It wasn't relevant, but just for fun, I threw out a question I thought would be related to his degree. In the context of HCI, what does the word "affordance" mean?
Instead of
User Experience | chat.stackexchange.com
can you change it to
Chat - User Experience | Stack Exchange
or something like that?
I often keep the home page and chat open in tabs. This would make it easier to distinguish the two.
room topic changed to UX Chat: User Experience (ux.stackexchange.com) community chat room: talk about user experience design, user interface design, visual design, usability, accessibility, and any related topics. [ui] [user-experience] [user-interface] [ux]
@BenBrocka Do we need a general reference close reason? I don't remember ever closing a question because it was too simple. The closest one that comes to mind is the floppy disk icon question (but it's not closed, and no one has suggested it should be).
@dnbrv I flagged that request and asked the mods to remove the status-declined tag. The devs should have another look at it, and if they want to decline it, fine, but they should at least post a comment explaining why it was declined.
Yeah, all the information is probably on the site already. I think we can put together an answer that supplants Nielsen as the go-to resource for questions about how to visually distinguish links.
I'm pretty sure that this is an intentional part of the Stack Exchange UX.
Answers are supposed to be standalone, because external sites may go offline, or rename/take down the page linked to. If they primary content of the answer was a link to another site, then that answer is now useless.
Th...
The question strikes me as absurd: I don't have to learn, but I want to know everything! There might be a way to edit it into a useful question about inspiration and galleries, but I would first check to make sure a decent list can't already be found on Google.
@BenBrocka Yeah, it's not literally an exact duplicate, but I figured closing as a dupe of the book question is slightly more helpful than just shutting it down.
In addition -- that's fine. But I don't' want it to supplant what they're doing. (And I'm a little concerned they're just trying to crowd source the work.)
What I'm hearing from all of you is that a moderator should stick to "janitorial" duties (although you don't like that particular term). Does anyone think that moderators are obliged to be involved in "decision making process" and "promoting the site"?