Stack Exchange Lobby

The beginner-friendly chat room for all users on the Stack Exc...
Jul 10 06:43
Btw what you guys are talkin about in this chat . I saw lot of you talking about Javascript, CSS
Jul 10 06:42
@DanGetz The accuracy is 38%
Jul 10 06:24
Yeah , I need geniuses like you mate . To refine that
Jul 10 06:19
@DanGetz I don't know how accurate rate of the data . Ok let me calculate and I will say you after a few minutes
Jul 10 06:16
@asoullikeyou No I have not tried plotting yet . I will try it later.
Jul 10 06:15
@DanGetz I tested it till 2000 numbers . Using programming. sone are valid and some are not .
Jul 10 06:13
With lot of effort and head scratching I came up to this formula . Now I m too tired to refined that . I hope someone will take it further
Jul 10 06:08
I have a question that's Can the formula be refined further to generate more possible prime numbers
Jul 10 06:06
#Dan gatz should I post the possible prime numbers generated by the formula , Here
Jul 10 06:04
@DanGetz I will give a pattern run by code generated by the formula
Jul 10 05:18
Hey everyone! 👋
I’ve been experimenting with a simple scoring formula that tries to predict prime numbers. It combines:

the number of composites in the last few numbers,

the gap from the last known prime,

and a small modulo penalty.


It doesn’t always produce primes, but it often does — especially early on — and seems to follow an interesting structure.

I posted the idea here, but it got closed:
https://math.stackexchange.com/q/5082006/1661757

Could anyone check it out and suggest how I might improve or clarify the post? Appreciate any help!