user76284

general recent conversations

Discussion on answer by Arno: What do…

Imported from a comment discussion on politics.stackexchange.c...

user76284

May 7 01:01

@MisterMiyagi He didn't claim such. He posted that link as an answer to my request for quotes. Obviously without having read it.

user76284

May 7 01:01

@MisterMiyagi No, he didn't.

user76284

May 7 01:01

@MisterMiyagi No, he didn't.

user76284

May 7 01:01

@JochenGlueck "As the report is not publically available, you can't expect Arno to quote the statements" Then why did Arno post it as an answer to my request for quotes? You feel obligated to cover for Arno, but you're doing a risible job.

user76284

May 7 01:01

@JochenGlueck Quote the racist statements by leading AfD politicians.

user76284

May 7 01:01

@Arno There's no such quotes in there.

user76284

May 7 01:01

"enourmous amount of racist statements by leading AfD politicians" Can you quote them?

Discussion on answer by nick012000: H…

Imported from a comment discussion on politics.stackexchange.c...

user76284

May 7 00:53

@haxor789 Yes. They were Communist regimes lead by Communist parties lead by committed Communists. Post-Deng CCP, I'll grant, is only nominally Communist. And that's precisely why they're successful: they abandoned Communism in all but name.

user76284

May 7 00:53

@haxor789 "didn't call themselves communists" Yes they did. Your historical denialism is par for the course for a Marxist, but fools no one.

user76284

May 7 00:53

@haxor789 Communist regimes were miserable totalitarian dictatorships. Period. No amount of Marxist obfuscation from your part will ever change that.

user76284

May 7 00:53

@haxor789 Mises is totally right. Communism is social misery. Communism is also a dictatorship, as you very well know, so why are you whining about that?

user76284

May 7 00:53

@haxor789 "none of what you mention there is actually connected to socialism" Yes it is.

user76284

May 7 00:53

@haxor789 More Marxist obfuscation I'd expect from you. This is what Mises said: "Still others, in full knowledge of the evil that Fascist economic policy brings with it, view Fascism, in comparison with Bolshevism and Sovietism, as at least the lesser evil." He's absolutely right, of course.

user76284

May 7 00:53

@haxor789 Despite your Marxist obfuscation attempts (you've admitted you're a Marxist), Hitler was a socialist. See The Vampire Economy: Reimann discusses the effects of heavy regulation, inflation, price controls, trade interference, national economic planning, and attacks on private property.

Discussion on answer by haxor789: Acc…

Imported from a comment discussion on philosophy.stackexchange...

user76284

Mar 5 01:08

That's Communism in a nutshell.

user76284

Mar 5 01:08

user76284

Mar 5 01:07

There's a reason why Communist states imprison their own ordinary citizens inside their borders. People lose their lives trying to escape from Communist states, not move to them.

user76284

Mar 5 01:06

@haxor789 Again, a Communist state is a state controlled by Communists. I engage with real-world things, people, and consequences. Not your imagination and delusions.

user76284

Mar 5 01:05

Which is a vast concentration of power and slavery on a national scale.

user76284

Mar 5 01:04

I care about the real world, and the real-world consequences of Communist ideology.

user76284

Mar 5 01:04

I don't care about your fictitious made-up imaginary utopia.

user76284

Mar 5 01:03

A Communist state is a state controlled by Communists. Simple as.

user76284

Mar 5 01:02

Or are you going to claim none of them were "Real Communists™" and so forth?

user76284

Mar 5 01:01

@haxor789 Why would it be "iffy"? They were firmly under the control of Communists.

user76284

Mar 5 00:58

Every Communist state practices slavery on a national scale.

user76284

Mar 5 00:54

"even capitalist businesses engage in economic planning" Evidently, you don't know what the term "economic planning" means in this context.

Once again, you show that you have *absolutely no idea* what you're talking about.

user76284

Mar 5 00:53

I'm just not as gullible as you are in thinking Wokepedia is an authoritative source. Did you learn anything in school?

user76284

Mar 5 00:52

@haxor789 Woke is just an accurate description, and no one's "afraid of encyclopedias".

user76284

Mar 5 00:51

For those reading this conversation who are interested (not haxor789, who's a coping Marxist ideologue), see also The role of anti-capitalism in Hitler's world view and Hitler’s views on private property and nationalization.

user76284

Mar 5 00:49

@haxor789 Yes, that you think Wokepedia is an authoritative source on anything speaks volumes on your gullibility.

user76284

Mar 5 00:44

@haxor789 Yes it did. Again, read The Vampire Economy (1939) for a description of Hitler's socialist policies and economic planning. Written by none other than a Marxist economist and communist resistance fighter.

user76284

Mar 5 00:43

The fact that you're gullible enough to quote Wokepedia as an authority speaks volumes.

user76284

Mar 5 00:42

See *Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning* (https://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0385511841):

> They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free …

user76284

Mar 5 00:39

@haxor789 Low-effort projection.

user76284

Mar 5 00:38

What do you mean by "horse-paste crowd"?

Are you unaware that ivermectin is widely used for humans, and has been used that way for decades, and got the Nobel Prize for its use as such, and is on WHO's list of essential medicines?

Do you call water "horse drink" and oats "horse food"?

Ironic how it's *you* who fell for misinformation, not the people you mock as gullible. You should self-reflect on that.

user76284

Mar 5 00:36

@haxor789 Right. And not being a Marxist doesn't mean he wasn't a socialist.

user76284

Mar 5 00:30

@haxor789 They are socialist, and Hitler sung praises for socialism. Just not Marxism (which is what you support).

user76284

Mar 5 00:28

You're coping because you're a socialist but don't like Hitler.

user76284

Mar 5 00:27

You mean a socialist economy with heavy regulation, inflation, price controls, trade interference, national economic planning, and attacks on private property.

user76284

Mar 5 00:26

The war started in late 1939. Obviously, you don't know what you're talking about.

user76284

Mar 5 00:25

@haxor789 You're coping.

user76284

Mar 4 23:57

@JimmyJames Read The Vampire Economy (1939) for a description of Hitler's socialist policies and economic planning. Written by none other than a Marxist economist and communist resistance fighter, by the way.

user76284

Mar 4 23:45

"H. was explicitly anti-socialist." That's a lie on your part. See https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler.

He was anti-Marxist and anti-Bolshevik, not anti-socialist. Marxism is not the only kind of socialism.

user76284

Mar 4 15:57

@haxor789 Imagine citing Wokepedia as an authority on definitions. That’s hilarious.

user76284

Mar 4 15:57

This is a Marxist rant, not an answer.

Discussion on answer by Peter - Reins…

Imported from a comment discussion on law.stackexchange.com/qu...

user76284

Dec 21, 2024 02:44

@wizzwizz4 Again, deflecting to future versions of this post to dodge the fact that you're wrong won't help you. Your claim was about the first version of this post.

user76284

Dec 21, 2024 02:44

@wizzwizz4 "It is if the law says that." That statement cites no law.

user76284

Dec 21, 2024 02:44

@wizzwizz4 "into a larger context" You mean more blather that has nothing to do with legal analysis, which is what this site is about, but merely the author's personal opinions and blovations.

user76284

Dec 21, 2024 02:44

@wizzwizz4 And "influencing politics with a gun is terrorism" isn't that.

user76284

Dec 21, 2024 02:44

@wizzwizz4 I already explained it. You simply refuse to admit you're wrong.