« first day (1254 days earlier)      last day (3375 days later) » 

12:02 AM
@Onlyheisgood. I believe you are finding a false association between Newton's Laws of Motion and re-applying them to Christian ethics, thereby taking the Laws of Motion completely out of context. Alas, one of the weaknesses of the English language, or any natural language, is that it uses the same wording for many different things. It is a common human error and thus forgiveable, but you should realize that applying laws of motion to ethics really doesn't make any sense.
4
@BleedingFingers Your name scares me.
 
@DoubleU haha :)
 
@BleedingFingers Why are you called that?
@BleedingFingers I see you are a moderator of the islam stack exchange.
I always misread al-Islamy as "Salami".
 
had roughly explained it before in the I.SE chatroom. Not, the best display name
 
@BleedingFingers So, why is your name Bleeding Fingers? Although the name gives a very disturbing imagery, it is still very interesting.
 
but a kinda appreciation for what the human fingers go through and their importance (yeah you can call it crude ;) )
@DoubleU haha, that's interesting ;)
 
12:09 AM
@BleedingFingers Since this is the Christianity.SE chatroom, on the topic of Christianity, there are blasphemous words and minced oaths for Christ or God, such as "Gazooks" for "God's hooks".
The underlying belief is that the man on the cross is Jesus Christ, who is also God. Hence the term, God's hooks, is profanity.
 
i don't follow, how is it profane? elaborate?
 
@BleedingFingers It is profane, because it uses God's name in vain.
 
@DoubleU is the underlying belief profane or is it that term?
 
@BleedingFingers I'm not sure, but I think it is the underlying belief that the term is referring to.
@BleedingFingers A stronger, modern-day profanity is "Oh, my god".
 
@DoubleU that too!?! :o
 
12:21 AM
1
Q: What was the banquet of chestnuts?

user10154It is supposed that at some point in Vatican history an event took place commonly referred to as the banquet of chestnuts. However this story is doubted and discounted in many quarters. Is there any archival evidence which may allow one to study this occurrence further?

 
@DoubleU You say that it is a false association. Yet the "Lord of the Objects" is indeed the "Laws of Motion".
Perhaps learning the meaning of the word Elohim would help you. (blueletterbible.org/search/…)
What power does not come from Motion?
 
12:36 AM
@BleedingFingers Yep. That's why you should be careful when using it in the United States.
 
Now for the record I do believe the Lord to be a greater expression then these simple Laws. However I do believe that Motion and these laws are the expression that we can see and experience his true understanding from.
Eye for eye, life for life, tooth for tooth (opposite equal reactions)
"He who leads into captivity shall go into captivity; he who kills with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints." (Revelation 13:10 NKJV)
More opposite and equal reactions.
Forgive us our sins as we forgive those that sin against us.
Do to another as you would do to yourself.
This is how the Law was summarized.
 

« first day (1254 days earlier)      last day (3375 days later) »