user2741831

@JonathanReez That's a great idea! I'll create a script myself, but thanks for the offer! Most of my projects are in fact private so its probably better that way, but thanks

@Graham I did infact run a project infected by lazarus malware.They are scary so I'm going to be careful

@Graham genuinly didn't think it was that bad, but you are probably right. Someone writing a little script or AI that seeks out git projects on a dev machine and automatically adds a little script at an unobtrusive spot felt just on the edge of plausible to me.

Nope, you can simply change the git history. completely remake it from scratch if you wish

@JosephSible-ReinstateMonica basically if I send a commit to github on february, I can make it look like its from february

I have to expect all copies of the repo have been tampered with. I don't have aclean rrpo

thanks

since i've done it already

Its probably not even that big of deal

thanks for your help

oh ok

transactions can still be used either way

why would closing out an accounting period need a stored procedure?

I'll probably start rewriting everything tomorrow

not to mention buggy as hell

but that was probably overkill

yeah, so far I was trying to reduce each api call to a single round trip to the database

because doing everything in stored procedure was pain

sort of a hybrid solution between sql and node that still involves a handfull of roundtrips

yeah thats probably how this will go

but thats already almost a stored procedure again

maybe I can try to create a really complex query

since each request is completely independant, I don't think so

serverless just creates and destrys containers as traffic comes in

yeah

since items are handled sequentually

its the distance between the two thats the problem

well I'm not worried about the server or the code being fast enough

each involving 24 items

if things go bad

hard to say since I haven't even made the thing yet, but lets say peak may be 10 a second

just much simpler

like an mmorpg

sort of

trading is very integral to the game

but there may be many transactions a minute, so it may still add up

no just a game

tthats where the problem is. A trade may contain dozens of items on both sides, so for each of those, an owner foreign key may be updated. I could also split the code somewhat, but I think that would make maintainability even worse

@RobertHarvey since the business logic involves loops, it would need a roundtrip on each iteration. So I expect it must impact performance in some way

That may not reflective of actual field performance because of things like autoscaling and the fact that the docker container may be spun up on any machine

This is specific to serverless, where containers may be far apart, so no

@Johanna when they work a job they would have gotten without the education and all the acquired knowledge remains unused

that is a very good argument for fields that are important but not very well paid that I hadn't considered. But what about majors where a large majority of students don't find a position in the same field, ie are unable to make a career out of?

Yeah 100 was too tight. But very nice read

It would't matter since task is limited to 100 years. But yes I guess they would. And they just cant bring anything electronical, so up to lightbulbs is fine

@user535733 Whats the point in even adding exceptions if nobody ever reads them?

Do 10'000 years really make a genetic difference? I thought it was the lack of farming that keep us back

Not sure what you mean by socially. Democracy? Capitalism? Because I'm pretty sure these are consequences of technology and education.

@AlexP I'm pretty sure there were tribes in germany 10'000 years ago

@Treva or is it really that difficult to create a basic battery or flintlock pistol? Because I can see that being dooable in a country full of natural resources like germany