 07f09c4e on unknown branch: AppVeyor build succeeded
 
lol - fastest merge ever!
 
[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] build for commit 67cb4dd5 on next: AppVeyor build succeeded
 
:)
I might shrink the circle a bit though - or does it scale with the toolwindows' width?
 
It's fixed at 120 ATM. It was 36, but you couldn't see the ducks. Maybe 72?
Go 240 and you see the duck's eye.
 
8:00 PM
lol
 
Wait the duck has an eye?
 
and it sees everything
 
I have Find configured for Entire Solution in VS2015, but it seems to stop finding after a few hits. Known issue or restart?
 
@Mat'sMug Brother Duck?
 
@ThunderFrame no clue.. I only use that in the .g4 grammar file lol
 
8:05 PM
Maybe the BusyIndicator could slow down a touch too?
 
sounds good to tweak just a tad on these ducks 🦆
 
8:20 PM
RD have any rerun inconclusive tests option?
 
> All tests
> Not run tests
> Failed tests
> Passed tests
> Repeat last run
so, no
I smell a feature request incoming
 
> Option to rerun Inconclusive tests.
 
The nose knows.
 
8:55 PM
@IvenBach could I ask what use case do you consider inconclusive by example?
 
@PeterMTaylor Tests that use Assert.Inconclusive.
@ThunderFrame Not known.
At least, I've never seen it.
@Duga @Mat'sMug Gosh, you keep labeling things wrong.
That's a 01 duckling issue.
Heck, I should take that myself.
That needs a minor refactoring, and it needs to move to C# 6.
 
9:32 PM
hi @CallumDA!
 
Hey! First time here
 
welcome to our little war room :)
 
Welcome @CallumDA, thanks again for helping me with my SO questions.
 
Hi, new duckling.
3
Just to introduce ourselves, Mat is Daddy Duck (project founder). Comintern and ThunderFrame are the renegade ducks (they can make VBA and the VBE do things nobody made them do before), and I'm the ugly duckling (in that I don't know VBA enough to talk about).
 
@CallumDA at first I felt like closing that question as "just a typo" ...and then I realized "wait a minute, that shouldn't even compile" - TIL the Range interface is extensible
@Hosch250 LOL!
 
9:36 PM
@puzzlepiece87 -- Always happy to help :) I'm probably totally out of my depth here but I'm certainly interested to see what's going on!
 
@CallumDA seen this?
Fakes.MsgBox.Returns 42
Debug.Print MsgBox("Flabbergasted yet?", vbYesNo, "Rubberduck") 'prints 42

With Fakes.MsgBox.Verify
    .Parameter "prompt", "Flabbergasted yet?"
    .Parameter "buttons", vbYesNo
    .Parameter "title", "Rubberduck"
End With
TTQW :)
 
@Mat'sMug Whoa, I'm just getting started over here. Working on my design doc for Checkers Treasury.
 
:O
@Hosch250, thanks for the introduction haha
 
driving, bbl
 
@PeterMTaylor I had a few tests that were inconclusive but had to run them all.
@CallumDA I don't belong here either but people here seem to tolerate my attempts to learn from them.
Welcome to the duck pond!
2
 
9:55 PM
@CallumDA, this is not an initiation question: Does anyone like dinosaurs? Some decently important dino news today.
 
@puzzlepiece87 I'm dino curious
3
 
10:40 PM
a self-driving dinosaur is being relaunched?
 
@ThunderFrame I rather imagine it wouldn't survive long.
 
@StackOverflow VB6/VBA... but I suspect it's *mostly* due to the lack of proper tooling in the IDE. Rubberduck to the rescue!
 
@Mat'sMug It can't be. The languages are rotten from the core.
 
11:08 PM
@rubberduckvba @StackOverflow Rebrand to VBA *Framework*, and all the JavaScript kiddies will suddenly embrace it.
 
@ThunderFrame LOL!!!
 
@ThunderFrame It should suit them just fine.
 

« first day (1025 days earlier)      last day (2155 days later) »