@wythagoras Right, the reason is that the post was edited directly after the edit was suggested. So the suggestion is no longer considered. I don't know what happens to it eventually. Usually, one can't edit a post without approving or rejecting previously suggested edits, but something went differently here.
They're using multiple accounts, and a large 'snowshoe' proxy network to distribute them evenly across many different hosts. The spam system does quickly hone in on networks when users spam-flag something into oblivion (it's one of the strongest signals we have) - they're just coming from all ove...
^ Tim Post says he has plans to explore integration between SpamRam and SmokeDetector.
I can't imagine that SE would give unvetted (well unvetted by them) users direct access to something that feeds directly into their network level spam blockers. I'd imagine that everyone with SD privs would either have to be a) elected or b) sign an agreement similar to the moderator agreement or c) both
Integration with the SE Spam system would mean the power to feedback on SD posts would be beyond even what network moderators have atm in certain aspects
@ArtOfCode
But yes, smokey at SE network level would be amazing
It has the potential to curb spam at an even more effective rate then what it currently does, and currently it does so at unprecedented speeds and accuracy already
But its nice that the SE team acknowledges that this project is running well enough and is effective enough to be worthy of being integrated with the network level SE spam blocker
@ArtOfCode what would be nice is to have a statistic for every privileged user with all the feedback they've given and how much of it was disputed / disputed by admin / valid
> Pattern-matching website in body, pattern-matching website in title ---------- Title - Position 1-27: bestandroiddatarecovery.co Body - Position 1-27: bestandroiddatarecovery.co
Yeah. Smokey is the same bot in both rooms - it's not two separate instances. The only differentiation in metasmoke is between "stuff that smokey passes to metasmoke" and "stuff that comes from review".
Yep, the same would happen if you fed back twice in one room. Chat feedback is grouped on username, so if your username is the same in both rooms, everything appears under that username in one place on metasmoke.
If your username is different or keeps changing then it becomes a little more difficult to keep track of, but the one user who often does that is not on a list of people to worry about :)
Anyway, I could just keep a manual list of usernames and check all of them.
They're using multiple accounts, and a large 'snowshoe' proxy network to distribute them evenly across many different hosts. The spam system does quickly hone in on networks when users spam-flag something into oblivion (it's one of the strongest signals we have) - they're just coming from all ove...
@Undo Depends. Ideally, I'd like to see it done so that the system can see as few changes as possible, because the setup we have works and is familiar. That kind of system will get us much better feedback than a new one that's buggy or clunky or unfamiliar.