« first day (1680 days earlier)      last day (3345 days later) » 

 
1 hour later…
1:35 AM
:( Terry Prachett died
 
2:03 AM
@JourneymanGeek Yea. :(
@JourneymanGeek This makes me happy I got a Samsung PRO 850.
 
2:21 AM
@MichaelFrank that's three people in this channel with that model of SSD :)
you, me, and DragonLord
I have two - 128GB and 1TB
 
@allquixotic I think I got the 250GB model.
 
that's super realistic and fully featured, omg... the download is 681 MB
for a plane only
that's after ~30GB of data in the base X-Plane already downloaded
 
> Access to this page is blocked

> Category Games
:(
 
I want one ;p
But not yet
@MichaelFrank: heh, even the normal/tlc 840 was no slouch
whohoo. Broke something. For Science.
 
2:36 AM
@JourneymanGeek the 850 Pro is super non-slouchy
 
@allquixotic: Samsung basically has the market on enthusiast SSDs anyway ;p
 
lol... IE explodes during their presentation.
 
Bob
3:09 AM
@JourneymanGeek I really don't like the self-bricking behaviour :\
Why not just boot in read-only mode?
@JourneymanGeek I'm running an 840 EVO mSATA (250 GB) in my laptop :P
I'll probably move it across to the new one.
The Clevo will come with a 256 GB Plextor M6M mSATA, and has two slots.
Also adding a 750 GB 7200 RPM HDD.
 
Planning on moving my 840 to my laptop if I get an 850
@Bob: raid 0!
 
Bob
Though... I'm beginning to wonder if I really need the HDD
And how much it'll affect battery life.
 
Could always throttle it down?
 
Bob
Excessive parking is bad for HDDs, though...
 
(Then again, between the A20P I ran a while, my spare linux box and the stream, I do decently on small hard drives other than gaming)
 
Bob
3:13 AM
Well... I could always leave the 840 in the old lappy
 
man, can't wait for may
(Next hardware cycle for me starts ;p)
Also, superuser.com/questions/888846/… is someone trying to use a PC as a space heater?
 
@JourneymanGeek I never got space heater...
Like, why not just call it a heater?
 
cause it heats sppppaaaccceee
(I'm pretty sure it differenciates it from a water heater, or something with a fan)
 
3:50 AM
ahh
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_heater It heats a space/ LOGIC!
 
 
1 hour later…
@JourneymanGeek Well we all need one of those.
 
5:32 AM
@JourneymanGeek where do I buy it?!
 
5:49 AM
@allquixotic: You can't? ;p
 
 
1 hour later…
6:59 AM
 
 
1 hour later…
8:18 AM
heh, Everyone at work is sick.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:04 AM
could we protect this question? superuser.com/q/155223/172747
 
10:30 AM
must. export. code. O____O
2
 
10:47 AM
I'm as sick as a dog. Well a sick dog. ;p
 
Bob
@OliverSalzburg That's... broken.
 
@Bob You tried it already?
 
Bob
@OliverSalzburg No, just saying the existence of an (public and full) export queue is weird and dodgy :P
 
11:42 AM
@JourneymanGeek o0 that's baaad
 
 
1 hour later…
12:50 PM
@JourneymanGeek woof :(
3
 
1:27 PM
@allquixotic woof woof :)
3
Hai
 
1:45 PM
@DragonLord ehlo
 
2:03 PM
Wow, my work network is so damn fast today!
 
@ThatBrazilianGuy :(
 
2:27 PM
3
A: Do rackmount servers need to be in a rack?

DragonLordA rackmount server need not be physically installed in a rack, but there are several important considerations when operating one at home. As far as I can tell, there is no regulatory or other requirement for a rackmount server to be installed in a rack. I've seen rackmount servers operated on a...

> (For comparison with a consumer part, a rackmount server running under load with good ventilation is typically about as loud as a reference AMD Radeon R9 290X graphics card with the fan running at 100%. Expect even more noise under suboptimal operating conditions.)
Is this an accurate comparison?
 
Bob
No. It's louder. Quite a lot louder.
(Making the assumption that said card is similar to the GTX 560 Ti I had... with the turbine fans...)
I'd expect a GPU's fans running at max to be medium (subjective) volume ~5m away.
They were setting up new rackmount servers down the other end of the office about a year ago. ~10-15m, and I would consider that loud (again, subjective).
Rackmount servers' fans are designed to move massive volumes of air with little to no consideration to volume.
Consider that consumer GPUs are typically used for gaming, where volume does matter.
 
