@@aaaaaa - You may want to look to your own questions before doing a down vote run on basis of question quality. Two very high rep users have now responded to that one, you may consider that long standing members don't actually agree with you.
@mattdm - Why do you think spam? The user is active on several SE sites and has answered at least one other question here as well. The answer is obviously link heavy, but given the question is about SEO and images, they're generally relevant.
@AJHenderson - I know that, I've done it before. I just don't want to do it on one user's opinion though, even if it is a user with as much time in and thought as Matt.
It seems to come in waves, but we often get questions with a sample photograph and tags like "photoshop", "post-processing", "photo-editing" and the base assumption that the photographer's primary effort was in a computer technique (possibly just choosing the right software filter — with "filter"...
Currently, the "shopping" close reason says
Questions seeking product or service recommendations are off-topic because they tend to become obsolete quickly. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve.
This is true (especially for camera bodies!) there ...
I have to be honest, I fail to see how training guard dogs is on topic and I'm not even going to get into a discussion about "train to kill" in this context. Posting them may well cause me to consider a ban.
Anyways, got to run off to a dental appointment. I would like the community to step back on the "too broad" concept a bit, some of the best questions I see on other sites have several really well-detailed answers.
@Spiderman There will be a blend, but rich questions that engender several thought out answers are not too broad, the network has a ton of those kinds of questions. We're actually getting a bit dinged on the answer in beta, we're below 2 answers per question and 2.5 or better is good. Many viable answers is a desirable thing.
@Spiderman We're not that edit heavy, I see far more on the Photography site, for example. The problem, I think, is that many of our questions don't necessarily need more than one answer. What I think is happening is that when we get a question that does look to need multiple thoughts, it gets closed as too broad.
I don't agree, and I respect Robert's experience around this, but I haven't had a chance to consider a full answer. There can also be a number of answers all adding up to a whole. We suffer from a lack of a good question:answer ratio, many are 1:1.
@JamesJenkins I think they are, as long as people do a little research first. We donated a bunch of gear to our local Rabbit Rescue that, sadly, exists because so many people just didn't do a bit of homework. Rabbits are awesome pets.
@DerrickK. - I'm more concerned because I think the answer is terrible... Nevertheless, cast the vote. As a mod, unless it's really, really, clear I don't like to shut down a question, but if a couple of votes come along then I lean in.
@JamesJenkins I was in Savannah, Georgia, on Friday, all last week actually, and it was definitely a bit chilly and it's only 2 hours north of Jacksonville.
@DerrickK. - Hmm... 5 out of 10 isn't hardly, though most were legit. Doesn't matter, though, I was simply pointing out that it takes 5 non-moderator votes to close a question and only one close vote was registered. Don't be so hasty, you even had a reasonable answer.
@DerrickK. - One close vote on your question is not a really good reason to delete it, there are plenty of users that have the right to vote to delete and some may have voted to retain it. Try not to over-react.
@CeilingCat - I find it incredibly frustrating that people think keeping rabbits outside is a good thing to do. This poor rabbit may well die of neglect now and that didn't have to happen.
The thing is, we've had them for years an nary a problem. The vet thinks his paw slipped a bit, maybe a little bit of a catch on his fur, and then he panicked. I feel terrible for him, I have no idea how long he was caught with this, but getting it off of him was a real challenge. Fortunately I had a leather coat on or I'd have seriously deep teeth and claw marks.
@Zaralynda I think he'll be okay, just needs time now. Anyways, it was a basic heating duct cover, but rather than slats had a nice fancy pattern. Not bad to look at, getting a bit dated, but the openings were a bit larger than some. It never really occurred to me to even consider that part of.
@NiallC. Well, I went the replacement route (though still need to replace one more). Not only did I get a better look for them, but they no longer eat cats. :)
@DerrickK. - Then imagine how those of us who moderate these sites might feel, given that we're volunteers or, in the case of this site, asked to help. We get all kinds of posts flagged and so posts that are flagged by the automated system and real users are almost always getting deleted on sight. Nothing personal there, it's just the nature of the beast.
@DerrickK. Shouting is unnecessary. I looked at the timeline and the first post was not linked and was deleted. The second post was when the link was added and, as ultimately happened, the answer was undeleted. There's no requirement to get testy about it.
Needless to say, a replacement program is now in the plans. Sadly, and it's a great tragedy for a cat, he's now a little afraid of the vents despite wanting to lie all over that delightful warm air.
PSA to all you pet lovers... I never really thought about it until tonight, but take a look at your vent covers for your heating/AC system if they're on the floor. One of our cats got caught in one today and was hurt. Fortunately, according to the vet, not too badly, but could have been worse.
@MattS. Heh... Thanks for doing it. I have a hard enough time keeping up with the weekly photography contest on the Photography site, I don't think I could really manage two of them.