« first day (278 days earlier)      last day (3546 days later) » 

12:22 AM
 
@Doorknob Seconded
 
1:10 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: RENDERING TEXTURES HELP! on blender.stackexchange.com
 
 
4 hours later…
5:36 AM
translate: test
 
test
 
test: test
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: BEST NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT FOR BODYBUILDING on meta.stackexchange.com
 
 
1 hour later…
7:23 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: LEXICAL ANALYSIS on cs.stackexchange.com
 
8:22 AM
translate: συνολικά ασυναρτησίες
 
total gibberish
 
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: TOR ERROR PERMISSION ISSUE on askubuntu.com
 
8:46 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword detected: nike air max thea danmark on ux.stackexchange.com
 
9:07 AM
@Undo I would prefer to see the titles in the post; then you can (in most cases) immediately see whether it is really spam or not, without having to visit the post/look at the alt-text.
 
9:28 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: SIMRANK FOR COMPUTING SIMILARITY on cs.stackexchange.com
 
10:08 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: SELECT QUERY WITH MANY-ON-MANY TABLE on stackoverflow.com
 
10:34 AM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: BARCODE SCANNER ADVICE NEEDED on superuser.com
 
someone online?
 
 
2 hours later…
12:21 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Bad keyword detected: all problem solution baba ji+91-9815331734 on gaming.stackexchange.com
 
 
1 hour later…
1:49 PM
@Undo Why does Firestorm have to have a gibberish-string at the end of a URL? e.g. http://firestorm.erwaysoftware.com/flags/view/5/ASZ4MiU - why doesn't /flags/view/5 work?
 
2:18 PM
@Doorknob The idea is that that's a presigned link. /flags/5 works if you're logged in (and soon only if you created the flag), but in /flags/view/x/yyyy, x is the flag ID and yyyy is the password to view it.
Because I figure people don't want everyone being able to see their flags just by guessing URLs.
 
@Undo Can't you just see everybody's flags on /flags anyway?
 
As of now, that's going to change sometime.
 
ok
Wouldn't it be more efficient to be able to create public flags, so everybody doesn't have to type their own {plagiarism / something} flag all the time?
 
My theory is that it's best for cases like roboreviewing, we can use the table thing to list bad reviews. But yeah, we could do templates and stuff.
gtg now, cya
 
2:38 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: VIDEO ON FACEBOOK NOT WORKING on webapps.stackexchange.com
 
 
4 hours later…
6:43 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] All-caps title: CONTINUE HANDLER FOR NOT FOUND on stackoverflow.com
 
7:15 PM
[Blaze] answer flagged by ProgramFOX: stackoverflow.com/a/25454024
[Blaze] answer flagged by ProgramFOX: stackoverflow.com/a/25453963
[Blaze] answer flagged by ProgramFOX: stackoverflow.com/a/25454033
 
7:55 PM
@Undo Is the pecl_http extension enabled on your server? I'm adding a Blaze feature to flag questions, but now I actually read the API-returned JSON, which was not yet necessary to check whether an answer link is valid (I have put an error_message check there, but that is actually not very useful as file_get_contents would return false if it isn't a valid link).
But file_get_contents returns just a lot of UTF-8 junk which json_decode cannot parse. So I'm thinking of using the HttpRequest class (perhaps that solves the problem), and that is included in the pecl_http extension, so that's why I'm asking.
 
@ProgramFOX Why not use cURL?
 
@hichris123 I have tried that, but I got SSL certificate issues.
 
You're getting the JSON from the SE API, correct?
 
Yep
 
8:04 PM
... and by disabling the verification of the certificates, you leave the door open to potential MITM attacks, which SSL/TLS otherwise aims to protect against. DON'T DO THIS! — Bruno May 14 '12 at 0:46
And that's what happens here. VERIFYPEER has been set to 0.
 
Meh.
I mean sure, it should be fixed... but it's not vital.
We're not accessing anything private... and people probably aren't going to MITM an EC2 instance.
 
hey, is API 3.0 (or whatever) public yet?
 
@Seth 2.2, yes.
 
Yes, it isn't really vital, but I thought it was worth asking about the pecl_http. If that is enabled, then it can be avoided.
 
@hichris123 The one used with the apps?
 
8:09 PM
Got to go now, see you!
 
@Seth Yes. It includes write access.
@ProgramFOX ... or I could just poke @Undo to fixy things.
cya.
 
Oh cool.
 
Oh, @ProgramFOX is a member of the GH group now. :D
 
8:27 PM
Did a little cleanup on signup.php.
 
8:55 PM
[Blaze] answer flagged by hichris123: stackoverflow.com/a/25455392
 
9:47 PM
@Undo Hmm... wishes me know Ruby to work on it
 
 
1 hour later…
11:09 PM
@ProgramFOX if it isn't I can enable it, lemme check
it's not enabled atm, if you really need it we can try to enable it
@hichris123 pulling...
pulled
uh I think you broke something
reverting...
reverted
@hichris123 ^
git is awesome
 
11:31 PM
Full working copy, bugs and all, at erwaysoftware.com/blaze-cutting-edge
 

« first day (278 days earlier)      last day (3546 days later) »