An R9 290X at 100% fan is about 65 dBA.
> For comparison with a consumer part, a rackmount server running under a moderate load with good ventilation is typically about as loud as a reference AMD Radeon R9 290X graphics card with the fan running at 100%, which is about 65 dBA. Expect even more noise under suboptimal operating conditions, potentially up to 75–80 dBA.
More accurate?
 
Bob
70 sounds about right
remember that's a logarithmic scale - 70 is twice as loud as 60
 
@Bob Actually 10 times as loud by absolute comparison
Updated to add "at least":
> For comparison with a consumer part, a rackmount server running under a moderate load with good ventilation is typically at least as loud as a reference AMD Radeon R9 290X graphics card with the fan running at 100%, which is about 65 dBA. Expect even more noise under suboptimal operating conditions, potentially up to 75–80 dBA.
 
Bob
the other thing is, rackmount servers are not optimised for low volumes, normally
some variants are
some have configurable fan controls too
 
2:41 PM
Newer ones are better from what I know
 
Bob
but the default usually leaves it running fast and loud
@DragonLord there isn't too much concern about fan volume with the typical environments rackmount servers operate in
fairly often adjustable though
 
They're designed to be operated in a clean-air datacenter where noise is a total non-concern, not a home office where noise must be limited
 
@OliverSalzburg TBH it was taken yesterday; speeds were so bad we all just gave up and went out to eat sushi. Today it's a little less worse, feels like dial-up
 
Bob
=> youtube.com/watch?v=FFu4vLai7Hc looks like this peaks at 85 (probably max), but 70 is more typical (not adjusted for A)
it might throttle down a little when idling, depending on the config
so, yea, 75-80 is a reasonable peak under load
 
You can hit 70-75 dBA with multiple R9 290X cards in CrossFire.
 
2:48 PM
0
Q: How to access full Adobe Acrobat AcroExch COM API from Internet Explorer embedded object?

allquixoticI have the following situation: Internet Explorer 9 on Windows 7 SP1 32-bit Adobe Acrobat Professional version 10 A webpage with code like this: <object data="foo.pdf" src="foo.pdf"> Given that: The default PDF reader on the system is Adobe Acrobat Adobe Reader's browser plugin is suppress...

 
Bob
@DragonLord I happen to sit maybe 5m from the door to our server room now... the fans are pretty loud whenever someone opens that door :P
 
@DragonLord I have two R9 280X in CrossFire, and they spin up the fans to 50-65% after prolonged play in a hot room when playing high-end games like Dragon Age Inquisition or Star Citizen, but they never redline, so the noise isn't that noticeable
 
The reference R9 290X is known to be very, very loud at 100%
 
@Bob I'd bet that an Atom server with an SSD is pretty damn quiet :D
 
Out of the box, they are not configured to operate at 100%, more like 40%
 
Bob
2:50 PM
> The problem is that if I save it to disk and re-open it in Acrobat, that file cannot be used to save and submit the form field data to the web server, as far as I know. (Or can it?)
 
55% under load in Uber mode, which allows a fan speed override all the way up to 100%
 
Bob
Depending on how it's designed? Potentially, yes.
 
@Bob Hmm. How?
O_O
could I use IE itself to download a copy of the PDF (it would pass all the cookies, the UA, etc., so the download would work), save it to a temp file, modify it with AcroExch.PDDoc, then use AxAcroPDFLib.AxAcroPDF.LoadFile, then click the save button in IE?
 
Bob
Not a save button in IE.
Acrobat (and Reader) can submit forms.
 
the save button in IE is a custom <input type="submit"> button with JS attached that needs to be manually "clicked" as part of the test
so what I'm saying is I want IE to submit the form
but if the AxAcroPDF.LoadFile API doesn't reload the page, that should work!
open webpage -> download PDF -> modify PDF -> LoadFile -> click button
 
Bob
2:55 PM
> a button on the webpage (using IE automation) to serialize the form fields to XML
:\
I thought you were using the Adobe forms submission stuff.
FormsCentral, IIRC
 
I don't know what the backend uses, but the frontend has XML in a div that appears to be some kind of "PDF Bridge" based on the comment
 
3:29 PM
Hi guys, anyone around? We are considering, at GD.SE, easing the migration of questions that are about how to make X software do Y thing (we are actually discussing if they belong at all in our site). Here's the meta discussion. I would like to know what you think about these questions, and how you'd feel about having more of them migrated to your site.
 
