Neal Conroy

Coronaviruses use RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), which synthesizes complementary RNA strands without the end replication issues found in DNA replication. The coronavirus RdRP initiates replication internally at a 3' RNA end and proceeds to replicate the entire genome from start to finish, maintaining the integrity of the full RNA strand, including its ends.

@ohwilleke and you said BankA will not get in trouble, I think I just said the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act prevents all banks from giving out your exact debt to other banks.

@ohwilleke the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act prevents banks from disclosing your exact debt, but are there not databases that keep track of ranges of debt? I.e., someone that owes $500-$1000, someone that owes $1,000 to $5,000? And that alert system can be used to help banks know if their customers of how big of a fraudster they are. And can these databases/alerts distinguish people who refuse to pay their debts from people that just owe a lot of debt and slowly pay into it?

@ohwilleke you said BankA will never sue BankB because they have to sue humans instead. What if BankB contacted BankA and said we know person owes you a lot, and they have that much in their accounts with us, if you can send us the exact amount they owe you, we'll transfer that from their account with us to pay your debts... Well, hopefully BankB won't get in trouble for that... Though I suspect if anything, BankA will get in trouble for telling BankB your exact debt... Thoughts?

open an account with another bank, after already being marked a fraudster, can the new banks be alerted that? Even though they won't know the exact amount you owe, but can know a range? Would they know which bank you were considered a fraud to?

@ohwilleke yes it happened to Kyle Rittenhouse who relocated to Florida, I guess a private investigator found his sister's address, and she wasn't trained to not say "I'm his sister" and so the judge said the lawsuit can proceed. But I guess my last question should be about once a bank considers you a fraudster, how can it communicate with other banks that you are a fraudster? Other banks that you have money in, won't snitch on you to say you have money in their bank, right. But when you try to

transferred $42,000 from my dad's annuity to her bankB, I'm thinking of contacting the credit card company to say she deposited $42,000, but sounds like they can't do anything if they don't know her address.

@ohwilleke it was the judge that said my lawsuit can't proceed. I didn't know the landlords addresses, so just mailed to the address where I lived at, and a tenant in the residence signed it, but judge said since that's not the landlord who signed, case can't proceed. Also tried the landlord's mother's house, where someone said no 1 with that name has ever lived there. Now in the case where my dad's wife #6 owes a credit card $27,000, they don't know her address. But 8 years later when she

@ohwilleke I think I tried suing my landlord for my security deposit 10 years ago, and he doesn't sign the lawsuit to acknowledge he received it, so, my lawsuit could not proceed. This is small claims court in Illinois.

@ohwilleke you say BankA sues person rather than BankB. Person would just withdraw all their money from BankB... Also there is no such lawsuit. When the process server rings your doorbell, you tell them they got the wrong address or don't know any person who lives there. Or you don't even answer the doorbell. And certainly don't sign anything. So the way I see it, Banks would be suing other Banks silently instead..

@Trish but I didn't say Bank will confirm to me if they marked someone as a fraudster.

@Trish perhaps you meant to say BankA will never mark person as a fraudster? Another story that I didn't mention, few years before my dad died another woman got a hold of his credit card and made charges for years, so, eventually, she phone called my dad to say she got labeled as a fraudster... I would be surprised if BankA would not mark someone as a fraudster for refusing to pay $27,000 in credit card debt.

Well thank you @ohwilleke I guess more banks ought to merge. I wonder what famous stories are where BankC bought BanksA and BankB heh and found out about the debts.

@Trish I said I told BankB that the fraudster owes BankA $27,000. But now I'm wondering how can BankB confirm this from BankA? As ChatGPT tells me BankB will never phone call or e-mail BankA to confirm it. Well, isn't ChatGPT right? Sounds like if BankB didn't already know someone is a fraudster, they have no way of finding out after. Anyways my credit score is 799 and I've been unemployed for over a year.

I don't have any specific advice requests @Trish. Like my other threads, I'm fishing for example stories. Stories where you owed BankA a lot of money, but BankA knows you have that money in BankB, then, does BankA have to take you to court, or can BankA get BankB to transfer it over...

@Trish what legal advice? These are theoretical questions on how banks can find out other banks that people owe debt to.

So if BankA knew you had a lot of money in BankB, would BankA contact BankB about it? Would BankB be willing to freeze your accounts, and let BankA take you to court for it? I feel like if you owed BankA $500 or even $1,000, BankA won't do anything because the amount of lawyer fees it takes to litigate you won't be worth it. The real question is if BankB's willing to freeze your account and transfer it to BankA without BankA taking you to court.

(continued) ChatGPT tells me BankB will never e-mail or phone call BankA to confirm that she owes BankA $27,000. I'm wondering if she had her account with BankB before she owed BankA (the credit card side) $27,000. 1st, BankB responded that her owing $27,000 to BankA has nothing to do with us. Then I replied it was to support my argument that she was a fraudster person, then BankB replied we sent this story to their fraud department.

