Stack Exchange
log in

Curious

 Discussion on question by Nabla: How …

Imported from a comment discussion on academia.stackexchange.c...
Curious
Dec 5, 2020 04:59
looks like the bold part of your question is something that is the least relevant for us to read and is best to be omitted. Strange way of using bold face. ;-)
 

 Discussion on question by Henre: Depa…

Imported from a comment discussion on workplace.stackexchange....
Curious
Oct 29, 2020 13:23
Henre, what is your position in the company and in relation to Gust?
Curious
Oct 29, 2020 13:23
Gust got disGUSTed.
 

 Discussion on answer by Jeff: Is it a…

Imported from a comment discussion on academia.stackexchange.c...
Curious
Oct 16, 2020 16:06
@Brondahl if there is a flaw then it's not a proof.
Curious
Oct 16, 2020 16:06
@Brondahl "no one ever knows that their proof is correct..." what?This is mathematics! If you found a proof then you are sure it's correct. That's why it's called proof.
Curious
Oct 16, 2020 16:06
This is withholding too much. Why would he ask if the proof is correct when he knows it? Why wouldn't he suggest that he found a simpler proof? It's always good to state the purpose why he's sending it.
 

 Discussion on question by mikey_john:…

Imported from a comment discussion on superuser.com/questions/...
Curious
Aug 15, 2020 15:37
The best way to compress upscaled video is to just take the original file from which it was upscaled :-)) And the upscaling process is then the "decompression" process :-)
 

 Discussion on question by verdery: Ca…

Imported from a comment discussion on ai.stackexchange.com/que...
Curious
Mar 6, 2020 01:22
define "understand". In the sense of the word as I understand it, computers actually understand nothing.
 

 Discussion on answer by Redd Herring:…

Imported from a comment discussion on travel.stackexchange.com...
Tomas
May 7, 2019 09:19
"I doubt you'd be able to take steel cutlery into the aircraft cabin." - bs. You can always get your spoon there.