@Yisela Personally, I'd welcome questions like that
 
@OliverSalzburg that's good to hear!
we took these questions in while in beta, because we really needed the traffic, but now they are growing and growing and we are a little divided on the subject
 
@OliverSalzburg Id say lets migrate it then!
use that question as a test item..
and greetings rooters
 
I don't see why you want to get rid of these questions though. Seems like a well-maintained collection of low-skill Q&As could prevent the questions from being re-asked
Also you'd have something to close dupes against
Especially if certain types of "simple" questions keep coming up, they could be a great vehicle to draw people into the site (or have it noticed in the first place)
 
well, we've had so many, they should all be answered by now. We created some go-to questions that we use to redirect new users, but the background issue is, really: "Are these on-topic?"
 
3:40 PM
We recently had a similar topic come up on meta IIRC
-4
Q: Basic shell question migrated to SuperUser?

Charlie MartinSo this question sudo command won't run from script was migrated to SuperUser. The question is really basic: why isn't my command in my path when I run it with sudo? This accepted answer Preferred location for "shell scripting" questions says "consider who is asking the question." This makes se...

 
taking a look
well, first line already gives me more to think about: power users vs new users
 
From my personal experience, I recently found the solution to a basic question of mine on GD. Can't find the specific one, but it was a dupe of graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/8082/…
 
but that would be on topic for you too, right?
 
@Yisela I'm pretty sure, yeah
 
not trying to find reasons to migrate! just observing. We overlap with so many sites, if we got too picky we would end up with nothing :)
 
3:45 PM
superuser has sometimes a too wide topicality range because we were one of the first sites on the network
when we were uncertain if there would be umpteen sites back in the past, we allowed almost anything computery, even stuff that's on-topic for SO/SF
graphics are computery so we even allowed questions that would be good fit for your site
 
Generally, I like "simple" questions as they are usually helpful to a very wide audience. The easier the question, the higher the score
 
it's hard to change the topicality to be more specific after we've previously allowed anything, though
 
superuser thrives in the chaos, I honestly don't know how you do it, it's really admirable
@allquixotic same thing happens to us
 
sometimes SU is the dumping ground for questions that other sites don't want -- as long as those questions are good questions, I'm not sure I really care though ;p
the problem we had for ages was SO was dumping us horrible questions
 
@OliverSalzburg Also completely agree, as a user frequently looking for (easy, quick) answers. However with graphic design you don't normally have one solution - we get long, super detailed and slightly subjective answers
 
3:49 PM
@Yisela sounds like the kind of answer I like to write :P
 
@allquixotic me too :D
but it's not as lineal, lots of dupes with degrees of variation
 
we solve our problems here by barking at them until they surrender, apparently (see star wall)
 
hahaha
 
@Yisela In any case, please open a question on [metasu] before you start sending an unusual amount of questions our way. Just so non-chat users have a chance to contribute to the discussion as well :)
 
I was going to say I'm glad I wasn't barked at, but saying that could prompt it
 
3:51 PM
what is the friggin shorthand for meta.su?
Oh!
 
@OliverSalzburg of course! we have just began to discuss this again
 
Cool :)
 
low quality (with very little effort) questions should be politely nuked everywhere :)
rephrase: politely put on hold
 
I think we try to be a fairly nice community, so we would tend towards being optimistic and trusting when another community proposes forking a bunch of questions over on us -- we would only get annoyed later, in the unusual event that said community might start heaping bad questions on our plate
like, we were happy to take migrations from SO (and still are), but when those migrations were bad up to a significant percentage, we had to talk about it with them
 
Yep. We have been migrating, but I think we've been fairly decent
thanks for your replies, this helps a lot
 
4:03 PM
@Bob Can I get an upboat on my SO q to bump it to the frontpage for another 0.323 ms? It's for work, so I kinda... :S
0
Q: How to access full Adobe Acrobat AcroExch COM API from Internet Explorer embedded object?

allquixoticI have the following situation: Internet Explorer 9 on Windows 7 SP1 32-bit Adobe Acrobat Professional version 10 A webpage with code like this: <object data="foo.pdf" src="foo.pdf"> Given that: The default PDF reader on the system is Adobe Acrobat Adobe Reader's browser plugin is suppress...

a coworker thinks you can do something with the hwnd to get at the PDDoc, but I'm skeptical
 
Bob
@allquixotic there ya go
does an upvote really bring it up?
 
