Alexander Janssen

true...

why was this migrated from wordpress to sf? serverfault.com/questions/256064/… - funky...

Aloha

aloha

ok, gotta hit the hay. good night

sound like it's hurts. a lot. in your butt.

@ewwhite 4-core server and loadavg of 55? far out

interesting question would be, how many cores does that machine have :)

@ewwhite: loadavg of 55? easily reachable with 48 cores.

something's funky with my keyboard

argh

@eewg

@Iain nice. you got a drive which could use those floppies?

because it's a floppy disk and you can't buy em any more!

@voretaq7 I think he tried to create a vhost on his localhost. or something.

or would that be comment-matter?

Was reading serverfault.com/questions/438892/… and I couldn't find a proper solution. But I started implementing one. It doesn't work yet though. Probably some really stupid error. Would it be OK to submit my not working solution (gist.github.com/e006fa8b3d0127a788c9) to inspire other to improve it and maybe getting it work?

I need a hint.

Aloha

@pauska sounds like fun....

whatever.

narf. serverfault.com/questions/439492/…

(means: the handset wasn't able to retrieve the content from the MMSC - turned out, the URL being sent from the PushProxyGateway was crap, also the secondary PDP context was not configured correctly on the handset9

rertrieve even

when my colleague was trying to retriece an MMS from the MMS-Center today with that 1996 Sharp mobile handset, he got this errormessage in German: lh3.googleusercontent.com/-8nRukg1335Q/UH6eqrAqH2I/AAAAAAAABHY/… - It basically say, literally translated: "win you fail again"

MMS is da ev1l

even though no one uses WAP anymore, MMS is still transported via WAP

Today I was testing WAP1-transport again... It reminded me how good mobile networks are working nowadays. As long as someone doesn't try to send an MMS.

@HopelessN00b could offer a non-stop nyan-cat loop :)

cheers

Here. Take a beer.

@Basil so it's not uplinks, but LAN?

@Basil OUCH!

@HopelessN00b can I trade in my X.25 for your T1? Although my customer offers 20 gbit for the subscribers, they still use a wee old 64 kbit for remote maintenance on some sites.

if i'm lucky I'll get a pre-release by the end of 2013

I'm waiting for the day when Bytemobile/Citrix ports their proxy software to Linux. It's on their roadmap. For years now....

also, that'd involve a cluster FS

@Basil oh, i'd like to churn out my videos via FC. but then again, it'd be overkill for my solaris clients.

sigh

hence: no jumbo frames.

also, the proxy nodes don't have a spare ethernet interface

but $customer is reluctant to gimme a new vlan id and another network.

...yeah, especiallly when the proxy nodes don't have a dedicated storage lan. i need to reuse an existing vlan, which is set to a friggin MTU of 1500

s/git/gbit

man, i deploy my netapps at POPs, we're churning out 20 git/s and transparently serve cached youtube vids - about 50 proxy nodes and all retrieve videos from the netapp. certainly i'm interested in utilizing the portchannel correctly...

only use mode-active

they're doin it wrong

fuck LACP

insane crap

a netapp engineer gave me the source code to a program which calculates which of the lines from the portchannel will be utilized if a certain source ip and port will be used