Hub of Reason

General discussion about skeptics.stackexchange.com
Mar 29, 2011 19:38
Still, that is a weak argument, so that if you boil it down to facts, it deflates.
Mar 29, 2011 19:29
I think that is the definition of a weak position: when it can only be defended with a weak argument
Mar 29, 2011 18:17
Ya, I just noticed it in that article. Oi.
Mar 29, 2011 18:15
1
Q: Tags for resources and references

FabianWe have a tag for resources, a tag for references and a tag resources-references. We should have no more than two of them, maybe even only one of them. Any thoughts which of those are the most useful?

Mar 29, 2011 18:15
as in :
Mar 29, 2011 18:15
how do you make a post tag in the markup?
Mar 29, 2011 14:46
You don't want to scare off people that could be quality users, but I think that it is working well so far.
Mar 29, 2011 14:45
It's a bit of a fine line too though
Mar 28, 2011 17:58
@MarkRogers It should be, in any case.
Mar 28, 2011 17:58
@MarkRogers I think that that will be the norm here.
Mar 28, 2011 17:58
@jennyfofenny Nice use of directed quotes. XD
Mar 28, 2011 17:57
ie, jealousy by those that are trying to disprove human-caused climate change.
Mar 28, 2011 17:56
But the more likely reason for that are human failings.
Mar 28, 2011 17:55
Well, some might.
Mar 28, 2011 17:55
And they don't believe that.
Mar 28, 2011 17:54
@jennyfofenny I'm not talking about whether the Earth's climate is changing based on our actions, but whether there is a global conspiracy of scientists.
Mar 28, 2011 17:53
It's not something that can be proven. The onus is on those that say there is a conspiracy to prove that there is one, which is so unlikely as to be silly.
Mar 28, 2011 17:51
@MarkRogers Prove that there isn't a global conspiracy of climate scientists.
Mar 28, 2011 17:50
@MarkRogers It isn't, that said, it's hard to answer, since it's hard to disprove claims like that. It's like proving that god/the invisible pink unicorn/etc exist.
Mar 28, 2011 17:48
It isn't like scientists are all working together in some lock-step way. They are always trying to verify and disprove the findings of each other. It isn't in their self-interest.
Mar 28, 2011 17:47
The whole idea of a conspiracy of the scientific community is flawed.
Mar 28, 2011 17:46
@Borror0 Exactly, amongst other parties.
Mar 28, 2011 17:46
@jennyfofenny Exactly. It was a problem that was foreseen and fixed. It wasn't a hoax.
Mar 28, 2011 17:45
@jennyfofenny If there were other scientists that could disprove those scientists, they would have all the funding that they need.
Mar 28, 2011 17:44
Reading that Question, there is a serious problem in the quote. It mentions the Y2K bug as a hoax, but it was really just a misunderstanding of a collection potentially serious problems that were fixed by a lot of computer scientists.
Mar 28, 2011 17:38
They don't trust science that doesn't agree with them.
Mar 28, 2011 17:37
@Borror0 And yet if there were scientific evidence to back their beliefs/claims, they would jump on them like a wolf on an injured chicken.
Mar 24, 2011 19:08
I think that he means mine.
Mar 24, 2011 19:05
Thanks, Fabian, for the insight.
Mar 24, 2011 19:04
@Fabian Or that.
Mar 24, 2011 19:00
Maybe not quite, but out of scope is out of scope. The more off-topic questions we allow, the more dilute and less useful this site is.
Mar 24, 2011 18:45
I might be over-zealous about OOS though. Others don't seem to be as ardent about it.
Mar 24, 2011 18:45
I honestly love the question, and if it was moved, I wish that there was some way to see that it happened and where it went, but if we accept questions like that, then it opens the door for any of those comparison questions (PC vs Linux vs Mac, iPhone vs Android vs Blackberry vs WP7 vs Palm, Coke vs Pepsi, Cats vs Dogs, etc.)
Mar 24, 2011 18:32
Just more appropriate on another QA site.
Mar 24, 2011 18:32
It's a good question, to be sure.
Mar 24, 2011 18:32
That is just one of the MANY on the subject.
Mar 24, 2011 18:31
10
Q: Dvorak vs QWERTY

titaniumdecoy Possible Duplicate: Which keymap for programmers? Dvorak? A friend of mine is trying to convince me to learn to type in Dvorak. The main reason I would consider switching is to relieve the strain on my hands from long periods of typing. Is it worth the effort to learn a new keyboard ...

Mar 24, 2011 18:30
It wasn't a skeptics question
Mar 24, 2011 18:30
likely to one of the other QA sites.
Mar 24, 2011 18:28
That one should be closed for just about all of the reasons.
Mar 24, 2011 18:27
-1
Q: Why are we told vaccines are efficient in preventing diseases when no studies have been made?

DanielWhy are we told that vaccines are efficient in preventing diseases when not even one Peer-Reviewed Double Blind Study of any vaccine has been done?

Mar 24, 2011 18:27
Suggestion to vote to close:
Mar 24, 2011 14:54
@Borror0 I couldn't believe that "orbs" even made it onto the site, given how much info there is on the subject on the internet.
Mar 24, 2011 14:53
I understand the reason not to, but it would REALLY help if we could do private messages.
Mar 23, 2011 20:39
Oh FSM! That sounds like a GREAT way to go from a splinter to a nasty infection.
Mar 23, 2011 20:39
0
Q: Can bacon actually help to remove splinters?

FarmBoySome claim that bacon can help to remove splinters. Is there any good evidence that this makes sense? For example: susangaer.com: Splinters myhomeremedies.com: Home Remedies for Splinters

Mar 23, 2011 20:36
Generally when you realize that the question really is out of scope.
Mar 23, 2011 20:35
Generally, I think that while you get elevated privileges on questions that you write, they should be used only when the question needs to be withdrawn.
Mar 23, 2011 20:34
Ya, I know.
Mar 23, 2011 20:34
Since it is no longer just the work of the questioner.