@Bob Yes.
5
Q: Upvoting of a question should bump it to the front page

sthWhen I upvote a question I do so because I think it's a good question. Other people would benefit from seeing the question or maybe be able to add important answers. To increase exposure of upvoted questions, I suppose that upvotes should bump a question to the top of the front page. This would ...

 
Bob
@allquixotic so a not-really-but-kinda
I normally sit on the active tab, not the actual front page :P
 
@Bob the front page is the hot tab IIRC
a lot of users sit there
what is with Acrobat-related help forums mangling "document" into "doent"?
I get why, but it's stupid substring parsing like Yahoo's buttbuttination
it's annoying
> I have looked at the doentation
 
Bob
just went from 700+ tabs to 314
mem usage has not gone down at all
I swear FF is actually slower now
 
4:14 PM
:/
it's probably trying to come to grips with the number of plugins and scripts
 
Bob
@allquixotic not many of those
and they're synced across desktop and laptop, while only desktop has this massive memory leak
 
Bob
4:37 PM
huh.
going through old tabs, I really don't see why this was closed/deleted => superuser.com/questions/821581/…
:\
it's a decent enough question with a great answer
and the other answers are on point enough that it's really a stretch to call it too broad
 
0
Q: Can devices connected to a Wi-Fi router communicate with devices connected to an associated Wi-Fi repeater?

KflyngIf I connect a Wi-Fi repeater to my existing network, can devices connected to the original router connect to devices connected to the repeater? For example, if my laptop is on the router, can I see a printer on the repeater network. I’m using Windows mainly, but I also use Linux from time to ti...

A repeater is really nothing more than a wireless network switch.
 
Bob
s/switch/hub/
well, depends on the repeater type... most I've seen are the dumb ones
 
Mine (NETGEAR WN2000RPTv3) is a switch
It's not a dumb retransmitter of the same signal, it transmits a new AP
It's really still nothing more than a layer 2 switch, though.
Not seen a layer 1 repeater, though.
So if I were to go the cheap route and use a regular router that I already have as a repeater, would it work the same way? Or should I go with the repeater? — Kflyng 7 mins ago
It would work the same way. The router is a layer 3 device (and may operate on higher layers), but most can act as a layer 2 switch/bridge just like a repeater, disregarding higher layers of the OSI stack. — DragonLord 1 min ago
Am I right?
 
5:33 PM
@DragonLord yeah, you can configure a router to just be a layer 2 switch in most cases, unless they intentionally hide advanced features from the user in the config pages
 
Bob
5:54 PM
Down to 14 tabs, memory usage still ridiculous.
Explicit allocations are better, but they only account for ~70%
 
 
2 hours later…
7:54 PM
woof
3
 
@JourneymanGeek Hello
 
I'm up early but I left work 2 hours early, had dinner at 6 and went to sleep ;p
 
Let's say I want to login to my bank account and I have 1 hotspot that I know is eavesdropping on me. But I have my smartphone on me with mobile data package. Would it be safe to use smartphone just to login to bank account but then immediately switch to hotspot (which is faster) to continue surfing?
Since I am past login, they won't be able to sniff password?
 
you should get logged out if that happens
 
And if it doesn't?
 
7:59 PM
its insecure
 
I have been changing IPs in the middle when used different accounts and all was good.
Like Gmail as well. It was unable to detect IP change after I refreshed.
 
@Boris_yo The session cookie could get intercepted.
 
@DragonLord Intercepted = sniffed?
 
Yes
 
And what then? Planted in sniffer's PC to login?
Or decrypted for password?
 
8:02 PM
In theory and in practice, yes
The session cookie doesn't contain the password, it contains a token indicating to the server "this user is logged in"
 
Adn then sniffer can use same IP I am currently on (his IP) to further manipulate session?
 
I believe so
That's why these communications are typically over HTTPS
 
Has woof literally replaced every form of hello in this room?
4
 
For the webmasters, since Google likes changing webpages
 
8:14 PM
 
8:43 PM
Yea...
 
@CanadianLuke woof?
4
;p
(Seems to have.)
 
You want it to stop miao? ;p
 
Right meow, dammit! Nah, I don't care. Just a useless observation
 
8:57 PM
;p
(I think it was a bit of a running joke, which rather ironically, I completely missed)
 
woof is the new ahh
 

« first day (1680 days earlier)      last day (3345 days later) »