Mathematics

Associated with Math.SE; for both general discussion & math qu...
Jun 7, 2020 09:46
Good morning: if anyone of you knows by chance some simple convex geometry/toric geometry, I posted some days ago this bountied question which I really like to understand

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3702221/concavity-and-convexity-from-a-linear-relation

If any of you can help me, I'd really appreciate. Have a nice day and apologize for the spam ;)
Feb 5, 2020 14:30
I know $C^1([a,b]), \left\lVert \cdot\right\rVert_{C^1})$ is not reflexive, and $C^1([a,b])$ is not closed in $C^0([a,b])$
Feb 5, 2020 14:27
How can I prove $(C^1([a,b]), \left\lVert \cdot\right\rVert_{\infty} )$ is not a relfexive space?
Feb 3, 2020 13:16
you obv right
Feb 3, 2020 13:01
I was wondering if there were some inclusions between $L^{p}([0,1])$ and $\mathcal{C}^0([0,1])$, so I thought via nestinf property to start with $L^{\infty}([0,1])$
Feb 3, 2020 13:00
Does it exist an inclusion between $\mathcal{C}^0([0,1])$ and $L^{\infty}([0,1])$? I think no, as we can find non-continuous function in $L^{\infty}([0,1])$ and continuous functions whose norm is not finite (like $log(x)$)... Am i missing something?
Dec 24, 2019 12:52
any hint or explanation would be much appreciate, thanks in advance
Dec 24, 2019 12:50
now, why ho did this is obscure to me
Dec 24, 2019 12:50
he defines it with a $\pm$ saying we choose the sign in such a way there is no integer btween $4^mx$ and $4^m(x+\delta_m)$
Dec 24, 2019 12:49
on fomrula (38), he defines $\delta_m$, which will become later the increment in the incremental rapport
Dec 24, 2019 12:48
hi chat, i'm studying on rudin's book an example of continuous function nowhere differentiabel
Dec 24, 2019 12:47
Jul 13, 2019 13:33
ok, thanks :)
Jul 13, 2019 13:29
@loch you serious? ahahhaah
Jul 13, 2019 13:29
I thought it was same restriction on the set of the endomorphism; I mean, with $\text{End}_R(M)$ is set the of endomorphism od $M$, regarded as a left $R$-module, so it is the set of all maps $M\rightarrow$ made by the action of $R\times M\rightarrow M$, but I'm a bit confused
Jul 13, 2019 13:26
Let $R$ be a ring, $M$ a left $R$-module: what are the differences between End($M$) and $\text{End}_R(M)$?
Jul 13, 2019 13:25
hey chat, I have some notation (and underatanfing) algebraic problems
May 26, 2019 07:33
hey chat, if someone of you knows a bit homogeneous space and want to earn a bounty, please give a look at this question, it would help me alot
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3234925/understanding-projection-of-vector-field-in-homgeneous-spaces
May 17, 2019 19:49
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3229524/killing-vector-fields-in-reductive-homogeneous-spaces

If someone wants to help me understanding some basic stuff about killing vector fields on reductive homogeneous spaces :) sorry for the spam
May 17, 2019 13:44
I misspelt the name, it's pretty common for me ahahah
May 17, 2019 13:42
@user170039 (page 79, I forgot to say sorry )
May 17, 2019 13:37
An introduction to Lie groups and the geometry of homogeneous spaces
May 17, 2019 13:32
Hey chat, I'm studying homogeneous spaces from the book of Arvaniteyergos, but I have a doubt
Consider $M\cong G/H$ a homogeneous reductive ($\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{h}+\mathfrak{m}$) space, and $\pi_{\star,e}:\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow T_o(G/H)$ (where $\mathfrak{m}\cong T_o(G/H)$)
Now, given $X\in \mathfrak{g}$, $\pi_{\star}(X)=X^{\star}_o=\pi_{\star}(X_{\mathfrak{m}})$ (the $\mathfrak{m}$ component), and the author says immediately that $X^{\star}$ is a Killing vector field
Can anyone help me understanding why?
May 7, 2019 12:39
hi chat
May 7, 2019 12:06
(obv other errors, I apologize)
May 7, 2019 12:05
Hi chat, I have some problems with the definition of reductive homogeneous space: we say that a homogeneous space $G/K$ is reductive if there exists a subspace $\mathcal{m}$ of $\mathcal{g}$ such that $\mathcal{g}=\mathcal{m}\oplus \mathcal{k}$, and $Ad(k)\mathcal{m} \subset \mathcal{m}$ $\forall k \in K$ (where $\mathcal{m}$ is the Lie algebra of G, $\mathcal{k}$ of K).
I surely didn′t study enough, but I can′t make" "$Ad(k)\mathcal{m} \subset \mathcal{m}$" make sense
Is it right to read this as "Pick the quotient algebra $\mathcal{g}/\mathcal{m}$ , consider all the images of the adjoint m
May 7, 2019 11:58
sorry, I made a lot of mistakes... now I fix
May 7, 2019 11:55
Hi chat, I have some problems with the definition of reductive homogeneous space: we say that a homogeneous space $G/K$ is reductive if there exists a subspace $\mathcal{m}$ of $\mathcal{g}$ such that $\mathcal{g}=\mathcal{m}\oplus \mathcal{k}$, and $Ad(k)\mathcal{m} subset \mathcal{m}$ $\forall k \in \mathcal{m}$ (where $\mathcal{g}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$, \mathcal{k} of K)$:
I surely didn't study enough, but I can't make "$Ad(k)\mathcal{m} \subset \mathcal{m}$" make sense
Is it right to read this as "Pick the quotient algebra $\mathcal{g}/\mathcal{m}$, consider all the images of the a
Jan 15, 2019 17:08
can someone help a friend with this question?
Jan 15, 2019 17:08
2
Q: Ricci Tensor in an Einstein Manifold