@Cadence my dad's wife #6 opened a credit card before they divorced in 2011. Kept paying the minimum. My dad hired a lawyer to send the credit card bank a copy of their divorce date so he doesn't have to be eligible for charges after their divorce, which is 100% of it I believe. Later a few months before my dad died, wife #6 wiped out his bank of $42,000 to her bank. But she put his name in it to make it look like he was transferring his own money. I contacted her bank to mark her as a fraudster person, and even told them she owes BankA $27,000 from 2016. But... (continued).

the story with owing $27,000 to a credit card side of a bank is where person kept paying the minimum required until the bank finally disabled their spending. Then years later the person has accounts with other banks, and then I try to tell the other banks that they owe another bank $27,000, so other banks already marked them as a fraudster person.

@ohwukkeje 1 what about the concept of being marked a fraudster by a bank? If Bank A marks you as a fraudster, then when you try to open a bank account with Bank B, couldn't Bank B be notified that you are already marked as a fraudster by another Bank?

Heh, I would love to hear some famous stories where Bank B froze a person's accounts, because it found out they owed Bank A a lot of money.

No response @Mithoron ?

No response @Mithoron ?

@BuckThorn edit it to what, exactly? If not, Andselisk seems to always edit my questions for me.

No response, @Mithoron

@BuckThorn I was a computer science minor, I was typing questions like "if statements." If A, then do B, if C, then do D, etc.

So @Mithoron, how does Porphyrin's answer in that thread you posted, answer my question here on colors?

I don't know how to make this more clear. The color of emission for fluorescence, has to be a different color for emission of phosphorescence, or the color of emission of phosphorescence, has to be a different color than emission of fluorescence, but they do not have to be different than the color of absorption.

@Maurice I was trying to distinguish, from absorbed color. Not where absorbs light A and emits light A for both fluorescence and phosphorescence. So, absorbs light color A, fluoresces color B and phosphoresces color C. Or at least, emits B or C, can absorb B or C too.

Now, a little update about a previously closed question of mine - what compounds can do phosphorescence and anti-Stokes/upconversion at the same time? After talking to a pchem professor, I got an answer none of you here have helped me on... And it's that upconversion wants hotter temperatures, while phosphorescence wants colder temperatures. So the challenge is finding a center point temperature range for compounds. So looks like for most cases, this is going to be a contradiction. I had known phosphorescence wanted colder temperatures but did not know upconversion wanted hotter.

@Mithoron I don't know why people are such bullies here. For my 3 some years here, I never insulted anyone. In real life, I'm an incel-virgin, never been kissed by a girl before. I'm oppressed by oppressors every where I go. Life's tough.

@Mithoron I wasn't disputing that the wave-particle duality is where 1 is more accurate than the other. Since both are valid models then both are valid answers.

@BuckThorn you know Ivan Neretin's response for the particle version of light says 0% hits the nucleus whereas Blacklight MG's wavelength-model said 100%.

So I (currently) have 4 non-comment answers. Earlier, I had 4 votes to close this thread, needing 1 more vote to close. Now, I have 4 non-comment answers, which means if a 5th person voted to close in time, it would have prevented the below 4 answers. Shaking-my-head, makes you wonder if it's the same people voting to close my threads all over. Also makes you wonder how the magic 5 number came to be, and how it has changed in proportion to the population of this stack.

@IvanNeretin that's for solids and liquids, right? What about hydrogen and helium?

@Poutnik I was never aware of a particle-wave duality for protons and nucleus, only for photons. So for light, does the answer depend on light as particle, vs. light as waves?

@Poutnik the en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inelastic_scattering#Photons only talks about photons hitting "matter" with no specificity on electrons vs. nucleus. Mithoron you're not by chance referring to the wavelength model, when you said balls, and not balls or waves? In this title I purposely used the word light rather than photons or wavelengths.

@Poutnik out of the 3 elastic scattering examples you listed as well as inelastic scattering, which 1 hits the nucleus the most? All tied?

So there are multiple types of hits @Poutnik? What are the types of hits?

@Mithoron what's my flaw?

@Poutnik unfortunately simpler topics just make the question more vague. I'm trying to make them "more focused."

@Poutnik the 1st 1 is to make them as focused as possible which is why my title is extremely focused. And my questions tend to have a few questions in them to increase the probability that some of them are legit.

@Mithoron you guys don't give me the benefit of the doubt to show why my posts are not "focused" enough. And then with the same message "were not resolved." And who wants me to give you guys the benefit of the doubt by stop editing?

So what are the issues, @Mithoron.

@NilayGhosh I don't know why the burden of proof is on me to show that they are focused. I'm looking for evidence that they are not focused. These questions are pretty narrow to me.

@Mithoron my question was on how is it not focused, I made it clear as possible, no? I'm surprised it isn't negative votes and someone like porphyrin answered it and people have him good reviews. Weird. As for your last statement, I wasn't asking how many compounds exist, or to list all possible compounds now was I...