fr33

when I see it I let you know if is annoying ;p

@Ivo

I know is 3:44 AM but, haven't got to sleep so...

for me is still night

1 colum, many rows data structure

using linked list it ain't bad, but a linked list of linked list is too much spaghetti code?

inst a graph works with trees and leaves

yes it is

isn't that a graph data structure?

list of vetex which each one contains a list of pointers?

so basically is a list of list?

lol

looks*

look unnecessarily tedious

ohh ok, and for a graph you passing such bunches of trouble... ;D

like are you building an engine, a game, a visual library? What?

What are you trying to acomplish as a whole?

you can always do wrappers if you need exactly a special functionality of a language in your program

like for example pointers, yes good, but in the hands of an inexperienced programer is too dangerous

Yeah, but those areas might sometimes be advantageous at some aspects and sometimes not

BUMP!

lI know it similar to Java, but it is C++ on steroids... Or that's too much...?

isn't the whole point of C# being C# is outwit C++?

thanks tho :)

:L ok, cool, SB is SunBurn, just an game engine made with XNA/C#

Yeah I know you know what it was, just want it to mention it, tho...

Hey bob had you work with XNA/C# specially with SB?

just passing the place the actual space of the variable is, not actually passing a copy (as per argument does) so if the value of variable is modified, the actual variable changes, as opposed with pass-by-arguments (copy)

ha ha, doing C#, cool same here ;)

lol

I remember that & was for reference

reference

ha ha, pointers screw things if use wrongly

ok, at least say yes, no, may be, I think is quite rude, to just leave other people expectation of an answer just hanging in the air ;L

u meant single argument?

get name should be a member function...

right?

but still you want to know if LHS type and RHS match or so to make the call using the object

ok, my bad I thought it was comparison, but is not is initialization

well you just comparing the operator variable with two different others at the time... although I think would be better if you separate the condition in two

had you tested?

seems that it should

why wont the object call wont work as suppose using the unary resolution operator (.)?

use a pointer instead of unary resolution operator?

yes it is, but in that particular case

let me see....

so did you got fixed the problem you had with the list not being a template type or something like that yesterday?

cool

I hope your issues were resolved

Ok, my bad ;L