Federico FalluccaI must prove that an hypersurface $M$ on $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ that is Einstein and compact can be only the $n-$dimensional sphere when $n>2$ The Einstein condition we permits to say that scalar curvature of $M$ is costant because $n>2$. The fact that it is an hypersfurface of $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ c...

Jan 12, 2019 16:44
sorry, it was a nonsense question, I solved my doubt ;)
Jan 12, 2019 16:24
is it true that $(\ell^1, \rVert * \rVert_{\ell^{\infty}})$ is a dense linear subspace of $(c_0,\rVert *\rVert_{\ell^{\infty}})$?
Dec 10, 2018 20:19
is there anyone familiar with the sylvester decomposition of a binary form?
Dec 10, 2018 20:19
hey chat
Dec 8, 2018 13:49
hi
Dec 5, 2018 20:12
@TedShifrin i know it's very stupid, but for example in the caso $n=2$, $a_2=1$ we have then that $(y^2-x^2)=(y-x)\cap(y+x)$, and the variety associated is a pair of lines in $k^2$, which becomes two in points in the projective space
Dec 5, 2018 19:57
@TedShifrin it's $(x^{a_n+1}_n-x^{a_n+1}_1,\ldots,x^{a_2+1}_2-x^{a_2+1}_1)$
Dec 5, 2018 19:55
oh sorry, now i see
Dec 5, 2018 19:54
unfortunately they appear without reason on the paper, the only thing is that they're contained (obviously) on the ideal $(x^{a_1+1}_1,\ldots,x^{a_n+1}_n)$, which is the perp ideal of the monomial $x^{a_1+1}_1 \ldots x^{a_n+1}_n$
Dec 5, 2018 19:46
oh the product starts from $i=2$, sorry. it's taken from this article arxiv.org/abs/1110.0745 ...i'll try and return to the chat if i can't find a solution ;)
Dec 5, 2018 19:37
but i don't know how to prove, or just to see, the general case
Dec 5, 2018 19:37
I tried some examples on macaulay2, finding the primary decomposition of $I$
Dec 5, 2018 19:34
consider the ideal $I=(x^{a_n+1}_n-x^{a_n+1}_1,\ldots,x^{a_2+1}_n-x^{a_2+1}_1) \subset k[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$, where $a_2\leqa_3\leq\ldots\leq a_n$. How can I prove $I$ is the ideal of $\prod_{i=1}^n a_i$ distinct points in $\mathbb{P}^{n-1}$?
Dec 5, 2018 19:31
hi chat
Nov 30, 2018 14:34
so, you fist shift the grading by one and then you multiply by $y_1$, it makes sense, thanks!
Nov 30, 2018 14:32
@loch yup i forgot this fundamental hypotesis, I made some mistakes writing this question sorry ahahaha
Nov 30, 2018 14:08
Sorry, i accidentally sent it before finish

Anyway, $T=l[y_1,\ldots,y_n]$, $I$ is a radical ideal and we're assuming $y_1$ is not a zerodivisor of $T/I$ (in fact in the second arrow there is an $y_1$ above, but I don't know how to write it)

Can someone help me understanding what $\frac{T}{I}(-1) $ mean?
Nov 30, 2018 14:01
hey chat! I found this ses

$$ 0 \rightarroww \frac{T}{I} (-1) \rightarrow T/I \rightarrow \frac{T}{I+(y_1)} \rightarrow 0 $$

What does it mean $\frac{T}{I} (-1)$? Never seen
Nov 30, 2018 10:03
So it's better if I ask directly to my teacher, thanks anyway @TobiasKildetoft ;)
Nov 30, 2018 09:56
@TobiasKildetoft I'm studying this article arxiv.org/abs/1110.0745 for an exam, and at the bottom of page 2